Driver who killed father and injured son, 6, sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash
Peter Agius sent 44 Snapchats while driving just 12km at 100km/h down a busy Victorian country road in early 2023.
He received 41 replies, including one 20 seconds before the deadly crash.
His victim, Adam Sutton, had just picked up his six-year-old son from school when their car was struck by Agius's vehicle in January 2023.
Sutton died at the scene while his son was taken to hospital with critical injuries. The boy was left with a permanent brain injury.
County Court judge Kevin Doyle labelled Agius's offending as 'extreme inattention' as he jailed him on Thursday for at least six years.
'A life was lost and a young child's life has been damaged by your actions,' the judge told Agius, aged 23, who cried upon learning his fate.
Agius had fought the two charges – of culpable driving causing death and negligently causing serious injury – during a jury trial in regional Victoria.
He claimed to have dropped his sunglasses while driving and looked down to pick them up, when the crash occurred.
His lawyers argued Agius should be convicted of dangerous driving causing death and serious injury, not the more serious charges.
But prosecutors argued Agius was not paying attention to the road because he was sending and receiving dozens of Snapchat messages while driving, which was grossly negligent behaviour.
Analysis of Agius's phone revealed he sent and received 85 Snapchat messages while driving about 12km from his worksite to the crash scene at the intersection of Traralgon-Maffra and Farmers roads in Glengarry.
A jury ultimately convicted Agius of the culpable and negligent driving charges in April 2025.
The judge on Thursday said Agius was 'an accident waiting to happen' and he would have seen Sutton waiting to turn right if he was paying attention.
'The duty of every driver is to pay proper attention to the road – you didn't do that,' he said.
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Agius had a history of dangerous driving, including a fine and loss of licence for dangerous driving while being pursued by police in 2022.
In 2020, he was ordered to undertake a road trauma awareness course for careless driving. In February 2024, he was caught driving while on bail for the offending which caused Sutton's death, despite having been banned.
'Twice before this catastrophic collision, you had engaged in incredibly stupid driving offences,' the judge said.
'You should have understood the basic duties of driving from these experiences, but you did not.'
Sutton's family and friends told the court he was 'deeply loved as a husband, father, son, brother and friend to many people', Doyle said.
Leanne Sutton said 1,000 people attended her son's funeral, with 2,000 watching online, and his death had left 'an enormous void' in the lives of all who knew him.
His father, Ray Sutton, said the pain and distress caused by Adam's death was 'indescribable' and not a day went by that he did not think about 'the life sentence we've been given'.
Agius was jailed for a maximum of nine years and eight months. He has served 122 days of that sentence and will be eligible for parole after serving six years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘No clear explanation': businesses reliant on Meta struggle in the wake of wrongful suspensions
This time of the year is typically the busy booking season for Sam Enticknap, a makeup artist based in Margaret River, Western Australia. But the phone has stopped ringing since her Instagram account, which had 48,000 followers, was suspended without notice by Meta three weeks ago. 'I received a horrible email saying a reference to child sexual exploitation content, which obviously was quite traumatic to see,' she said. 'Saying my Instagram accounts have been disabled with just no clear explanation.' Enticknap estimates that, as a result of her account being wrongly suspended, she has lost 80% of the bookings she otherwise would have leading into the busy wedding season in Margaret River. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'A lot of people come through Instagram, they find hashtags and they find word of mouth, and obviously through other businesses that always tag us,' she said. Enticknap said it made her realise how reliant she was on Meta for business. She said she lost two Instagram accounts and a Facebook account as a result of the permanent suspension, and said attempts to contact the company to have the ban appealed had resulted in a 'dead end'. She said she was not alone, citing another Western Australian business – which sells artificial flowers – which had been suspended from Meta platforms and received the same reference to child sexual exploitation. 'My friend who has another successful makeup business, she went down the week after me, but she's managed to get her account back,' Enticknap said. Incorrect account suspensions on social media platforms are not a new phenomenon. Often when Meta is asked by media about an account, it is later restored. However, something changed in July. A flood of emails were sent to journalists from people all over the world saying that, without warning, their Facebook and Instagram accounts had been suspended. Many were told – erroneously – by Meta that their accounts had been suspended for breaching community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity. Users report Meta has typically been unresponsive to their pleas for assistance, often with standardised responses to requests for review, almost all of which have been rejected. There are petitions with tens of thousands of signatures, a subreddit devoted to people who have had their accounts disabled and talk of a class action against Meta over the bans. From around a dozen emails received in the past two weeks, Guardian Australia has reported five accounts – including Enticknap's to Meta, which said it had internally escalated the investigation of those accounts. Media reporting of the plight of businesses struggling as a result of their Instagram ban has led to many of those accounts being restored. But the company claims there has not been an increase in incorrect account suspension, and the volume of users complaining was not indicative of new targeting or over-enforcement. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we've made a mistake,' a spokesperson for Meta said. Meta is reliant on a mix of human reports and automation to find and remove accounts in breach of its rules. The company publishes data on how many accounts it removes – and data on how many it subsequently restores – in its quarterly community standards enforcement report. However, the latest report only covers to the end of March, so it can't yet be judged whether the company has had a significant uptick in removed accounts or appeals. For Enticknap, the suspension carries an emotional weight. Her father died this year, and the photos and messages her father uploaded to Facebook cannot be accessed. 'I've tried to message and just say: 'Can I just get my data? Can I just get that? Shut me down, but let me get those pictures back',' she said. 'But nothing. I've not had any reply.'
