Remembrance Sunday rules changed to protect NI peace process
Papers released by the National Archives show Northern Ireland secretary Paul Murphy said there were 'pressing political reasons' why the leaders of both the main unionist parties, David Trimble and the Rev Ian Paisley, should be able to take part in the ceremony.
However other ministers warned of an 'adverse reaction' from the SNP and Plaid Cymru, who were restricted to laying a single joint wreath.
Under rules drawn up in 1984, the leader of any party which secured six seats at the previous general election was entitled to lay a wreath during the ceremony led by the monarch.
After the 2001 general election that meant Mr Trimble, whose Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) secured six seats, could take part, but Mr Paisley, the leader of the Democratic Unionists (DUP) with five, could not.
But after Jeffrey Donaldson defected from the UUP to the DUP in 2003, the balance was reversed, and the DUP complained they were being treated unfairly compared with the UUP.
In the run up to the 2004 ceremony, Mr Murphy told the constitutional affairs secretary, Lord Falconer, there would be 'real difficulties' if the 1984 formulation continued to apply to the Northern Ireland parties.
'We will undoubtedly face renewed pressure from the the DUP this year given that they are now not only the largest NI party but also have six Westminster MPs (and had done resoundingly well in the assembly and Euro elections),' he wrote.
'But we are now involved in intensive dialogue over the political future in Northern Ireland in which the DUP, and the UUP, are the key players. I fear, therefore, there are now pressing political reasons for amending the 1984 formulation.'
He suggested it could be tweaked so both parties which had six MPs at the last election, and those with subsequently passed that threshold through by-elections or defections, could take part.
Lord Falconer expressed concern that there was 'a certain awkwardness' in the proposal, which involved overturning a clearly established formula.
'There is a further difficulty in the Scottish Nationalists, like the Official Unionists currently have five seats at Westminster. If Mr Trimble continues to lay a wreath, they might argue that they should be allowed to do so also,' he wrote.
'However, it is in fact Plaid Cymru's turn to lay the wreath in 2004 on behalf of the joint parliamentary group. The result will be, apparently, that Northern Ireland lays two wreaths while Scotland lays none.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
17 hours ago
- BBC News
Government denies reallocating £1m of NI peace funding
The UK government has denied reallocating £1m of funding from a cross-border peace project to a new scheme aimed at strengthening connections between Northern Ireland and Great for the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) was withdrawn, with the government saying there was a "challenging fiscal position".It emerged after the government in June announced funding of up to £1m to help groups build connections between NI and government said the two initiatives were "entirely separate" and it "remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation". The IFI was set up by the UK and Irish governments in 1986 and supports work in Northern Ireland and border counties in the Republic of UK government was due to contribute £4m between 2021 and 2025 in four a spokesman said it "decided not to continue" with a planned £1m contribution in 2024-25."This government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing," he said. In June, the government launched a funding scheme worth up to £1m aimed at "strengthening east-west connections".The Connect Fund was announced after a meeting of the East-West council was set up in a deal between the previous Conservative government and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) that saw it return to Stormont after a two-year boycott over post-Brexit trade O'Toole, leader of the opposition in the Northern Ireland Assembly, said the funding decisions were "deeply concerning".The Social Democratic and Labour Party assembly member claimed the "north-south and cross-community" aspects of such funding were being "abandoned".He described the Connect Fund as being "borne out of a clandestine, bilateral deal cooked up between the last Tory government and the DUP". The government rejected the concerns and said the decision to introduce the new funding scheme was in response to sectoral needs."The UK government did not reallocate money from the IFI to the East-West Council," a spokesperson said."These are two entirely separate entities."The government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation."A DUP spokesperson said the party welcomed "recent funding announcements".The Irish government said it contributed €4m (£3.45m) to the IFI in 2025.A spokesperson for its Department of Foreign Affairs said: "We are aware that the UK government indicated they were not in a position to make the final £1m instalment of funding in 2024."We look forward to continuing to work with the UK in support of the IFI and hope that the UK will consider further funding to the IFI when its new strategy for 2026-2030 is launched at the end of this year."In a statement, the IFI said it had received financial support from a range of donors including the UK, Irish and US governments, the European Union, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.A spokesperson for the IFI said it was "grateful for the long-standing support from the UK government and the financial assistance provided in supporting our delivery of the IFI's current strategy"."We look forward to continuing to work with the UK government and our partners in delivering critical peace and reconciliation initiatives in Northern Ireland and the southern border counties," the spokesperson added.
