logo
Healthy babies born in Britain after scientists used DNA from three people to avoid genetic disease

Healthy babies born in Britain after scientists used DNA from three people to avoid genetic disease

CNN16-07-2025
Eight healthy babies were born in Britain with the help of an experimental technique that uses DNA from three people to help mothers avoid passing devastating rare diseases to their children, researchers reported Wednesday.
Most DNA is found in the nucleus of our cells, and it's that genetic material — some inherited from mom, some from dad — that makes us who we are. But there's also some DNA outside of the cell's nucleus, in structures called mitochondria. Dangerous mutations there can cause a range of diseases in children that can lead to muscle weakness, seizures, developmental delays, major organ failure and death.
Testing during the in vitro fertilization process can usually identify whether these mutations are present. But in rare cases, it's not clear.
Researchers have been developing a technique that tries to avoid the problem by using the healthy mitochondria from a donor egg. They reported in 2023 that the first babies had been born using this method, where scientists take genetic material from the mother's egg or embryo, which is then transferred into a donor egg or embryo that has healthy mitochondria but the rest of its key DNA removed.
The latest research 'marks an important milestone,' said Dr. Zev Williams, who directs the Columbia University Fertility Center and was not involved in the work. 'Expanding the range of reproductive options … will empower more couples to pursue safe and healthy pregnancies.'
Using this method means the embryo has DNA from three people — from the mother's egg, the father's sperm and the donor's mitochondria — and it required a 2016 U.K. law change to approve it. It is also allowed in Australia but not in many other countries, including the U.S.
Experts at Britain's Newcastle University and Monash University in Australia reported in the New England Journal of Medicine Wednesday that they performed the new technique in fertilized embryos from 22 patients, which resulted in eight babies that appear to be free of mitochondrial diseases. One woman is still pregnant.
One of the eight babies born had slightly higher than expected levels of abnormal mitochondria, said Robin Lovell-Badge, a stem cell and developmental genetics scientist at the Francis Crick Institute who was not involved in the research. He said it was still not considered a high enough level to cause disease, but should be monitored as the baby develops.
Dr. Andy Greenfield, a reproductive health expert at the University of Oxford, called the work 'a triumph of scientific innovation,' and said the method of exchanging mitochondria would only be used for a small number of women for whom other ways of avoiding passing on genetic diseases, like testing embryos at an early stage, was not effective.
Lovell-Badge said the amount of DNA from the donor is insignificant, noting that any resulting child would have no traits from the woman who donated the healthy mitochondria. The genetic material from the donated egg makes up less than 1% of the baby born after this technique.
'If you had a bone marrow transplant from a donor … you will have much more DNA from another person,' he said.
In the U.K., every couple seeking a baby born through donated mitochondria must be approved by the country's fertility regulator. As of this month, 35 patients have been authorized to undergo the technique.
Critics have previously raised concerns, warning that it's impossible to know the impact these sorts of novel techniques might have on future generations.
'Currently, pronuclear transfer is not permitted for clinical use in the U.S., largely due to regulatory restrictions on techniques that result in heritable changes to the embryo,' Williams, of Columbia, said in an email. 'Whether that will change remains uncertain and will depend on evolving scientific, ethical, and policy discussions.'
For about a decade, Congress has included provisions in annual funding bills banning the Food and Drug Administration from accepting applications for clinical research involving techniques, 'in which a human embryo is intentionally created or modified to include a heritable genetic modification.'
But in countries where the technique is allowed, advocates say it could provide a promising alternative for some families.
Liz Curtis, whose daughter Lily died of a mitochondrial disease in 2006, now works with other families affected by them. She said it was devastating to be told there was no treatment for her eight-month-old baby and that death was inevitable.
She said the diagnosis 'turned our world upside down, and yet nobody could tell us very much about it, what it was or how it was going to affect Lily.' Curtis later founded the Lily Foundation in her daughter's name to raise awareness and support research into the disease, including the latest work done at Newcastle University.
'It's super exciting for families that don't have much hope in their lives,' Curtis said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors
UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors

