logo
Sleeping arrangements for IPAS residents affects ‘dignity and privacy'

Sleeping arrangements for IPAS residents affects ‘dignity and privacy'

The Journal3 days ago
THE SLEEPING ARRANGEMENTS for residents living at an International Protection facility is impacting upon their dignity and privacy and has the potential to lead to accumulative harm to children, a report has found.
The Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) published six inspection reports on permanent International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) centres.
IPAS centres, formerly known as direct provision centres, provide accommodation for people seeking international protection in Ireland.
When inspectors visited a centre in Co Dublin, which accommodates around 231 residents, 60 of whom were children, they observed overcrowding and cramped conditions in some rooms.
They found 11 families where parents shared bedrooms with children aged 10 and over.
For instance, in one family unit observed, the room was divided by a wardrobe, with one side featuring a bunk bed and a single bed for three teenagers, while the other side contained a double bed for the parents.
In addition, the rooms lacked dedicated living areas for families or single residents in shared bedrooms.
While all rooms viewed met the minimum space requirements of the national standards, these living arrangements compromised the dignity and privacy of residents, and were not in line with the provisions of the Housing Act of 1966.
Privacy and dignity
Inspectors found that while families were accommodated together, the privacy and dignity of some families were not adequately protected.
It said that the arrangements were not in line with the requirements of the Housing Act of 1966, and impacted upon the dignity and privacy of residents and had a potential to lead to accumulative harm to children.
Advertisement
The private provider of the IPAS facility had plans to relocate some families to more suitable accommodation within the centre once available and had engaged with the relevant Government department on this issue.
Hiqa inspects the quality and safety of permanent IPAS centres against the National Standards for accommodation offered to people in the protection process (2019).
The reports were published on Cuirt Uisce Accommodation Centre, Co Galway; Atlantic Lodge, Co Kerry; Davis Lane Apartments, Co Cork; Glenvera Hotel, Co Cork; Ocean View House, Co Waterford; and The Towers, Co Dublin.
Hiqa found that four of the centres inspected – Cuirt Uisce Accommodation Centre, Davis Lane Apartments, Glenvera Hotel and Ocean View House — had no non-compliances against the standards. The remaining two centres had varying levels of compliance.
Across the inspections conducted, inspectors found examples of good practice such as well-equipped cooking facilities for preparing meals, access to health and social supports, and support for integrating into the community.
Atlantic Lodge and the Towers were have found to have breached compliance in areas around governance, accountability and leadership; safeguarding and protection; and accommodation.
For example, in one centre, the management team was not aware of its responsibility to notify safeguarding incidents to HIQA.
At the Atlantic Lodge, inspectors found that the management team did not have a full understanding of the relevant legislation, regulations, national policies and standards to protect residents living in the accommodation centre.
While residents were treated with respect in the centre, the management team were not aware of their responsibilities in terms of notifying safeguarding incidents to Hiqa, the report stated.
In accordance with Standard 8:3, the provider had established a process to ensure that adverse events were reported to the relevant body.
However, this process was not followed, and an incident was not reported to Hiqa as required by policy and legislation.
Where non-compliance with the national standards was identified, providers were required to submit compliance plans to demonstrate how they will make improvements and come into compliance with the national standards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Child at risk of sexual abuse left on social services waiting list for over 14 months
Child at risk of sexual abuse left on social services waiting list for over 14 months

The Journal

time2 hours ago

  • The Journal

Child at risk of sexual abuse left on social services waiting list for over 14 months

