logo
Residents of a remote island disputed by Colombia hope their Peruvian government won't forget them

Residents of a remote island disputed by Colombia hope their Peruvian government won't forget them

Independenta day ago
A remote island on the Amazon river — now the subject of a territorial dispute between Peru and Colombia — has a single paved road for a main street, which is home to more nightclubs and evangelical churches than any other businesses.
Named after a 16th-century saint, Santa Rosa has no running water or sewage system for its 3,000 residents, who build their one-story homes on stilts to prevent them from flooding every year. People are Peruvian, but they cross the river to neighboring cities in Colombia or Brazil to see a doctor for routine care or an emergency that the rusting local health center cannot handle.
'Our island suffers from many needs,' said Marcos Mera, the owner of a restaurant and dance hall in Santa Rosa, as he wiped sweat from his forehead and set up tables.
While the struggles of Mera and his neighbors are not new, their hometown has suddenly become the center of attention for the Peruvian government. The surge in interest even garnered a presidential visit after Colombian President Gustavo Petro disavowed Peruvian jurisdiction over Santa Rosa earlier this month.
Peru maintains it owns Santa Rosa Island based on treaties about a century old, but Colombia disputes that ownership because the island had not yet emerged from the Amazon river at the time.
Residents see themselves as proud Peruvians even though they rely on other countries for basic needs. Now, they hope their government will not forget them again, a sentiment that President Dina Boluarte acknowledged during a recent visit.
'It's true that, for too long, our border populations have not received the attention they deserve,' Boluarte said Friday during her first-ever visit to the island.
Recent tensions between Peru and Colombia have escalated into a series of incidents, including the arrest of three Colombian men who were on the island doing land surveying work. The arrests, described by Petro as 'kidnapping,' prompted a dispute over the workers' rights to be in Santa Rosa. They marked the third binational incident in the area since Petro denied Peru's jurisdiction over Santa Rosa Island in early August.
'We are Peruvians, and if necessary, we will defend our island with pride,' said José Morales outside his currency-exchange house where he trades Peruvian soles, Colombian pesos and U.S. dollars. Residents often carry all three currencies, plus Brazilian reals, at once.
Most residents of Santa Rosa collect rainwater, which they filter through a white cloth and then boil, often using wood-burning stoves. Reaching the island takes a two-hour flight from Colombia's capital, Bogota, followed by a five-minute boat ride. In contrast, the trip from Peru's capital, Lima, involves a two-hour flight followed by a 15-hour boat journey.
The parents, children and grandchildren of many Santa Rosa residents live in Leticia, Colombia, or Tabatinga, Brazil. Some have also buried their loved ones in those cities, too, as Santa Rosa does not have a cemetery. Several residents said they have a cordial relationship with people in Colombia and Brazil.
'We live peacefully, sharing culture, gastronomy and good ideas,' Mera said before criticizing Colombian politicians saying he thinks they "have made a mistake.'
Some, however, are going as far as thanking Colombia's president for drawing interest to Santa Rosa.
'I have to thank Petro for speaking out like that,' nurse Rudy Ahuanari said. 'In all these blessed years, no minister had ever shown interest in us, but now he has. We were truly forgotten — not even God remembered.'
____
Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Roundabouts graffitied with St George flag
Roundabouts graffitied with St George flag

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Roundabouts graffitied with St George flag

BBC At least six mini-roundabouts in Birmingham have been graffitied with red crosses to look like St George's flags. Roundabouts in the Kings Heath and Yardley Wood areas were painted overnight at the weekend, while a video on social media purportedly showed a man daubing others several miles away in Bromsgrove, Worcestershire. It comes as hundreds of St George's and union jack flags flown from lampposts by residents started to be taken down by Birmingham City Council last week, which the authority said was due to safety concerns. Some residents described the painted traffic islands as "vandalism" but others have applauded the emergence of England flags in suburbs across the city. West Midlands Police said it had not received a complaint but said it would investigate criminal damage if a report was made by the local authority or a member of the public. 'Wanton vandalism' One woman, who lives near a painted roundabout in Woodthorpe Road, Kings Heath, described it as "sheer, wanton vandalism". "The council doesn't have the money to fix the potholes, let alone repaint mini islands." A man living close to the same roundabout said it was "not patriotic, it just feels like an excuse for xenophobia". "There are better ways to show pride - ways that are inclusive and respectful, not resorting to vandalism," he said. In recent weeks, the union jack and St George's Cross have been hung in the Weoley Castle and Northfield areas of the city, which local residents said they were doing so in an act of patriotism. But the city council had them taken down and issued a safety plea to residents thinking of attaching the flags to lampposts and other street furniture. It said it was upgrading streetlights to energy-efficient LED lighting and because of this had so far removed about 200 banners and flags. Flags have emerged in other areas, including Hollywood, Wythall and Barnt Green on the Worcestershire border. 'Flags represent us' Some people in the Weoley Castle and Northfield areas of Birmingham told BBC Radio WM they supported the flags being flown. One woman said: "It's patriotic, so I think it's lovely. It represents us doesn't it, Great Britain?" Another woman said: "I think they're great, [they] put a smile on people's faces. "They're not doing any harm just flying in the wind, representing England, which is where we are, obviously." Another woman said it would "nice to see all different flags up" to show how multicultural the city was. While a man told the BBC if the sentiment behind it was "anti-immigration", he was "totally against" the flags being put up. "That's not a very nice thing to do," he said. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. Related internet links West Midlands Police Birmingham West Midlands Police

Trump ‘urged Vlad to be realistic on Ukraine land demand' as ‘White House eyes Putin's EU pal to host trilateral summit'
Trump ‘urged Vlad to be realistic on Ukraine land demand' as ‘White House eyes Putin's EU pal to host trilateral summit'

The Sun

time11 hours ago

  • The Sun

Trump ‘urged Vlad to be realistic on Ukraine land demand' as ‘White House eyes Putin's EU pal to host trilateral summit'

DONALD Trump is said to have urged Vladimir Putin to be "realistic" on his territorial demands in Ukraine in exchange for a peace deal. It comes as the White House is reportedly planning to choose Budapest as a possible location to host a possible trilateral summit between Putin, Zelensky and Trump. 4 4 4 4 Putin laid his cards on the table when he declared that he wants the whole of Ukraine's Donbas region in exchange for peace. The eastern zone, home to Ukraine's "fortress belt", would be a valuable prize for Putin with murderous potential - and one he has sought for over a decade. Since invading in 2022, Russia has overrun almost the entire Donbas - comprised of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. Only one corner of the Donetsk region remains clinging on - which Putin has demanded in exchange for peace. He also demanded the recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. But Trump reportedly told Putin he has to be realistic about his territorial demands in Ukraine. He also added that Ukraine will 'get a lot of land' as efforts to end Russian aggression continued. Meanwhile, the White House is said to be planning to choose Hungary's capital as a possible location for the trilat summit, POLITICO reports. Victor Orbán, the PM of the EU nation, has had close ties to Russia since the American president's first term in office. Putin had reportedly suggested to Trump that Moscow could host the summit - but this was flatly refused by Zelensky. It all comes after suggested British troops would be sent to help secure peace in Ukraine - while ruling out US boots on the ground. Speaking to Fox News about security guarantees for Ukraine, Trump said European nations would "frontload it". Referring to France, Germany and the UK, he said: "They want to have boots on the ground. I don't think it's going to be a problem." But he gave his "assurance" when asked if he could guarantee no US troops in Ukraine. The US president admitted Putin could have no interest in securing a deal - but warned that he would face a "rough situation" if he doesn't come to the table. He added: "We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks.... it's possible that he doesn't want to make a deal." Zelensky and Trump smoothed over their differences and appeared to pave the way for peace during a love-in at the White House on Monday. The Ukrainian leader said he was "ready" to speak to Putin in person under any circumstances. Any face-to-face showdown - which would be their first since the start of the war in February 2022 - could be followed by a trilateral summit with Trump. But Kremlin 's official channels of communication remain deathly silent on confirming a possible summit between Zelensky and Putin to end the war in Ukraine.

