
Trump, Noem, Powell and Democrats: Five takeaways from the Hill Nation Summit
Republican speakers were notably deferent to and confident in Trump, while Democrats struggling to coalesce around a strategy to come back from their crushing 2024 defeat outlined their own ideas.
Here are five takeaways from the summit.
Trump is king for GOP
Six months into Trump's second term, it is clear that his grip on other Republicans is the strongest it's ever been.
Republicans at the Hill Nation Summit gave the president high marks for his term so far — and resisted any hint at criticism.
Rep. John James (R-Mich.), who is running for governor, declined to criticize President Trump's tariffs despite representing an area heavily dependent on auto manufacturing.
'I have every reason to believe, when I talk to people in my district who are saying, 'We're getting more business than we've ever gotten before,' … that's a result of President Trump, a businessman who knows what he's doing,' James said.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said there was a 'huge distinction' between President Biden's policies around social media and Trump's pressure campaign on major law firms.
'It's not censorship,' Jordan said, arguing that the firms were not directed to take down particular posts or speech from their websites.
House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) said that the pressure Trump exerts on members is actually helpful to help unify Republicans in Congress.
'I think too often we're all we're all carrot and no stick. And I think in life in general, and in business, to many audience members, I think you have to have equal parts carrot and stick, and that's generally the best way to incentivize the outcomes and the behavior we want,' Arrington said.
Trump is winning, and his first six in months have underscored his willingness to hit back hard at his opponents in either party.
The remarks from Republicans on Wednesday suggested they like the winning. But Republicans also aren't interested, for the most part, in getting on the president's bad side.
Powell's future hangs over event
Did we just say something about staying on Trump's good side?
One person who isn't on his good side is Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who is under a severe pressure campaign from the president.
In the first hour of the confab, Peter Navarro, the White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, unloaded on Powell at the summit, labeling him the 'worst Fed chair in history' — without, notably, calling for his ouster.
All I want is a Fed chair who understands how economies work, and Powell ain't that,' he said. 'We're in the endgame now for Powell.'
During the event, reports surfaced that Trump, during an Oval Office meeting with House Republicans on Tuesday, indicated that he would likely fire Powell 'soon,' according to a senior White House official. Trump later said it was 'not true' and 'highly unlikely,' but noted 'I don't rule out anything.'
One of the GOP lawmakers in the meeting, Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), sat down for an interview at the Hill Nation Summit shortly after. Donalds refused to disclose details from the gathering — 'I'm not gonna get into the details of that conversation' — but notably said he was not, and likely would never be, in favor of pushing Powell.
'I'm not there yet, but I'll tell you that the president doesn't rule anything out,' Donalds said. 'It's pretty clear the president is frustrated about where short-term interest rates are.'
'I think the greater issue is Congress being smart with the people's money,' he added.
Asked if he would ever get to a moment where he believes Powell should be fired, Donalds responded: 'For me, probably won't get to that point.'
Democrats debate how to make comeback
Democrats attending the Hill Nation Summit all had something to say about how their party can make a comeback and regain power in Washington.
But there were some differences over how to do so.
Activist David Hogg, 25, who has sought to pressure his party into shifting toward the left and allowing a new generation of leaders to take hold, said it is vital for his party to make big changes.
He joked that he was confident he'd eventually win out since he'd 'out-live' many of those on the other side of the debate, and more seriously compared the Democratic Party to the Soviet Union when it came to aging leaders holding on.
Other speakers, such as Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.), said they thought age was overrated, even as they said the party needed to rethink some things.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said that one of the problems Democrats are facing is that 'we were way too judgmental' of people who voted for President Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
Khanna, a prominent House progressive, recently visited South Carolina, a crucial stop on the road to the Democratic nomination, but said he hadn't made a decision on running for president in 2028.
'Whether I run or whether I get behind someone and have a network that can then support them, I haven't decided,' Khanna said. 'But I do know this: the Democratic Party has not had a compelling economic vision for years. I have a compelling economic vision.'
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) said his state's governor, Gavin Newsom, would be a great 2028 candidate. He also predicted Republicans would pay for their 'big, beautiful' bill's cuts to Medicaid, noting Sen. Josh Hawley's (R-Mo.) bill seeking to undo parts of the legislation's Medicaid provisions.
'One thing the bill does is for any Republican that's been saying, 'Oh, these weren't actually cuts to Medicaid,' it shows a lie to that,' Lieu said at the Hill Nation Summit. 'Our messaging is, if you want to elect the same person who voted for the cuts, you can do that, or you can elect a Democrat that's going to stop the cuts.'
And while Hogg was pushed out of his unpaid role at the Democratic National Committee earlier this year, he said he is still interested in working with the committee in the future, adding that he still has a 'good' relationship with the DNC Chair Ken Martin.
