logo
How unpredictable currents and crowded waters increasingly put Singapore's coastal infrastructure at risk

How unpredictable currents and crowded waters increasingly put Singapore's coastal infrastructure at risk

CNA02-07-2025
SINGAPORE: He was sailing through a channel between Sentosa and Lazarus islands south of Singapore, when his vessel met with strong winds and currents.
The captain soon noticed something was amiss with his ship's position relative to a fixed navigation buoy, a sign that it was on the dangerous side of the channel.
The 35m-long vessel was in fact being pushed by the elements towards a hidden shoal off Lazarus, a popular destination for nature lovers and beach goers.
A quick intervention by the captain to divert the vessel sharply to the right helped avert disaster – barely.
'It was so close to hitting a shoal that couldn't be seen due to high tide,' the now-retired captain Iskandar Ismail told CNA.
He added that his ship's alarms sounded metres away from the shallow waters, and that grounding and subsequent environmental pollution were real risks.
The close shave has served as a reminder to Mr Iskandar, who for five years sailed on bunker tankers among other vessels, of the challenges navigating Singapore's coastal waters.
In June, a container barge ran aground off Tanjong Beach in Sentosa. There were no reports of damage, injuries or pollution, and the barge was later towed away for inspection and investigation.
Two years ago, a superyacht also ran aground near the Buran Channel near Sentosa.
'Ships losing control is not a new phenomenon, but thankfully still relatively rare,' said Mr Toby Stephens, head of shipping in Asia for global maritime law firm HFW.
It is nevertheless a concern in a busy port like Singapore, especially in the vicinity of areas like Jurong Island and liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals, he added.
Mr Stephens cited the example of the Vox Maxima incident in 2024 - Singapore's worst oil spill in a decade.
The Netherlands-flagged dredger lost steering control before colliding with the Singapore-flagged Marine Honour at Pasir Panjang Terminal in June last year, causing about 400 tonnes of oil to spill into the sea.
The oil washed up along Singapore's southern shorelines, including beaches at Sentosa, East Coast Park and Labrador Nature Reserve. Clean-up operations took over two months.
Abroad, there have also been periodic cases of large vessels colliding into coastal infrastructure when passing through waterways.
Singapore-flagged container vessel Dali smashed into a Baltimore bridge in March last year, after losing power and despite desperate attempts to stop in time by dropping anchor.
In May, a Mexican Navy training ship Cuauhtemoc also lost power and slammed into the Brooklyn Bridge in New York.
ROGUE WAVES, ROGUE SHIPS
Challenges unique to manoeuvring through Singapore's waters include strong tidal currents when entering narrow straits and channels, and heavy maritime traffic, industry players told CNA.
Singapore's coastal infrastructure – from civilian structures like Marina Barrage and Bedok Jetty, to industrial facilities like those on Jurong Island – now faces greater risks with rising sea levels, changing climate and complicated tropical coastal geography, said coastal science professor Adam Switzer from the Nanyang Technological University's Asian School of the Environment.
'Ocean currents, including in Singapore, are commonly fast, shifting and hard to predict. Extreme waves from storm activity, potential tsunamis and other rogue waves can hit with little warning. Runaway vessels may lose control in strong currents,' said the expert in coastal hazards.
The move to new fuels as a result of industry efforts to decarbonise may also increase short-term risks, as ships adjust to new technology and systems, noted Mr Stephens.
Increasing maritime congestion is another ongoing issue. Beyond the sheer number of ships, there is the added complexity of different sized vessels and multi-way traffic.
A ship captain who has sailed for about a decade, from ocean-going container ships to coastal vessels, told CNA that some ships are unfamiliar with Singapore's waters and do not anticipate the number of vessels they would encounter.
He chose to remain unnamed as he is still working in the industry.
'Some ships are designed to run at fixed speeds for a very long time, so the engineers will adjust the settings as such,' he said.
Not expecting the high level of traffic, they do not lower their speeds before passing through, which is dangerous as it could take vessels up to 15 minutes to slow down, he said.
On the other hand, it is also dangerous if a ship moves too slowly as currents could push it sideways, noted the captain.
'Poor visibility during heavy downpours and strong winds also affect vessel manoeuvrability,' added Mr Iskandar.
Then there is the language barrier over radio communications, as some vessels carry crew with a poor command of English, he said.
Prof Switzer pointed to another threat in the form of rogue actors seeking to breach sea-facing oil terminals or industrial hubs.