9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program
9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program

The Independent

time13 hours ago

  • The Independent

9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program

An attorney who helped design and implement the 9/11 victims' compensation fund says New Hampshire lawmakers have eroded the fairness of a settlement program for those who were abused at the state's youth detention center. Deborah Greenspan, who served as deputy special master of the fund created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, recently submitted an affidavit in a class-action lawsuit seeking to block changes to New Hampshire's out-of-court settlement fund for abuse victims. She's among those expected to testify Wednesday at a hearing on the state's request to dismiss the case and other matters. More than 1,300 people have sued the state since 2020 alleging that they were physically or sexually abused as children while in state custody, mostly at the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. Most of them put their lawsuits on hold after lawmakers created a settlement fund in 2022 that was pitched as a 'victim-centered' and 'trauma-informed' alternative to litigation run by a neutral administrator appointed by the state Supreme Court. But the Republican-led Legislature changed that process through last-minute additions to the state budget Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed in June. The amended law gives the governor authority to hire and fire the fund's administrator and gives the attorney general — also a political appointee — veto power over settlement awards. That stands in stark contrast to other victim compensation funds, said Greenspan, who currently serves as a court-appointed special master for lawsuits related to lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan. She said it 'strains credulity' to believe that anyone would file a claim knowing that 'the persons ultimately deciding the claim were those responsible for the claimant's injuries.' 'Such a construct would go beyond the appearance of impropriety and create a clear conflict of interest, undermining the fairness and legitimacy of the settlement process," she wrote. Ayotte and Attorney General John Formella responded by asking a judge to bar Greenspan's testimony, saying she offered 'policy preferences masquerading as expert opinions' without explaining the principles beyond her conclusions. 'Her affidavit is instead a series of non sequiturs that move from her experience to her conclusions without any of the necessary connective tissue,' they wrote. The defendants argue that the law still requires the administrator to be 'an independent, neutral attorney' and point out that the same appointment process is used for the state's judges. They said giving the attorney general the authority to accept or reject settlements is necessary to give the public a voice and ensure that the responsibility for spending millions of dollars in public funds rests with the executive branch. As of June 30, nearly 2,000 people had filed claims with the settlement fund, which caps payouts at $2.5 million. A total of 386 had been settled, with an average award of $545,000. One of the claimants says he was awarded $1.5 million award in late July, but the state hasn't finalized it yet, leaving him worried that Formella will veto it. 'I feel like the state has tricked us,' he said in an interview this week. 'We've had the rug pulled right out from underneath us.' The Associated Press does not name those who say they were sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly. The claimant, now 39, said the two years he spent at the facility as a teenager were the hardest times of his life. 'I lost my childhood. I lost things that I can't get back,' he said. 'I was broken.' Though the settlement process was overwhelming and scary at times, the assistant administrator who heard his case was kind and understanding, he said. That meeting alone was enough to lift a huge burden, he said. 'I was treated with a lot of love,' he said. 'I felt really appreciated as a victim and like I was speaking to somebody who would listen and believe my story.' Separate from the fund, the state has settled two lawsuits by agreeing to pay victims $10 million and $4.5 million. Only one lawsuit has gone to trial, resulting in a $38 million verdict, though the state is trying to slash it to $475,000. The state has also brought criminal charges against former workers, with two convictions and two mistrials so far. The 39-year-old claimant who fears his award offer will be retracted said he doesn't know if he could face testifying at a public trial. 'It's basically allowing the same people who hurt us to hurt us all over again,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store