Awkward moment political party backing a pro-squatter candidate gets a brutal taste of its own medicine
Pavlou arrived uninvited at the party's Melbourne office on Tuesday, camera rolling, and claimed he was there to 'squat', echoing a stance by a party's candidate.
'Hello guys, I'm at the Victorian Socialists Office,' he announces in the video.
'They actually support squatting, they support people getting inside buildings and squatting. So I thought I would squat inside the Victorian Socialists HQ.'
He then amps up the performance, lying down on the floor and wrapping himself in a sleeping bag.
'I'm homeless and I'm a meth addict and I haven't been able to get housing due to the capitalist system, so I thought I would just crash here for a few nights.'
A visibly uncomfortable staff member calmly asks him to stop filming and leave, which he does, just under a minute after arriving, as soon as his cameraman lowers the camera.
The stunt follows comments made by Victorian Socialists Senate candidate Jordan van den Lamb, also known online as Purplepingers, who urged people in 2024 to squat in vacant properties.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Drew Pavlou (@drewpavlou)
One of his posts was linked to a high-profile incident in April 2025, when a Melbourne woman's home was broken into after the address was shared online.
The squatters changed the locks, sold her late father's possessions, and left her with a $70,000 repair bill, a cost her insurer refused to cover.
At the time, Pavlou criticised van den Lamb, calling him 'unhinged.'
After the stunt, Pavlou posted to social media slamming the Victorian Socialists as hypocrites.
'The Victorian Socialists officially support breaking into homes and squatting so I thought I would take a sleeping bag and pillow and try sleep in their front office for a few nights,' Pavlou wrote.
'They threatened to call the police on me as an unhoused neurodivergent POC. Zero solidarity.'
The Victorian Socialists fired back on Wednesday with a scathing statement, accusing Pavlou of exploiting the issue of homelessness for clicks.
'Yesterday we were paid a visit by right-wing social media 'influencer' Drew Pavlou who was cosplaying homelessness in order to generate engagement for his social media pages,' the party said.
'He was asked to leave by one of our young volunteers (no-one threatened to call the police on him as he claimed in his posts about the stunt) and he did so as soon as his cameraman was no longer able to film him, about one minute in total.'
They also used the opportunity to distance themselves from the stunt, reminding supporters they take the issue seriously.
'As a party, we take the issue of homelessness very seriously, and have developed a policy plan that would, if implemented, mean people in actual housing emergencies have a chance of finding secure shelter.'
Victorian Socialists also said they didn't have a party policy on squatting, but did 'oppose perfectly good housing being left empty long-term without a good reason'
'One of our policies is to seize those empty for 12 months or more for use as public housing,' they wrote.
Pavlou hit back on social media, saying he was not politically right wing.
'I am not a right wing social media influencer, I am a social democrat philosopher and intellectual. Read some theory and get back to me you infantile leftists,' he wrote.
Victorian Socialists supporters criticised Pavlou for his acts.
'This is behaviour I would expect from a toddler' someone wrote on social media.
'He inadvertently made a statement about what it's like to sleep rough,' said another.
Pavlou's followers meanwhile backed his protest.
'Oh so suddenly private property is a thing?? Good on you Drew,' said one follower.
'This is awesome. You forgot their main philosophy which is they only care about things if it doesn't affect them personally. They are only generous with other people's money and property, not their own.' wrote another.
Pavlou became known in 2019, after a protest against the Chinese Communist Party saw him suspended from the University of Queensland.
