Philippine flooding centre stage at Marcos state of nation speech
Addressing a joint session of Congress after days of rain that left at least 31 dead, Marcos repeated his recent warning that the nation faced a climate change-driven "new normal", while pledging to investigate publicly funded projects that had failed.
"Let's not pretend, the people know that these projects can breed corruption. Kickbacks ... for the boys," he said, citing houses that were "swept away" by the floods.
"Someone has to pay for the grave damage and corruption," he said, adding he would demand a full list of failed flood control projects and make it public.
After months dominated by a feud with his vice president that left many voters disillusioned, Marcos's speech leaned heavily into bread-and-butter concerns.
"The people feel a sense of defeat and dismay at the government, especially when it concerns basic services," he said, referencing disappointing mid-term election results in May.
"The lesson for us is very simple. We need to do better. We need to work faster."
Marcos spent much of his 70-minute speech unveiling promises for the second half of his six-year term – from 40,000 more classrooms to new power plants and free dialysis treatments – though he offered little by way of detail.
Notably absent was any explicit mention of the rising tensions with China over disputed areas of the South China Sea that figured heavily into last year's address.
After 12 months marked by violent clashes at sea and an increasingly close military relationship with the United States, Marcos said only that the country faced "new threats" to its sovereignty while adding "more allies who can help us in our time of need".
NO SHOWS
Numerous high-profile allies of Vice President Sara Duterte, whose would-be impeachment trial was scrapped by the Supreme Court on Friday, skipped Monday's address, including the president's senator sister Imee Marcos.
The feud between the Marcos and Duterte political dynasties loomed large over the May mid-terms that saw the vice president's camp outperform expectations.
The duo swept to power in 2022 in an alliance that began crumbling almost immediately.
Their feud exploded into open warfare this year with her impeachment and the subsequent arrest and transfer of her father, ex-president Rodrigo Duterte, to face charges at the International Criminal Court in The Hague over his deadly drug war.
The timelines of those two events coincided with a sharp dip in the president's polling numbers.
Marcos had publicly stated that he was against the impeachment while consistently maintaining he was powerless to intervene.
"NEW NORMAL"
Last week, the Philippine president for the first time blamed climate change for storms which are hitting the country harder and more frequently, saying Filipinos would need to learn how to adapt.
"This is not an extraordinary situation anymore ... This will be our lives no matter what we do," he told a cabinet briefing, adding the country should plan for the long-term in addressing natural disasters.
"This is the way it's going to be as far as we know for... many decades to come, so let's just prepare," he said.
Michael Henry Yusingco, a senior research fellow at the Ateneo de Manila University School of Government, on Monday praised Marcos's pledge to tackle corruption around flood control projects but warned that follow-through would be everything.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Prabowo's Indonesia draws opposition via cartoon pirates
CANBERRA: The lead up to Indonesia's Independence Day on Aug 17 is a colourful affair. Red and white blankets every surface and pole in the country ahead of celebrations. This year will mark an 80-year milestone – one the government isn't keen on sharing with a popular long-running anime TV series. One Piece is a classic for a reason, a tale of good people versus a draconian regime that rules with an iron fist and ostentatious decadence. The story follows Monkey D Luffy and fellow Straw Hat Pirates in a quest for treasure that would allow the gang to overthrow the evils of World Government. But in Indonesia, for anime fans of a particular political persuasion, the parallels with the increasingly centralised government led by President Prabowo Subianto are attractive. THE CLASH OF BANNERS And so, with Aug 17 looming, the flag under which Monkey and friends strive – a cartoon jolly roger wearing Monkey's straw hat – has become a symbol of dissent in Prabowo's Indonesia. It began slowly, with the cartoon flag appearing on the back of trucks and spreading widely online. Now, with the ubiquity of the Indonesian flag across the country this month, the appearance of the jolly roger displayed underneath the red and white has erupted into a culture war. 