
Victoria Brings Forward Ban on Machete Sales After Violent Knife Brawl
The Allan government's interim ban on the sale of machetes has been brought forward to May 28 following a violent knife fight between rival gangs in Melbourne's Northland Shopping Centre.
A broader ban on possession will follow on Sept. 1.
The measure comes under Commonwealth consumer law, which allows state ministers to impose temporary sales bans on dangerous goods.
'When the interim sale ban is declared on Wednesday, a supplier (e.g. a retailer) must not supply the banned item for sale or possess them with the intent to sell during the banned period,' the government said in a statement.
Victoria's move comes after a violent, pre-arranged brawl involving machetes at the Melbourne shopping centre on May 25.
Up to 10 individuals clashed around 2:30 p.m., leaving at least one person injured.
Related Stories
5/5/2025
5/21/2025
Shoppers hid inside stores as police locked down the centre. Two people, including a 15-year-old boy, were arrested. Authorities allege the confrontation was planned between rival groups.
The sale ban will apply to all machetes—defined as knives with blades over 20 centimetres—and excludes kitchen knives.
Retailers holding excess stock have been told to store it safely until the start of the disposal, amnesty, and exemption schemes in September.
Non-compliance may attract criminal charges.
Premier Jacinta Allan said she was determined to keep machetes off Victorian streets.
'I hate these knives, and I will keep introducing as many laws as it takes to get them off our streets, out of our shops and out of our lives,' she said.
Possession Ban To Carry Stiff Penalties
From Sept. 1, anyone caught with a machete without a valid exemption will face up to two years in prison or fines exceeding $47,000.
Exemptions will be available for those with legitimate uses, including farmers and hunters, who must apply for approval.
The government acknowledged that some legitimate users would be unable to buy machetes during the interim ban despite qualifying for future exemptions, but insisted public safety must come first.
Authorities have seized a record number of knives from the state's streets this year.
In response, the state amended the Control of Weapons Act on March 19 to outlaw the sale and possession of machetes. The ban also builds on Australia's strictest bail laws and expanded police powers for random knife searches.
'The purpose of the interim sale ban is to dry up the supply of these items as much as possible before the possession ban comes into place,' the government said.
Crackdown Follows Surge in Crime
Victoria moved to ban machetes in December 2024, becoming the first state to do so after a spate of violent incidents involving the weapon.
The push followed a home invasion in Black Rock, Melbourne, where machete-wielding burglars stole two cars while residents were asleep.
Victoria has been grappling with increase in crime. According to police data for the year ending September 2024, overall offences rose by 13.4 percent to 578,762 offences.
Among the key contributors are 68,042 car thefts, including stolen number plates and power tools. Retail theft has also risen sharply, driven by inflation and cost-of-living pressures.
These new measures are seen as a necessary step in addressing public safety concerns and curbing violent crime in Victoria.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
British man held over '£200k of meth' in suitcase
A British man has been arrested in Chile after custom officials claimed to have discovered £200k worth of crystal meth inside his suitcase. Sources in the South American country have confirmed the man to be William Eastment, from Milbourne Port in Somerset. He had been travelling from Mexico to Chile when, according to Chilean authorities, his suitcase was found to contain more than 5kg (11lbs) of methamphetamine. In a statement published online, customs officials said they had identified irregularities in one piece of luggage, prompting them to track down the owner. Rodrigo Díaz, Metropolitan Customs Regional Director, said: "Once the traveller retrieved the suspicious luggage from the airport baggage carousel, it was quickly identified by our officers and moved to the secondary screening area, where the drugs team confirmed the presence of a hidden object." More news stories for Somerset Listen to the latest news for Somerset Inside the suitcase, the online statement added, six plastic bags were found containing 5,100 grams (179 oz) of a white substance, later found to be methamphetamine after testing. Mr Eastment was then handed over to anti-narcotics officers at the airport, and then remanded in custody following an initial court hearing. A spokesperson from the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) said: "We are aware of a British man detained in Chile and are in contact with his family and the local authorities." Follow BBC Somerset on Facebook and X. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
State House members reintroduce Pennsylvania Fairness Act