He has since remained an outspoken critic of the Chinese and Russian Governments, and like Van Den Lamb, unsuccessfully ran for the Australian Senate in 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
NSW religious schools see 30% rise in enrolments in a decade – and not necessarily due to beliefs
When the Australian Christian college (ACC) in north-west Sydney began receiving a surge of enrolments after the pandemic, its principal, Brendan Corr, was not surprised. ACC is located in Marsden Park, a major growth corridor of Sydney identified by the state government as an area where a failure to factor in the pace and scale of development has left families without access to local public schools. ACC has more than doubled in size, from 667 students in 2019 to 2,155 in 2024, the strongest growth of any independent school in New South Wales. While 60% of families are Christian, 40% either have no religion or are from other faith backgrounds, predominantly Hindu. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The ACC is not an outlier. Enrolments in religious schools have increased by a record 30% in NSW in the past decade, new data shows – and not necessarily correlating with student beliefs. The Association of Independent Schools of NSW (AISNSW), the peak body for the state's 430 independent schools, released a new report on Wednesday finding independent schools have enrolled almost two-thirds of the state's additional students since 2000 – growing by 101,565. More new students were enrolled in NSW independent schools in the past five years than every state and territory government school sector combined. They now account for almost 20% of state enrolments, up from 13% in 2000. And religious independent schools, which represent more than 80% of the sector, have done the heavy lifting. Enrolments surged by 30% in a decade, compared with 2% in government schools and 6% in Catholic systemic systems. Growth was highest in Sydney's north-west and south-west, including Blacktown, Baulkham Hills and Hawkesbury, where 10 new low-to-medium fee independent schools opened over the past decade. The acting education minister, Courtney Houssos, says the former government 'neglected growing suburbs', leaving 'many families' in Western Sydney without a public school option. An audit of enrolment growth in NSW, released last year, found the top 10 student growth areas between 2018 and 2023, all located in Sydney's north-west and south-west corridors, collectively accounted for almost 40% of the state's student enrolment growth. Houssos says the state government is investing $9bn in new and upgraded schools, including $3.9bn in Western Sydney, to address the backlog, including new schools in Leppington, Tallawong, Box Hill, Gables, Gledswood Hills and Jordan Springs. Corr believes his school's success is not just down to geography. 'Spiritual nurturing is something that's important to our parents,' he says. 'It's not even just that people of non-faith are welcomed into the school, which they undoubtedly are. 'Regardless of the faith position of a family, the students gain benefit of being part of our Christian community, because of the way we see humanity and serve it.' AISNSW's chief executive, Margery Evans, says the face of independent schools is changing, led by low-to-medium fee Christian, Islamic and Anglican schools. 'In 2025, the typical independent school is co-ed, K-12, faith-based, located west of Parramatta and charging less than $6,000 a year,' Evans says. That's despite a decline in religious affiliation. The percentage of students who identified as having no faith in NSW almost doubled in the past decade, the report found, from 16% to 29%. But while affiliation with Christianity dropped from 55% to 38%, students identifying as Islamic increased from 8% to 12%. The findings aligned with the latest census data, which found religious affiliation had dramatically reduced overall, but non-Christian religions, including Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism, grew – from 3.5% of the population in 1996 to 10% in 2021, or 2.5 million people. Anglican schools enrolled the largest proportion of students in NSW independent schools (27%), followed by Catholic independent (18%) and Christian (16%), the AISNSW report found. They were among 15 different faiths represented in the state's schooling system, from Hare Krishna to Seventh Day Adventist, Pentecostal and Brethren. Islamic schools experienced the most rapid annual enrolment growth of any sector in the past five years (5.2%, or an additional 5,074 students), representing 9% of the state's religious schools overall. Four expanded by more than 20% in the past five years, placing them among the top 15 fastest-growing schools statewide. The religious schools sector has faced backlash in recent years for allowing staff and students to be discriminated against on the basis of sexuality and gender identity. Last year, the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended the blanket exemptions should be repealed, a view backed by the majority of Australians, but the prime minister has ruled out legislating new laws without bipartisan support. Emma Rowe, an associate professor in education at Deakin University, says religious schools can be 'very inclusive' towards different identities. But she is against private schools – disproportionately composed of religious schools – receiving taxpayer money. 'I'm not opposed to religious schools receiving government funding. I'm opposed to private schools receiving government funding,' Rowe says. 'If you want to practise a religion in school, but you're not charging tuition fees, and you are accepting everyone at the door – I think that's different.'
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
An unlikely group of protesters fear Victoria's power bill is a threat to private landowners. Here's what we know
