Billy Cypress, longest-serving Chairman and leader of Miccosukee Tribe, dies at 74
Cypress was first elected to the Miccosukee Business Council in 1973, serving for over a decade before being elected Chairman. He held the office for over 26 years.
The Miccosukee Tribe announced that Billy Cypress died on Feb. 28 at age 74.
Current Chairman Talbert Cypress, who previously served as Tribal Secretary alongside him, in a statement said: 'He always recognized the honor it was to serve as Chairman for our people and carried himself with immense pride. There are few who understand the responsibility of this seat, but only he served for almost 30 years. Chairman Billy Cypress: Thank you for your humor, your dedication, and your service.'
The Miccosukee Tribe's statement highlighted his life-long commitment and dedication to the Tribe.
According to the Tribe, under Cypress's leadership, the Tribe led significant legal and political battles, including fights in Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. He was a fierce opponent of Big Sugar's water pollution, championing stringent pollution-control standards in the Everglades that secured billions in state and federal investment. His advocacy played a key role in restoring historic water flows and ending engineered flooding in the region.
'I mourn the passing of Billy Cypress, a visionary and longtime Chairman of the Miccosukee Tribe,' said Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava in a statement. 'His decades of service transformed the Tribe, expanded its reach, and strengthened advocacy for our Everglades.'
Senator Rick Scott also expressed condolences calling Cypress a 'good friend' who will be 'greatly missed.
Cypress also fought for the preservation of Miccosukee culture and education, ensuring that the Tribe maintained the right to teach its young people traditionally.
He brought thousands of acres back into tribal control and reestablished jurisdiction over areas of the Everglades National Park from which the Tribe had been displaced in the 1940s. His diplomatic efforts led to the establishment of the Miccosukee Tribe's first embassy and the recognition of Miccosukee passports by foreign nations, setting a precedent for tribal sovereignty on an international stage.
The Tribe shared a testimony from Cypress before Congress in 1997, Cypress said:
'We're not asking for much. Just leave us alone and we'll leave you alone. We'll protect the environment, protect water quality, assist in Everglades restoration... Miccosukees hope to see just one law — yours and mine — and that we're all equal under it together.'
'As the Tribe's longest-serving executive, his leadership left a lasting impact on South Central Florida,' said Congressman Scott Franklin in a statement.
During his tenure, Cypress played a pivotal role in establishing the Tribe's gaming operations and strengthening its administrative departments.
Cypress also faced legal challenges, including a high-profile dispute with the federal government over taxation of the Miccosukee Tribe's casino profits. In 2009, he lost his position as chairman but regained the chairmanship in a 2016 special election, where he took a strong stand against federal taxation policies affecting the Tribe.
'The former Chairman is remembered by his friends and family as funny, charming, and lighthearted, despite taking his role seriously as an elected official,' the Tribe said in a statement. 'He always made time to talk to family, friends, and his fellow Tribal members.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Jeffries vows to call Kristi Noem to testify in long-overdue oversight push
When House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries promised that Kristi Noem would be one of the first called before Congress if Democrats take the majority in 2026, he wasn't just previewing political theater — he was signaling a long-overdue accountability moment. Because what we've seen under Noem's watch as Homeland Security secretary isn't just controversial policy, it's a collision between power and the Constitution. Listen, the government has every right to deport violent criminals. But what we're talking about here isn't that. These are families being ripped apart, U.S. citizen children deported to countries they've never known, and raids on churches, swap meets and sidewalks that read less like lawful arrests and more like kidnappings in broad daylight. Armed, masked agents storming neighborhoods — it looks less like 'law and order' and more like a scene from a dystopian movie. Except it's not fiction. It's happening here. And at the center of it is Secretary Noem, who, when asked to define 'habeas corpus' earlier this year — which, by the way, is a bedrock constitutional right — got it flat-out wrong. She described it as the president's power to deport people. That's not just a slip of the tongue; that's a fundamental misunderstanding of the very principle that protects all of us from government overreach. Habeas corpus is the right of