SPJ gives dishonorable Black Hole Award to Utah Legislature for ‘egregious violations'
SALT LAKE CITY () — The Society of Professional Journalists has chosen the Utah State Legislature as the recipient of the dishonorable 2025 Black Hole Award, an award meant to bring attention to 'the most egregious violations of the public's right to know.'
SPJ is one of the largest and longest-standing journalism organizations in the country, having been founded more than 100 years ago. The Black Hole Award, however, is just shy of 15 years old — and the Utah Legislature has already been a recipient twice.
'Utah cannot be 'the best run state' and the most secretive state at the same time; these goals are inherently exclusive of one another,' said Emma Penrod, president of the SPJ Utah Headliners Chapter.
This dishonorable award comes after the legislature passed several laws pertaining to public records over the past several years.
SPJ's Freedom of Information (FOI) Committee said the legislature 'earned this year's award for repeatedly undermining transparency' by amending public records law to 'block the release of public records – even after court orders mandated their disclosure.'
'After the State Records Committee ruled in favor of releasing several records that government agencies and elected officials sought to withhold, the Legislature turned around and made changes to the law to keep those records secret,' the SPJ press release reads.
One sponsor of a recent public records bill, Sen. Mike McKell (R – Spanish Fork), calls the SPJ claims 'inaccurate' and lacking in merit, adding that he did not hear from the organization until after his bill was passed.
SPJ points to multiple bills in particular over the past three years, including one passed this session that disbanded the State Records Committee, an independent board that managed record request appeals. The committee consisted of news representatives, governor-appointed citizens, and an archive representative.
With the passing of S.B. 277 earlier this month, a governor-appointed director will now make the final call on whether the public has a right to see particular government records.
'Replacing that committee with a governor's appointee can only reduce accountability and undermine public confidence in government,' said Howard Goldberg, SPJ Freedom of Information committee member.
McKell, the bill's sponsor, told ABC4 this law was 'modeled after successful approaches in other states' and 'is expected to be far more effective.' He said in 2023, the average time it took the committee to receive an appeal and issue a decision was 156 days.
'It is disappointing that the Society of Professional Journalists fails to recognize the need to address an inefficient and flawed system. Their claims are inaccurate and lack merit. Moreover, it is unfortunate that we are only hearing from SPJ now, after the fact,' McKell said.
He continued to say lawmakers worked with the Utah Media Coalition to refine the bill and the organization did not oppose it. He said the local coalition expressed 'support for the legislative efforts to create a structure that is both efficient and fair.'
ABC4 reached out to legislative leaders and Gov. Cox for comment and did not receive additional statements at the time of publication.
SPJ pointed to another instance in 2022 when the legislature voted to block Garrity Statements — comments from public employees during an investigation — from the public eye.
The organization said this came after the State Records Committee released Garrity Statements regarding officer-involved shootings upon the request of the Salt Lake Tribune.
Last year, the legislature passed a law saying public officials' digital work calendars are not public records and therefore cannot be requested and publicized.
SPJ said lawmakers passed the law shortly after courts supported the release of Attorney General Sean Reyes' calendar as journalists investigated his connection to Tim allard, the controversial CEO of Operation Underground Railroad.
The recent national award was given after the local SPJ chapter in Utah gave its state-wide Black Hole Award to the legislature these past two years. However, it's not the legislature's first national Black Hole Award as Utah lawmakers were the first recipient in 2011.
The 2011 Black Hole Award was given to the state legislature after 'extreme changes made to its public records law' under Gov. Gary Herbert.
'The legislature has clearly violated the public's right to know, and as a two-time recipient of this 'award,' it serves as a reminder to journalists to keep holding those in government accountable,' said Jodi Rave Spotted Bear, chair of the national SPJ FOI Committee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Torture now a class A felony in Hawaiʻi
HONOLULU (KHON2) — Torture is now a class A felony in the islands following Gov. Josh Green's signing of Senate Bill 281 on June 4. The bill, known as 'S.B. 281: Relating to Torture,' passed both houses of the legislature, receiving unanimous approval in the state senate and near unanimous approval in the house, minus one excused member who did not vote. Has Sam's Club stopped shipping online orders to Hawaii? The item was submitted to the 2025 Legislative Session by the City and County of Honolulu's Department of the Prosecuting Attorney and was sponsored by Sen. Ronald Kouchi. The legislation marks the first of its kind in the islands, with Prosecuting Attorney Steve Alm saying the new law helps toughen up 'inadequate' laws.'Until we submitted this bill as part of our legislative package, our state had inadequate laws to deal with perpetrators who use torture against children and vulnerable persons. Our state needed this law to protect those who are vulnerable and unable to protect themselves,' Alm said. The new law also provides significant aid in ensuring children who are victims of torture are able to get justice. 'Across the state, prosecutors have seen heinous crimes involving children who suffered acts of torture committed against them by their parents or those who have a duty to protect them,' Alm explained. 'The laws that we had to fight these crimes did not adequately address the criminal conduct exhibited in these cases.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Male criminals can self-identify as women in mental health hospitals
