Prince Mashele endorses Helen Zille for mayor of Johannesburg
This comes after reports last month that Zille, who currently serves as the Democratic Alliance's (DA) federal council chairperson, was considering running for the mayoral post, following multiple requests to enter the race.
In an interview with Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh on the SMWX podcast, Mashele surprised many by stating that he would endorse Zille – despite not being a DA supporter – because of Johannesburg's current state under ANC leadership.
'If Helen Zille wins the contest to become the mayoral candidate of Johannesburg, I am going to do something I have never done in my life. I am going to publicly endorse her,' said Mashele.
'With a heavy heart. The way the ANC has destroyed Johannesburg… Johannesburg used to be the pride of Africa.'
Mashele was critical of former ANC mayor Parks Tau, now Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, saying Tau contributed to the city's urban decay.
'Helen Zille has a proven track record. She ran Cape Town as mayor, she did not destroy it. She ran the Western Cape as premier, she did not destroy it,' he said, pointing to Cape Town's thriving tourism and well-maintained infrastructure.
Mashele's scathing remarks extended to current Johannesburg Mayor Dada Morero, describing his tenure as marked by basic service delivery failures, including water outages in Sandton, a crumbling inner city, and growing urban neglect.
'How can you go without water in Sandton? The richest square mile in Africa without water. It can only happen under an incompetent called Dada Morero,' he said.
Despite mounting criticism, Morero has defended his administration, citing ongoing interventions since 2016 and the recent establishment of crisis response teams.
'We have now been given an opportunity to address those challenges, and we need time to do so,' Morero said in March at the opening of the Naledi Clinic in Soweto.The Presidency has also stepped in, with President Cyril Ramaphosa announcing the deployment of the Presidential Johannesburg Working Group (PJWG) to help the metro recover from what many are calling a crisis of governance.
While Zille has not confirmed her candidacy, she said in June that she was consulting with her family after being approached to run.
'I have been approached to put my hat in the ring for mayor. I am still considering it,' she said.
Her potential return to executive office has ignited debate across political circles, especially in light of Johannesburg's severe decline under ANC leadership and the DA's ongoing internal contestation for 2026 candidates.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
32 minutes ago
- The South African
Malema: 'EFF has never been in the pockets of criminals'
EFF leader Julius Malema firmly denied that criminals have captured the Economic Freedom Fighters. Speaking on Saturday at the party's 3rd Central Command Team meeting of the 3rd National People's Assembly in Bela-Bela, Limpopo, Malema said the EFF has consistently been at the forefront of demanding accountability from the state. The Central Command Team is the EFF's highest decision-making body between the National People's Assemblies. According to IOL , Malema criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa for allegedly failing to act on warnings from the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). He said the EFF called for an inquiry after NPA head Shamila Batohi claimed 'sinister forces' had captured the institution. 'It was the EFF that wrote to the president, demanding an inquiry into Batohi's claims. Instead of acting, he coerced her into withdrawing her remarks, calling it a misuse of language,' Malema said. Malema also pointed to the EFF's 2024 parliamentary motion to establish an ad hoc committee to investigate extortion rings targeting businesses and residents. He said the ANC, DA, and IFP, which govern the provinces worst hit by extortion, the Eastern Cape, Western Cape, and KwaZulu-Natal, rejected the proposal. 'Extortionists and criminal syndicates celebrated that day, as their political protection worked in their favour,' Malema said. Malema praised KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi for exposing the links between criminal cartels and political figures. 'It took Mkhwanazi breaking ranks for the truth the EFF has always spoken to finally be taken seriously,' he said. Malema reiterated that the EFF remains independent. 'We have never been and will never be in the pockets of criminals. When we gave other parties the chance to stand against crime, they refused,' he said. Malema reaffirmed his support for Mkhwanazi and said the EFF would welcome him to join the party if he loses his position in the SAPS. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Southern African Liberation Movements Summit tries to revive its members' declining fortunes
The annual summit of the six southern African liberation movements reveals why they haven't evolved. The 2025 Liberation Movements Summit provided insights into why the six southern African movements governing or co-governing their countries have struggled to evolve into normal, democratic political parties. From 25 to 28 July, leaders gathered in Johannesburg for solidarity, introspection and mutual learning under the theme 'Defending the Liberation Gains, Advancing Integrated Socio-Economic Development, Strengthening Solidarity for a Better Africa'. The six movements are South Africa's ANC, the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (Zanu-PF), Tanzania's Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), the Mozambique Liberation Front (Frelimo), the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), and Namibia's South West Africa People's Organisation (Swapo). The summit's announcement by the host party, the ANC, said: 'This critical gathering reaffirms the ideological foundations of the six southern African liberation movements… and their historical role in securing independence, dignity and development across the region. It also seeks to reassert the relevance of these movements in a rapidly shifting global order.' The movements defeated colonial rule and apartheid and 'implemented landmark policies on land reform, education, housing, infrastructure and social protection', it said. 'However, these gains now face erosion due to renewed imperial pressures, economic crises and attempts at neocolonial interference. The [summit] provides a united platform to confront these threats and consolidate progressive regional responses.' Renewal is a good thing. But is this club the right vehicle for renewal and transformation? So the downturns of the six parties in government were entirely attributed to external forces, with no mention of internal causes. However, during the conference itself, some leaders did acknowledge internal ills. ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said the movements' strategic imperatives now included defending the gains of liberation, which were 'under threat from internal erosion and external manipulation and interference', and confronting the reassertion of imperialism and geopolitical subversion. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa elaborated, saying the liberation movements had to 'contend with declining electoral support, shifting demographics, frustrated young people in our various countries, economic inequality and foreign interference'. He acknowledged a 'disconnect between our founding narratives and the lived realities of a new generation of young people' and admitted that 'many of the threats we face are internal', including corruption, patronage and the competition for public positions and resources. As a remedy, Ramaphosa said: 'We must institutionalise mechanisms for mutual accountability amongst our movements. We must find and hold each other to higher standards.' Namibian President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah echoed that sentiment, saying 'we must hold each other accountable as sister parties' to fight corruption. As far as one could tell, none of the other parties echoed such introspection. Renewal is a good thing. But is this club the right vehicle for renewal and transformation? Lack of democracy, for example, cannot be blamed on outsiders. Only two of the six countries governed by these parties, South Africa and Namibia, can be considered truly democratic. Tanzania's CCM-led regime has imprisoned leading opposition leader, Tundu Lissu, on spurious grounds. Under Frelimo, Mozambique violently suppressed opposition at last year's election and last week charged the main opposition presidential candidate, Venâncio Mondlane, with 'incitement to terrorism' for leading protests against those presidential polls. In general, most of these liberation movements' refusal to allow full democracy is the main reason they have not evolved into real political parties. In Zimbabwe, Zanu-PF has systematically suppressed and dismantled any opposition since independence in 1980. Angola's ruling MPLA has also systematically stifled any opposition. Largely because of such manoeuvres, those four liberation movements have remained in power since independence or liberation. Under strong regional pressure, Zanu-PF briefly admitted the opposition Movement for Democratic Change into a coalition government from 2009 to 2013. But it conceded no real power and, in 2013, won another dubious election outright. It has ruled solo since then. Even in South Africa – one of the movement's two genuine democracies – the ANC fell to under 40% of the vote in national elections in 2024 and had to form a government of national unity with the liberal DA as its main partner. In general, most of these liberation movements' refusal to allow full democracy is the main reason they have not evolved into real political parties. For some of the six, the liberation ideology this summit was designed to revive appears to include an attempt to maintain state control over as much of the economy as possible. That has been one of the main causes of economic failure, as public infrastructure such as railways and ports crumbles. For the six movements themselves, there may indeed have been benefits from the summit, not least in picking up tips on how to stay in power despite the odds, and assurances of mutual political support. But for the populations of the six countries, it is hard to see much benefit. It seems unlikely that Ramaphosa's proposed peer review mechanism will see the light of day. And if it does, even less chance it will hold any of the movements accountable – especially for suppressing political opposition. It would appear that the democratic deficit wasn't even mentioned at the summit. Rather ironically, Ramaphosa observed: 'History demands that we don't allow our legacies to be buried under the rubble of revolutionary nostalgia.' Indeed, that is a real danger. And it was revealing that this was billed as a summit of liberation movements – not 'former' liberation movements, as they have described themselves up to now. That change may suggest that these movements, facing growing opposition to their rules, need to assert their continued relevance. The liberation struggle deserves an honourable place in Africa's history. In the present, we need to move on. The struggle – for democracy, prosperity and equality – should indeed continue, but not through this vehicle. Its members mostly can't offer each other good examples of how to achieve that. Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa told the summit: 'We have a sacred duty and responsibility to retain power for the purpose of advancing the people's agenda. We should never allow ourselves to lose power.' That captured what appears to be the real purpose of this club – collaborating to stay in power. DM
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Here's why it might be difficult for Donald Trump to pardon Diddy
Two months after Diddy was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, reports suggested that US President Donald Trump may grant him a pardon. Recent updates indicate that the US President is re-evaluating his stance on the matter. Here's what the US President had to say regarding the potential pardon. In May 2025, US President Trump first suggested the possibility of pardoning Diddy. Although the rapper had escaped sex-trafficking and racketeering charges, he was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. During his statement at the Oval Office, Trump mentioned that he would look into the matter and that he would be objective. By late July 2025, a source from the administration revealed that Trump was 'seriously considering' a pardon for the rapper. This would have been exceptional news for the rapper and all of those who support him. It appears though that Trump may be reconsidering granting Diddy a pardon. Trump recently revealed that some of his previous interactions with Diddy have led him to rethink the pardon. During an interview with Newsmax on 1 August 2025, Trump shared that his relationship with Diddy had been amicable until the 2020 presidential election. This is what Trump had to say about the nature of his relationship with the rapper and where he stands regarding the pardon: I was very friendly with him. I got along with him great. Seemed like a nice guy, I didn't know him well. When I ran for office, he was very hostile. It's hard, we're human beings. We don't like to have things cloud our judgment, right? But when you knew someone and you were fine and then you run for office and he made some terrible statements. It's more difficult. Makes it more, I'm being honest, makes it more difficult to do. What are the statements that Diddy made that left a bad taste in Donald Trump's mouth, you ask? During an interview with Charlamagne tha God in October 2020, Diddy expressed his candid feelings concerning Trump's re-election. He emphasised the need to keep figures like Trump out of power, suggesting that white men should be removed from the political landscape. Judging by the interview, it was clear that Diddy was no fan of Trump's personally or in regard to his presidency. Given Diddy's outspoken criticism, it's understandable why Trump might hesitate to consider any form of clemency for the rapper. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
