
Exclusive: Trump's "pro-Hamas" purge could block foreign students from colleges
The Trump administration is discussing plans to try to block certain colleges from having any foreign students if it decides too many are "pro-Hamas," senior Justice and State Department officials tell Axios.
Why it matters: The effort — which could include grand jury subpoenas —marks another escalation of Trump's aggressive crackdown on immigration and antisemitism that civil libertarians say stifles campus speech and has led to several lawsuits.
Zoom in: The idea of prohibiting colleges from enrolling any student visa-holders grew out of Secretary of State Marco Rubio's " Catch and Revoke" program, which now is focusing on students who protested against the war in Gaza.
A senior State Department official called the demonstrators it's targeting "Hamasniks" — people the government claims have shown support for the terror group.
More than 300 foreign students have had their student visas revoked in the three weeks "Catch and Revoke" has been in operation, the official said. There are 1.5 million student visa-holders nationwide.
"Everyone is fair game," the official said.
At the heart of the plan is the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which certifies schools to accept student visa-holders. Institutions have been decertified in the past if the government determines they have too many student-visa holders who are using the education system as a ruse to live and work in the U.S., officials say.
Now, the Trump administration is threatening to apply that decertification framework to the post- Oct. 7 demonstrations on college campuses.
"Every institution that has foreign students ... will go through some sort of review," the official said. "You can have so many bad apples in one place that it leads to decertification of the school ... I don't think we're at that point yet. But it is not an empty threat."
Columbia University and UCLA — both of which had controversial, disruptive pro-Palestinian protests last year — are among the schools mentioned the most often by administration officials.
Columbia officials couldn't be reached for comment.
"UCLA is committed to eradicating hate," a spokesperson for that university said, pointing to UCLA's new Initiative to Combat Antisemitism.
What they're saying: Critics accuse the administration of trampling free speech and due process rights, and of unfairly conflating support for Palestinian rights with backing Hamas, the terror group that rules Gaza.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a nonpartisan free-speech group, said the concept of decertifying entire universities based on who is "pro-Hamas" is "a worrying escalation."
"Deemed 'pro-Hamas' by whom? This kind of explicitly viewpoint-driven decision-making is ripe for abuse and risks arbitrary enforcement," FIRE legal director Will Creeley told Axios in a statement.
Zoom out: The administration's zero-tolerance immigration enforcement has provoked a spate of lawsuits, some of which are likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
That's what the administration wants: to give the high court several opportunities to expand the executive branch's power to deport a noncitizen with little judicial review.
A judge Tuesday temporarily blocked federal agents from detaining Yunseo Chung, a Columbia student who participated in pro-Palestinian protests. Her lawsuit argues that immigration enforcement can't "be used as a tool to punish noncitizen speakers who express political views disfavored by the current administration."
The first major case challenging Rubio's right to revoke a green card was brought this month by Mahmoud Khalil, an organizer of the pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia.
The big picture: As the political parties realign, the GOP increasingly appeals to non-college voters and has clashed with academics and higher-education experts on cultural issues, including the Gaza war.
Student visa holders are a lucrative revenue stream for colleges that can be choked off by the executive branch.
"That's one of their biggest cash cows, foreign students. That's a meaningful source of revenue for them," a senior Justice Department official said.
"What you're going to see in the not-too-distant future is the universities that we can show that were not doing anything to stop these demonstrations in support of Hamas — or encouraged enrollment by activists — ... we can stop approving student visas for them, and they can no longer admit foreign students," the official said.
Catch up quick: The Trump administration's assault on colleges and that had significant pro-Palestine, anti-Israel or antisemitic activism spans both coasts.
Last week, to escape losing $400 million in federal money, Columbia caved to administration demands to combat antisemitism and limit protests.
On March 5, the DOJ's new antisemitism task force launched a civil rights investigation into the University of California system.
On March 10, the Education Department sent letters to 60 universities warning them of possible civil rights enforcement actions concerning antisemitism.
And on March 18, the Justice Department filed a statement of interest siding with Jewish students suing over antisemitic activity during protests at UCLA.
What's next: The DOJ also is monitoring a new federal lawsuit from Columbia students accusing protest organizers of acting as a "propaganda arm" of Hamas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) led the entire Senate Democratic in writing to President Trump Sunday, demanding he remove all military forces from Los Angeles and cease threats to further deploy troops, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Padilla was physically removed from a press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and handcuffed Thursday, triggering a five-alarm fire for Democrats. The letter from Padilla and 46 other Senate Democrats asked Trump to "immediately withdraw all military personnel that have been deployed to Los Angeles in recent day." Trump federalized California's National Guard without the state's consent and mobilized more than 700 Marines to the state to try to quash protests over his mass deportation program. "Respect for our Constitution and for our civilian law enforcement demands nothing less," the Senate Democrats wrote. Driving the news: A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that the Trump administration's deployment of the California National Guard can continue, for now. The Pentagon said on Friday that U.S. troops will not be responsible for law enforcement at the Los Angeles riots. Instead, they will protect federal property and personnel. Protests over the deportations have spread to numerous cities across the country, and Trump has warned that he may deploy troops to different areas. The Democrats asked Trump to "cease any further threats of deploying National Guard or other active duty military personnel into American cities absent a request from the Governor." Between the lines: The fight against the White House's deportation program is becoming a rallying point for Democrats who have largely been split over how to push back against Trump. Padilla's incident at the Noem presser on Thursday added more fuel to the flames. Democrats almost universally panned the manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator.


