logo
Children's Books: Maggie O'Farrell's ‘The Boy Who Lost His Spark'

Children's Books: Maggie O'Farrell's ‘The Boy Who Lost His Spark'

There comes a delicate point in the life of a young person, usually around puberty, when the enchantment of childhood becomes harder to conjure. The Hundred Acre Wood, Neverland, Narnia and even Hogwarts can no longer easily be entered, and the change can leave an imaginative child feeling bereft. The novelist Maggie O'Farrell ('Hamnet') touches on this painful phase in her third book for children, 'The Boy Who Lost His Spark,' a lovely read-aloud for children ages 5-9. Young Jem has had to move with his mother and little sister from the city to a rural village for reasons unspecified. Homesick and unhappy, the boy is irritated by his sister's new belief in mischievous magical creatures called noukas. Poor Jem is on that delicate developmental cusp: Young enough to think that the bark of a tree resembles 'the overlapping scales of a sea monster' yet old enough to scoff at the fancies of little girls. But it's hard to remain scornful when strange and wondrous things begin to happen, as Jem discovers in this beautifully written tale illustrated by Daniela Jaglenka Terrazzini.
An old rat and a young owl return in a second story of unlikely friendship in 'Orris and Timble: Lost and Found,' by Kate DiCamillo. Luminous soft-edged illustrations by Carmen Mok set off this careful story of mixed signals, hurt feelings and tender reconciliation for children ages 5-8 (for younger ones too, if an adult reads it out loud). Every night, Timble visits Orris in the barn where he lives, and every night the well-read rat tells the owl a story. One evening, moved by a particular tale of devotion, Timble promises that he will always return to his friend. In the same conversation, he wonders whether it's possible to fly to the moon or stars. When Timble fails to turn up the next night and the next, Orris is so stung by the betrayal that he decides to turn his back on his friend, in this second volume of a planned easy-reader trilogy.
In drawings of dazzling intricacy, the illustrator Henry Cole traces the flourishing of a single tree in 'Mighty: The Story of an Oak Tree Ecosystem' a picture book for children ages 4-8. You might think there is nothing more boring than watching a tree grow—unless maybe it's watching paint dry—but Mr. Cole finds tiny elements of visual drama that, combined with his well-chosen text, will carry young readers through the tree's long progress from acorn to seedling to sapling and beyond. In the artwork, children will see how small accidents of fate allow new life to take root—and to take flight, for the mighty oak hosts all sorts of other creatures: insects that eat its blossoms, squirrels that eat its acorns and humans who sit in its shade.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When a democratic medium documented a democratic nation
When a democratic medium documented a democratic nation

