
Our trade ambitions should make us look across as many seas as we can
In a world recoiling from America's secession from the global economy under US President Donald Trump, India's policymakers have to answer three questions.
One, does international trade remain an instrument of improving efficiency in production and consumption? Two, does US abdication of its traditional leadership of the rules-based global system mean the end of rules for mutual engagement among other nations? And, three, do regional trade blocs make sense for a country like India?
Clarity was provided on these matters by former Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia in a recent media interaction. As a believer in the benefits of globalized growth, he said he would like India to shed some of the additional layers of protection it has adopted, particularly since 2017. Further, he would like India to join some of the regional trading arrangements India had been invited to but walked away from.
Also Read: India should reconsider its rejection of the RCEP trade bloc
We are in broad agreement with this approach. As the US withdraws behind tariff walls, India's government should go for greater trade openness—not just to counteract its effects, but to foster a more efficient economy on the whole.
In terms of the diversity, sophistication and scale of capabilities that our overall economy and workers represent, ours is the only country that can host the supply chains that much of the rich world would like shifted out of China, at least in part. Not that the West should or can decouple entirely from China. But diversifying factory locations offers insurance cover against calamitous disruptions enabled by any geographic concentration of production.
While Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia have attracted more nodes in supply networks from China than we have, that does not contradict the proposition of India's potential as the world's next big factory. Rather, it speaks of an opportunity waiting to be exploited. For our production base to turn export oriented, it must be able to rely on easy and predictable imports of inputs and other needs. It also requires our cost base to go down in general; falling tariff protection can do this by slowly exposing domestic players to competition and driving business efficiency.
Also Read: The time is right for a reset of India's trade ties with China
Our tariff rates need to be uniformly in single digits across categories—be it finished goods, components or material inputs—so that import policy does not distort how market forces allot value addition; let sectors with a competitive edge emerge on their own. The big aim should be global competitiveness, for which we must learn to compete globally, not just bilaterally with select partners. Lower barriers to our markets for a wide range of players would let local firms test themselves against the world's best.
Since we lack an edge in several sectors right now, some early-stage protection and state support is justified, but only to be gradually withdrawn. One way to pre-set protective shields on a downslope is for India to join trade blocs that span dynamic parts of the globe.
Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | Is China's mediation game a hegemony play?
In 2019, India gave up on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership in anxiety over Beijing's role in it. China's record on fair trade is scandalous, no doubt, but there is also the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership, which excludes China but includes Japan, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and Chile, besides Vietnam, Brunei, Singapore and Malaysia. As Trump-battered world trade goes into turmoil, let's broaden our global engagement. Bilateral pacts are welcome, of course, but it's best to look across as many seas as we can to meet our trade ambitions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Will liberate Los Angeles,' Trump defends troop deployment amid protests; says city has become ‘trash heap'
During a tribute to soldiers on Tuesday, President Donald Trump defended his decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles amid tensions over his immigration policy saying, 'LA has gone from being one of the cleanest, safest and most beautiful cities on earth, to being a trash heap' 'Within the span of a few decades, Los Angeles has gone from being one of the cleanest, safest and most beautiful cities on earth, to being a trash heap with entire neighbourhoods under the control of transnational gangs and criminal the entire world can now see, uncontrolled migration leads to chaos, dysfunction, and disorder.' "What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and on national sovereignty, carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags." 'Very simply, we will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again,' he goes on to add. Trump's visit to Fort Bragg, home to some 50,000 active-duty soldiers, followed his move to deploy 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in an escalating response to street protests over his immigration policies. The Republican president said the military deployment was needed to protect federal property and personnel. California's Democratic-led government has sued to block Trump's move, calling it an abuse of power and an unnecessary provocation. Street demonstrations have been underway since Friday, when activists clashed with sheriff's deputies. Los Angeles officials have said the unrest has been limited to a few downtown blocks and that the majority of demonstrators are protesting peacefully in support of immigrants. In North Carolina, Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took part in long-scheduled commemorations of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, watching soldiers demonstrate a special forces assault and use a long-range missile launcher. It was the first in a series of celebrations of the Army anniversary involving Trump, ahead of a major parade in Washington on Saturday. Speaking to reporters earlier on Tuesday in the Oval Office, Trump warned against demonstrators at that parade, saying "they're going to be met with very big force." He made no distinction between peaceful and violent protesters. The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have said there are no credible threats to the event.