Nearly one in five doctors is considering quitting in the UK, new figures show, while one in eight is thinking about leaving the country to work abroad. The General Medical Council (GMC), which commissioned the research, is warning that plans to cut hospital waiting lists will be at risk unless more is done to retain them. By July 2029, the prime minister has said 92% of patients needing routine hospital treatment like hip and knee replacements will be . "[Poor staff retention] could threaten government ambitions to reduce waiting times and deliver better care to patients," warned the authors of the GMC's latest report. The main reason doctors gave for considering moving abroad was they are "treated better" in other countries, while the second most common reason was better pay. Some 43% said they had researched career opportunities in other countries, while 15% reported taking "hard steps" towards moving abroad, like applying for roles or contacting recruiters. "Like any profession, doctors who are disillusioned with their careers will start looking elsewhere," said Charlie Massey, chief executive of the GMC. "Doctors need to be satisfied, supported, and see a hopeful future for themselves, or we may risk losing their talent and expertise altogether." Read more on Sky News:Airport reopens after plane incidentReeves told big tax rises neededHiroshima survivor's warning, 80 years on The report - which comes after a recent five-day walkout by resident doctors - is based on the responses of 4,697 doctors around the UK and also explores how they feel about career progression. One in three said they are unable to progress their education, training and careers in the way they want. Those who didn't feel like their careers were progressing were at higher risk of burnout and were less satisfied with their work. The GMC blamed workloads, competition for jobs, and lack of senior support for development for adversely impacting the career progression of UK doctors. 'Legitimate complaints' The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledged doctors had suffered "more than a decade of neglect". "Doctors have legitimate complaints about their conditions, including issues with training bottlenecks and career progression," said a spokesperson. "We want to work with them to address these and improve their working lives, which includes our plans set out in the 10 Year Health Plan to prioritise UK graduates and increase speciality training posts. "This government is committed to improving career opportunities and working conditions, bringing in ways to recognise and reward talent - as well as freeing up clinicians' time by cutting red tape."

If Another Home For Humanity Is Out There, This Spaceship Could Get Us There
If Another Home For Humanity Is Out There, This Spaceship Could Get Us There