Boston Globe

time5 days ago

  • Boston Globe

When a democratic medium documented a democratic nation

Nearly two centuries later, it's impossible to imagine the transformative effect the invention of photography had. As the medium grew and developed, it allowed for an unprecedented, and unprecedentedly varied, documentation of the growth and development of the nation that sustained it. 'The New Art' is drawn from a promised gift to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the William L. Schaeffer Collection. The show runs at the Met through July 20. Advertisement Anonymous, "Roller Skate and Boot," 1860s. Metropolitan Museum of Art It's abundant and abundantly miscellaneous, though portraits very much predominate. What people most wanted to see was themselves and other people. If anything, that was even truer then than now, since accessible (and affordable) portraiture was a phenomenal novelty. In no other genre did this democratic medium democratize more. As Douglass also said in that speech, 'The farmer boy gets an iron shoe for his horse, and metallic picture for himself at the same time, and at the same price.' Advertisement Installation view of "The New Art: American Photography, 1839–1910." Photo by Eugenia Tinsley, Courtesy of The Met But among the 275 photographs on display there are also still lifes, landscapes, nature studies, charming bits of bizarrerie. The hats on a quartet of sorority sisters from around 1870 are millinery a la Hogwarts. The aplomb of a young man posing with a rooster is positively monarchical. Pet squirrels appear not once but twice. In one of the images, the animal's tail is blurred, thanks to the long exposure times required by the daguerreotype process. Anonymous, "Studio Photographer at Work," c. 1855. Metropolitan Museum of Art Of special interest are multiple examples of the medium taking itself for its subject. There are images of photographic studios, of photographers at work, of people holding photographs. Are they more documentation or celebration? Clearly, it didn't take long for photography to enter the realm of meta and reflexivity. That, too, was part of the medium's newness, extending to how, in its self-awareness and capacity for fantastical juxtaposition, photography foreshadowed Surrealism. Along with photographs, 'The New Art' includes three vintage cameras and three stereopticons. Greeting visitors at the entrance to the show is a studio camera from the 1870s. A handsome object of wood, brass, and glass, it's bigger than two breadboxes. In the last gallery, there's a stereoscopic camera from the 1880s. With its pair of small protruding lenses, it could be the stationary great-great-great-grandfather of the title character in Pixar's Installation view of "The New Art: American Photography, 1839–1910." Photo by Eugenia Tinsley, Courtesy of The Met The cameras are a reminder that the title of the exhibition could just as well be 'The New Technology.' A camera, after all, is a machine as a paintbrush, say, or pencil is not. It was this piece of machinery that enabled the newness of this new art. Advertisement The show's abundance makes it all the more important that it be mounted with skill and imagination, which it is. The exhibition is organized by photographic format, which effectively means it's organized chronologically, as a succession of new formats advanced the medium. They included daguerreotypes, tintypes (made of iron, not tin), ambrotypes, cyanotypes, salted paper prints, albumen prints, platinum prints, and gelatin silver prints, which would dominate 20th-century photography. Anonymous, "748. Schoolmaster Hill Tobogganing, Franklin Park, Roxbury, Massachusetts," 1905. Metropolitan Museum of Art One of the fascinations of 'The New Art' is the interplay of format and subject. Published by E. & H. T. Anthony, "Specimens of New York Bill Posting, No. 897," from the series "Anthony's Stereoscopic Views," 1863. Metropolitan Museum of Art Religiosity does come through in several portraits of dead infants and children. In an era when the depredations of infectious disease were a given, such images weren't seen as morbid. That absence of morbidity underscores how different then was from now. Much more frequent are photographs that look ahead (more newness): a roller skate strapped to a boot, a wall of ads (both from the 1860s), locomotives; a Ferris wheel. Or there's the way four views of Niagara Falls, one of them showing a tightrope walker crossing above, contrast with an 1897 platinum print of a high-power line being raised there. Famous events are recorded — the California Gold Rush, the Civil War — but daily life and everyday people are much more prominent here. A few celebrated photographic names appear: Advertisement Carleton E. Watkins, "View on the Columbia River, from the O.R.R., Cascades, No. 1286," from the series 'Pacific Coast,' 1867. Metropolitan Museum of Art Yet the vast majority of photographers are either little remembered or simply unknown. Anonymity, in a way, is fitting. Again and again, what we see here — not that this was the photographers' intent — is the rendering of what was common then becoming uncommon in the eyes of posterity. Posterity is, of course, just a fancy way of saying 'us,' 'now,' and, yes, 'new.' THE NEW ART: American Photography, 1839-1910 At Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 Fifth Ave., New York, through July 20. 212-535-7710, Mark Feeney can be reached at

Jason Isaacs approves of Johnny Flynn casting as Lucius Malfoy in 'Harry Potter' series: 'Just please don't make him sing'
Jason Isaacs approves of Johnny Flynn casting as Lucius Malfoy in 'Harry Potter' series: 'Just please don't make him sing'

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Jason Isaacs approves of Johnny Flynn casting as Lucius Malfoy in 'Harry Potter' series: 'Just please don't make him sing'

