
Eric Adams faces fifth lawsuit in two weeks from former NYPD officials alleging corruption in the department
The suit, filed by former interim NYPD Commissioner Thomas Donlon, is the fifth in two weeks to allege rampant corruption within the police department — which the lawsuits say was condoned by City Hall. Donlon's suit now joins those of other former high-ranking NYPD officials, such as former Chief of Detectives James Essig, who claim they were pushed out after speaking up.
The corruption allegations against Adams are the latest blow for the embattled mayor — who managed to skirt federal corruption charges earlier this year and is now running for re-election as an independent candidate, where he faces a difficult path to victory.
Donlon's suit alleges that top members of the NYPD fabricated promotions, retaliated against other members of the department, obstructed internal investigations, and used their power and connections to usurp Donlon's authority — all while being protected by Adams. Donlon, a former FBI senior executive, says he wants a federal monitor to now oversee the department to 'ensure compliance with law and prevent further abuse,' according to the suit.
'These are baseless accusations from a disgruntled former employee who — when given the opportunity to lead the greatest police department in the world — proved himself to be ineffective,' said City Hall spokesperson Kayla Mamelak Altus in a statement. 'This suit is nothing more than an attempt to seek compensation at the taxpayer's expense after Mr. Donlon was rightfully removed from the role of interim police commissioner.'
When reached for comment, the NYPD deferred to the statement provided by City Hall.
Donlon, a former intelligence official who served as New York's director of the Office of Homeland Security, ran the FBI's National Threat Center and the FBI and NYPD joint terrorist task force, became interim police commissioner after Edward Caban, who became embroiled in his own investigation with his twin brother surrounding nightclubs in New York, stepped down.
Donlon's run as commissioner lasted less than two months. He stepped down after reports emerged that federal agents had searched his house for classified documents as part of an investigation not related to his role as commissioner. In that time, Donlon alleges he saw what he called systemic corruption from Adams and several members of the leadership team.
'Its core function was to shield loyalists and silence internal critics through a calculated regime of favoritism, retaliation, and concealment. Promotions and assignments were manipulated to reward obedience rather than merit. Misconduct was buried rather than addressed,' according to the suit.
Donlon said he tried to raise his concerns — including directly with Adams — and the group moved against him by 'stripping his authority, systematically excluding him from core decision-making processes, continually and consistently lying to Donlon, and ultimately eliminating his Police Commissioner position. Donlon's integrity was viewed as a threat — and the enterprise responded accordingly,' the suit alleges.
Donlon's suit comes a week after four former top NYPD officials filed suits of their own with similar allegations — that unqualified members who were connected to the executive staff were funneled into high profile units. When they spoke up, they faced retaliation and were eventually pushed out — all under the protection of the mayor.
Essig alleged in his suit that he complained about the unvetted transfers and promotions that were done outside the proper channels, so much so that when Caban took over as police commissioner, he was offered a demotion in rank and a pay cut or the option to resign from his position. Essig chose to resign, according to the suit.
The other chiefs had similar offers after they spoke out against perceived wrongdoing — such as Matthew Pontillo, the then-Chief of Professional Standards who spoke out internally about the latitude officers were given for vehicle pursuits and body worn cameras that recorded acts of excessive force but did not record the entire interaction, according to the suit.
'Even in his relatively short tenure at NYPD, Mr. Donlon recognized what my long-tenured clients complained of: rampant, unchecked, dangerous and costly corruption run by Mayor Adams and his cronies,' said attorney Sarena Townsend, who is representing the four chiefs in their suit in a statement. 'I applaud Mr. Donlon for coming forward with these details, which will surely lead to vindication for him, and many others who suffered as victims of Mayor Adams' corruption.'
The suits are the latest allegation of corruption at City Hall.
In April, the federal judge overseeing the corruption case against Mayor Adams dismissed the charges and ruled the case cannot be brought back again. Adams had been indicted on charges related to bribery, wire fraud, conspiracy and soliciting campaign contributions from foreign nationals in exchange for political favors. He had pleaded not guilty to all charges and has repeatedly said he did nothing wrong.
The dismissal of the charges — a ruling sought by the Justice Department under Trump after the agency had pursued the charges during the Biden administration — coincided with the ramp up of immigration enforcement across the country, leading many critics and political opponents of the mayor to allege he cooperated with the Trump administration on removals in exchange for his own freedom.