On Wednesday, an unlikely group of protesters gathered on the front steps of Victoria's parliament to oppose a piece of legislation that, at least on the surface, appears unremarkable. For this motley collective, which included farmers, prospectors, volunteer firefighters and animal advocates concerned about the plight of the wedge-tailed eagle, the National Electricity (Victoria) Amendment (VicGrid Stage 2 Reform) bill is a major concern. They fear the bill will give the government power to access their land without their consent to build transmission towers as tall as 85 metres. If they resist, they could be fined thousands. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Standing behind a makeshift cage made from farm gates, the rally organiser Andrew Weidemann slammed the bill, saying it made farmers and their families 'feel like we're behind bars'. He blasted the government's 'stupid push for this renewables agenda'. In another cage, a man stood holding a sign that read: 'I disagreed with Jacinta.' Also in attendance was the Victorian opposition leader, Brad Battin, who criticised the government for acting like a 'dictatorship' with 'draconian measures' that 'take away your rights'. When Battin said the Coalition would oppose the bill and repeal it if elected next year, the crowd cheered. So is this bill as alarming as some believe and what does it mean for Victorian property owners? Here's what we know. Introduced to parliament last month, the bill hands responsibility for planning the state's transmission network from the Australian Energy Market Operator (Aemo) to the government agency VicGrid. It also gives VicGrid the responsibility for developing renewable energy zones. The bill creates two new funding streams to support communities impacted by the construction of energy infrastructure and legislates financial incentives for landholders, who will receive $8,000 per kilometre of infrastructure on their land annually. But it also provides VicGrid and their contractors power to access private land without consent when required to construct energy infrastructure. The bill states authorised officers can 'use reasonable force to gain entry' to private land 'if it is reasonably necessary to do so'. It also prohibits landowners 'obstructing, hindering, or delaying the entry of the authorised officer'. Individuals who resist face fines of up to $12,000, while body corporates could be slapped with fines of up to $48,000. Refusing to provide your name or proof of ownership could result in fines up to $4,000, while interfering with a notice of entry could attract a fine of $1,221. Only authorised officers can access land and the bill sets strict rules for them. They must give written notice of entry to the landowner or occupier at least 30 business days before entry and again 48 hours before. If the officer can't find the owner of the land, the notice can be published in a newspaper and posted near the property entrance. Only if an officer has been blocked or disrupted from accessing a property are they able to use force, and only after applying to the magistrates court for an entry order. The court order allows the officer and other approved people to enter, use reasonable force if needed, bring equipment and be accompanied by police. If at this point you attempt to block their access, the larger fines apply. A government spokesperson said these powers are intended to be used as a last resort – only when all avenues to reach agreement for voluntary access have failed. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, has defended the bill. She said the government and private companies already have the power to forcibly access and acquire land. 'Whether it's for transport projects, for energy projects, for other projects, there are already arrangements in place for access to land. What this is providing is landowners – through VicGrid – a place where they can work through the these issues,' Allan said. She conceded some private companies' dealings with landowners had been 'not up to scratch' but said the new legislation would improve coordination. Allan said more high-voltage transmission lines were needed to connect homes and businesses to 'reliable, cheaper and more secure renewable energy' as it comes online and ahead of the closure of 'ageing coal-fired plants'. Battin responded: 'We're not anti-renewable energy but you can't do it by bulldozing through people's properties.' Yes and no. All levels of government – local, state and federal – have the power to compulsorily acquire private property in certain circumstances. In New South Wales, the government similarly set up its own body, EnergyCo, to lead the development of renewable energy zones and the transmission infrastructure needed to support them. EnergyCo holds compulsory acquisition powers but they are only exercised after at least six months of attempted negotiations for voluntary acquisition. The Victorian government says NSW, South Australia and Tasmania have fines for landowners for denying entry to authorised officers. In late 2024, VicGrid released a draft plan that identified seven renewable energy zones in the state that could host renewable projects, including wind turbines, solar farms and battery storage. Several travel through agricultural areas, angering farmers, who have also been subject to an increased emergency services levy in recent weeks by the Allan government (though it has been paused this year due to drought). That levy has also been criticised by volunteer firefighters, who joined Wednesday's rally, as well as animal activists who say windfarms pose a deadly risk to endangered wedge-tailed eagles. The VicGrid plan will be finalised later this year and will also include proposed transmission line routes. It includes projects already committed to or expected by Aemo, such as the Victoria to NSW Interconnector West and the Western Renewables Link, a 190km transmission line from Bulgana in western Victoria to Sydenham in Melbourne's north-west. Both projects have faced substantial delays, in part due to community opposition. But the government appears determined for them to press ahead. The bill is expected to pass the lower house on Thursday and then move to the upper house next sitting week.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sprawl or nothing: medium density advocates despair as Brisbane swings back to urban expansion
Almost two decades ago, the Queensland historian Peter Spearritt issued a dire warning. If planning attitudes didn't change, Brisbane would become 'the 200 kilometre city' – a giant conurbation, solid suburbs from Noosa to the NSW border, causing traffic chaos and dooming millions to a worse standard of living. 'I don't think many people realised just how dramatic continuing suburban sprawl would be,' he says. Queensland's governments did put some legal limits on untrammelled expansion. But with the city facing an epic housing shortage, many planners are now concerned the new conservative state government will return to the city's historic sprawl-or-nothing approach. The government has started test drilling on a proposed underground freeway designed to permit new suburbs in farmland west of Caboolture. At $14bn, the four-lane north-west transport corridor would be the most expensive road project in the city's history. The first new suburb, Waraba, is set to boast 70,000 residents once complete. Spearritt, now an emeritus professor of urban history at the University of Queensland, says legal limitations on sprawl are crucial for a city with few geographical barriers – unlike Sydney, Brisbane doesn't have national parks on three of its four sides. 