The big-screen version of the villainous Lucius Malfoy has spoken. Jason Isaacs, who portrayed the wizard in several films based on J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter saga, approves of Johnny Flynn being cast in the role of the father of Draco Malfoy in the upcoming TV adaptation for HBO. A fantastic actor, a lovely man and, irritatingly, a rather brilliant musician too. Couldn't have handed the snake-topped baton on to anyone better. Just please don't make him sing…#HarryPotter #JohnnyFlynn#KillTheElfEarly — Jason Isaacs (@jasonsfolly) June 9, 2025 "A fantastic actor, a lovely man and, irritatingly, a rather brilliant musician too," Isaacs posted Monday on X. "Couldn't have handed the snake-topped baton on to anyone better. Just please don't make him sing...." The actor is known for starring in the Netflix series Lovesick, which aired from 2014 to 2018, and for the 2020 movie Stardust, in which he portrayed the late David Bowie. Flynn also appeared in the 2020 version of Emma. In the streamer's 2024 drama series Ripley, he played the ill-fated Dickie Greenleaf. As Isaacs noted, Flynn is a singer and songwriter who's released several albums and soundtracks. The younger actor is one of more than a dozen cast members headed to Hogwarts, following the phenomenal success of the movies and books following the adventures of the boy wizard and his friends attending a school of magic. Isaacs has said that he thinks he will be but a memory, if anything at all, once the new show has debuted. "I have to say, I'll milk this, because this time next year, there's gonna be another Lucius Malfoy, and he's gonna be fantastic, and I'll be long forgotten," he said in April on the Awards Chatter podcast. "So I am savoring every round of applause I get." He said he wasn't looking for compliments, but being realistic. "I'm just saying, they are making the TV series, and it will be brilliant," Isaacs said. "And I will be — just like I'm now last season's White Lotus actor — I will be the [previous] iteration of Lucius Malfoy, and that's fine by me. I've had a good run." While the cast includes other showbiz veterans, such as John Lithgow, Janet McTeer, and Nick Frost, it also features several newcomers: Dominic McLaughlin, Arabella Stanton, and Alastair Stout will play Harry and his closest friends Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly

HBO's ‘Harry Potter' series reportedly casts Harry, Ron, Hermione
HBO's ‘Harry Potter' series reportedly casts Harry, Ron, Hermione

American Military News

time5 days ago

  • American Military News

HBO's ‘Harry Potter' series reportedly casts Harry, Ron, Hermione

The spell has been cast, and so too have Harry, Ron and Hermione in HBO's new 'Harry Potter' series. Dominic McLaughlin will sport the lightning bolt scar as the titular chosen wizard, while Arabella Stanton — who recently starred as Matilda in the West End's production of 'Matilda: The Musical' — and Alastair Stout will round out the trio as Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, respectively, Variety reports. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint were the first actors to play the magical roles, across eight films from 2001 to 2011. 'The talent of these three unique actors is wonderful to behold, and we cannot wait for the world to witness their magic together onscreen,' showrunner Francesca Gardiner and director-executive producer Mark Mylod said in a statement to the outlet. 'We would like to thank all the tens of thousands of children who auditioned.' Variety reports that over 30,000 hopefuls tossed their sorting hats in the ring since the fall. Also recently announced were the castings of John Lithgow as Headmaster Albus Dumbledore, Janet McTeer as Minerva McGonagall, Paapa Essiedu as Severus Snape and Nick Frost as Rubeus Hagrid. The Hollywood Reporter first broke news of the show, based on J.K. Rowling's hit children's fantasy books, in early 2021. The show is expected to debut next year, with filming slated for this summer. The network has already promised 'a faithful adaptation of the beloved 'Harry Potter' books.' In April 2023, Bloomberg reported that Warner Bros. Discovery was 'close to a deal' enabling them to adapt each of the seven books for the small screen. Rowling's name in recent years has been perhaps more entwined with her anti-transgender political views than the Hogwarts-set tale. ___ © 2025 New York Daily News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store