'Due to recent global developments, Singapore should review the potential threats and take preventive and reactive action to enhance its security,' said S Rajaratnam School of International Studies security studies professor Rohan Gunaratna.
These include the conflict in the Middle East, the Ukraine-Russia war and the South China Sea dispute.
'It is generally not the well-run, well-regulated ships to worry about, but dark fleet or rogue ships, of which there is an increasing volume,' Mr Stephens added.
A ' dark ship" is a vessel which employs illicit or evasive tactics to transport oil from countries subject to global sanctions.
WHAT'S BEING DONE ABOUT IT
The unnamed ship captain said he takes additional safety measures when his vessel nears Singapore's shore and port.
This includes deploying crew to visually monitor the surroundings, beyond using radar and electronic charts.
Another measure is to ensure the vessel is ready to change its speed or direction on short notice, to respond to any situation.
Mr Stephens noted that for Singapore, there are 'exclusion zones around all naval bases and critical infrastructure which minimises traffic and therefore also the risk of damage'.
'The east coast, in particular, is congested with ships at anchor, which provides a boundary for any ships that have loss of control, meaning they will likely hit other ships before reaching shore,' he said.
Mr Stephens also pointed to the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore's (MPA) Vessel Traffic Information System, which constantly tracks new problems developing out on the waters and can call in tugboats to assist when needed.
As a maritime hub, there are a lot of commercial tugs available in Singapore, he noted.
Singapore also has a multi-layered security system - including naval, police and intelligence elements - to safeguard its coastal infrastructure and maritime access points, said Prof Gunaratna, noting that vessels are profiled even before they reach Singapore.
'Based on the vessel's port of origin, previous detentions, cargo and other indicators, the vessels are classified as high, medium and low risk,' he explained.
MPA told CNA that ships transiting here are required to report their movements to its Port Operations Control Centres.
There are two such control centres, equipped to monitor and coordinate vessel traffic round the clock, said the authority.
It is also developing a Next Generation Vessel Traffic Management System that will use data analytics and machine learning to handle heavier and more complex vessel traffic safely.
MPA also highlighted the key role played by harbour pilots in helping ships navigate Singapore port waters.
Vessels of 300 gross tonnage and above are required to engage such MPA-licensed pilots, who are also trained in emergency procedures and incident management.
MPA deploys up to seven patrol craft daily to conduct enforcement patrols, complement shore-based and drone-based surveillance systems, and respond to any incidents at sea.
CNA has also reached out to the Police Coast Guard for comments.
WHAT MORE CAN BE DONE
As coastal risks grow and evolve, methods and measures to respond must also keep up to date, said experts.
While ship tracking is now very advanced, it can still be improved using the likes of satellites and underwater sensors, said Prof Spitzer.
'With smart data and fast models, we can hopefully see the danger before it hits. Knowing the currents well is key to protecting the coast,' he said.
'Gaps remain at high resolution. Models need better data. Infrastructure must be smarter, stronger and ready. The ocean around Singapore is very dynamic so our defences must be too.'
On the security front, the increasing use of unmanned technologies and grey zone operations, such as those targeting submarine cables, are also worth looking more closely at, said Prof Gunaratna.
He cited the NATO Maritime Centre for Security of Critical Undersea Infrastructure as a model of a joint effort which the regional ASEAN bloc could potentially adopt.
The centre, launched last year, is dedicated to securing undersea energy pipelines and cables which are vulnerable to attacks aimed at disrupting energy supply, global communications and economic activity.
Mr Stephens meanwhile urged the maritime sector to upgrade existing systems to respond to threats such as GPS spoofing, which involves faking data to hide the actual location of a ship.
Analogue methods such as the use of revetments and riprap should also not be discounted, he added. This involves placing large stones or concrete along vulnerable sections of the coastline, to help withstand the impact of vessels and also absorb wave energy.
For now, Singapore's context means that it's not likely to see incidents of the level of severity that have played out overseas, said Mr Stephens.
'Vessels do not transit through Singapore waters so close to infrastructure. They come straight into anchorage or berth and then out,' he said.
'The Tanjong Beach grounding was nowhere close in terms of damage severity or consequences.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The lost art of punctuality in a world where lateness is increasingly tolerated
The lost art of punctuality in a world where lateness is increasingly tolerated