Adams has also denied these claims, saying he and his administration only cooperated with federal authorities on criminal investigations — not civil enforcement.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Secretary LaRose releases modernized Election Official Manual
COLUMBUS — Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose announced on Aug. 7 the release of a revised, accessible version of the Ohio Election Official Manual, a statewide resource issued by the office annually with detailed guidance on the administration of Ohio elections. The updated manual is designed to be more user-friendly both for election officials and the general public. Improvements include simplified language, clearer explanations of complex processes and procedures, the use of checklists and charts to explain concepts, and expanded resources to help Ohio's 88 county boards of elections perform their duties. 'Election officials are on the front lines of democracy, and they deserve the best tools we can give them,' said LaRose. 'This updated manual makes it easier for boards of elections to do their jobs with clarity and confidence, while also empowering the public to better understand how Ohio elections are run. It's another step in making our elections more transparent and more trusted.' This initiative builds on Secretary LaRose's broader strategy to enhance election readiness and transparency. These initiatives include: * Ready for November – A comprehensive plan to ensure all counties are fully prepared for Election Day, including contingency planning, cybersecurity updates, and poll worker recruitment support. * Peer Mentorship Program – A program that pairs experienced election officials with newer staff to strengthen institutional knowledge and share best practices across the state. * Transparency Dashboards – Publicly available data tools on the Secretary of State's website that track voter registration updates, ballot returns, and other election metrics in real time. 'With each improvement, from readiness plans to mentorship to real-time data, we're helping Ohioans see what we see: a system that's well-run, constantly improving, and worthy of their trust,' LaRose added. The Ohio Election Official Manual is a critical resource that provides standardized guidance on election procedures, legal compliance, and administrative processes.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Several senior FBI leaders ousted without explanation, sources say
Several top FBI officials were ousted from their jobs this week, sources familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News, including the former acting director of the bureau who previously resisted efforts to compile a list of agents who worked on the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Sources tell ABC News that among those informed of their terminations are former acting FBI director Brian Driscoll, assistant director in charge of the Washington, D.C. Field office Steven Jensen, and agents Walter Giardina and Christopher Meyer. It does not appear that any were informed of the rationale behind their terminations, the sources said. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump expected to sign executive order putting pressure on big banks over 'politicized debanking'
President Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Thursday that ups his administration's scrutiny over whether big banks denied services to consumers and businesses based on political or religious grounds. The action calls for federal bank regulators to investigate if the decisions made by financial institutions to deny access to certain customers were 'politicized or unlawful debanking.' Regulators are also called to review their supervisory data for instances of unlawful debanking based on religion and refer such cases to the Attorney General. Institutions found to have encouraged politicized or unlawful debanking will face remedial actions, including fines or consent decrees, according to the order. The order also calls for bank regulators to strike a particular kind of risk assessment from their guidance and supervision efforts known as reputational risk. Two federal bank regulators — the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency — have already eliminated reputational risk as part of their bank examination programs. The Small Business Administration will also be tasked with requiring institutions to take efforts to reinstate customers previously denied services unlawfully. The order did not lay out further details for how the investigative efforts by regulators will unfold, including which lenders these agencies will choose to scrutinize first. The order is also another boon to crypto, which, during the Biden era, was flagged by regulators as a higher-risk industry for lenders. It also reflects how the president's own interests continue to shape policymaking this year. On Tuesday, President Trump claimed that the country's two largest banks — JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC) discriminated against him and other conservatives by denying them services. He cited his own personal experience as an example. "The banks discriminated against me very badly,' Trump said in a Tuesday morning interview with CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' The president is far from the only entity carrying the Trump name that has claimed denial of banking services. Earlier this year, the Trump Organization sued major credit card lender Capital One (COF) for allegedly debanking hundreds of its accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol in Washington, D.C. The bank has since said the lawsuit failed to include any facts to back the claim that the moves were politically motivated. For years, conservatives have claimed that US banks have denied accounts to certain customers for political reasons. Crypto companies and their executives have also claimed they have lost or were denied banking services; Coinbase Global executives have shared several accounts. Another criticism heard from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers is that banks can use debanking too aggressively as a legal and reputational risk-management tool when following the broad aim of preventing fraud, money laundering, terrorism, and other crimes. And that, critics have said, has led to incorrectly evicting or refusing customers service. Lawmakers have said that there have been thousands of debanking complaints from consumers in recent years. However, US lenders must follow guidance handed down by regulators that calls for lenders to assess customers based on specific risk criteria including reputational race, gender, religion,s and national origin. However, US lenders must follow guidance handed down by regulators that calls for lenders to assess customers based on specific risk criteria, including reputational risk. Arguably, that dynamic gives banks greater discretion when weighing whether customers signaling questionable behavior are too risky to bank. It also grants regulators wider authority to lay out what sort of activity lenders should pay closer attention to. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data