(WHTM) — Two Pennsylvania lawmakers have reintroduced the Pennsylvania Fairness Act, which would prohibit discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community in the workplace and housing. House Bill 300, introduced by State Representatives Jessica Benham (D-Allegheny) and Malcolm Kenyatta (D-Philadelphia), aims to amend the PA Human Relations Act to include 'sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression' to the list of prohibited types of discrimination, according to PA House Democrats. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Roughly half of the states in the U.S. already have similar bills. The Pennsylvania Fairness Act has been brought up in the Commonwealth for decades and even cleared the House for the first time last year. Rep. Kenyatta is a member of the LGBTQ+ community and also considers himself religious. He says the bill found bipartisan support last year because religious organizations are exempt. Still, the state Senate has refused to consider the bill every time it's been introduced. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Irremediable': Karen Read's defense team demands mistrial over prosecutor's questioning
Karen Read's lawyers demanded that Judge Beverly Cannone declare a mistrial after the prosecution brought up the topic of DNA while cross-examining a key defense witness on Tuesday morning. While questioning Dr. Marie Russell, special prosecutor Hank Brennan pointed out that no dog DNA was found on John O'Keefe after his death. 'When you look at the clothes in this case, Mr. O'Keefe's clothes, you are aware those clothes were swabbed for traces of dog DNA?' Brennan asked Russell. Defense attorney Robert Alessi took major objection because the prosecution didn't bring in a witness to testify about DNA and noted the defense has been meticulous about avoiding the mention of DNA. Alessi argued that raising the subject while questioning Russell had prejudiced the jury. Judge Cannone then ordered the jury out of the court to allow Alessi and Brennan to weigh in on the matter. 'He [attorney Brennan] has introduced it [DNA] and brought it in for the very first time in front of the jury. 'He has done so intentionally. He intentionally brought up DNA. Based upon that intentional mention, the defense moves strongly, vigorously for a mistrial with prejudice, a mistrial with prejudice,' a fired-up Alessi told the court. Alessi added, 'I want to be very clear. The defense has been incredibly assiduous and meticulous about not mentioning DNA in any fashion, directly or indirectly." Alessi concluded, 'So, in conclusion, your honor, because of the conduct of the prosecution and specifically the intentional mention of DNA, the prosecution has put in the jury's mind that topic, that is, irremediable. That cannot be reversed, that cannot be cured. That cannot be ameliorated with a jury instruction. That cannot be dislodged. The prosecution has to suffer the consequences of its own intentional actions of bringing up that topic." Brennan then brushed off the accusation, saying, 'The defense does not get to pick and choose what words the Commonwealth can or cannot use.' Watch Alessi's argument and Brennan's response: After a 30-minute break, Cannone denied Alessi's motion to dismiss the case, ruling that Brennan could continue his line of questioning. Russell, an emergency physician and forensic pathologist, has testified that her opinion is that linear abrasions on O'Keefe's arm were the result of multiple dog bites, not a vehicle collision. When shown an image of the injuries to O'Keefe's arm, 'Those wounds were inflicted as the result of a dog attack,' the Los Angeles-based doctor testified. 'The teeth made these abrasions,' Russell told the court as she examined the photo and cited 'multiple groupings of wounds.' Russell said she observed 'multiple strikes from a dog' on O'Keefe's arm, including 'bites and claw marks.' During Read's first trial, Russell also testified that the holes found in O'Keefe's hoodie and the wounds to his arm were from a dog. She also said her opinion is that O'Keefe's injuries do not appear to have been caused by a vehicle. The prosecution sought to block her testimony ahead of the start of Read's retrial, but Judge Beverly Cannone ruled in favor of the defense. Read, 45, of Mansfield, is accused of striking O'Keefe, her Boston police officer boyfriend, with her Lexus SUV and leaving him to die alone in a blizzard outside of a house party in Canton at the home of fellow officer Brian Albert on Jan. 29, 2022, following a night of drinking. Prosecutors allege Read intentionally backed into O'Keefe after she dropped him off at the house party and returned hours later to find him dead. The defense has claimed that she was a victim of a vast police conspiracy and that O'Keefe was fatally beaten by another law enforcement officer at the party. Read has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence, and leaving the scene of a crash resulting in death. A mistrial was declared last year after jurors said they were at an impasse and deliberating further would be futile. Get caught up with all of the latest in Karen Read's retrial. Reporting from the Associated Press was included in this article. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW