Bates says Post Office scandal compensation schemes are ‘quasi-kangaroo courts'
The former subpostmaster, who has campaigned for justice for colleagues, added that he has been offered compensation which he said amounts to less than half of his original claim.
Writing in the Sunday Times, the 70-year-old said: 'The subpostmaster compensation schemes have been turned into quasi-kangaroo courts in which the Department for Business and Trade sits in judgement of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses.
'Claims are, and have been, knocked back on the basis that legally you would not be able to make them, or that the parameters of the scheme do not extend to certain items.'
More than 900 subpostmasters were prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts.
Many are still awaiting compensation despite the previous government announcing that those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000 payouts.
The group litigation order (GLO) scheme was set up to achieve redress for the 555 claimants who took the Post Office to the High Court between 2017 and 2019.
But Sir Alan, who was portrayed by actor Toby Jones in ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, said promises that compensation schemes would be 'non-legalistic' had turned out to be 'worthless'.
He has also called for an independent body to be created to deliver compensation schemes for this and similar public sector scandals.
Under the GLO, claimants can take a fixed sum of £75,000 or seek their own settlement.
If there are disputes in individual cases, they are referred to an independent panel for review.
Postmasters can also seek a final view from Sir Ross Cranston, a former High Court judge, if they believe the panel has got it wrong.
Sir Alan was knighted last year for his services to justice, having founded the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance (JFSA).
Last month, he sent an email to members of his group, calling on victims to take the Government to court over delays to financial redress, adding that a judicial review would 'probably be the quickest way to ensure fairness for all'.
It is understood that 80% of postmasters in Sir Alan's group have accepted a full and final redress or been paid most of their offer.
A Department for Business and Trade spokesman said: 'We pay tribute to all the postmasters who've suffered from this scandal, including Sir Alan for his tireless campaign for justice, and we have quadrupled the total amount paid to postmasters since entering government.
'We recognise there will be an absence of evidence given the length of time which has passed, and we therefore aim to give the benefit of the doubt to postmasters as far as possible. Anyone unhappy with their offer can have their case reviewed by a panel of experts, which is independent of the Government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
'Racist AND disabled?': Soccer fans react after Antoine Semenyo was allegedly subjected to abuse during Liverpool-Bournemouth game
The 2025-26 Premier League season started with a six-goal thriller between Liverpool and Bournemouth on Friday, but was quickly overshadowed by a racist incident at Anfield. This happened during the first half of the game when Bournemouth's Antoine Semenyo was allegedly subjected to racist abuse from a Liverpool fan. Video footage showed the English-born Ghanaian forward about to take a throw-in, when he received obscene comments from a Liverpool supporter sitting pitchside. However, Semenyo ignored the man without a word and proceeded with the game. The ugly incident led to a stoppage in play by the referee, sparking widespread condemnations from both teams and supporters alike. Although the defending champions eventually secured their first three points of the new season, the conversation after the game focused on the comments directed at Semenyo. Fans react to racist abuse directed at Antoine Semenyo in EPL opener Following the game, reactions to the incident from fans have been rife on social media. While some have condemned racial abuse at Antoine Semenyo entirely, others decided to single out the Liverpool supporter who made the comments. The man who was in a wheelchair was escorted out of the stadium at half-time by three police officers. One fan wrote, 'Racist AND disabled? What a combination, lmfao, imagine having the balls to do that in full view of everyone, knowing it would be easy as piss to identify you out of everyone in the crowd.' While another fan wrote, 'He's a better man than me, I'm flipping the c**t over so he eats concrete for 90 mins.' 'As a Liverpool supporter, I condemn this behavior.. ban that guy forever,' wrote another fan. One fan seemed to aim a dig at the man who made the comments at Semenyo and wrote, 'He's on chair wearing a never walk alone jersey. The humor is cooked.' 'Not a single person behind him giving him shit for whatever he said either 🥴,' another fan added. Liverpool issues statement about alleged racist comments during Bournemouth win After their 4-2 win over AFC Bournemouth on Friday night, Liverpool issued a statement condemning the ugly incident. Amid reports that the Merseyside police are investigating the alleged abuse directed at Semenyo, the official statement from the defending Premier League champions read: 'Liverpool Football Club is aware of an allegation of racist abuse made during our Premier League game against AFC Bournemouth. We condemn racism and discrimination in all forms; it has no place in society or football.' Bournemouth head coach Andoni Iraola revealed Antoine Semenyo was upset after the game, but praised the Ghana international for maintaining his composure and scoring two goals at Anfield to draw the visitors level. Nonetheless, it will be interesting to see how the ongoing police investigation eventually turns out. Related Headlines UFC Middleweight Rankings: Khamzat Chimaev Takes the No. 1 Spot After Dominant UFC 319 Win 10 Biggest UFC 319 Winners and Losers, Including the New King of 185-Pounds Khamzat Chimaev UFC Featherweight Rankings: Lerone Murphy Rises After Filthy KO Win at UFC 319
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Metals Exploration plc (LON:MTL) has caught the attention of institutional investors who hold a sizeable 39% stake
Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in Metals Exploration implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership Insiders have bought recently We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Every investor in Metals Exploration plc (LON:MTL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 39% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Metals Exploration. View our latest analysis for Metals Exploration What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Metals Exploration? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that Metals Exploration does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Metals Exploration, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Metals Exploration is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Candy Ventures S.à R.L. with 22% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 20% and 7.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Darren Bowden is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares. After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage. Insider Ownership Of Metals Exploration The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Metals Exploration plc. In their own names, insiders own UK£19m worth of stock in the UK£404m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Private Equity Ownership Private equity firms hold a 22% stake in Metals Exploration. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere. Private Company Ownership We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Metals Exploration better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Metals Exploration (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
107% earnings growth over 1 year has not materialized into gains for Genuit Group (LON:GEN) shareholders over that period
Investors can approximate the average market return by buying an index fund. Active investors aim to buy stocks that vastly outperform the market - but in the process, they risk under-performance. For example, the Genuit Group plc (LON:GEN) share price is down 21% in the last year. That falls noticeably short of the market return of around 23%. At least the damage isn't so bad if you look at the last three years, since the stock is down 7.7% in that time. The falls have accelerated recently, with the share price down 13% in the last three months. This could be related to the recent financial results - you can catch up on the most recent data by reading our company report. If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for Genuit Group isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. During the unfortunate twelve months during which the Genuit Group share price fell, it actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 107%. It's quite possible that growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past. The divergence between the EPS and the share price is quite notable, during the year. So it's easy to justify a look at some other metrics. Genuit Group's revenue is actually up 5.9% over the last year. Since the fundamental metrics don't readily explain the share price drop, there might be an opportunity if the market has overreacted. You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values). We know that Genuit Group has improved its bottom line lately, but what does the future have in store? This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Genuit Group What About Dividends? As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Genuit Group the TSR over the last 1 year was -18%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective While the broader market gained around 23% in the last year, Genuit Group shareholders lost 18% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 0.6% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Genuit Group that you should be aware of. But note: Genuit Group may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
