logo
GB Group PLC (GBGPF) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Growth Amidst Challenges

GB Group PLC (GBGPF) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Growth Amidst Challenges

Yahooa day ago

Release Date: June 10, 2025
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
GB Group PLC (GBGPF) reported a revenue increase of 3% on a constant currency basis, indicating growth despite challenging macroeconomic conditions.
The company achieved a 9.5% increase in adjusted operating profit, with margins expanding to 23.7%, showcasing improved operational efficiency.
Cash conversion remained strong at 91.3%, allowing GB Group PLC (GBGPF) to reduce net debt by over 32 million pounds year on year.
The launch of GBG Go, an identity orchestration platform, has already signed customers in key regions and built a strong pipeline, indicating positive market reception.
The company maintained a high level of repeatable revenue streams, with 95% of revenue coming from these sources, ensuring stability and predictability in income.
Revenue growth was slightly below initial expectations, reflecting ongoing challenges in certain market sectors.
The fraud segment experienced a 4% decline in revenue on a constant currency basis, primarily due to timing differences in revenue recognition.
The Americas identity business showed flat performance, indicating ongoing challenges in this region despite operational improvements.
The company anticipates a similar level of exceptional costs in FY26 as it continues transformation initiatives, which may impact short-term profitability.
There is a potential headwind from FX translation expected to affect reported growth in FY26, which could impact financial performance.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with GBGPF.
Q: Can you provide more details on the strategic review of global fraud solutions and the decision-making process? Also, how is the competitive landscape in the US changing, and what are the pricing dynamics across your products, particularly in the Americas? A: We evaluated various options for our global fraud solutions and decided to structure it as a single global business, focusing on geographic expansion and leveraging our tier-one customer base. In the US, we are focusing on our execution rather than the competition, targeting areas where we have a strong product-market fit. Regarding pricing, we have been proactive, deploying pricing experts to manage significant customer negotiations and renewals, which has helped maintain our gross margin. (Respondent: CEO and CFO)
Q: What are the right sectors for GBG in the US, and how are you managing the transition to a subscription model? Also, how is GBG Go currently priced? A: Our right-to-win sectors include businesses that value global coverage, such as gaming operators. The transition to a subscription model has seen little pushback, as it aligns with market standards. GBG Go is priced with a platform fee and customization based on customer needs, ensuring a productive conversation around their requirements. (Respondent: CEO and CFO)
Q: Can you explain the slowdown in momentum in the second half of the year and the outlook for future growth? A: The second half growth was slower due to lapping a strong Q4 and some customer project volumes in identity. However, we are confident in the underlying momentum for FY26, expecting growth to be second-half weighted. We are focused on building growth levers into the business, and the acceleration in growth expected by analysts aligns with our outlook. (Respondent: CFO)
Q: How are you managing the risk of customer churn with the transition to new strategic products and the introduction of GBG Go? A: GBG Go was developed based on customer feedback, and we anticipate uplift potential rather than churn risk. The platform offers more value, allowing customers to grow with it, which should enhance net revenue retention (NRR). We are focused on ensuring customers receive the best possible value from the platform. (Respondent: CEO and CFO)
Q: What is the strategy behind the move from AIM to the main market, and how will it impact your investor base? A: The move to the main market is intended to increase access to broader pools of capital. We are considering how to make the transition seamless, learning from others who have made similar moves. We have capital optionality, which could be used to address any overhang from the transition. (Respondent: CFO)
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU Confirms Further One-Year Delay to Bank Trading Desk Rules
EU Confirms Further One-Year Delay to Bank Trading Desk Rules

Wall Street Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

EU Confirms Further One-Year Delay to Bank Trading Desk Rules

The European Union confirmed the delay by one more year of tougher global rules for banks' trading businesses. The bloc is seeking to level the playing field for European lenders amid U.S. President Trump's deregulation push. The region is home to BNP Paribas and Deutsche Bank, whose investment-bank trading desks could stand at a disadvantage if they have to comply with the rules ahead of their competitors across the Atlantic.

