Rep. Smithee introduces bill to transfer management of PPHM
Filed as an amendment to the Texas Government Code, HB 5554, introduced by State Rep. John Smithee (R-Amarillo), would authorize the THC to contract with the Panhandle-Plains Historical Society, which owns the museum's collection, for day-to-day management. The bill also allows the THC to enter into agreements with West Texas A&M University or The Texas A&M University System for the maintenance, renovation, and expansion of the museum facilities on the university's campus.
A key provision of the bill is the establishment of the Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum Fund, a dedicated source of funding outside the state treasury. This fund would be supported through admissions, gift shop sales, and donations, allowing the THC to use the funds for operational expenses, repairs, and growth without the need for legislative approval.
If the bill is passed, museum staff currently employed by West Texas A&M would transition to the THC by Sept. 1, 2025. For the bill to take effect immediately, it must pass with a two-thirds majority vote in both the Texas House and Senate. Otherwise, it would go into effect on the specified date.
The bill is aimed at securing the future of the Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum, ensuring it remains a vital part of Texas' cultural heritage. Supporters of the measure argue that transferring management to the Texas Historical Commission would provide the focused expertise needed to preserve the museum's collection and address its long-term operational needs.
This legislative effort follows the recent closure of the museum after a State Fire Marshal report highlighted critical fire and life safety concerns. According to West Texas A&M, the museum shut its doors indefinitely to address issues such as sprinkler system deficiencies, dead-end hallways, and inadequate exits. The total cost of the required renovations is estimated at nearly $100 million.
State Sen. Kevin Sparks (R-Midland) has filed an identical companion bill in the Senate, and both bills will be reviewed in the coming months.
This article originally appeared on Amarillo Globe-News: Texas bills filed on Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum Management
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Texas Senate passes bill banning delta-8 THC
The Texas Senate on Tuesday advanced a bill banning delta-8 THC in consumable products while allowing low, nonintoxicating levels of THC and CBD to stay on the market. Why it matters: If the bill becomes law, it would impact Texas business owners who produce THC variants and would remove the products from shelves statewide. Driving the news: The bill passed 22-8 on its final reading Tuesday with no deliberation on the floor, just days into the second special legislative session called by Gov. Greg Abbott this year. Flashback: After passing the Senate in the first special session, the bill died when House Democrats broke quorum in protest of Abbott's push for congressional redistricting. Catch up quick: The 2019 Texas farm bill legalized 0.3% THC in consumable products like vapes, edibles and bud. The bill also legalized chemical variations of THC, like delta-8. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has pushed for a full ban on hemp-derived consumable products, which passed both the Texas Senate and House during the regular legislative session this spring.
UPI
17 hours ago
- UPI
Federal appeals court blocks West Texas A&M drag ban
An appeals court Monday blocked West Texas A&M from enforcing its ban on drag shows amid litigation. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo Aug. 19 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court barred West Texas A&M University from enforcing a ban on drag shows on campus, overruling a lower court's decision that said drag shows did not necessarily enjoy First Amendment protections. The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled 2-1 in favor of the LGBTQ+ Spectrum WT student group and two of its student leaders who sued the school in March 2023, after university president Walter Wendler unilaterally canceled their then-upcoming charity drag show by arguing such performances were comparable to blackface and against his religious beliefs. The appeals court ruling puts a hold on Wendler's ban, allowing the student group to host drag shows on campus amid litigation. "FIRE is pleased that the Fifth Circuit has halted President Wendler's unconstitutional censorship and restored the First Amendment at West Texas A&M," JT Morris, supervising senior attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which filed the lawsuit, said in a statement. "This is a victory not just for Spectrum WT, but for any public university students at risk of being silenced by campus censors." In March 2023, Spectrum WT was planning a drag show for adults on West Texas A&M University to raise money for the Trevor Project, an LGBTQ+ suicide prevention and crisis intervention nonprofit -- but was barred from hosting the event by Wendler, who issued a ban on drag shows. In a March 21, 2023, letter to students, Wendler stated he believes humans are created in God's image and that drag shows do not preserve human dignity. "As a performance exaggerating aspects of womanhood (sexuality, femininity, gender), drag shows stereotype women in cartoon-like extremes for the amusement of others and discriminate against womanhood," he said. "Drag shows are derisive, divisive and demoralizing misogyny, no matter the stated intent," he continued. "Such conduct runs counter to the