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
DoorDash customer misleading claims row: Did food ordering company fool users with ‘drip pricing'? What we know
DoorDash, a popular food delivery platform, is under fire following a lawsuit filed by Canada's Competition Bureau, alleging the company engaged in 'drip pricing', a deceptive practice that misleads customers by advertising lower prices than what they ultimately pay. The claims suggest DoorDash amassed nearly $1 billion in hidden fees over a decade. The Competition Bureau filed an application with Canada's Competition Tribunal, accusing DoorDash and its Canadian subsidiary of drip pricing, where advertised prices exclude mandatory fees revealed only at checkout. The Bureau claims customers cannot purchase items at the promoted price due to fees like service, delivery, expanded range, small order, and regulatory response fees. Read More: Walmart faces renewed boycott calls over owner Christy Walton's action - Here's what happened The Bureau added that it estimates DoorDash collected nearly $1 billion in mandatory fees from Canadian consumers over nearly a decade. The lawsuit seeks penalties, an end to deceptive pricing, cessation of misrepresenting fees as taxes, and restitution for affected customers. DoorDash called the lawsuit 'misguided and excessive', denying it hides fees or misleads customers. 'Transparency with customers is a top priority at DoorDash. All fees on DoorDash, which support the high-quality operations of our platform, are clearly labeled and disclosed to consumers through the ordering process — including a final review before payment. To be crystal clear, DoorDash does not hide fees from consumers or mislead them in any way,' a spokesperson told The Street. Read More: What is Insurrection Act? 1807 law Donald Trump could invoke in Los Angeles amid anti-ICE riots The Bureau said its investigation found that fees are often hidden or not displayed near advertised prices until checkout. A 2023 t.-action lawsuit in the US similarly alleged DoorDash's fees, including 'city' or 'regulatory response' charges, mislead consumers into believing they're government-imposed. These fees, kept by DoorDash, circumvent local fee caps, the suit claimed.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
iPhone Production Slows but Steadies in May at ₹15,000 crore
Apple's India vendors produced iPhones worth more than ₹15,000 crore in May, easing slightly from the scorching pace in the preceding two months, but well ahead of the ₹10,000-11,000 crore average in 2024, according to two market research firms and industry data. Industry experts expect an average ₹15,000 crore monthly rate for the rest of the year now. As of May, Apple's vendors have already made iPhones worth ₹84,000 crore this year — both for domestic sales and exports. That equals the entire domestic consumption of calendar 2024, according to industry data reviewed by ET. This has been partly driven by a sharp rise in production in March to meet US President Donald Trump's tariff deadline. Apple's monthly run rate of India iPhone production hit a peak of ₹19,630 crore in March, as the Cupertino-based company rushed to ship devices to the US ahead of the start of reciprocal tariffs. The levy's April deadline has since been pushed to July. Trump has been threatening to impose tariffs on India-made iPhones. Domestic contract manufacturers produced iPhones worth Rs 16,600 crore in April. Both of Apple's suppliers in India — Foxconn and Tata Electronics — have ramped up production, with the latter gaining share from its Taiwanese rival. Live Events Tata Electronics, which began assembling iPhones after it acquired the Wistron facility in Karnataka in 2023, now makes 35% of the iPhones manufactured in India, compared with around 30% in 2024. Foxconn has the remaining 65% share, an analysis by the two market trackers showed. Tata also bought a 60% stake in Taiwanese rival Pegatron's plant in India in January. Last year, total revenue from iPhone assembly for Tata Electronics and Foxconn was ₹1.38 lakh crore, of which Foxconn accounted for about ₹90,000 crore and Tata Electronics, the remaining ₹48,000 crore, according to analyst data seen by ET. Devices worth ₹84,000 crore were for local sale. The duo has been the biggest beneficiary of the production linked incentive (PLI) scheme for smartphones. According to media reports, Tata Electronics has received ₹2,068 crore and Foxconn, ₹2,807 crore, in PLI incentives for FY23 to FY25. Apple, Tata Electronics and Foxconn did not respond to ET's emails seeking comment. Smartphones account for nearly 50% of Apple's revenue and the US represents nearly a third of its global smartphone shipments, according to an S&P report on Tuesday. It said India will likely make most of the iPhones shipped to the US by 2026. The company is on track to significantly increase its manufacturing capacity in India. Foxconn has begun production in a phased manner at its new Bengaluru facility, while Tata Electronics is building another plant in Hosur. 'It's difficult to give the future run rate as it depends on a lot of the India-US and Sino-US trade negotiations,' said one of the industry executives, asking not to be named. He said local shipments of iPhones are expected to rise by 15% in 2025, from around 11 million units sold in 2024, while India is expected to cater to the majority of US demand by this year itself, going by chief executive Tim Cook's comments. Last month, he said US demand for iPhones in June would be fulfilled in large part from India. However, this prospect is riddled with uncertainty due to Trump's comments last month, exhorting Cook to make in the US whatever devices it sells in the country or face 25% tariffs. That may not be a realistic ask, given the costs. 'If Apple really produced an iPhone in a US factory, considering that everything is not in place yet, my estimate is that the price will go up by at least 15-20%, that is, $150-200,' said Neil Shah, vice-president at Counterpoint Research. 'We believe this cost increase will be mostly due to the cost delta of labour, factories' amortised capex and logistics.' India is expected to be a big winner in smartphone manufacturing in 2025 despite global output forecast to decline by 1% due to tariff impacts and a broader industry slowdown, according to Counterpoint Research. The firm expects smartphone manufacturing in India to grow in the double digits to reach a record 20% share of global output, fuelled by export demand from Apple and Samsung.