What to watch as Trump meets Germany's new leader Merz
President Trump will meet German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday at the White House, where issues of foreign policy and trade are likely to dominate.
The center-right leader, who has at times clashed with Trump allies, is poised to meet his biggest diplomatic test yet since being narrowly elected in May.
Here are four things to watch in what could be a contentious meeting.
Trump is set to meet with Merz a day after he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in what Trump called a 'good conversation,' but not one that will lead to peace. The president has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin, who he recently said has gone 'absolutely crazy.'
Merz's election in February gave Ukraine a strong supporter in Germany. He has joined Trump's push for a ceasefire deal in the war with Russia, while also positioning Germany to better support Ukraine without the U.S.
Merz met last week with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Berlin, where he announced Germany will bolster its backing of Ukraine, including by sending over more military equipment and increasing weapons manufacturing in Kyiv.
When Trump and Zelensky had a tense exchange in the Oval Office in February, sparked by Vice President Vance suggesting Zelensky wasn't thankful enough for U.S. support, Merz accused the U.S. leaders of 'deliberate escalation.'
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who recently got back from Ukraine, said he expects the Trump-Merz meeting to be productive, pointing out how Germany has increased its defense production and defense spending commitments.
'Obviously, the chancellor's going to be concerned about tariffs, and that could be a real sticking point,' the senator said.
The visit between the two leaders comes as the European Union (EU) is in talks with U.S. officials to make a deal on tariffs, and a day after Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs were doubled to 50 percent.
The EU's trade chief Maroš Šefčovič met with Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Wednesday, Bloomberg reported, while the European bloc braces for retaliatory tariffs imposed by the U.S.
Trump imposed a 20 percent tariff on European goods on 'Liberation Day' before pausing tariffs for 90 days; separate 10 percent tariffs remain in place. The president recently threatened to impose a 50 percent tariff on the EU, arguing the Europeans have been uncooperative and that negotiations haven't gone far enough.
The visit on Thursday is critical for Merz to try on behalf of the 27-member bloc to convince Trump to back off the 50 percent tariffs. It's the first in-person meeting between the leaders.
Merz spoke with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finland's President Alexander Stubb in recent weeks for advice about the delicate talks with Trump, Bloomberg reported, looking to avoid the confrontation and tension that emerged in Trump's face-to-face meetings with Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Vance met with Merz, as well as the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party's leader Alice Weidel, in February before the country's elections.
After the meetings, the vice president said that the AfD is the 'most popular party in Germany, and by far the most representative of East Germany. Now the bureaucrats try to destroy it.'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio this month piled on support for AfD, blasting the German domestic spy agency for designating the far-right party as an 'extremist' political group.
'Germany just gave its spy agency new powers to surveil the opposition. That's not democracy—it's tyranny in disguise,' Rubio said on the social platform X. 'What is truly extremist is not the popular AfD—which took second in the recent election — but rather the establishment's deadly open border immigration policies that the AfD opposes.'
Vance had also accused the government of trying to 'destroy' AfD, which tech billionaire and former Trump adviser Elon Musk also supports. Musk appeared virtually at a rally for AfD, which at the time led the German government to accuse the Tesla CEO of meddling in the country's elections.
Merz has pushed back on Trump officials meddling in Germany's domestic politics.
'We have largely stayed out of the American election campaign in recent years, and that includes me personally,' Merz said in an interview with Politico in May. He said he told American officials, 'We have not taken sides with either candidate. And I ask you to accept that in return.'
It's not clear if talks on the Middle East will be on Trump and Merz's agenda, with Washington and Berlin largely in alignment on engaging more with Syria and securing a deal with Iran to box in its nuclear program.
On Israel, the German chancellor could ask the president to exert more pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to scale back Israel's military operations and increase delivery of humanitarian aid.
While Germany has defended Israel's right to respond to Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, attack against Israel, the Palestinian death toll and humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip prompted the German government last month to threaten limits on weapons transfers to Israel and other unnamed measures.
While Trump has supported Israel's military actions and called for the U.S. to take ownership of the Gaza Strip and for Palestinians to be permanently relocated, he has also directed the resumption of humanitarian aid deliveries and negotiated with Hamas to release an American citizen.
His top envoy for negotiations, Steve Witkoff, is pushing a two-month ceasefire and hostage release deal with the U.S.-designated terrorist group.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Departure of Tesla's humanoid robot boss caps tough week for Elon Musk, amid bitter fallout with Trump
It's been a difficult week for Tesla. Not long after Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's very-public social media spat led Tesla shares to take their greatest single-day drop ever on Thursday—erasing $152 billion off its market cap—one of Tesla's top engineers confirmed on social media late Friday afternoon that he was leaving the company. Milan Kovac, who oversaw the development of Tesla's 'Optimus' humanoid robot posted on X that he had made 'the most difficult decision of my life' and would be 'moving out of my position,' confirming a Bloomberg report from earlier Friday afternoon that he was departing the company. 'I've been far away from home for too long, and will need to spend more time with family abroad,' he wrote in the post. 'I want to make it clear that this is the only reason, and has absolutely nothing to do with anything else. My support for [Elon Musk] and the team is ironclad—Tesla team forever.' Musk later replied to the post on X, thanking Kovac for his contributions to the company and saying it had been an 'honor' to work with him. The departure is a meaningful one for Tesla. Musk has repeatedly made public statements staking the future of the company on Tesla's self-driving software and its yet-to-be-released humanoid robot product. Musk has claimed that the Optimus robot, specifically, could generate 'north of $10 trillion in revenue' for Tesla and be its biggest product ever. It's largely his bullishness on these AI-powered initiatives that have contributed to Tesla's soaring stock price, which some analysts have argued is divorced from reality. Kovac's departure raises questions over the future direction of Optimus, and whether Tesla will successfully be able to develop, manufacture, and deliver the humanoid robots. Bloomberg reported that Ashok Elluswamy, who leads Tesla's Autopilot, would be taking over responsibilities for Optimus. Tesla had already been criticized for overselling the capabilities of Optimus after it failed to alert attendees of its 'We, Robot' launch event that humans were apparently remotely controlling the robots. (Kovac had confirmed in a social media post after the event that the robots were human-assisted 'to some extent') The departure of one of Tesla's top engineers adds to what has already been a troubling week for the electric vehicle maker. Tesla's shares tumbled this week as President Trump and Musk took to their respective social media platforms to hurl insults at one another. Trump accused Musk of being frustrated that EV credits for Tesla cars would go away as part of the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' while Musk accused the president of irresponsible spending with the proposed legislation. The conversation spiraled into insults and even discussions of cutting SpaceX contracts with NASA as the partnership between the two figures very publicly imploded. Adding to Tesla's woes, Wall Street investment bank Goldman Sachs issued a note to investors on Thursday forecasting weaker-than-expected sales of Tesla cars in the second quarter. Tesla shares recovered some ground on Friday as Musk said he was open to making amends with Trump, though the stock still finished the week down 14% from January (still, Tesla shares are trading nearly 66% higher than they were this time last year.) In his social media post, Kovac recounted how he had joined Tesla in 2016 as an engineer on its Autopilot team and that he had transitioned to lead the Optimus group in early 2022 when Tesla had 'nothing but a couple Kuka arms arranged upside-down,' referring to the industrial robotic arms that are often used in automated factory systems. Tesla did not respond to an immediate request for comment on Kovac's departure. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
26 minutes ago
Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services
WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report.