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Footy boss lashes back at the NRL over an 'unfair' punishment which left one of his club's key members 'struggling'
Ivan Cleary has clapped back at the NRL after the league handed down a heavy punishment to the Penrith Panthers after one of the club's trainers was involved in a controversial incident in Round 22. Trainer Corey Bocking found himself under scrutiny after he appeared to run in front of Gold Coast Titans star Jayden Campbell as the fullback attempted to take a kick for goal. Campbell missed the set shot, with the Panthers rallying late in the match. Nathan Cleary kicked a two-point penalty in the 79th minute to send the game to a golden point tiebreaker Blaize Talagi crossed over the white wash in the 82nd minute to keep the Panthers' eight-match winning streak alive. But the talking point from the match was Bocking's decision to run back in front of Campbell while he was taking a kick. While the Panthers are adamant the incident was an accident, the league handed a proposed five-match ban to Bocking and slapped the club with a prospective $50,000 fine. The severity of the punishment takes into account the Panthers' rap sheet, which includes six other indiscretions involving trainers. Shane Elford was the most recent to cop a fine, with the trainer being slapped with a $10,000 penalty after squirting water on a ball during a clash against North Queensland. Cleary, though, claimed the penalty on Bocking was unfair. 'I think the punishment is pretty heavy,' the four-time premiership-winning coach explained. On Bocking, he added: 'I think his suspension is the biggest of anyone in the NRL this year. I think it's a bit harsh to come and say that his penalty is based on other things. 'He's struggling, has been right from the time it happened. 'We kind of try to temper that with banter, which he takes in good nature. 'But yeah, he's struggling. He cares about his job and understands that he made a mistake and it's become a big deal. 'The last thing he would want is any excess attention, that's his nature. You can see clearly that he was embarrassed and apologised. 'I just think it's harsh and I think it's a little unfair.' Cleary also took responsibility for the trainer's decision to run across the pitch. 'It was clearly a mistake,' Cleary added. 'His job is to stay with the team after the goal has been kicked. 'The only reason why he ran that line is because I changed a sub. If anyone is to blame, it's me - that is the truth.' The Panthers have stated that Bocking was running to the bench to alert the Penrith dugout of a substitution when the incident took place. Penrith will have five days to respond to the breach notice. Speaking on the heavy sanctions, NRL CEO Andrew Abdo explained that it was important for the NRL to take into account other actions of Panthers coaches in recent times in their sanctions. '(Penrith) have an opportunity to respond to the breach notice but it's important to note there have been six separate incidents involving Penrith Panthers trainers since 2021,' Abdo said at the launch of the NRL's Indigenous Round. 'So whilst we treat every incident on its own merits, taking into account the fact there have been several indiscretions by trainers from that club, it was important for us to take the action that we've taken.' Lifeline 13 11 14
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Arsenic in the damper, campers driven off a cliff: the murky historical links of AACo, Australia's largest beef producer
Warning: This article contains historical records that use racist and offensive language, and descriptions of events that will be distressing to some readers. It also contains references to Indigenous Australians who have died In a bustling Newcastle suburb there is a large park where families gather under giant fig trees. Few know it is named after a man who killed Aboriginal people. Gregson park was given to the local council in 1889 by Jesse Gregson, then the head of one of the nation's most important enterprises, the Australian Agricultural Company. AACo, today worth about $830m, is still Australia's largest beef producer, with stations covering almost 1% of the nation's land mass. Its majority shareholder is the UK billionaire Joe Lewis, whose family own Tottenham Hotspur, followed by the Australian mining magnate Andrew Forrest and his ex-wife, Nicola Forrest. An investigation as part of Guardian Australia's the Descendants series has revealed the company's historical links with the dispossession, shooting and poisoning of Aboriginal people – through the exploits of Gregson before he joined the company, and others who helped establish its farming operations in the 19th century. The discoveries raise complex questions about how longstanding Australian companies can reckon with past harms. Before Gregson joined AACo in the 1870s, he managed a sheep station in central Queensland where he perpetrated a series of massacres that unleashed a bloody war. Gregson arrived at Rainworth station, 300km inland from Rockhampton, in June 1861. Queensland had become a self-governing colony two years earlier and the frontier was moving north, assisted by the notorious native police – contingents of Aboriginal troopers led by white officers tasked with protecting the livelihoods of settlers and punishing Aboriginal resistance. As Gregson and his workers approached the station, they were greeted by Aboriginal people. 'We had been met by blacks who made overtures of peace by attaching white feathers to our horses' bridles or anywhere they could stick them,' the pastoralist wrote in his memoirs. 