‘Cruel' criminalisation of women over abortion must end, says MP ahead of vote
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said her amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill would remove women from the criminal justice system in relation to their own pregnancies, ensuring they could not face investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment.
She said the UK's 'Victorian' abortion law is 'increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls' and that her amendment is the 'right change at the right time' and a 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to bring change.
Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability.
It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant.
Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
Ms Antoniazzi said her proposed 'narrow, targeted' measure does not change how abortion services are provided or the rules under the 1967 Abortion Act.
She said: 'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help. As I have said it before, and I will say it again, just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.'
She added that her amendment is backed by 180 MPs from across the Commons and 50 organisations including the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG).
The MP assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain, abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors, and that healthcare professionals 'acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now'.
A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them.
Ms Creasy's amendment will also be debated but 'will fall' if Ms Antoniazzi's is passed by MPs, the Commons heard.
Referring to Ms Creasy's amendment, Ms Antoniazzi said while she agreed 'more comprehensive reform of abortion law is needed', such change of that scale should take place through a future separate piece of legislation.
Conservative MP and Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh, speaking against both amendments, described them as 'not pro-woman' and argued they 'would introduce sex-selective abortion'.
DUP MP Carla Lockhart insisted 'both lives matter', saying the proposed amendments 'would be bad for both women and unborn children'.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who is not present for Tuesday's vote, outlined her opposition to both amendments in a letter to constituents, saying while she believes safe and legal abortions are part of female healthcare, the amendments 'unnecessary' and 'dangerous'.
The issue of women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster.
Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home.
She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks.
The case of Ms Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'.
MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election.
The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) has urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967″.
Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers.
'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason.
A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy.
She said her amendment aims to make sure women and girls are safe when they access abortion services.
She told the Commons: 'I'm not trying to limit people's access to what is clinically legally available. I'm trying to make sure that people are safe when they do so.'
She said the change she has proposed would be to protect women who have been trafficked and forced into sex work or those who have been sexually abused and where a perpetrator is attempting to cover up their crimes by causing a termination.
But Ms Antoniazzi said remote access to abortion care was 'safe, effective and reduces waiting times', and that such a change would 'devastate abortion access in this country'.
The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border.
On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines.
The Government has previously said it is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
MPs vote in favour of measures to decriminalise abortion for women in England and Wales
The Commons voted 379 to 137, majority 242, to back Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Reviews show Tories wasted billions of pounds on HS2, transport secretary to say
The Conservatives wasted billions of pounds on HS2 through poor management, badly negotiated contracts and constant design changes, the transport secretary will say on Wednesday. Heidi Alexander will tell MPs the last government overspent on the high-speed rail line in multiple ways, including signing contracts even when advised not to and drawing up expensive plans for redesigning Euston station in London before scrapping them. She will announce the findings of two reviews into the troubled project, even as ministers brace to swallow another increase in the projected price tag to a reported £100bn. 'Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management,' Alexander will tell the House of Commons. 'It's an appalling mess. But it's one we will sort out.' Referencing recently reported claims of fraud by contractors supplying workers, she will add: 'There are allegations that parts of the supply chain have been defrauding taxpayers, and I have been clear that these need to be investigated rapidly and rigorously. If fraud is found, then the consequences will be felt by all involved.' A Labour source said: 'The cost inflated out of all control, billions were wasted due to political indecision. There was a failure of ministerial oversight from the then transport secretary and a delivery company not fit for purpose. It's a comedy of errors, but no one's laughing.' The Conservatives were contacted for comment. Alexander will lay out the results of two reviews into the scheme: one by James Stewart into what went wrong and what it can teach ministers about how to run future infrastructure projects, and an initial assessment by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2 Ltd, looking at how and when to construct the rest of the phase one line from London to Birmingham. The problems identified in those reports go beyond the escalating costs of tunnelling and environmental mitigations such as the £100m bat tunnel, which has been singled out for criticism by the prime minister, Keir Starmer. Phase one of the HS2 scheme was projected in 2012 to cost £20bn, but more recent estimates now put that figure at as much as £57bn. Wild's review, according to sources quoted by the rail expert, Christian Wolmar, could lead to the full budget being restated at current prices at more than £100bn. Alexander will tell MPs that among the mistakes made by the previous government was the decision to sign a series of construction contracts despite having been advised by a review in 2020 not to do so until the scope of the project had been fully decided. The Oakervee review, which was commissioned by Boris Johnson as prime minister, recommended in 2020 that the government renegotiate key contracts to build the scheme and hold off signing further ones until making political decisions about its future. The transport secretary will tell MPs on Wednesday that contracts continued to be signed even when those decisions had yet to be made. Ministers were also commissioning two sets of designs for a new station at Euston at a total cost of over £250m, only to scrap both of them. They also spent £2bn on the northern leg from Birmingham to Manchester before it was cancelled by Rishi Sunak as prime minister in October 2023. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Soon after the northern arm was axed, Sunak announced a Euston ministerial task force to oversee improvements to the station. That committee was due to include ministers from the Treasury, the transport department and the levelling up department, but government sources now say it never held a meeting. More recently, HS2 Ltd has begun an investigation into claims that one of its labour suppliers on the project charged overinflated rates for staff. A spokesperson for HS2 Ltd said at the time: 'We treat all whistleblower allegations seriously and are continuing to conduct our own investigation. Furthermore, HS2 Ltd has formally reported the allegations to HMRC.' One of the measures Alexander is taking to try to get the project back on track is to appoint Mike Brown, the former commissioner of Transport for London (TfL), as the new chair of HS2 Ltd. He will replace Jon Thompson, who stepped down in the spring after a series of colourful public interventions, including disclosing the bat tunnel saga. Brown worked under and then succeeded the current rail minister, Lord Hendy, in running TfL. Meanwhile, Wild has written to Alexander setting out the broad terms of a 'reset' for the project to keep costs down and get construction back on track. He carried out a similar role with TfL on the Elizabeth line to eventually deliver it successfully within a revised timescale and budget. However, in the short term it is likely to mean that HS2's full opening, even on the reduced network, is pushed back further into the 2030s, while the budget is likely to soar in real terms.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Defiant Rayner says ‘underestimate me at your peril' over criticism of huge housing pledge
Angela Rayner has hit back at critics of Labour's ambitious plan to build 1.5 million homes, warning them to 'underestimate me at your peril'. The deputy prime minister has come under increasing pressure over the flagship target after property agent Savills forecast that there would be only 840,000 new homes – just over half. Ms Rayner, who is the cabinet minister in charge of the policy, said she had been underestimated 'all my life' as she announced the launch of a new government-backed project to support builders. She says the National Housing Bank will unlock new housing schemes across the UK, thanks to low-interest loans provided to developers hampered by rising inflation and higher interest and mortgage costs. The move, backed by £22bn in government finance, will see more than 500,000 new homes built, including many social and affordable properties, says Ms Rayner. It comes after warnings to the local government secretary that Labour's election pledge for 1.5 million homes over this parliament is unachievable. In its forecast on housebuilding published earlier this month, Savills said 840,000 new homes will be completed over the next five years, with the property firm blaming a low demand from buyers. Government figures for 2024 also show a 28 per cent fall in new-build starts in England compared to 2023. However, writing exclusively for The Independent, Ms Rayner tells critics to 'underestimate me at your peril' as she announced the housing bank scheme, which she claims would finally give access to housing for many hard-working families. Ms Rayner leans on her own experience of living in a council house, saying it provided her with stability, but that for too many people, this remained out of reach. And she blames the Tories for the 'broken system'. In her piece, Ms Rayner says: 'Underestimate me at your peril. People have done this all my life. But this government has a bold vision to fix the housing crisis and a strategy to deliver both investment and reform. 'We're overhauling the planning system to speed up approvals and unlock land – a clear statement of intent. And today we are taking another major step to fix a broken system that has held back too many hard-working families – and the country – for far too long.' Building more homes has been at the centre of Labour's plan since coming to power. Earlier this year, Ms Rayner vowed to build 10 to 12 new towns from 100 potential sites, with the chosen locations set to be unveiled this summer. Also, Labour has pledged to strip demands on developers to mitigate the environmental impact of new buildings before they are constructed, although the reforms have faced fierce criticism from wildlife groups. And at chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review announcement, she pledged £39bn would be spent on affordable and social housing over the next decade. The National Housing Bank, unveiled on Tuesday, will further push the development of new homes, said Ms Rayner. The public financial institution will work with mayors and local leaders to back projects meeting regional priorities, and it will support, in particular, small and medium-sized firms that have struggled most in securing capital. In total, Ms Rayner says the initiative would open up £53m of private investment into building homes. She writes: 'Our commitment to build 1.5 million homes as part of our Plan for Change is a stretching target, but not one I will shy away from. To those with doubts, I repeat: underestimate me at your peril. 'Yes – the road ahead is tough. But we are committed, as this is about more than just numbers. 'It's about giving fresh hope for millions of people across Britain and creating communities where families can thrive and children grow up in safety. It's about making sure a generation is no longer locked out of homeownership – and ensuring children aren't growing up in temporary accommodation.' Shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake MP said: 'While the ambition to increase housing supply is welcome, history teaches us that governments are often poor at picking winners and Homes England has very mixed results. 'The new National Housing Bank must be laser-focused: it must not crowd out private capital, must not subsidise developments that would have proceeded anyway, and must not be lured into funding pie-in-the-sky or unviable projects - instead its role should be limited to de-risking only those schemes that are genuinely unable to attract finance, to ensure taxpayer money is not wasted and private investment is not crowded out.' Ms Rayner came under the spotlight for the sale of her own ex-council house last year. The secretary of state for housing, communities and local government was told she would face no police action after an investigation into whether she owed tax from the sale of the home, on which she made a £48,500 profit.
