Police launch investigation after Colwyn Bay man dies from head injury
John Gittins, senior coroner for North Wales East and Central, said he had been told by North Wales Police that a disturbance had occurred at Mr Hardman's home in Coed y Glyn, Colwyn Bay.
On July 22 Mr Hardman, a telephone engineer, was taken to hospital but later discharged. He then complained of feeling unwell and returned to hospital, but died in the early hours of the following day.
Home Office pathologist Dr Brian Rodgers gave the provisional cause of death as a massive subdural hematoma due to a severe blunt force injury.
Adjourning the inquest to a date to be fixed, the coroner said that investigations were continuing. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Why journalists cover inquests and why it's crucial that we do
Reporting on an inquest can be one of the hardest types of stories a journalist can write.
More often than not, they are emotionally charged proceedings attended by grief-stricken people who are desperate for answers.
Sometimes, inquests can seem quite clinical due to a coroner's need to remain impartial and level-headed so that they can draw a conclusion from desperately sad events.
As painful as these proceedings are for those who have lost a loved one, the lessons that can be learned from inquests can go a long way to saving others' lives.
Families are often surprised - and sometimes angry - when they see a reporter in attendance.
Understandably they worry the nature of their loved one's death will be sensationalised and that a news story will forever tarnish their memory.
Responsible and ethically minded journalists will do what they can to report inquests sensitively, while not shying away from the often upsetting facts.
It is vital that the public don't forget that inquests are a type of judicial inquiry; they are after all held in a coroner's court.
The press has a legal right to attend inquests and has a responsibility to report on them as part of their duty to uphold the principle of 'open justice'.
But in doing so journalists must follow the guidance provided by the Independent Press Standards Organisation and set out in Editors' Code of Conduct.
It's a journalist's duty to make sure the public understands the reasons why someone has died and to make sure their deaths are not kept secret.
An inquest report can also clear up any rumours or suspicion surrounding a person's death.
But most importantly of all, an inquest report can draw attention to circumstances which may stop further deaths from happening.
Inquests are not criminal courts - there is no prosecution or defence - they are fact-finding tribunals which seek to answer four key questions:
Who is the person who died?
Where did they die?
When did they die?
How did they die?
They do not apportion blame.
Once these questions are answered a coroner will be able to record a conclusion.
The wider lessons that can be learned from an inquest can have far-reaching consequences - but if journalists do not attend them how can the public be made aware?
The harsh reality is they can't. Coroners often do not publish the results of an inquest.
Should journalists shy away from attending inquests then an entire arm of the judicial system - and numerous others who need to answer vital questions - is not held to account.
Inquests can often prompt a wider discussion on serious issues, the most recent of these being mental health and suicide.
Editors actively ask and encourage reporters to speak to the family and friends of a person who is the subject of an inquest.
Their contributions help us create a clearer picture of the person who died and also provides the opportunity to pay tribute to their loved one.
Often families do not wish to speak to the press and of course that decision has to be respected.
However, as has been seen by many brilliant campaigns run by newspapers and websites up and down the country, the input of a person's family and friends can make all the difference in helping to save others.
Without the attendance of the press at inquests questions will remain unanswered, debates unargued and lives lost.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
44 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Petition launched after Ethan Ives-Griffiths trial
Michael Ives and Kerry Ives, both of Kingsley Road, Garden City, were found guilty of murdering their two-year-old grandson at Mold Crown Court earlier this month. They were also found guilty of cruelty to a child, as was their daughter and Ethan's mother, Shannon Ives. Shannon Ives was also convicted of causing or allowing Ethan's death. During proceedings, the court heard harrowing details of the neglect and abuse Ethan suffered. Following the completion of the court case, Ethan's paternal family have set up a petition calling for an update in child protection services. The petition can be found here 'Ethan's Law' suggests that if social workers are denied entry to homes, they have the ability to escalate proceedings to the police. It also calls for checks to be carried out every five to seven days as opposed to the current 10-days. The petition states: "After four years of relentless pursuit, we finally received a verdict in the tragic case of our beautiful Ethan, a bright and innocent two-year-old boy. "He fell victim to the gross negligence and abhorrent abuse at the hands of his own maternal grandparents who were supposed to cherish him. Tragically, Ethan's mother stood by, neglecting her duty to protect her precious son during the most vulnerable time of his life, instead joined in with the neglect. Ethan Ives-Griffiths. (Image: North Wales Police) "When Ethan was discovered, he was severely malnourished, bruised and had a serious head injury, which resulted in Ethan being pronounced brain dead, testament to the horrifying neglect he suffered. Although justice has been served, and Ethan's soul can find peace, the profound loss we feel is indelible. "This painful experience underscores the urgent need for reform in the way child protection services operate, (Ethan's Law), particularly related to home visits for children on the protection register. "The safety and well-being of vulnerable children must be prioritised with more stringent measures. Currently, social services are able to conduct home visits without a warrant, in Ethan's case they were refused to go in and could not enter the home, resulting in missing critical signs of harm. "We propose a change in legislation to ensure that social services are following the correct protocol and if they are refused entry then they are to escalate it to the police. If this is not reported to the police for a further welfare check then the social workers must be held accountable