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

If Another Home For Humanity Is Out There, This Spaceship Could Get Us There

Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Project Hyperion competition winners dreamed up Chrysalis, a starship and space habitat that could make it to the planet Proxima b in just 400 years (which is ridiculously fast). The spacecraft is designed to run on a fusion engine, create artificial gravity, and carry about a thousand people while flying at around a tenth of the speed of light. Though Chrysalis remains a concept (for now), it could end up launching something unprecedented in the future. Headed towards the Proxima Centauri system, the starship Chrysalis traverses a seemingly endless expanse of space as it soars toward its final destination—the potentially habitable planet Proxima b. There, over a thousand passengers who have been living in the airborne habitat (the descendants of a crew that launched from Earth four centuries ago) will build a new frontier for humanity. Chrysalis sounds as if it flew straight out of a scene in Isaac Asimov's Foundation. But despite its sci-fi features, this is an actual spacecraft concept that recently won the Project Hyperion design competition hosted by the Initiative for Interstellar Studies (i4is). The craft is the brainchild of an interdisciplinary team of Italian researchers—Giacomo Infelise, Veronica Magli, Guido Sbrogio, Nevenka Martinello, and Federica Chiara Serpe—who were challenged to come up with a floating habitat that would eventually touch down on the closest exoplanet to Earth, Proxima b. 'The presentation is rich and visually engaging, drawing comparisons to iconic works like Rama, and showcasing a clear passion for both design and storytelling,' the competition jury said of Chrysalis in a recent press release. 'Its overall spacecraft design seems to take inspiration from the gigantic world ship concepts of the 1980s.' Each team that embarked on this conceptual journey needed at least one architectural designer, one engineer, and one social scientist. Their mission was to figure out how to accommodate a thousand (give or take 500) people over the centuries it would take for the spacecraft to reach its destination. Like the fictional starships it was inspired by, Chrysalis would to produce artificial gravity through a rotation system, in order to try and counteract the detrimental effects of microgravity on the human body. Designing support systems for food, water, waste, and an atmosphere—as well as coming up with ways to provide livable conditions and meet basic needs—were also mandatory parts of the contest. Additionally, there would need to be methods of transferring knowledge from generation to generations in order to both keep culture alive and retain (and advance) technology. The spacecraft would also have to trek through space at a maximum velocity of a tenth of the speed of light, and make it to Proxima b in as close to 250 years as possible. The fastest spacecraft to date is NASA's Parker Solar Probe, which recently zoomed past the Sun at a blazing 692,000 kmph (430,000 mph). But even Parker would still be short of one trillion miles (1.6 trillion km) after 224 years of travel, and still have over 24 trillion miles to go. If Chrysalis ever becomes a reality, it should make it to Proxima b in 400 years, after a year-long acceleration period. It would take another year to decelerate once it reached the planet. Proxima b is 4.24 light-years away, and one light-year equates to about 9.5 trillion km (6 trillion miles). So, the journey from here to Proxima b would cover 39 trillion km (25 trillion miles) through the void. Doing that in 400 years is certainly nothing to sneeze at. Much like the chrysalis of a moth or butterfly blown to epic proportions, Chrysalis was imagined as a 58,000-meter-long (63,430 yards), 2.4 billion-metric-ton (2.65 US tons) cylindrical structure. Its narrower front end would mitigate the risk of impacts from micrometeoroids, space junk, and anything else that could cause a damaging collision. The minimized front end is also meant to reduce stress on the spacecraft as it accelerates and decelerates. Powered by the nuclear fusion of helium and deuterium isotopes, its propulsion system would be a Direct Fusion Drive (DFD)—an engine that is still very much in the conceptual phase. It is supposed to give the spacecraft a simultaneous burst of electrical power and thrust. There is a reason that some floating off-earth habitats in science fiction are shown rotating in space. The front end of Chrysalis—which is imagined to function as the habitat—would have multiple levels in flexible modular shells that fit into each other and constantly rotate on one axis to maintain artificial gravity. From outer to inner, levels would be specialized for food production, ecosystems, communal spaces, housing, gardens, facilities, a warehouse, and the axial core. The Cosmo Dome at the front end is intended to be a bubble of microgravity that provides an incredible view to passengers as they experience weightlessness for a while. So, where do we go from here? Humans have yet to reach Mars (much less Proxima b), and whether such a massive concept can ever translate to reality remains to be seen. However, landing on the Moon was seen as an impossibility only a hundred years ago—the limits of humanity are possibly boundless. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

Forget the treadmill! I tried Nordic walking every day for a week — and it challenged me in ways I didn't expect
Forget the treadmill! I tried Nordic walking every day for a week — and it challenged me in ways I didn't expect

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Forget the treadmill! I tried Nordic walking every day for a week — and it challenged me in ways I didn't expect