A CHILD IN Dublin was placed on a wait list for over 14 months after a referral of sexual abuse was made to Tusla, even though a second concern was raised a month after the first referral. It is one of several cases highlighted in an inspection report by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), exposing numerous service delays in the Dublin South Central area. The inspection examined progress on case allocation, waitlists, safety planning, and oversight of child protection cases. In the 12 months prior to the inspection, the area received 7,781 child protection and welfare referrals. In the case of the child at risk of sexual abuse, they were placed on a waitlist and classified as 'medium' priority, the HIQA report found, with no adjustment made after the second referral. The report also noted that the child had not been met by child welfare officers, despite internal audits recommending such contact. At the time of the inspection, the child had still not received any therapeutic support. In a separate case flagged by HIQA, a referral alleging physical abuse of a child with complex needs was incorrectly classified as a child welfare concern and prioritised as medium, with gardaí initially not notified. Advertisement In another case involving a one-year-old, clarifying information needed to assess risk had not been sought six months later, leaving the child's wellbeing unestablished. Overall, HIQA found that social services staff in the Dublin South Central area were lacking, as the scale of demand continued to challenge the service. However, HIQA also highlighted that the percentage of unallocated cases had fallen from 54% in February 2024 to 41% at the time of the inspection, and is currently at 34%, which the report described as reflecting 'focused efforts' in the area. Tusla said that cases awaiting allocation are regularly reviewed, with urgent responses provided when necessary. Alamy Alamy In a statement on the inspection, the agency highlighted ongoing reforms, including the Local Integrated Service Delivery Model, designed to improve access to services and support staff. Gerry Hone, Interim Director of Services and Integration at Tusla, said HIQA oversight 'assists us in striving for the best possible standards across our services.' In relation to the child at risk of sexual abuse, he added: 'On this occasion, due in part to challenges relating to rising demand and the capacity of the service to meet this demand, we have not reached those expected standards.' Tusla said that improvements agreed with HIQA following the inspection include better oversight and progression of unallocated cases, allocating additional resources, and implementing a compliance plan for child protection and welfare referrals for children in care. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Children at risk of physical or sexual abuse experienced ‘significant' delays before Tusla intervention, report finds
Children at risk of physical or sexual abuse experienced ‘significant' delays before Tusla intervention, report finds

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Children at risk of physical or sexual abuse experienced ‘significant' delays before Tusla intervention, report finds

Children in Dublin who were at risk of physical or sexual abuse experienced 'significant' delays in receiving a child protection and welfare service, according to the health watchdog. The Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) on Monday published an inspection report on protection and welfare services operated by Tusla, the child and family agency , in the Dublin South Central area. One child was on a waiting list for assistance for more than two years, Hiqa said. In a number of cases, the authority found gardaí should have been informed of certain allegations but were not. The inspection was carried out from April 8th to 11th, 2025. It found that 'in most cases' at-risk children experienced long delays before intervention. READ MORE 'This was as a result of children not being allocated in a timely manner and being placed on a waiting list after they had been deemed to meet the criteria for a service,' the report noted. 'It was clear that the welfare and protection needs of some of the children referred to the Dublin South Central service area were not always met in a timely and effective manner.' One child who had been the subject of three referrals, two of which were for physical abuse, was placed on a waiting list. One of these referrals dated back 26 months before the inspection. 'The third came in as a child welfare referral and was received two months before the inspection. This had not been screened to establish the risk of harm to the child and ensure that it was correctly categorised,' the report said. In relation to another child, a sexual abuse referral was received 14 months before the inspection, with another concern referred one month later. 'The child was placed on a wait-list and prioritised as medium, with no consideration given to revising the priority following the receipt of the second referral,' the report stated. 'The child had not been met with despite audits carried out by a manager that indicated that this should be done. The child had still not received any therapeutic support at the time of the inspection.' In a separate case, Tusla received an allegation of physical abuse in respect of a child with complex needs which 'was inappropriately categorised as a child welfare concern, and prioritised as medium'. 'Gardaí were not notified of this allegation of abuse. This was brought to the attention of the area manager and response provided showed that gardaí had been notified after the inspection,' the report stated. Hiqa said these cases 'illustrated gaps in the service capacity to carry out assessments of children's welfare and protection needs in a timely manner'. 'This had resulted in children waiting for significantly long periods in many cases for the required support and interventions,' it said. 'Inspectors escalated 13 cases and the response provided indicated that all cases had actions completed to ensure children's safety and that risks identified were being effectively managed.' Responding to the report, Tusla said the Dublin South Central area received 7,781 child protection and welfare referrals in the 12 months before the inspection. Despite improvements in recruitment and retention of staff since the previous inspection in February 2024, the service 'remained challenged by the scale of demand, and its current capacity', a statement noted. 'The area has developed an action plan to bring it into compliance, which has been accepted by Hiqa.' Gerry Hone, interim director of services and integration at Tusla, said the Dublin South Central area has been 'challenged to provide a timely service to all children and families'. 'There has been a considerable effort undertaken in the area in the recruitment and retention of staff, and we are beginning to see the dividends of this across the service.' There has been a 7 per cent decrease in the number of children awaiting allocation since the inspection in April, Mr Hone added.

