
South Korea ex-president back in court for criminal trial
Supports of South Korea's ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol stand to call for the cancellation of his removal in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, South Korea, Monday, April 21, 2025. -- AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon
SEOUL (AFP): South Korea's former president Yoon Suk Yeol appeared in court Monday (April 21) for the second hearing of his criminal trial to defend himself against insurrection charges over his short-lived declaration of martial law.
Yoon was formally stripped of office earlier this month, after being impeached and suspended by lawmakers over his December 3 attempt to subvert civilian rule, which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament.
He became South Korea's first sitting head of state to be arrested in January in connection with the criminal case against him, although he was later released on procedural grounds.
Yoon's court appearance on Monday is the first time media were allowed to film the former president's criminal trial, where he was seated in the defendant's chair before proceedings began.
Dressed in a suit and red tie, Yoon appeared indifferent as photographers captured him seated in the courtroom.
During the first day of his criminal trial last week, the ex-president defended himself in court, speaking for more than 90 minutes, denying that he had committed insurrection.
If found guilty, Yoon would become the third South Korean president to be found guilty of insurrection -- after two military leaders in connection with a 1979 coup.
For charges of insurrection, Yoon could be sentenced to life in prison or the maximum penalty: the death sentence.
But it is highly unlikely that sentence would be carried out. South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.
Separately, last week police attempted to raid Yoon's former presidential office and his security detail as part of a probe into "alleged obstruction of an arrest warrant execution," but failed after presidential security denied them permission to enter the residence.
Yoon spent weeks holed up in his compound in January, protected by members of the Presidential Security Service who had remained loyal to him.
His guards had installed barbed wire and barricades at the residence, forcing hundreds of police officers and investigators to use ladders and scale perimeter walls to reach the main building.
At the time, he was booked on charges of obstruction, with police saying last week that "in principle", an in-person investigation would be necessary. - AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump flexes strongman instincts over Los Angeles protests
DONALD Trump likes to show off his strongman credentials at cage fights and military parades – and over the weekend, the US president did it by sending troops into Los Angeles. The move once again showed Trump pushing presidential power to its limits, at the start of a second term that has begun with what critics say is a distinctly authoritarian edge. Trump deployed the National Guard after clashes sparked by immigration raids, marking the first time since 1965 that a president has done so without a request by a state governor. His administration said Monday it was also sending 700 active-duty Marines to America's second largest city. The Republican has warned that troops could be sent "everywhere" – sparking fears that he will send the military out into the streets across America to crack down on protests and dissent. "It's a slippery slope," William Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University, told AFP. "If the president tries to do more, he's cutting against the grain in the United States of a long history of leaving law enforcement to civilians." The protests in Los Angeles are in many ways the showdown that Trump has been waiting for. Trump has been spoiling for a fight against California's Democratic governor Gavin Newsom, and he is now doing so on his signature issue of immigration. Newsom has bitterly accused the "dictatorial" president of manufacturing the crisis for political gain – while Trump suggested the governor, a potential 2028 presidential contender, could be arrested. Democratic California senator Alex Padilla slammed what he called "the behaviour of an authoritarian government." Rights groups have also opposed it. Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in a statement that Trump's response was "unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power." Trump said Monday that he does not "want a civil war" – but the situation is a golden opportunity to appear tough to his base. Indeed, Trump has long cultivated a strongman image and has previously expressed admiration for authoritarian leaders like Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping. This weekend, Trump will spend his 79th birthday watching tanks rumble through Washington at a parade to mark the 250th anniversary of the US army. And the order to send the National Guard into Los Angeles came shortly before Trump attended a UFC fight in New Jersey – a sport he has used frequently to appeal to macho voters. Critics however fear that Trump's actions in Los Angeles are not just for show. Since returning to office, Trump has repeatedly pushed the boundaries of presidential power to target the US bureaucracy, universities, law firms, cultural institutions and anywhere else he believes liberal ideologies linger. Trump seemed to hint at what could come next when he pinned the blame for the Los Angeles unrest – without evidence – on "insurrectionists." It appeared to be a clear reference to the Insurrection Act, which would allow the military to be used as a domestic police force. "Trump is pretty free and loose when it comes to the use of force," Todd Belt, a political science professor at George Washington University, told AFP. "He knows it is popular with his base, and he always likes to look strong in their eyes." Trump has talked for years about using the military against protests. Although he did not do so during his first term, his former defence secretary Mark Esper said Trump asked why Black Lives Matter protesters could not be shot in the legs. Conversely, Trump made no move to bring in the military when his own supporters attacked the US Capitol in a bid to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden. Trump would not say if he would invoke the Insurrection Act when asked by reporters on Monday, but he and his advisors have been framing the issue in increasingly apocalyptic terms. His top migration advisor Stephen Miller has explicitly framed the Los Angeles protests as a battle for the future of Western civilisation against an "invasion" of migrants. "The 'war' and 'invasion' framing have helped the administration make the case for the domestic use of these laws that are normally used to put down rebellions or invasions," said Belt.