San Francisco Chronicle
24 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
As Trump goes to G7 summit, other world leaders aim to show they're not intimidated
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has long bet that he can scare allies into submission — a gamble that is increasingly being tested ahead of the Group of Seven summit beginning Monday in Canada. He's threatened stiff tariffs in the belief that other nations would crumple. He's mused about taking over Canada and Greenland. He's suggested he will not honor NATO's obligations to defend partners under attack. And he's used Oval Office meetings to try to intimidate the leaders of Ukraine and South Africa. But many world leaders see fewer reasons to be cowed by Trump, even as they recognize the risks if he followed through on his threats. They believe he will ultimately back down — since many of his plans could inflict harm on the U.S. — or that he can simply be charmed and flattered into cooperating. 'Many leaders still seem intimidated by Trump, but increasingly they are catching on to his pattern of bullying,' said Jeremy Shapiro, research director at the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'In places as diverse as Canada, Iran, China and the EU, we are seeing increasing signs that leaders now recognize that Trump is afraid of anything resembling a fair fight. And so they are increasingly willing to stand up to him.' In the 22 instances in which Trump has publicly threatened military action since his first term, the U.S. only used force twice, according to a May analysis by Shapiro. World leaders feel comfortable standing up to Trump Ahead of the G7 summit, there are already signs of subtle pushback against Trump from fellow leaders in the group. French President Emanuel Macron planned to visit Greenland over the weekend in a show of European solidarity. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the U.S. is no longer the 'predominant' force in the world after Trump's tariffs created fissures in a decades-long partnership between the U.S. and its northern neighbor. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage," Carney said this past week in French. "Today, that predominance is a thing of the past.' The new prime minister added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the U.S. became the global hegemon, a position of authority undermined by Trump's transactional nature that puts little emphasis on defending democratic values or the rule of law. 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. Israel's attack on Iran has added a new wrinkle to the global picture as the summit leaders gather to tackle some of the world's thorniest problems A senior Canadian official said it was decided early on that the G7 won't be issuing a joint communiqué as it has at past summits — an indication of how hard it can be to get Trump on the same page with other world leaders. The White House said individual leader statements will be issued on the issues being discussed. Speaking last month at a conference in Singapore, Macron called France a 'friend and an ally of the United States' but pushed back against Trump's desire to dominate what other countries do. Macron said efforts to force other nations to choose between the U.S. and China would lead to the breakdown of the global order put in place after World War II. 'We want to cooperate, but we do not want to be instructed on a daily basis what is allowed, what is not allowed, and how our life will change because of the decision of a single person,' Macron said. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba pushed back against Trump's agenda of levying higher tariffs on imported goods, arguing it would hurt economic growth. The Japanese leader specifically called Trump ahead of the summit to confirm their plans to talk on the sidelines, which is a greater focus for Japan than the summit itself. 'I called him as I also wanted to congratulate his birthday, though one day earlier,' Ishiba said. Trump cares about being tough, but G7 is a chance to reset relations Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said the summit was an opportunity for Trump to 'mend' relationships with other countries so China would be unable to exploit differences among the G7. She said other foreign leaders are 'not intimidated' by Trump's actions, which could be driving them away from tighter commitments with the U.S. 'The conversations that I've had with those leaders suggest that they think that the partnership with the United States has been really important, but they also understand that there are other opportunities,' Shaheen said. The White House did not respond to emailed questions for this story. Many leaders feel more confident that they can sidestep Trump's threats Having originally made his reputation in real estate and hospitality, Trump has taken kindly to certain foreign visitors, such as U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Starmer has sought to keep Trump in line with Europe in supporting Ukraine and NATO instead of brokering any truces that would favor Russia. He has echoed the president's language about NATO members spending more on defense. But in his Oval Office visit, Starmer also pleased Trump by delivering an invite for a state visit from King Charles III. The German government said it, too, wanted to send a public signal of unity, saying that while Trump's recent meeting with Merz at the White House went harmoniously, the next test is how the relationship plays out in a team setting. There will also be other world leaders outside of the G7 nations attending the summit in mountainous Kananaskis, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, whom Trump dressed down in the Oval Office. Italy's Meloni has positioned herself as a 'bridge' between the Trump administration and the rest of Europe. But Italy's strong support of Ukraine and Trump's threatened tariffs on European goods have put Meloni, the only European leader to attend Trump's inauguration, in a difficult position. Mark Sobel, U.S. chair of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum, an independent think tank, said Trump's 'trade policies, backing for right wing European movements, seeming preference for dealing with authoritarians and many of his other actions are alienating our G7 allies,' even if the U.S. president is correct that Europe needs to do more on defense. But even as other G7 leaders defuse any public disputes with Trump, the U.S. president's vision for the world remains largely incompatible with they want. 'In short, behind the curtains, and notwithstanding whatever theater, the Kananaskis summit will highlight a more fragmented G7 and an adrift global economy," Sobel said.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