for not following through with protocol for a child that is registered on the child protection list. This would empower social workers to take decisive action in safeguarding children. "Moreover, we urge for increased frequency of these checks. Instead of the existing 10-day interval, we recommend reducing this period to every 5- 7 days. "For children that are not on the child protection register, to have checks every 4-6 weeks, by health care professionals such as, health visitors or GPs. By doing so, we can substantially mitigate the risks of abuse, neglect, and tragedy that families like ours have faced. Consistently monitoring the living conditions and treatment of children will allow for timely interventions and potentially save lives. "Let us come together to push for these crucial reforms in child protection services. By signing this petition, you join us in advocating for the safety and security of all children like Ethan, ensuring that no child suffers in silence. "Your support can make a real difference in preventing future tragedies and strengthening our social service systems to better protect our most vulnerable." Flintshire County Council did not wish to comment on the petition, when approached.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Cooper cracks down on shotgun ownership
Yvette Cooper is tightening firearms licensing rules from Tuesday in response to a gun rampage in Plymouth four years ago. Applicants for shotgun certificates will now need two referees who have known them for more than two years. At present, they only need one. The changes by the Home Office bring shotguns into line with other firearms. Police will also be urged to speak to family members before granting firearms licences to ensure the applicant is not a domestic violence risk. The reforms were demanded by a senior coroner after the fatal shooting of five people in Plymouth in August 2021. Among the victims of 22-year-old Jake Davison was his mother. He shot and injured two others before turning the gun on himself. Diana Johnson, the policing minister, also referred to a shooting in Woodmancote, West Sussex, which left a mother and her two children dead. 'Only those who meet the highest standards of safety and responsibility should be permitted to use shotguns or firearms, and it is crucial that police have full information about the suitability of all applicants for these lethal weapons,' she said. 'The events in Woodmancote in 2020, Plymouth in 2021, and other cases provide a tragic reminder of what can happen when these weapons are in the hands of the wrong people, and we must do everything we can to protect the public. 'That is why, as part of our Plan for Change, we are giving the police the tools and resources they need to make safe, timely and consistent decisions when it comes to firearms licensing. 'This is just one part of our mission to make our streets safer. We will also launch a public consultation on the controls on shotguns and other firearms issues later this year.' Guidance for the police on how they determine who is suitable to hold a firearm or shotgun licence will be published on Tuesday. The number of referees required for shotgun certificate applications is rising from one to two, and new advice will be given to referees on their responsibilities when supporting an application. It will mean an additional person who has known the applicant well for at least two years will need to vouch for them, bringing shotgun referee checks in line with wider firearms rules. The Home Office is also strengthening the guidance for how police should consider suspected domestic abuse or other violence, when someone is applying for a firearms licence. This includes making clear that the police must speak to partners and household members to identify any signs of domestic abuse or any other factors which could indicate the applicant is not suitable to have a firearms licence. The updated guidance will mean officers must carry out additional checks before approving a licence to make sure those who perpetrate such crimes or have a record of violence are not permitted to access firearms. Emma Ambler is a campaigner who has called for stricter gun laws after her twin sister, Kelly Fitzgibbons, and her two nieces, Ava and Lexi Needham, were murdered in 2020 with a legally owned weapon. 'I'm really pleased that the Government is strengthening the current firearms licensing guidance,' she said. 'Although there is still some way to go, these changes are very welcome and it is pleasing to finally feel listened to after five years of campaigning to make the system safer. 'I still believe that holding a gun licence is a privilege and not a right. The priority has to be the safety of society and it's so important to stop these extremely dangerous weapons falling into the wrong hands, which these changes will go some way to doing.' Tim Bonner, chief executive of the Countryside Alliance, welcomed the changes. 'We support these changes to guidance which align some of the rules for shotguns and other firearms,' he said. 'They should make it less likely that licences are granted to the wrong people. None of this will, however, make any difference where the licensing system fails, as it did in Plymouth and has done far too often elsewhere. 'There can be no justification for further restricting gun ownership and the Government must address the fundamental question of why we have an antiquated system with 43 separate licensing authorities, too many of which are not fit for purpose. 'The public and gun owners want a system that does not put guns in the hands of people who should never have had a licence.'
Times
20 hours ago
- Times
Labour ‘must stop 8 in 10 migrant crossings' to break smuggling model
Britain and France will have to stop eight in ten attempted migrant crossings in order to destroy the business model of people smugglers, senior officials believe. The first migrants due for deportation to France as part of Britain's new returns deal will be detained by the end of this week, the Home Office said. The one in, one out migrant returns deal with France has been approved by the European Commission and will come into force on Tuesday. Dozens of beds have been freed up in immigration removal centres ready for any small boat migrant arrivals this week and Border Force officers have been prepared to start selecting those to be removed. Any adult migrant who arrives on small boats will face being sent back as part of an arrangement that will see an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers in France moving the other way — those with a family connection to the UK or from a country with a high rate of asylum claims granted, such as Afghanistan, Iran or Eritrea.