‘Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE
‘Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE

A lack of liquidity due to a relatively low appetite for investment in the UK is the main factor behind the decline of the London Stock Exchange (LSE), according to a commercial growth expert. Speaking on an episode of GlobalData's Instant Insights podcast, Carrie Osman, founder and CEO of growth consultancy Cruxy, suggested there are a range of factors behind companies choosing to list elsewhere or delisting, including some structural, but that, in her view, liquidity is the main issue. 'It doesn't have the liquidity, it doesn't have the buoyancy, and it doesn't, quite frankly, attract the most innovative technologies to list in London because of the fact that there doesn't seem to be the appetite from an investment pool to provide the liquidity that obviously some of these founders or private equity firms are looking for,' Osman said. 'Ultimately, you're looking for people to back your concept or idea, and you're looking for them to believe in that with their money to buy shares in your company and say, 'Yes, I believe that you're going to make me a lot of money. Let's go long here.' I was looking at some facts, and I thought it's very interesting that, for example, in the UK, about 23% of adults have stocks and shares. When we compare that to the US, it's 62%.' Osman was speaking following the announcement that Qualcomm has acquired UK-based semiconductor company Alphawave Semi, resulting in another high-profile departure from the LSE. She pointed to that deal as just one example of the challenges facing the LSE but noted that it wasn't just the UK exchange facing such issues. 'When you look at Europe as a whole, I think [there are] 183 European listings, and only about 15% of those are listed in their home turf,' she said. 'So, I think it probably is kind of far and wide when you look at Europe as a whole.' Osman believes the lesser culture for investing in the UK compared to the US – where individuals are exposed to investing through the 401(k) retirement savings plan – is limiting the potential of the LSE. 'How could you encourage people to kind of play an active role in the market?' she said. 'Maybe teach them about the market, teach them about stocks, teach them about trading. And then, of course, maybe there are ways that we could use tax incentives to encourage either companies or, of course, employees to be able to feel like they can invest in the markets without feeling like it's so much of a risk.' 'It always feels like it's less of a risk to just stick your money in an ISA and fingers crossed the Bank of England doesn't reduce the rate too much. That was how I was brought up. I think it would be amazing to think that there's a way to encourage more slight risk taking but with a bit of a support layer there so that people feel they can invest in our country and invest in some of our great assets.' Osman also pointed to the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES) as a means of encouraging investment. Per the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, 'PISCES is a new type of private stock market that will give investors more opportunities to buy stakes in growing companies.' 'If I own shares in a company, I can trade those shares without listing it publicly, so that there'll be these kind of trading windows,' Osman explained. 'So, I can trade those shares, and an asset manager can buy them all. But the thing that concerns me about that is that it's only secondaries, so it's only certain people they decide can do that, who are professional investors, whatever that means. 'And who decides the price? Is this just regulation? All the positive consequences, but it ends up with a lot of regulation on regulation, and it ends up with a lot of complexity? I'm worried that that could end up being a lot of positive intent, but maybe it doesn't lead to that outcome of driving liquidity that they would hope.' "'Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE" was originally created and published by Investment Monitor, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Europe's Nuclear Ambitions Face €241 Billion Funding Challenge
Europe's Nuclear Ambitions Face €241 Billion Funding Challenge

Bloomberg

time17 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Europe's Nuclear Ambitions Face €241 Billion Funding Challenge

The European Union's ambition to scale up nuclear energy as part of its 2050 climate neutrality goal will cost €241 billion ($280 billion), posing funding challenges, according to a draft document. More than four-fifths of investment under that base-case scenario would go on building new reactors, taking the bloc's capacity to 109 gigawatts by 2050, according to a draft of the European Commission's Nuclear Illustrative Program seen by Bloomberg News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store