'There were no green space barriers, and that makes it much easier to just basically develop former agricultural land forever,' he says. Brisbane has always been an unusually car-dependent and low-density city, even by Australian standards. There's a simple reason for this: since 1885 Queensland has more or less banned townhouses and apartments. It worked. Just 11.3% of residents of the Brisbane local government area live in townhouses, which is even lower than the state average, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Ten times more people told the 2021 census they drove to work than took the bus or train. Locked out of the inner city, decades of newcomers have been forced into new communities in Logan, Ipswich, Moreton Bay and even further afield, swelling the populations of those outer areas by millions. In 2006 the state government stepped in, setting the first south-east Queensland regional plan. For the first time it established an 'urban footprint' – a limited area where development is permitted. 'It was a big political moment. I think it got fairly widespread support,' Spearritt says. 'Was Brisbane actually thinking about how it would shape itself for the future? And I guess that sort of approach has been completely swamped by the rhetoric about the housing crisis'. As expansion slowed, the pace of inner-city development did not speed up. As a result, house prices and rents have skyrocketed, as development approvals head in the opposite direction. Under Labor, the state government used the regional plan to set density targets for councils – effectively requiring 60% of new homes to be apartments and townhouses. Now the Liberal National party planning minister, Jarrod Bleijie, has signalled radical change to the unpopular rule. 'We are going to review every regional plan in Queensland and we are going to review them in consultation with local government,' he told parliament in March. 'The time for state government acting like Big Brother over local government is over.' Asked last month if he would ditch the targets, he confirmed that there would be a move back to sprawl. 'We need to look at the urban growth everywhere, across every regional plan, including the south-east Queensland regional plan,' he said. 'The problem with the current south-east Queensland regional plan, the density is upwards, but developers are finding it incredibly difficult to afford to build vertical towers at the moment and to find buyers for them. So it's no use putting in the regional plan to just go up, when the towers and housing is actually not being provided.' The government has also budgeted to spend $2bn subsidising council infrastructure to speed up development in new-build estates, including in regional Queensland. The Queensland Conservation Council (QCC) is one of many groups concerned that the city's urban footprint boundaries might be expanded. Jen Basham, the council's urban sustainability lead, says: 'Further urban sprawl is not a solution to the housing crisis – it's slower, more expensive and environmentally damaging.' A recent QCC report found that the city could more than accommodate all new growth within its current boundaries – and that doing so would cost the taxpayer less and result in better social outcomes. New suburbs tend to be more car-dependent because there are few alternatives, the report says. That means greater emissions and many hours trapped behind the wheel for the residents. Sprawl also tends to cost more – an estimated $75,000 per dwelling in Sydney, according to the NSW Productivity Commission – due to the need to construct new infrastructure such as schools and hospitals. Instead, the OCC report concludes, Queensland should look to the long-banned 'missing middle' housing typologies – townhouses and small apartments. Dorina Pojani, an associate professor of urban planning at the University of Queensland, says increasing density doesn't have to mean towers blocks. 'That's a failure of the imagination,' she says. 'What about the missing middle: row housing, 4-5 storey apartment complexes, co-housing, and so on? We need to move away from both the detached single-family and the tower typology. Zoning codes need be overhauled.' Travis Jordan, an organiser of the Yimby (yes in my back yard) group for greater Brisbane, says there is another factor in favour of reform. The single-family house with a picket fence on 400 sq m isn't for everyone, he says. Some people want to live within walking distance of work, shops, schools and friends – and the law shouldn't stop them. 'Priorities change. The things we wanted to stop 40 years ago might be things we want to encourage now, and the kinds of homes our parents wanted might not be the ones our kids want to grow up in.' Jordan says other Australian cities are making better choices. The NSW and Victorian state governments have rolled out new rules limiting the power of councils to halt more sustainable development. Globally the real leader is New Zealand, he says. Since 2016, cities including Auckland have eliminated bans on apartments and townhouses, a policy that now has national support. Research has found that as a result, there has been a huge spike in construction, and a resulting dip in rents. Jordan says it's time for Brisbane to follow their lead. 'For most of the last 20 years, 'tall versus sprawl' is all our planning schemes said you were allowed,' he says. 'Instead of saying that's too hard, the government should be standing up to the busybodies who want to tell everyone else what kind of homes they're allowed to build on their land.' But Brisbane city council, the hemisphere's largest and most powerful, flat out opposes missing middle development. It passed a new version of the century-old ban on townhouses in 2020. 'Spreading the density right across every suburb of Brisbane is not the right answer,' lord mayor Adrian Schrinner said at a candidates debate in the 2024 election. In 2015, Spearritt announced that his warning had already come true. Brisbane had fused 200km of unending city. Ten years later, he doesn't see much political will for reform. 'I think it's depressing that that there's not more interest in the quality of community life and the quality of the urban environment. It's almost as if people have sort of given up,' he says. 'Maybe it'll take another generation to realise – Jesus, this city is really getting awful.'
