All the ways Republicans want to honor Trump, from the $100 bill to Mount Rushmore
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Doug Heye, a Republican strategist who served as communications director of the Republican National Committee, said the bills have an important audience despite their seeming frivolity.
Advertisement
'This is more about one person,' Heye said. 'It's not, 'Hey, voters, look what I'm trying to do for Donald.' It's, 'Hey, Donald, look what I'm trying to do for you.''
No time to waste
House Republicans moved quickly to honor Trump after his second term began. The bill to rename Dulles International Airport in Virginia after Trump was introduced 72 hours after his swearing-in.
'Best president in my lifetime,' said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Addison McDowell of North Carolina. 'And I can't think of a better way to honor somebody than to cement their place in history by naming an international airport in our nation's capital after him.'
Advertisement
Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas waited a few more weeks before sponsoring his bill to put Trump's picture on the $100 bill. His legislation stated no $100 bill printed after Dec. 31, 2028, could be printed without Trump's portrait on the front, even though federal law bans living figures from being placed on U.S. currency. That law, enacted just after the Civil War, was intended to avoid the appearance of a monarchy.
Another proposal from Rep. Greg Steube of Florida would rename Washington's subway system the Trump Train. There's also a bill from Rep. Claudia Tenney of New York combining Trump's birthday with Flag Day to designate June 14 a federal holiday.
Perhaps the most daring idea comes from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, who wants the Interior secretary to arrange for Trump's likeness to be carved into Mount Rushmore alongside Washington, Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and Teddy Roosevelt. She has two models of it in her office.
Luna said through two assassination attempts and a 'sham impeachment,' Trump has 'shown not just resiliency in character but also to have been able to do what no other president has been able to accomplish.'
Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina admits he wasn't enamored with Trump at first. Now, Wilson carries a pamphlet he gives to colleagues asking them to sponsor a bill that would direct the Bureau of Printing and Engraving to design and print a $250 bill bearing Trump's image. The honor would coincide with the 250th anniversary of the United States declaring its independence.
Advertisement
'I believe the president has served in a such a manner that he deserves it,' Wilson said.
It's not just a few random Republicans taking part. In the GOP's tax cut and immigration law, leadership changed the name of a new type of savings account for children from 'MAGA accounts' to 'Trump accounts.'
'Because Trump is a transformational leader and he advocated for them,' Rep. Jason Smith, the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said of the name change.
The Nobel Peace Prize
Several lawmakers are also talking Trump up as someone who should win the Nobel Peace Prize.
As a candidate, Trump promised he would end the Russia-Ukraine war on his first day in office before saying later as president he was joking. Solving that conflict and Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza has eluded Trump.
But Republicans — and at least one foreign leader, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — are still proposing Trump receive the prize. Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio has called on the Senate to nominate Trump, while Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee asked her social media followers to share her post if they agree he deserves it.
Tenney recently wrote on X she has nominated Trump twice and will continue to do so until he's awarded the prize.
Honoring Melania Trump, too
An appropriations bill making its way through the House includes an amendment from Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho that would name the Opera House at the Kennedy Center for first lady Melania Trump.
Simpson said the White House didn't know about the amendment until it was introduced. He said the effort is different from renaming Dulles Airport in Trump's honor because the theater isn't currently named after anyone.
Advertisement
'She's just been a supporter of the arts, always has been, and we're trying to keep the arts alive in this bill,' Simpson said. 'So we thought it was the appropriate thing to do.'
Smart politics
For many Republicans, lauding Trump in legislation is simply smart politics. Trump's endorsement helped catapult many lawmakers into elected office, and his support could be helpful as individual members try to get their priorities into law.
Plus, Trump wields his endorsement aggressively to replace members he finds disloyal and reward allies. He's already endorsed Gill and Luna for reelection in 2026, calling them 'MAGA Warriors.'
But the power of a Trump endorsement extends beyond the primary, especially in the midterm elections.
'In the general election, they just send a signal to Trump voters to turn out, to trust somebody and vote for them,' said Steve Stivers, former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee.
Democrats have taken note of the flurry of Trump tributes, seeing it as a chance to portray a pliant Republican majority as being focused on placating Trump rather than helping Americans.