CNA

time9 hours ago

  • CNA

The lost art of punctuality in a world where lateness is increasingly tolerated

For as long as I can remember, when I'm not chasing people, I've been waiting for them. My parents had drilled into me from young that being even five minutes early was as good as being late – a lesson I learnt after my dad once waited 10 minutes to pick me up. Just because I'd been dilly-dallying. Big mistake. I only later realised this lesson hadn't been as universal as I thought. All throughout polytechnic and university, I was often told to "chill" by groupmates whenever I pushed to finish a project way before the due date. I didn't want to risk eleventh-hour changes that would result in a late submission, costing us a fraction of our grade. Over time, it became second nature to create buffer time around my plans to anticipate last-minute changes. So imagine my culture shock when I was in Switzerland about a month ago. The Swiss are known sticklers for punctuality, but experiencing that firsthand made me feel right at home. Being told that a public bus would be arriving at 1.05pm, only for it to indeed arrive at 1.05pm? How refreshing. Despite having evolved in many ways throughout a decade of working various jobs across different organisations, I try to remain just as militant about punctuality. But more and more, this attitude seems to be in a diminishing minority. We've all gotten that "Sorry, still 15 minutes away" text. We've probably sent some of those ourselves. Even I've been guilty, especially if I know the other party will likely be late too. With everyone instantly contactable now, last-minute rescheduling or delays are no longer a breach of social etiquette, provided you inform the other party beforehand. Flexibility, in many cases, is now just another part of relationship management. But why are so many of us increasingly content to give punctuality a pass? IN DEFENCE OF LATENESS? If punctuality is nothing more than mechanical timekeeping, it's easy for us to write off lateness as just a disrupted schedule. We may even rationalise it by leaning on stereotypes about certain types of people. Years ago, I moderated a panel discussion where some of the panellists were more than half an hour late to arrive at the requested time. With 20 minutes to showtime, the amount of time I had left to brief them on the conversation flow was rapidly dwindling. To quell my anxiety, I asked the person-in-charge if he'd contacted them. Instead, he laughed sheepishly and apologised for forgetting. While irritated, I was prepared to let it go – until he spoke again. "Well, you know how it is. ADHD people and time blindness!" he quipped, referring to a common indicator of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, which he was open about having. Because of the way they perceive time, people with ADHD often struggle to accurately estimate how long tasks take. This can often lead to chronic lateness or falling behind schedule. Having been formally diagnosed with ADHD myself, I understood this tendency on a clinical level. But despite our shared neurotype, his comment felt less like an explanation and more like an excuse. On one hand, him brushing off lateness as a default symptom of ADHD was an overgeneralisation, perhaps even problematic. Not all of us experience poor time management as underestimating how long tasks take – some of us overestimate instead and end up perpetually early. On the other hand, his attitude felt all too familiar. It wasn't the first instance I'd seen a lack of punctuality not just tolerated, but embraced and even expected. A classmate, who was academically brilliant, once handed in schoolwork after the deadline, leading to an immediate deduction of 10 per cent off his final grade. But because he still performed better than others, he reasoned that he could simply make up for tardiness with quality work. From then on, he continued turning in work late. I suspect he sometimes even did it on purpose. I've observed a similar disregard for timekeeping among some so-called creative types too, where lateness often seems baked into their personal brand, enabled by the idea that flexibility fuels creativity. And the infuriating thing is, it sometimes does. Nonetheless, these justifications of lateness fail to consider that punctuality is never just about respecting other people's time. Our attitudes towards time reflect our