America Is Finally Getting A Fascist Dictator Parade, Courtesy Of Donald Trump
WASHINGTON — After years of admiring autocrats like Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping and envying the sort of military parade they get to enjoy, President Donald Trump is finally getting one of his own. America's capital city will resemble Pyongyang, Beijing and Moscow's Red Square on Saturday evening, with tanks and missile launchers rolling down the street, thanks to Trump's $45 million birthday gift to himself at taxpayer expense. 'I don't really think the symbolism of tanks and missiles is really what we're all about,' Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul told HuffPost. 'If you ask me about a military parade, all the images that come to mind, the first images, are of the Soviet Union and North Korea.' Trump and his administration claim that the parade was actually organized for the U.S. Army's 250th birthday, not Trump's 79th. Both the Navy and the Marines also have founding date anniversaries this year, however, and there has been no discussion about holding $45 million celebrations for either. White House officials did not respond to HuffPost queries on the matter. Democracy advocates warn that Trump's use of the military to honor himself should not be downplayed as harmless, particularly given his deployment of thousands of troops in Los Angeles to put down protests against his deportations, his repeated attacks on judges, his use of his executive power to attack critics and his willingness to defy a Supreme Court order for months. 'The military parade is a blatant adoption and celebration of authoritarian power display,' said Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz who is now with the group Protect Democracy. 'Given this is coupled with the deployment of U.S. troops to police American streets, by no means should it be considered as only optics.' John Bolton, Trump's third of four national security advisers during his first term, said Trump has been infatuated with the idea of his own parade after attending France's Bastille Day celebration in 2017 at the invitation of that country's president, Emmanuel Macron. Bolton said Trump's advisers were able to talk him out of ordering one back then. 'He was dissuaded by a number of factors, not the least of which was how much it would cost, and how bad that would appear, and what damage the tank treads would do to the streets of Washington,' he said. Gen. Paul Selva, the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, reportedly told Trump that a military parade was 'what dictators do.' The United States has had few military parades in its history, the last one taking place in 1991 during the presidency of George H.W. Bush after U.S. forces successfully pushed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, which he had invaded. 'It was a parade to celebrate winning the war, which is a good reason to have a military parade,' Bolton said. 'That's not what this is about. It's about Donald Trump.' Patty Murray, a Democratic senator from Washington state, said during a hearing Wednesday that Trump's casual use of the military should alarm Americans. 'President Trump is promising heavy force against peaceful protesters at his D.C. military parade. Those sorts of actions and that sort of rhetoric from a president of the United States should stop every one of us cold. Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented,' she said. 'It is unconstitutional and it is downright un-American. We should all be speaking out against this and demanding accountability now.' Despite his frequent claims of support for the armed forces and service members, Trump has a decades-long history of disrespect, even disdain, for both. As a young man, Trump had the opportunity to fight in the Vietnam War but instead avoided service with a diagnosis of 'bone spurs' from a doctor who was a friend of his father. In 2015, running for president, Trump declared that Arizona Sen. John McCain, who spent nearly six years in a Hanoi prison undergoing routine torture, was not a war hero just because he was captured. Trump said he preferred those who were not captured. During his first term in office, when he was unable to get fellow Republicans running both chambers of Congress to approve billions of dollars for a border wall he had repeatedly promised Mexico would pay for, Trump instead raided a Pentagon fund for service members' housing and schools to pay for it instead. Also in those years, Trump disparaged those in the military who had died for the United States as 'suckers' and 'losers,' according to his own chief of staff. And just months into his second term, Trump broke the tradition of the commander-in-chief shaking the hand of every graduating cadet at a military academy by immediately leaving West Point after his speech and returning to his golf resort in New Jersey. Trump's predecessor Joe Biden spent 70 minutes congratulating each graduate last year, as Trump himself had done five years earlier, although he later complained about how many times he had to raise his arm to salute. To this day, Trump still does not seem to understand military protocol. On his recent trip to the Middle East, Trump saluted Saudi military officials, just as he had saluted North Korean officers during his summit meeting with Kim in 2018. Protect Democracy's Carpenter said Americans need to take Saturday as a warning of things to come. 'Americans should see this plainly for what it is: Troops in the streets are troops in the streets, whether it's a parade or a raid,' she said. Trump Says Protesters At Weekend Military Parade Will Face 'Very Heavy Force' GOP Senator Says Trump's Military Parade Reminds Him Of North Korea Trump's Real War Is Against America