NHS mental health hospitals are allowing male criminals to self-identify as women, NHS documents have revealed. Trusts in London are permitting transgender women to use female-only spaces despite acknowledging their presence as a 'risk to a particular gender' and potentially 'very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. Campaigners have accused the NHS of endangering the welfare of the 'most vulnerable women' by allowing transgender women, who were born male, on female wards. A women's rights group used Freedom of Information (FoI) requests to obtain sex and gender policies at NHS mental health trusts in London. The recently disclosed documents found mental health trusts raising concerns over the guidance that forensic patients should use single-sex female spaces if they identified as women. Forensic patients are those referred to the NHS from court or prison for committing offences, or considered a potential risk to themselves or others because of a mental health disorder. Under the current NHS guidelines published in 2019, transgender people should be accommodated according to the way they dress, their name and pronouns, which 'may not always accord with the physical sex appearance of the chest or genitalia'. This also 'applies to toilet and bathing facilities', with the exception of pre-operative transgender people sharing open shower facilities. Policy at West London NHS Trust, which runs the high-security Broadmoor Hospital, abides by these guidelines, stating: 'A trans man or a trans woman must be admitted on to a ward in accordance with their presenting gender, if this is their preference.' It added: 'Patients should be addressed respectfully, using the pronouns of their acquired gender.' The trust cited an example of a transgender patient in a manic state getting undressed in front of women and revealing their genitals. It said: 'A patient with bipolar (who happens also to be trans) who is in a manic state and who does not have capacity may be disinhibited and at risk of disrobing in public. 'Depending on where they are in their transition, it may be more appropriate for them to be admitted to a ward that is in line with their birth gender … while they are acutely unwell and at risk of 'outing' themselves.' The policy document added: 'Once they have recovered and have regained capacity it would be essential to have a conversation with the patient around where they would be most comfortably accommodated, and to arrange a move to a ward in accordance with their correct gender.' Both trusts note that there may be circumstances where it is lawful to exclude a patient, transgender or otherwise, from a single-sex ward if it constitutes 'proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim' such as harm reduction. At Central and North Western London, a policy document said that 'further consideration may be needed as to how best to manage a trans individual' in some cases, such as when 'a sexually disinhibited pre-operative transsexual individual may be very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. In such a 'rare occasion', the policy recommends the individual 'be transferred to a single room and consideration made to their temporary use of a disabled toilet should individual toilets not be available'. The trust said it 'respects an individual's right to self-identify as male or female', and made clear that transgender women could access women's lavatories. The Equality and Human Rights Commission, the equalities watchdog, has issued interim guidance advising it should be 'compulsory' for workplaces to provide single-sex lavatories, though trans women should not be left with no facilities to use. The NHS is currently reviewing its guidelines on same-sex accommodation in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at the human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'It's deeply disturbing that the safety and welfare of some of the most vulnerable women in London – those in the care of state mental health services – are being so seriously compromised by NHS trusts. 'The Supreme Court judgment was crystal-clear that single-sex services must be run on the basis of biological sex. 'There is no excuse for a dangerous 'case-by-case' approach that deems some men safe to be housed in women's accommodation. 'These NHS trusts are missing the point: no male patient should ever be allowed in female accommodation under any circumstances. His claimed identity, history of sexual behaviour and whether he has had surgery to remove body parts are all irrelevant. So is the state of his mental and physical health. 'If health care managers cannot understand why this matters so much in mental health services, then they are not fit to run NHS trusts or to have female patients in their care.' A campaigner involved in the audit told The Times that it was 'scary to think' that the gender identity of violent criminals could 'override the safety and dignity of women'. They added: 'NHS trusts are playing Russian roulette with women's safety. The Supreme Court ruling clarified that single-sex spaces must be single sex, and it is vital that this is now enforced nationally across all hospitals.' An NHS spokesman said: 'The NHS is working through the implications of the Supreme Court ruling, and we absolutely recognise the need for revised guidance. It's important that we wait for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to publish its statutory guidance before final decisions about future policy are taken. 'In the meantime, we are working closely with Government to ensure we can provide updated guidance for the health service as soon as possible.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
E&E News
6 days ago
- E&E News
Pennsylvania lawmakers go after local drilling restrictions
Pennsylvania lawmakers are considering a bill that would withhold some funding from local governments that restrict where the oil industry can build fracking pads. The bill, S.B. 102, would prohibit counties and municipalities from receiving impact fees from fracking operations if they pass local rules that 'unreasonably' restrict oil and gas activity. It was written in reaction to a growing number of local 'setback' ordinances in western Pennsylvania that increase the distance between oil development and nearby homes and bodies of water. Industry groups and the bill's supporters say it would ensure impact fees go to municipalities that are most affected by drilling and continue to host more oil and gas production. But local government leaders — along with environmental groups — say the bill would hurt local budgets and could have a chilling affect on their ability to pass zoning ordinances. Advertisement 'The state set the standards for us in the municipal planning code, and they set us up to be the ones to have to administer zoning,' said Thomas Casciola, chair of the Board of Supervisors for the Cecil Township in western Pennsylvania. 'And yet now they're upset because we're doing it.'