values, priorities and even personal identity – whether we are aware or not. DIFFERING CULTURAL AND INDIVIDUAL APPROACHES TO TIME This isn't a moral judgement of people who see time as fluid, to be clear. Even a punctuality hardliner such as myself can admit that there is no objectively right or wrong approach to time. In the 1950s, US anthropologist Edward T Hall introduced the terms "monochronic" and "polychronic" to describe different cultural attitudes to time. Monochronic cultures – such as Germany, Switzerland and Japan – tend to value deadlines, planning and sequential focus. Tasks are completed one at a time. Meanwhile, in more fluid polychronic cultures, it's normal to shift gears mid-task. Relationships often take precedence over strict adherence to schedules and deadlines. Such cultures include those in Indonesia, the Philippines and the Middle East. And although no society is entirely uniform, Dr Hall's chronemic framing helps us understand our preferred ways of managing time and completing tasks. You could simply be an "event timer" – someone who progresses at their own internal rhythm, transitioning between tasks when they feel the last one is finished. (Conversely, a "clock timer" uses external cues such as timers to schedule their actions.) Still, there is no denying that the Singapore workplace – while placing value on relationships – remains largely monochronic. "Event timers" who often find themselves running late may risk damaging their professional relationships and reputations. "Clock timers", on the other hand, may struggle or even refuse to empathise with those who don't perceive time in the traditional sense. Many of my closest friends would be late to their own funeral, but our wildly differing time perceptions haven't coloured the reasons I love them or stopped us from finding ways around our differences. I often catch up on reading while waiting. It's a dynamic that works for us as friends. But we can hardly expect our bosses and colleagues to repeatedly give us the same allowances in a professional setting, where tasks must be done and goals met according to certain timelines. WHEN BEING ON TIME IS NOT JUST ABOUT TIME As the line between personal and professional branding continues to blur, our relationship with punctuality can also suggest adjacent character traits, even if those impressions may not always be accurate. Perennial lateness is frequently equated with laziness – they didn't put in "enough effort" to be on time. It's also easy to assume such a person thinks their time matters more than anyone else's, or that they don't care about the job. These judgements may bleed into assumptions about their quality of work, even if proven otherwise: If a person can't meet a request as basic as arriving on time, can they really be trusted to consistently meet the greater standards their role demands? Someone who's not strict about timeliness can also be seen as laidback. It may make it easier for others to approach them – or to attempt to take advantage of them. On the flip side, someone who sticks rigidly to deadlines may be seen as unnecessarily stubborn or unwilling to accommodate others. To some, this feels just as disrespectful as lateness. Prioritising punctuality may also suggest a fixed mindset, an overreliance on structure, or a discomfort with spontaneity or risk-taking to those on the opposing end of the spectrum – the sure kiss of death to creativity and innovation. On its face, it's an understandable assumption, but it couldn't be further from my reality. Clear, set deadlines or appointment times give me something tangible to work towards. Ironically, that structure allows me more creative freedom by easing my anxiety over time pressure. No longer is it yet another fluctuating variable, but a fixed factor more clearly defining the task at hand. I'm far less rigid about punctuality now than I was 10 years ago, in favour of purposeful adaptability. Even so, I doubt I'll ever be someone who "goes with the flow" nor do I want to be. No matter how we try to cast punctuality in a different angle, we cannot hand-wave away the fact that what we do (or don't do) indelibly reflects something about who we are – and we can't always control what that something is. For me, it's less about showing respect for others, and more about upholding the standards I set for myself.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store