a person to challenge their detention. Without it, the government could lock up anyone indefinitely. Even Abraham Lincoln had to go to Congress before suspending it during the Civil War. Yet somehow, Kristi Noem thinks she can redefine it on the fly. Meanwhile, lawsuits are piling up. The ACLU and others say these mass raids aren't about justice, they're about quotas. Three thousand arrests a day, demanded from the White House, no matter who gets caught in the dragnet. The result? Overcrowded, dungeon-like detention centers, families denied food, water and lawyers. That's not just cruel — it's unconstitutional. And it costs taxpayers millions to warehouse people who pose no threat to society. Jeffries is right: this calls for oversight. Not partisan point-scoring, but a public examination of what happens when immigration policy is driven by fear, politics and raw numbers instead of law, due process and human dignity. Because if the government can strip immigrants of rights today, what's to stop them from doing the same to citizens tomorrow? Kristi Noem may soon face Congress, but make no mistake — this is bigger than her. It's about whether America will continue to twist the meaning of justice until it serves whoever holds power, or whether we'll insist that justice, in this country, still means something. This isn't about Kristi Noem forgetting her civics lesson. It's about whether America still remembers its own.


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Karoline Leavitt gives update on Trump's plan to "eliminate" mail-in voting
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to a question about President Donald Trump's plans to "eliminate" mail-in voting in the U.S. A reporter asked during Tuesday's press briefing, "President Trump says he plans to "eliminate" mail-in voting. States administer elections not federal authorities. Can you provide any more details about how the White House plans to eliminate that?" Leavitt responded, in part, "When Congress comes back to Washington, I'm sure there will be many discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill and also our friends in state legislatures to ensure that we're protecting the integrity of the vote." She continued, "The president wants to make it easier for Americans to vote and harder for people to cheat in our elections. He wants to ensure our election integrity. There were great efforts made in 2024. I won't get ahead of myself for Hatch Act reasons to get ahead for the next election, but I can assure you this is a priority for the president." Reporter: States administer elections not federal authorities. Can you give details about how the white house plans to [eliminate mail-in voting]? Leavitt: The president wants to make it easier to vote and harder to cheat… I won't get ahead of myself for Hatch Act reasons to… — Acyn (@Acyn) August 19, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Indianapolis Star
10 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
A mysterious group is leaving robocalls about Indiana redistricting. Are they legal?
Attorney General Todd Rokita's office is looking into complaints about robocalls urging Indiana to redistrict mid-cycle, amid concerns about the calls' legality. Political robocalls are the latest in the national campaign to pressure Hoosier lawmakers to support redistricting, a move the Trump administration hopes could add one to two more Republican seats in Congress in order to help solidify the GOP majority. "Radical progressives like Gavin Newsom, JB Pritzker and Kathy Hochul are threatening to redistrict their states with the goal of ending the Trump presidency," begins one robocall from a group calling itself "Forward America," before urging constituents to call their representatives about supporting redistricting. But are the automated messages legal? Indiana law prohibits robocalls unless the recipient gives permission, such as by opting in to the calls previously or asking callers to leave a message. Rokita's office confirmed this week it had received multiple complaints and was beginning to review them. "To clarify earlier reporting, the legality of the Forward America robocalls is an open question," Communications Director Josh DeFonce wrote in a post on Rokita's X account on Aug. 18. "Only just receiving them today and as you can understand, it will take some time to review those appropriately and fully." The group conducting the calls has little online presence. There are no active committees with that exact name, according to a search of Federal Election Commission and Indiana Election Division data. A telephone number associated with the group only plays an automated version of the message when reached. The calls started days before members of Indiana's congressional delegation came out in support of redistricting, a position at odds with several Republican state legislators who have called the push a "stunt" and a "bad precedent." Already Republicans hold seven of nine congressional seats in Indiana.