'The Indonesian flag is not a choice. It is a necessity. The Indonesian flag cannot be replaced,' Hasan Nasbi, head of the president's communications office, told local media on Monday. Protesters say that's not quite what is happening. The South China Morning Post published comments from one anonymous user who claimed 'The red-and-white flag is too sacred for us to raise right now, at a time when many people are still colonised by those in power.' The flag is 'the spirit of resistance against injustice'. It's a sentiment widely echoed online. POP CULTURE IN POLITICAL DISSENT Fandom of the mega-popular anime is not a prerequisite. Savvy internet users have become accustomed to pop culture references replacing explicit naming and shaming. Euphemisms for the country's government and leading political figures are a common feature of online dissent. China has seen Winnie-the-Pooh equated with Xi Jinping, for example. And in Indonesia, too, through the Joko Widodo period, 'Wakanda', the fictional country in which Marvel's 2018 hit Black Panther is based, became the name of choice for Indonesia in online discussions to critique moves that were strikingly similar to those made by the then president. As with all regulation, what 'counts' as violations and who gets to decide is slanted to favour those with power. It often reveals authorities to be deeply fearful of dissent. During Jokowi's consecutive terms, the controversial Information and Electronic Transactions Law was increasingly deployed against individuals the government accused of defamation and hate speech or displays of 'immorality'. A pandemic-era discussion about revising those laws ultimately fizzled, but by then the fear had set in anyway. Such deliberate online obfuscation has continued into the Prabowo era, suggesting it is simply now a feature of public discourse in Indonesia as long as dissent remains curtailed. PRABOWO'S STRUGGLES That pairs with another feature of the Prabowo era – the inability to ever let anything go. Prabowo's desire to be seen as a great unifier has been very successful in the parliament, with all parties now kissing the ring. This leaves the people as the sole source of opposition, and, despite a sizable win over his presidential challengers, Prabowo has found bringing the country to heel is much more difficult. Countrywide protests earlier this year clearly rattled the President. The protests, dubbed Indonesia Gelap (Dark Indonesia), focused on reforms to the military law, but soon spilled over to broader social issues including police violence and corruption. They were large, dramatic and, at times, violent. But they were also short-lived. For Prabowo, the threat lingers. He accused foreign interlopers and corruptors of bankrolling the movement during a speech at the Solidarity Party of Indonesia's conference last month. This was despite there being no large-scale demonstrations against his government for months. Which brings us back to One Piece and the cartoon jolly roger in the vicinity of Indonesia's national flag. Deputy House Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, Prabowo's right hand man and the closest we often get to what the president himself thinks, is scathing of the display. 'There is a coordinated attempt to divide the nation,' he told media on Friday. Police have warned communities across the country of crackdowns and white paint is at the ready if anyone thinks that cartoon murals are a better move than flags.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump spending clash splits Democrats on fighting or dealmaking
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Prominent Democrats are demanding party leaders take a harder line against US President Donald Trump. WASHINGTON – Democratic congressional leaders, locked out of power, see the upcoming government funding deadline as their best chance to strike deals in US President Donald Trump's Washington. Their increasingly restive left flank is itching for a fight. After six months of getting steamrolled by Mr Trump and the Republican Congress, prominent Democrats – including Senators Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker and Chris Murphy – are demanding party leaders take a harder line against Mr Trump as the president circumvents checks and balances and consolidates power. 'I'm not willing to be a helpmate on another one of Donald Trump's scams,' Ms Warren said last week. 'Do we really look that gullible?' The Democratic party is united on its goal: to leverage voter concerns about Mr Trump's economic and broader political agenda to win a majority in one – if not both – chambers of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. Democratic leaders have long insisted that the best way to do that is to present themselves as a moderating force, essentially the grown-ups in the room preaching stability over chaos. In that vein, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer focused the last week before the month-long August recess on Mr Trump's imposition of sweeping global tariffs, the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein matter, looming cuts to health care benefits for millions, and Mr Trump's self-enrichment with his family's crypto and other businesses – matters that Democrats consider to be winning issues for them. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore 81 primary schools to hold ballot for Phase 2C of Primary 1 registration Singapore Three people taken to hospital after fire in Punggol executive condominium Sport Young Lions and distance runner Soh Rui Yong out of SEA Games contingent Singapore Elderly man found dead in SingPost Centre stairwell could have been in confused state: Coroner Singapore Two workers died after being hit by flying gas cylinders in separate incidents in 2025 Singapore Man recruited victim to open bank account, forced him to drink urine after account was frozen But he also backed a bipartisan spending package without guarantees demanded by progressives that Republicans and Mr Trump will not try and delete some of the funding later on. 