'There's obviously disagreements that we have at the end of the day, but I think that we all still have good relationships. I still have, you know, enormous respect for all my fellow vice chairs, for the other officers of the DNC,' Hogg said.
McCarthy opens door to return to politics
Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who has joined the speech-giving circuit since he was ousted from the Speakership and left Congress, had previously ruled out taking a role in the Trump administration — but cracked that door back open at the Hill Nation Summit.
Asked if he would be open to serving in the Trump administration or another government role, McCarthy said: 'Oh, yeah. I talk to the president often. I will do whatever I can to help this president, I will do whatever I can to help this country be successful.'
But McCarthy indicated he is happy, at least for now, with being outside the government.
'I think there's things I do now that do that in a way that I don't have to take a paycheck from the government, I think that's more helpful to the taxpayer,' McCarthy said, adding: 'I don't have to go back into government — but I will always help individuals.'
Noem defends, attacks and surprises
The Department of Homeland Security is a large enterprise that gives its secretary, Kristi Noem, power and influence over a host of issues.
At Wednesday's summit, that was underlined as Noem defended the administration's record, went on offense on immigration and surprised, at least a bit, with some news on security at airports.
Noem, commenting on the immigration raid on a California marijuana farm where protesters clashed with federal officers, said, 'We will go places where we know there are known criminals, where we've built a case to go get those individuals.'
That signaled Noem and the administration have no intention of backing down on an issue that has been a huge strength of Trump's, though the known criminals part of Trump's wording could also suggest the administration will be less focused on migrants without criminal records who may be working on farms.
Noem separately said the Trump administration might not spend all of the money allocated to it to build a wall on the southern border. That funding was included in the tax and spending megabill earlier this month. She said the funding might not need to be spent given the significant drop in border-crossing numbers since President Trump came into office.
'Maybe you don't need all that money for the wall because we've done such a great job securing the border. We'll look at all of that,' Noem told NewsNation's Blake Burman.
Noem separately suggested changes could be coming to the size of liquid containers allowed for passengers boarding flights in the United States.
Noem said such changes were one of the things the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which reports to Noem, is weighing.
'But I will tell you — I mean the liquids — I'm questioning. So that may be the next big announcement is what size your liquids need to be,' Noem told NewsNation's host Blake Burman at the Hill Nation Summit. 'We're looking at, you know, our scanners.'
Noem's comments came about a week after the DHS, which oversees the TSA, announced travelers flying domestically will be allowed to keep their shoes on while passing through TSA screening.
Currently, liquids like juices, bottled water and coffee as well as aerosols, creams, gels and pastes all under 3.4 ounces are allowed in carry-on bags.
Noem spoke about streamlining the experience for domestic travelers at airports, revealing that the DHS is in discussions with 'several' companies about making it happen
'Well, hopefully the future of an airport where I'm looking to go is that you walk in the door with your carry-on suitcase, you walk through a scanner and go right to your flight,' Noem said Wednesday, adding that it could take just 'one' minute to get to the gate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Is Coca-Cola changing its US recipe? What we know so far
While Coca-Cola has yet to announce a recipe change, President Donald Trump said the drink-maker agreed to switch a primary ingredient for its U.S. beverages. In a Truth Social post on Wednesday, July 16, the president said he has spoke with the company about using "REAL cane sugar" in its flagship soda, adding that company has agreed to do so. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" he wrote. For its U.S. products, the soft drink manufacturer currently uses high-fructose corn syrup as opposed to cane sugar, which is used in other countries like Mexico. The announcement aligns with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to shift American food consumption away from certain ingredients, like artificial dyes. While Kennedy has deemed both sugar and high fructose corn syrup as unhealthy, his Make America Healthy Again initiative combatting chronic health problems has claimed the proposed substitutes are ultimately healthier. Here's what to know about the supposed recipe change. What has Coca-Cola said about the move? Coca-Cola has not yet confirmed a recipe switch, as of Thursday evening, July 17, but the company teased an announcement could be coming. "We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca‑Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon," the company said in a statement July 16. A company quarterly earnings call is scheduled for Tuesday, July 22, 2025 starting at 8:30 a.m. ET. What has Trump, the White House said? The White House has not responded to USA TODAY's requests for comment after Trump initially announced the recipe switch on Truth Social July 16. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better! Wall Street reacts: Stock prices of high fructose syrup producer ADM drop Archer-Daniels-Midland, a major producer of high fructose syrup, saw its shares fall close to 1% on July 17, following Trump's announcement. Meanwhile, ingredients provider Ingredion saw its shares decline by 0.6% after falling as much as 7% ahead of the market's open, CNBC reported. Coca-Cola shares rose nearly 2% on Thursday. Is cane sugar healthier than corn syrup? If consumed in excess, both cane and high-fructose corn syrup, like all sugars, can carry negative health effects including weight gain, diabetes and heart disease. While some studies have suggested that high-fructose corn syrup may be linked to increased fat production and inflammation, the FDA says it is "not aware of any evidence" of a difference in safety between foods containing high-fructose corn syrup and "foods containing similar amounts of other nutritive sweeteners with approximately equal glucose and fructose content, such as sucrose, honey, or other traditional sweeteners." How would the recipe change impact Coca-Cola? Coca-Cola switching from cane sugar to high-fructose corn syrup would pose changes to cost and product labeling, Reuters reported, citing industry analysts. The company would have to significantly adjust its supply chains as the two sweeteners primarily come from different producers. Is corn syrup cheaper than sugar? Ron Sterk, a senior editor at food industry insider SOSland Publishing, said it is cheaper for U.S. food and beverage companies to use corn syrup than cane sugar, Reuters reported. Contributing: Reuters and Mary Walrath-Holdridge, USA TODAY

Los Angeles Times
15 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Emails show DeSantis administration blindsided county officials with plans for ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration left many local officials in the dark about the immigration detention center that rose from an isolated airstrip in the Everglades, emails obtained by the Associated Press show, while relying on an executive order to seize the land, hire contractors and bypass laws and regulations. The emails show that local officials in southwest Florida were still trying to chase down a 'rumor' about the sprawling 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility planned for their county while state officials were already on the ground and sending vendors through the gates to coordinate construction of the detention center, which was designed to house thousands of migrants and went up in a matter of days. 'Not cool!' one local official told the state agency director spearheading the construction. The 100-plus emails dated June 21 to July 1, obtained through a public records request, underscore the breakneck speed at which the the governor's team built the facility and the extent to which local officials were blindsided by the plans for the compound of makeshift tents and trailers in Collier County, a wealthy, majority-Republican corner of the state that's home to white-sand beaches and the western stretch of the Everglades. The executive order, originally signed by the Republican governor in 2023 and extended since then, accelerated the project, allowing the state to seize county-owned land and evade rules in what critics have called an abuse of power. The order granted the state sweeping authority to suspend 'any statute, rule or order' seen as slowing the response to the immigration 'emergency.' A representative for DeSantis did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Known as the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, the airstrip is about 45 miles (72 kilometers) west of downtown Miami. It is located within Collier County but is owned and managed by neighboring Miami-Dade County. The AP asked for similar records from Miami-Dade County, which is still processing the request. To DeSantis and other state officials, building the facility in the remote Everglades and naming it after a notorious federal prison were meant as deterrents. It's another sign of how President Donald Trump's administration and his allies are relying on scare tactics to pressure people who are in the country illegally to leave. Collier County Commissioner Rick LoCastro apparently first heard about the proposal after a concerned resident in another county sent him an email on June 21. 'A citizen is asking about a proposed 'detention center' in the Everglades?' LoCastro wrote to County Manager Amy Patterson and other staff. 'Never heard of that … Am I missing something?' 'I am unaware of any land use petitions that are proposing a detention center in the Everglades. I'll check with my intake team, but I don't believe any such proposal has been received by Zoning,' replied the county's planning and zoning director, Michael Bosi. Environmental groups have since filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that the state illegally bypassed federal and state laws in building the facility. In fact, LoCastro was included on a June 21 email from state officials announcing their intention to buy the airfield. LoCastro sits on the county's governing board but does not lead it, and his district does not include the airstrip. He forwarded the message to the county attorney, saying, 'Not sure why they would send this to me?' In the email, Kevin Guthrie, the head of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which built the detention center, said the state intended to 'work collaboratively' with the counties. The message referenced the executive order on illegal immigration, but it did not specify how the state wanted to use the site, other than for 'future emergency response, aviation logistics, and staging operations.' The next day, Collier County's emergency management director, Dan Summers, wrote up a briefing for the county manager and other local officials, including some notes about the 'rumor' he had heard about plans for an immigration detention facility at the airfield. Summers knew the place well, he said, after doing a detailed site survey a few years ago. 'The infrastructure is — well, nothing much but a few equipment barns and a mobile home office … (wet and mosquito-infested),' Summers wrote. FDEM told Summers that while the agency had surveyed the airstrip, 'NO mobilization or action plans are being executed at this time' and all activity was 'investigatory,' Summers wrote. By June 23, Summers was racing to prepare a presentation for a meeting of the board of county commissioners the next day. He shot off an email to FDEM Director Kevin Guthrie seeking confirmation of basic facts about the airfield and the plans for the detention facility, which Summers understood to be 'conceptual' and in 'discussion or investigatory stages only.' 'Is it in the plans or is there an actual operation set to open?' Summers asked. 'Rumor is operational today… ???' In fact, the agency was already 'on site with our vendors,' coordinating construction of the site, FDEM bureau chief Ian Guidicelli responded. 