Belfast Telegraph
20 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Council calls on Minister to allow it to vary business rates in bid to tackle high street vacancies
Elected representatives at Ards and North Down Borough Council want to differentiate rates increases between small and medium businesses and larger ones. They have made a call to the Finance Minister John O'Dowd for new powers for councils to separate non-domestic rates between big and smaller businesses, in a bid to liven up town centres and fight vacancies. At the most recent full meeting of the council at Bangor Castle, UUP councillor Philip Smith proposed that 'to grow our non-domestic rates base, the council writes to the Minister for Finance to request that he amends the Administrative and Financial Provisions Bill to provide local councils with the powers to vary the level of rates increases between SME's (small and medium enterprises) and larger businesses'. News Catch Up - Wednesday 30th July Rates are a property tax used to fund services at both local or 'district' level through councils and the 'regional' level through the NI Assembly. They are collected from residential property owners through domestic rates and business owners through non-domestic rates. Business rates are a rate for all non domestic properties, such as offices, factories and shops, with bills based on the rateable value of that property. Mr Smith said: 'The debate around the vacancy rates obviously highlighted the issues we have, particularly around certain areas like Bangor. I strongly believe a measure like this would help our performance. We obviously have a corporate goal to attract more businesses to the borough and grow our non-domestic rate base, and we are currently reviewing how we might best do this. 'One lever we have discussed is the possible use of the non-domestic rate, and the decoupling powers that the previous Finance Minister provided to bear the domestic and non-domestic rates increases. One of the issues we have all identified is the danger this would benefit large companies the best – the likes of Tesco, Mark and Spencer and Sainsburys would incur more than smaller businesses. 'Councils in Northern Ireland do not have the power to vary the rates of increase between different types of businesses. If we did, it would obviously give us the flexibility to make a decision on this.' He added: 'The principle for targeting rates at small businesses is well established across the whole of the UK, the only anomaly is that Northern Ireland councils don't have the power or the flexibility to vary our rates policy accordingly. That's why I want to raise it with the Finance Minister and ask him to give councils this power to differentiate between rate increases between SME's and larger businesses. 'He is currently bringing a bill through the Assembly at the moment, called the Administrative and Financial Provisions Bill, which is covering a whole plethora of different issues within government in Northern Ireland.' He added: 'This is not a new concept, but what is new would be allowing councils in Northern Ireland to vary their rates and deploy this policy if they chose to do so.' The chamber supported the proposal. A study commissioned by the council, and delivered by Queen's University and McGarry Consultants from analysis earlier this year, showed Bangor has an overall vacancy rate of 20%, while Newtownards has an overall vacancy rate of 21.3%. In Bangor, 11 of the 12 vacant properties on Queen's Parade are due to be developed as part of the Queen's Parade development – leaving these out of the figures would reduce vacancy in Bangor to 16.5%. The greatest concentrations of vacancy in Newtownards are at Movilla Street, Greenwell Street, and Castle Street, with respective vacancy rates of 42.9%, 42.9% and 40%. The study report is part of preparation by the council for its 'Empty to Energised' scheme, which will see a pilot launched as a first point to developing interventions to tackle the issue of vacancy and dereliction in the borough.
The National
a day ago
- The National
Westminster watchdog investigates Reform UK's Nigel Farage
The Clacton MP is being probed amid allegations relating to a registration of an interest, according to the UK Parliament website. Daniel Greenberg, the parliamentary commissioner for standards, will investigate whether Farage broke rule 5 of the code of conduct. This rule states: 'Members must fulfil conscientiously the requirements of the House in respect of the registration of interests in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. 'New Members must register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election within one month of their election, and Members must register any change in those registrable interests within 28 days.' Reform UK has been approached for comment about the investigation, but Farage told The Independent: 'It is not to do with any undeclared income.' In March, Good Law Project said it had submitted a formal complaint about the Reform UK leader having taken 'advice from a former spokesperson for the far-right agitator Steve Bannon, but he hasn't declared it as a benefit'. The project went on: 'Documents released in the US reveal that the MP for Clacton received help with speaking engagements, political meetings, media appearances and travel from Capital HQ. 'According to a statement filed with the US Department of Justice, Farage was benefitting from an extremely comprehensive service. Between 27 September and 17 February he was in touch with the firm via 'telephone, email and text' almost every day – including Christmas.' It's pretty awesome how dancing makes robots less intimidating. Looking forward to seeing more nontrivial Machine Learning on these robots. Credit: Boston Dynamics. — Reza Zadeh 🇺🇸 (@Reza_Zadeh) December 29, 2020 Earlier in July, Plaid Cymru MP Liz Saville Roberts shared figures showing that Farage had pocketed almost £1 million from outside earnings since becoming an MP, nearly treble the second-highest MP with outside earnings: Tory MP Geoffrey Cox. '[[Nigel Farage]] has made nearly £1 million on top of his MP salary - Westminster's top earner,' Saville Roberts said. 'Plaid Cymru MPs are busy doing the job. Farage is busy lining his pockets.'