HIQA confirmed two new children's care homes on same day it said operator breached standards
HIQA confirmed two new children's care homes on same day it said operator breached standards

The Journal

time2 days ago

  • The Journal

HIQA confirmed two new children's care homes on same day it said operator breached standards

THE OPERATOR OF a number of private care homes for children with disabilities was given permission to open two new homes on the same day that a report detailed a number of breaches of standards at an existing site. Inspectors at a care home for children with disabilities in April said Irish company Lotus Care Ltd was not compliant with a number of care standards and that development plans for residents were not properly completed. The firm, who owns and operates a number of centres in the midlands, had previously been told to make improvements to a child's timetable at a different facility earlier this year, after inspectors found it repeated for months on end – except for one trip to the zoo . The Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa), the agency in charge of inspecting and monitoring residential care centres for children, did not explain why it approved two new sites owned by Lotus Care Ltd when asked by The Journal. An inspection report at Lime Tree Lodge in Co Offaly, published on 18 July, detailed that staff had no received proper training in a number of skills. It also highlighted governance failures in respect of this oversight. A Lotus Care spokesperson has said it welcomed Hiqa's review of Lime Tree Lodge and 'fully accepts the findings of the inspection report'. The firm noted that the majority of the inspector's findings were 'overwhelmingly positive'. On the same day the report was uploaded to Hiqa's website, the authority also published documentation showing that it had approved two new sites operated by Lotus Care, Willow Brook in Co Laois and Cedar Lodge in Offaly. Willow Brook was approved exactly three months after the unannounced inspection at Lime Tree Lodge and Cedar Lodge was fully registered the day before the review was made public. A spokesperson for Hiqa said that providers are obliged to apply to register all new centres with the authority, adding that an operator's fitness and ability to comply with standards is also examined prior to approval. Advertisement Hiqa's Chief Inspector of Social Services Finbarr Colfer, who has the responsibility to approve new centres, recently told the Oireachtas that meeting and being compliant with care requirements are the basic standards for all providers . The Ombudsman for Children's office told The Journal that the state has a 'duty' to protect the rights of children with disabilities who are cared for outside their homes, in respect of education, healthcare and participation in society. 'Standards and inspections are a crucial part of the delivery of high-quality care and ensure the continual improvement in service delivery for children,' it said, adding that the state must also 'ensure they receive high-quality care'. Despite being the watchdog of residential care centres, such as nursing homes, Colfer also told the Oireachtas that Hiqa does not have legislative powers to regulate facilities for children . While HIQA carries out inspections on the facilities, it is unclear which agency regulates them as both the HSE and Tusla have told The Journal they do not. The unannounced inspection at Lime Tree Lodge, carried out in April, found that the two residents living there at the time were relaxed and happy. They also noted that the staff were aware of their needs, preferences and interests. It added, however, that staff members were not properly trained in fire safety, medicine administration or manual handling skills. Inspectors noted governance and managing failures in respect of the scheduling of training for staff. They added that development plans for the two children needed to be improved. Lotus Care said it fully accepts Hiqa's findings. Lotus Care told The Journal that management took 'immediate action' and that all staff received the necessary fire safety training within 48 hours of the inspection's completion. 'Lotus Care is committed to quality improvement and ensuring all in our care receive the opportunity to reach their full potential,' it added. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store