purpose of WT." Spectrum WT then sued the school and held its performance off campus. Before the court, Wendler argued that drag shows are not express conduct protected by the First Amendment right to free speech, and that drag shows should be restricted due to lewd conduct. In September, the lower court agreed with Wendler that not all drag shows are inherently expressive and entitled to First Amendment protections, finding Wendler was right to cancel the performance because of "potential lewdness." Writing on behalf of the majority, Circuit Judge Leslie Southwick, a President George W. Bush appointee, said the district court erred by concluding the student group was not likely to succeed on the merits of their First Amendment argument. "Because theatrical performances plainly involve expressive conduct within the protection of the First Amendment, and because we find that plaintiffs' drag show is protected expression, discrimination among such shows must pass strict scrutiny," Southwick said in the ruling. "President Wendler did not argue, either before the district court or on appeal, that restricting the intended drag show would survive strict scrutiny." Southwick also found that the group suffered ongoing irreparable injury to their free speech First Amendment rights as Wendler had canceled their planned show and would permit no future shows going forward. Circuit Judge James Ho, a Trump appointee, in dissent agreed that drag shows are not inherently expressive and that if universities allow men to act as women in campus events, such as drag shows, "they may feel compelled to allow men to act as women in other campus events as well -- like women's sports." "What a university allows in an auditorium, it might have to allow on an athletic field, too." UPI has contacted West Texas A&M University for comment.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Federal appeals court blocks West Texas A&M drag ban
A federal appeals court on Monday blocked West Texas A&M University from banning student drag performances on its campus, overruling a lower court order that claimed First Amendment protections do not extend to drag shows. The 2-1 decision from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals asserts the university acted unconstitutionally when it canceled student-organized charity drag performances in 2023 and 2024. In a March 2023 email to students, faculty and staff titled, 'A Harmless Drag Show? No Such Thing,' University President Walter Wendler said drag discriminates against women and compared it to blackface. 'West Texas A&M University will not host a drag show on campus,' Wendler wrote in the email, which also referenced his Christian religious beliefs. The school, part of the Texas A&M University System, is public and not religiously affiliated. 'I will not appear to condone the diminishment of any group at the expense of impertinent gestures toward another group for any reason, even when the law of the land appears to require it,' Wendler wrote. He added that students should donate directly to the Trevor Project, the LGBTQ youth suicide prevention organization that was to be the drag show's beneficiary. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) sued Wendler and West Texas A&M in 2023 on behalf of Spectrum WT, the LGBTQ student group behind the drag show, 'A Fool's Drag Race,' that Wendler canceled. He canceled another of the group's drag performances in 2024, citing his 2023 email and a new Texas law restricting 'sexually oriented performances.' A district court judge denied FIRE and Spectrum WT's motion for a preliminary injunction in 2023. In 2024, the Supreme Court declined to intervene in the case following a request for emergency action by the student group. In Thursday's 5th Circuit ruling, Judge Leslie H. Southwick, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, wrote that theatrical performances, including drag shows, 'plainly involve expressive conduct within the protection of the First Amendment.' 'President Wendler did not argue, either before the district court or on appeal, that restricting the intended drag show would survive strict scrutiny,' Southwick wrote on Monday. 'Based on the record before us, the district court erred in concluding that the plaintiffs were not substantially likely to succeed on the merits of their First Amendment claim.' Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney for the plaintiffs at FIRE, said in a statement that the organization is 'overjoyed that our clients will now be able to express themselves freely, and we'll be watching to make sure that President Wendler obeys the law of the land while the case proceeds.' 'This is a victory not just for Spectrum WT, but for any public university students at risk of being silenced by campus censors,' said JT Morris, FIRE's senior supervising attorney. A spokesperson for West Texas A&M University did not immediately return a request for comment. The ruling comes several months after a federal judge handed a victory to another student-led LGBTQ group that sued the Texas A&M University System and its flagship earlier this year over a policy banning drag performances on each of its 11 campuses. The university system's Board of Regents voted almost unanimously in February to adopt a resolution that states drag events are inconsistent with the system's 'mission and core values, including the value of respect for others.' The resolution cites an executive order from President Trump that proclaims the U.S. recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female, and aims to prevent federal spending on 'gender ideology.'