'As soon as the drays reached the camp I gave the blacks to understand that they must keep clear which they did good humouredly enough.' The next month he and the native police went looking for some missing sheep, finding them on the side of a ridge with a Gayiri tribe. They opened fire. Gregson describes the encounter as a 'brush' but native police records show at least four Gayiri people were shot. Months later, on the property next to Gregson's, the Gayiri responded by killing 19 men, women and children – including the Victorian sheep farmer Horatio Wills, the father of Australian rules football co-founder Tom Wills. It was Queensland's largest massacre of white settlers by Aboriginal people. Gregson assembled a group of settlers to track those he believed to be responsible. Finding them within days, they shot the sleeping tribe, killing at least 30. More reprisals would follow, led by native police and vigilantes, wiping out about 300 Aboriginal people. There are various theories about what provoked the Wills massacre but the commonly held view among historians, Indigenous knowledge holders and Wills' descendants is that the encounter with Gregson and the native police was a tipping point. It is believed that the Gayiri thought Horatio Wills was Gregson's brother, and therefore an appropriate target for retribution. About a decade later Gregson moved to Newcastle in New South Wales to take up the position of superintendent of AACo. He remains the company's longest-serving superintendent, holding the position for 30 years and wrote one of the first histories of the company. Darryl Black, a Bidjara and Ghungalu man from central Queensland who learnt of the massacres from his father, said Gregson 'wasn't a very good person at all'. He described Gregson's appointment to the prestigious company as his 'reward' for opening up the region to farming and grazing. Founded in 1824, AACo is the oldest continuously operating company in Australia. It was established by an act of British parliament when a handful of UK politicians, banking directors and business leaders were granted 1m acres of land around Port Stephens to raise sheep for fleece to be sold on the London market. The Worimi historian John Maynard wrote that the company's arrival on his ancestors' country at a time when his people were being ravaged by violence and disease was both a lifeline and 'another means of enforced organised brutality'. The company employed Aboriginal people as stockmen, sailors, constables and domestic workers. When AACo experienced convict labour shortages, the company's records show that Aboriginal workers helped fill the gap and were an essential part of its success. Historical reports link the company to at least two shooting attacks on Aboriginal people near Newcastle in the Hunter Valley region, in 1830 and 1835, in retaliation for the spearing of shepherds and livestock. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In the later encounter, according to a 1922 newspaper article, soldiers retained by AACo joined local vigilantes in tracking an Aboriginal group who had speared five shepherds. The soldiers, fearing ambush, stopped before the rest of the group fired on the sleeping camp at a cliff's edge – but according to the report later re-engaged to hunt down survivors. 'Maddened with fear under the gunfire they broke hither and thither in vain attempts to escape,' the article says of the clifftop encounter. 'Panic stricken they turned to the cliff edge and sprang into space.' About the same time, the same article claims that a group of convicts employed on an AACo station poisoned a group of Aboriginal people in retaliation for raids on cattle, by giving them damper laced with arsenic. It says they 'lay down and died all around'. The modern-day suburb of Belbora (from the Worimi Baal Bora) is said to be named after the tragedy, meaning 'a place to be shunned'. AACo eventually sold its NSW properties and moved into cattle production. Today it holds 7m hectares across the Northern Territory and Queensland, including two properties within an hour of Gregson's former station. An AACo spokesperson told Guardian Australia: 'We won't and can't comment on historical matters, especially given we don't have access to records from the time.' Most of the company's records, dating back to 1824, are held at the Australian National University. Last year, to mark its 200th anniversary, the company held an exhibition showcasing its history through archival photos, maps, drawings and papers held at the university. The exhibition's section on Aboriginal history said the Worimi people had been largely displaced by cedar getters (convicts who harvested timber) before AACo was established, but said the company 'would also have displaced some of the local Worimi'. James Fitzgerald, a legal consultant for the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said companies had an obligation to confront the 'evils of the past'. 'Just creeping along as though nothing happened is moral cowardice, particularly when it's an enterprise that's making money off dispossession,' he said. 'The more a company's wealth is built on that sort of dispossession, I would have thought, the greater its obligation to take account of that as a decent corporate citizen in 2025.' Fitzgerald said there were comparable cases where mining companies had made reparations through apologies, working with traditional owners to improve cultural heritage management, setting Indigenous employment targets or negotiating financial compensation. The AACo spokesperson said the company had built 'trusted relationships' with many traditional custodians across the properties managed. 'We recognise their culture and deep connection to Country and work with them to ensure we engage respectfully,' they said. Joe Lewis, through a spokesperson, declined to comment to Guardian Australia. Andrew and Nicola Forrest did not respond to questions. Fitzgerald said the 1992 Mabo verdict, which recognised Indigenous peoples' rights to their land, raised complex questions for Australian companies that had built their wealth on land taken from and cleared of Aboriginal people. 'If you keep pulling at the thread long enough, it implicates the entire basis of our sovereign state economy,' he said. 'We are all the beneficiaries of these actions in one way or another, whether as real property owners, shareholders or super fund members.' Indigenous Australians can call 13YARN on 13 92 76 for information and crisis support; or call Lifeline on 13 11 14, Mensline on 1300 789 978 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 Lorena Allam is a professor at the Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous research at the University of Technology Sydney