'If we don't stand as Democrats, we deserve to lose,' Mr Booker warned on the Senate floor as he complained some Democrats are too eager to make deals without adequate safeguards. Spending battle Mr Trump will need some Democratic support to overcome a Senate filibuster of spending Bills needed to keep the government open after Sept 30. He also may need Democrats' votes in the House, where fractious Republicans enjoy the narrowest of majorities. Mr Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries see the spending showdown as an opportunity to score some legislative victories. They have requested a meeting this week with their GOP counterparts and want, among other things, to avert cuts to Affordable Care Act subsidies set to take effect Jan 1, 2026, which would result in sharp increases in health insurance premiums for millions. 'You have the responsibility to govern for all Americans and work on a bipartisan basis to avert a painful, unnecessary shutdown at the end of September. Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many within your party are preparing to 'go it alone' and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' they wrote to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Ms Warren, breaking with party leaders, is urging Democrats to withhold their votes, arguing that Republicans have repeatedly broken deals and will not commit to keeping them in the future. The Massachussetts progressive and her allies specifically want to avoid a repeat of March, when Republicans muscled through a GOP-written spending package with Mr Schumer's reluctant acquiescence. Mr Schumer argued then a shutdown would have been far worse for Democratic priorities and undermined court challenges to Mr Trump's unilateral spending cuts. But his move fractured Democrats and prompted a fierce backlash from the left. Progressives were further incensed by a Republican-only vote in July clawing back billions for foreign aid and public broadcasting, the first of what could be several attempts to rescind already appropriated funding. Unlike the spending Bills, the so-called rescissions packages are not subject to a filibuster. Mr Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat who has built a strong social media following by tapping into the base's frustrations, argued Mr Trump could simply ignore them again and seek to rescind the money, or refuse to spend it. 'Republicans have told us that they're going to ask us to negotiate a budget and then they are going to stab us in the back the minute we walk out of the room,' he said. Public feud Mounting frustrations among Democrats spilled out on the Senate floor last week when Mr Booker lashed out at his more moderate colleagues and accused them 'complicity' with an authoritarian Mr Trump. 'It is time for Democrats to have a backbone. It is time for us to fight. It is time for us to draw lines!' he thundered. Mr Booker's comments were directed at Democrats' acceptance of police grant legislation without requiring Mr Trump to restore police aid withheld from Democratic-leaning states like Mr Booker's New Jersey. The tension spilled into the weekend, as Mr Schumer sought to cut a deal with Republicans and Mr Trump to win some concessions on spending in return for swift passage of some of Mr Trump's nominees. Mr Trump pulled the plug on the offer and told Republicans to go home for August. Ultimately, only six Democrats, independent Bernie Sanders and two Republicans voted against the spending package, which included funding for military construction, veterans, agriculture and other items. The 87-9 vote was a sign the vast bulk of Democrats are aligned with Mr Schumer and prepared to move ahead with bipartisan spending Bills even without guarantees Mr Trump will spend the money. Top Democratic appropriator Patty Murray, who supported the package, acknowledged concerns that Mr Trump and his budget chief Russ Vought will continue to act unilaterally to cut spending even if the Bills become law. But she does not see an easy fix. 'There is no magic bullet that will change that unfortunate reality,' she said last week. BLOOMBERG
CNA
10 hours ago
- CNA
India's Modi to visit China for first time in 7 years as tensions with US rise
NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday (Aug 6), in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the United States rise. Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation that begins on Aug 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the US faces its most serious crisis in years after President Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbours are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from members, which include India, of the BRICS group for "aligning themselves with anti-American policies". Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of US efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. Trump's top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions.