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Xi urges South Korea's Lee to help safeguard free trade in call
BEIJING: Chinese President Xi Jinping (pic) held his first phone conversation with South Korea's newly elected President Lee Jae-myung and called for cooperation to safeguard multilateralism and free trade. Xi made the remarks in a phone call with Lee, state-run Xinhua News Agency and China Central Television reported. Lee earlier said he was set to speak with Xi by phone on Tuesday (June 10). "We should strengthen bilateral cooperation and multilateral coordination, jointly safeguard multilateralism and free trade, and ensure the stability and smoothness of global and regional industrial chains and supply chains,' Xi said, according to the CCTV report. Xi said the two countries should promote their strategic partnership to a higher level and "inject more certainty' into the regional and international landscape, the reports said. The new South Korean leader has signalled a more cautious stance on the US-China rivalry, marking a shift from predecessor Yoon Suk-yeol's foreign policy, which emphasised closer ties with Washington and a trilateral partnership with Japan. - Bloomberg


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Two Chinese aircraft carriers seen in Pacific for first time: Tokyo
TOKYO: Japan said Tuesday (June 10) that two Chinese aircraft carriers had been seen operating in the Pacific for the first time as Beijing boosts its military capability in far-flung areas. On Monday (June 9), China's Shandong carrier and four other vessels, including a missile destroyer, sailed inside the Japanese economic waters surrounding the remote Pacific atoll of Okinotori, Tokyo's defence ministry said. Its fighter jets and helicopters conducted take-offs and landings there, the ministry said. The fleet of five warships was also seen sailing on Saturday 550km southeast of Miyako Island near Taiwan, it added. China's other operational aircraft carrier Liaoning (pic) and its fleet entered Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the Pacific over the weekend, before exiting to conduct drills involving fighter jets, Tokyo previously said. "This is the first time two Chinese aircraft carriers were spotted operating in the Pacific at the same time," a defence ministry spokesman told AFP on Tuesday. "We believe the Chinese military's purpose is to improve its operational capability and ability to conduct operations in distant areas," he said. China's use of naval and air assets to press its territorial claims has rattled the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. Japanese and US defence officials say China wants to push the American military out of the so-called "first island chain" from Japan down through the Philippines. Eventually, its strategy is to dominate areas west of the "second island chain" in the Pacific between Japan's remote Ogasawara Islands and the US territory of Guam, they say. The Liaoning's recent cruise eastwards marked the first time the Japanese defence ministry has said a Chinese aircraft carrier had crossed the second island chain. In September, the warship sailed between two Japanese islands near Taiwan and entered Japan's contiguous waters, an area up to 24 nautical miles from its coast. At the time, Tokyo called that move "unacceptable" and expressed "serious concerns" to Beijing. Under international law, a state has rights to the management of natural resources and other economic activities within its EEZ, which is within 200 nautical miles (370km) of its coastline. - AFP