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. From the viral trends of color walking and silent walking to the popular 5-2-4 Fartlek walking method, we've tested just about every walking workout going here at Tom's Guide. But Nordic walking — a technique that uses poles to turn a simple walk into a full-body workout — might just be one of the most intriguing yet. Often described as cross-country skiing without the snow, Nordic walking has been popular in parts of Europe for decades, especially in Scandinavia, where it's credited with boosting cardio fitness, improving posture, and reducing joint strain. As someone who loves low-impact exercise but still wants to feel results, I decided to pick up a pair of poles and give Nordic walking a go myself. After a week of daily Nordic walking, I noticed three key benefits that set it apart from a regular walk. It was more physically demanding than I expected — but in the best way. Here's what stood out. What is Nordic walking? Unlike the Japanese walking method, there's no interval training involved in Nordic walking. Originally developed in Finland as a way for cross-country skiers to stay fit in the off-season, Nordic walking involves walking with a pair of poles that help engage your upper body as you move. Rather than simply hiking with trekking poles, Nordic walking uses a specific motion: you plant the poles diagonally behind you and use them to help propel yourself forward with each step. It turns a regular walk into a full-body workout, activating the arms, shoulders, back and core, alongside your legs. In fact, research from the Cooper Institute suggests Nordic walking can burn between 20-46% more calories than normal walking at the same pace. It's also low-impact and joint-friendly, which makes it popular among people recovering from injury and older adults. That said, I don't fall into either of these categories, and I was still eager to give Nordic walking a go. I'm a pretty keen walker, and nothing quite helps me press the reset button — mentally as much as physically — like getting outside and moving my body. If Nordic walking is a way for me to scale up my daily walks so I can experience more of a cardio hit (and build strength to boot), then I'm all for it. After getting my hands on some poles (the OEX Ultralite Carbon Z Walking Poles from Go Outdoors, to be exact), I was only too eager to start the challenge. I live on the outskirts of a city, so while I'm close to public transport and pavement, I'm also lucky to have easy access to rural trails. But, once you get over the somewhat strange sensation of walking with poles, Nordic walking can be done pretty much anywhere — in parks, along sidewalks, or even in urban green spaces. Here are the three key benefits that stood out to me when trying Nordic walking. 1. My upper body *actually* got a workout I'll be honest — I didn't expect to feel this much in my arms. Upper body strength training is a key focus for me at the gym, so I (naively) assumed that I wouldn't find Nordic walking to be too challenging. I was wrong. From day one, I could feel my triceps and shoulders working as I pushed back with the poles. Nordic walking isn't just about holding the poles — it's about using them to propel yourself forward, which means your arms, back, chest, and even your core get involved. It felt a bit awkward at first, but once I found the rhythm, I could feel the difference. On a couple of mornings, I noticed some muscle fatigue in my upper body after finishing my walk — the kind of gentle soreness that tells you you've worked, but without the strain. It was a nice reminder that walking doesn't always have to be lower-body dominant, and Nordic walking offers a way to engage your whole body without stepping into a gym. 2. It improved my posture and walking form Once I got the hang of coordinating the poles with my stride, I started to notice how much better I was walking — not just during the workout, but throughout the day. Nordic walking forces you to stand tall, engage your core, and use a longer, more deliberate stride. I found myself naturally correcting my slouch and lifting through my chest to get the full benefit of the movement. As someone who swears by anti-desk exercises to keep my posture in check, I was pleasantly surprised. And because the poles help distribute your weight and provide support, I was also landing more evenly through my feet, rather than collapsing into my hips (something I tend to do when I'm tired). It was like getting a gentle reminder with every step to move with intention. 3. It was more mindful than I expected I went into this challenge thinking Nordic walking would be purely physical — a brisker version of my usual walk with the added bonus of some arm work. But what surprised me most was how mentally engaging it was. Because you're coordinating your arm swings with each step, there's a rhythm to it that demands focus, especially at the start. Without realizing it, I was paying more attention to my body — how I was moving, how upright I felt, where I was planting my feet. I wasn't scrolling on my phone or half-listening to a podcast. Being this present meant that by the end of each walk, I felt significantly calmer (which is no easy feat for someone with diagnosed ADHD). I'm yet to try walking yoga, so I'm not able to draw a direct comparison — but I can say that Nordic walking is a surprisingly effective way to feel more grounded. I tried Nordic walking every day for a week — my verdict Nordic walking was a lot more dynamic than I'd expected. It challenged my body in new ways, especially my upper body, and made me think more intentionally about how I move. I probably won't swap all my walks for pole-assisted ones, but I can definitely see the appeal — especially for people looking for low-impact, full-body cardio that's also friendly on the joints. If you've got access to walking poles (or want to invest in a pair), and you're looking for a way to shake up your current walking routine, what've you got to lose? Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide I followed the Japanese walking method for 30 days — here's what happened to my back pain and energy levels Forget running — 3 walking workouts that build lower body strength and burn calories Forget 10,000 steps — I tried 'rucking' instead of regular walking for one week, and it's a game changer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store