'Not cool! That's not what was relayed to me last week or over the weekend,' Summers responded, adding that he would have 'egg on my face' with the Collier County Sheriff's Office and Board of County Commissioners. 'It's a Collier County site. I am on your team, how about the courtesy of some coordination?' On the evening of June 23, FDEM officially notified Miami-Dade County it was seizing the county-owned land to build the detention center, under emergency powers granted by the executive order. Plans for the facility sparked concerns among first responders in Collier County, who questioned which agency would be responsible if an emergency should strike the site. Discussions on the issue grew tense at times. Local Fire Chief Chris Wolfe wrote to the county's chief of emergency medical services and other officials on June 25: 'I am not attempting to argue with you, more simply seeking how we are going to prepare for this that is clearly within the jurisdiction of Collier County.' Summers, the emergency management director, repeatedly reached out to FDEM for guidance, trying to 'eliminate some of the confusion' around the site. As he and other county officials waited for details from Tallahassee, they turned to local news outlets for information, sharing links to stories among themselves. 'Keep them coming,' Summers wrote to county Communications Director John Mullins in response to one news article, 'since [it's] crickets from Tally at this point.' Hoping to manage any blowback to the county's tourism industry, local officials kept close tabs on media coverage of the facility, watching as the news spread rapidly from local newspapers in southwest Florida to national outlets such as the Washington Post and the New York Times and international news sites as far away as the U.K., Germany and Switzerland. As questions from reporters and complaints from concerned residents streamed in, local officials lined up legal documentation to show the airfield was not their responsibility. In an email chain labeled, 'Not our circus, not our monkeys...,' County Attorney Jeffrey Klatzkow wrote to the county manager, 'My view is we have no interest in this airport parcel, which was acquired by eminent domain by Dade County in 1968.' Meanwhile, construction at the site plowed ahead, with trucks arriving around the clock carrying portable toilets, asphalt and construction materials. Among the companies that snagged multimillion-dollar contracts for the work were those whose owners donated generously to DeSantis and other Republicans. On July 1, just 10 days after Collier County first got wind of the plans, the state officially opened the facility, welcoming DeSantis, Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other state and national officials for a tour. A county emergency management staffer fired off an email to Summers, asking to be included on any site visit to the facility. 'Absolutely,' Summers replied. 'After the President's visit and some of the chaos on-site settles-in, we will get you all down there…' Payne writes for the Associated Press.


San Francisco Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump offers regulatory relief for coal, iron ore and chemical industries
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is granting two years of regulatory relief to coal-fired power plants, chemical manufacturers and other polluting industries as he seeks to reverse Biden-era regulations he considers overly burdensome. Trump issued a series of proclamations late Thursday exempting a range of industries that he calls vital to national security. The proclamations cover coal-fired power plants, taconite iron ore processing facilities used to make steel, and chemical manufacturers that help produce semiconductors and medical device sterilizers. The proclamations allow the facilities to comply with Environmental Protection Agency standards that were in place before rules imposed in recent years by President Joe Biden's administration, the White House said. Trump called the Biden-era rules expensive and, in some cases, unattainable. His actions will ensure that 'critical industries can continue to operate uninterrupted to support national security without incurring substantial costs,'' the White House said in a fact sheet. Trump's EPA had earlier exempted dozens of coal-fired plants from air-pollution rules for the same reasons. The EPA also offered other industrial polluters a chance for exemptions from requirements to reduce emissions of toxic chemicals such as mercury, arsenic and benzene. An electronic mailbox set up by the EPA allowed regulated companies to request a presidential exemption under the Clean Air Act to a host of Biden-era rules. Environmental groups denounced the offer to grant exemptions, calling the new email address a 'polluters' portal' that could allow hundreds of companies to evade laws meant to protect the environment and public health. Mercury exposure can cause brain damage, especially in children. Fetuses are vulnerable to birth defects via exposure in a mother's womb. Within weeks of the EPA's offer, industry groups representing hundreds of chemical and petrochemical manufacturers began seeking the blanket exemptions from federal pollution requirements. The Clean Air Act enables the president to temporarily exempt industrial sites from new rules if the technology required to meet them is not widely available and if the continued activity is in the interest of national security. In April, the EPA granted nearly 70 coal-fired power plants a two-year exemption from federal requirements to reduce emissions of toxic chemicals. A list posted on the agency's website lists 47 power providers — which operate at least 66 coal-fired plants — that are receiving exemptions from the Biden-era rules. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced plans in March to roll back dozens of key environmental rules on everything from clean air to clean water and climate change. Zeldin called the planned rollbacks the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history." An Associated Press examination of the proposed rollbacks concluded that rules targeted by the EPA could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect. The AP review included the agency's own prior assessments as well as a wide range of other research.