'House Republicans continue to embarrass themselves,' said Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York. 'These people are sycophants.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed check-in: Waller reportedly top Chair pick, rate cut outlook
Federal Reserve governor Christopher Waller is reportedly the top pick for Fed chair among President Trump's team, according to Bloomberg. Fed Watch Advisors founder and chief investment officer Ben Emons and StoneX senior adviser Jon Hilsenrath join Market Catalysts with Julie Hyman to discuss. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller has emerged as Trump officials' top pick to replace Fed chair Jerome Powell. That's according to report from Bloomberg. Waller has met with several members of the administration. He's not yet spoken with President Trump himself though. Of course, it's not a done deal. Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official, and Kevin Hassett, currently Trump's National Economic Council director, are reportedly both still in the running. Joining me now, Ben Emmens, Fed Watch Advisors founder and chief investment officer, and John Hilsenrath, Stone X senior advisor and Yahoo Finance contributor. It does seem like and there were some reporting from Wall Street Journal today that the administration is leaning towards appointing someone to fill Adriana Kugler's seat that could then move into the Fed chair spot. Ben, I'll start with you. What do what do you make of this latest reporting on Waller sort of maybe, maybe being the front runner, at least today? Yeah, I think that he is a front runner, but he has said himself that because the president hasn't reached out to him, you know, he doesn't know for sure. And you know, he really wants to do the job. So he's clearly keen to do it. Um, but it's all the speculation around this actual chair, I think it's by far not determined because they have to fill the Adriana Kugler position first, which kind of procedural how they have to go about it. This new Fed chair or Fed member will be only in place for October meeting, not a September meeting because of the the specifics of the Senate confirmation. Yet, that position is key because it's an additional vote at the table for cutting rates. And it looks like a lot of Fed members are ready, like, moving in a direction of like we'll probably have to lower rates in September. So, it just only fuels more the rate cut speculation. I think this debate about who will be the next chair. But who will it be? That's, I think, still a guessing game. And Trump has his time, but I mean, once he puts the replacement for Kugler in place, he could take his time, that's been reported. Right. And John, what do you make it? I mean, it feels like the market is relatively comfortable with a Warsh or a Waller potentially in place here. Uh, the market seems very comfortable with a lot, uh, that's going on in the macro setting right now. Stock prices are rising, interest rates are low, but I don't think that the drama, uh, over this succession is going to end very quickly. And, you know, today we get a headline that it's that it's Waller, tomorrow we might get a headline that it's Warsh again. Uh, I'm really going to believe it when I see it, especially when the president hasn't had one-on-one time with Waller. Let's not forget that Jay Powell was a sitting Fed governor that the president chose, and he ended up becoming very unhappy with Jay Powell. The president said something the other day that sometimes you think someone is great and then he gets in the job and you're not so sure. So I I I think that we're we're moving into maybe the second or third round of this apprentice, uh, campaign and there there might be 10 episodes before the season is over. I I mean, Ben, does it, you know, what we were saying here about the changing expectations for what's going to happen with rate cuts, does that make it not moot, certainly who is the head of the Fed, but the whole politicization conversation, it seems like that comes off the boil if there are real economic underpinnings and reasons for the Fed to cut rates, right? Yeah, I think so, Julie, because it is a story about inflation, unemployment ultimately. So the reaction to this job support on Friday is telling. The Fed is quite concerned if the unemployment rate goes up too quickly and will act faster than if inflation were to go up a little bit. And they just sort of wait and see what happens with inflation before they do anything. So it is really a point here where we may repeat what happened last year in September when they surprised with 50 base points of a rate cut. It's not in markets currently, but if the unemployment rate goes up a little further from here, that becomes a a real possibility because I think the Fed does not want its forecast of 4.5% unemployment to actually materialize. They want to put in place an insurance to make sure that that actually doesn't happen. So this is really a rate cut speculation ultimately, I think. And it is more notable, as we talked at previous time, that how the tone starts to shift from one Fed member to the other member. Like I wrote today, like dominoes, like it sort of goes from one to the other. You have Muesselem today is kind of hawkish, he may have a different tone. You have Golsby next week, he's also voting member, he may start changing his tone, too. Before you know it, we have a full majority of Fed members ready to cut rates before the meeting starts. So I think that's how it plays out. Yeah. And John, we haven't had a chance to talk since the jobs report, which, as we know, came out worse than estimated. We got CPI also coming next week, which could be really telling here. So, what do you think all of this means for September? Well, I I think the market's getting ahead of itself, frankly. Uh, I think, you know, to me, the key comments that came out from the Fed since that jobs report was John Williams, who is part of Jay Powell's inner circle. And he said, in his view, the job market was still relatively solid, and they want to see more data before they make a decision. I think that the, you know, the Fed doesn't want to get pinned down to September. I think they certainly don't want to get pinned down to 50 basis points in September. Look, they did that last year, and it seems to have been a mistake. They seems to have moved too aggressively last year because inflation stopped falling. Literally, the month that the Fed uh did that 50 basis point cut, that was the low point for inflation so far in this cycle. So, you know, I think we're one bad inflation print away from them saying, "Oh, well, wait a second, you know, maybe we shouldn't get ahead of ourselves on this rate cut talk." Well, we'll see what CPI says next week. And lest we forget, we will hear from Chair Powell in Jackson Hole uh later this month as well. Ben, John, got to leave it there. Thank you so much. Related Videos Crypto stock boost, Toyota guidance cut, Zillow revenue beat Miran Talks Trump's Tariffs, Exemptions and Waller Trump to sign EO allowing crypto in 401(k)s: What it means for markets This could be Wall Street's next hot trade Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Los Angeles Times
4 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Powerful labor coalition backs redrawing California's congressional map in fight with Texas and Trump
One of California's most influential labor organizations endorsed redrawing the state's congressional maps to counter President Trump's effort to push Republican states, notably Texas, to increase his party's numbers in Congress in next year's midterm election. The California Federation of Labor Unions voted unanimously Tuesday to support putting a measure on the ballot in November. The proposal, backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and many of the state's Democratic leaders, would ask voters to temporarily change congressional district boundaries that were drawn by an independent redistricting commission four years ago, with some conditions. Republicans could potentially lose up to a half dozen seats in California's 52-member delegation to the U.S. House of Representatives. After it returns for its summer recess on Aug. 18, the California Legislature is expected to vote to place the measure on the statewide ballot in a special election. 'President Trump has said that Republicans are 'entitled' to five more congressional votes in Texas. Well, they aren't entitled to steal the 2026 election. California's unions refuse to stand by as democracy is tested,' Lorena Gonzalez, president of the federation, said in a statement. 'California Labor is unified in our resolve to fight back against President Trump's anti-worker agenda.' Redistricting — the esoteric redrawing of the nation's 435 congressional districts — typically occurs once every decade after the U.S. census tallies the population across the nation. Population shifts can result in changes in a state's allocation of congressional seats, such as when California lost a seat after the 2020 census the first time in the state's history. The political redistricting process had long been crafted by elected officials to give their political parties an edge or to protect incumbents — sometimes in brazen, bizarrely shaped districts. Californians voted in 2010 to create an independent commission to draw congressional maps based on communities of interest, logical geography and ensuring representation of minority communities. The ballot measure being pushed by Newsom and others would allow state lawmakers to help determine district boundaries for the next three election cycles if Texas approves a pending measure to reconfigure districts to increase Republican-held congressional seats in that state. Line-drawing would return to the independent commission after the 2030 census. The California Federation of Labor is committed to spending several million dollars supporting a mid-decade redistricting ballot measure, on top of what it already planned to spend on competitive congressional races next year, according to a person familiar with the plans who asked for anonymity to speak candidly about the strategy. A spokesperson for several organizations devoted to fighting any effort to change the state's redistricting process said that Charles Munger Jr., the son of a billionaire, and who bankrolled the ballot measure to create the independent commission, is committed to making sure it is not weakened. 'While Charles Munger has been out of politics since 2016, he has said he will vigorously defend the reforms he helped pass, including nonpartisan redistricting,' said Amy Thoma, spokesperson for the Voters First Coalition. 'His previous success in passing ballot measures in California means he knows exactly what is needed to be successful. We will have the resources necessary to make our coalition heard.'
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fox News moves to dismiss Newsom lawsuit
Fox News has asked a judge to dismiss a lawsuit brought against the network by California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over its coverage of a call President Trump said he had with the Democrat as the two politicians fought about immigration enforcement. Newsom's suit, filed in June, alleges the network defamed him when prime-time host Jesse Watters claimed the governor lied about a call with Trump earlier that month. 'If Fox News wants to lie to the American people on Donald Trump's behalf, it should face consequences — just like it did in the Dominion case,' Newsom said in a statement at the time. This week, Fox asked the judge overseeing the case to strike Newsom's complaint, saying the Democrat 'made an unqualified assertion that no call had taken place when in fact he and President Trump had spoken just days before.' The network's attorneys argued as part of its filing that Newsom was purposely trying to drum up press coverage amid speculation he could run for president in 2028. 'With Gov. Newsom facing possible payment of Fox's attorney fees and political embarrassment, we're not surprised he has told us he plans to amend his original complaint,' the network said in a statement issued on Thursday. 'But no amendment will change that this case is a transparent publicity stunt and a colossal waste of the court's time and resources.' Watters last month apologized on air, saying Newsom 'didn't deceive anybody on purpose' but was 'confusing and unclear' with his comments. Newsom is a frequent critic of the Rupert Murdoch-owned cable channel, where various personalities each day criticize Democrats and other foes of President Trump.
