Maryland Republicans ask President Trump to keep U.S. Marshals out of Piedmont power line project
In a letter dated Aug. 20, seven Republican delegates from Baltimore, Carroll and Frederick counties expressed strong opposition to a federal court motion filed by New Jersey-based developer PSEG Renewable Transmission.
The developer, which is planning to build a 70-mile high-voltage transmission line through central Maryland, requested U.S. Marshals to accompany surveyors who have allegedly faced threats from property owners—particularly in Carroll County.
The lawmakers said that landowners in the path of the project are "understandably outraged" over the possibility of survey crews entering private property without consent.
They criticized the project, saying it offers "no energy benefit" to Maryland.
"This request constitutes a clear overreach," the lawmakers wrote. "It is a gross misuse of federal resources to send Marshals, particularly while appeals are in process. This is a local issue."
The project has drawn sharp criticism from residents, environmental groups, and property rights advocates who say the line would cut through farms, forests, and protected watersheds.
PSEG says the infrastructure is needed to address regional energy congestion and to avoid potential blackouts in the coming years, per analysis from grid operator PJM Interconnection.
In the letter, Republican delegates, including House Minority Whip Jesse Pippy, Assistant Minority Leader April Rose, and Delegates Barrie Ciliberti, April Miller, Chris Tomlinson, Joshua Stonko, and Nino Mangione, argue that federal involvement would escalate tensions and erode trust.
"The involvement of U.S. Marshals in this context is causing undue distress and anxiety among local residents," the letter reads. "This heavy-handed approach would be disproportionate and unnecessary."
The lawmakers also said that local law enforcement agencies allegedly told surveyors they would not participate in enforcing PSEG's property access, but were willing to respond if public safety concerns arise.
They argue any necessary security measures should be managed locally, not through federal intervention.
PSEG's request for federal protection remains pending before the U.S. District Court in Maryland.
The delegates urged the court to deny PSEG's motion, saying it would "foster a more collaborative atmosphere" if survey work proceeds without federal law enforcement presence.
In a motion filed Aug. 15 in U.S. District Court in Maryland, PSEG Renewable Transmission requested that U.S. Marshals protect them during land surveys, after crews were allegedly threatened while attempting to access private land in Carroll County.
According to the court filing, survey crews and private security personnel faced multiple threats while trying to conduct property assessments at six locations.
Crews detailed several alleged incidents. In one encounter, PSEG said crews faced a man pointing a gun at them during one attempted survey.
In another case, an ATV rider allegedly charged at private security, nearly striking one guard. At a separate property, the company said dogs were intentionally released toward the crew.
PSEG also said that during one survey attempt, a landowner warned then they would "leave in a body bag" if they entered.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pence calls for secondary sanctions on Russia
Former Vice President Pence urged the Senate on Thursday to pass a major sanctions bill against Russia, arguing that the hefty tariffs, along with continued military aid to Ukraine, provide the best 'pathway' to reaching peace in Eastern Europe. 'He's fully capable of doing the diplomatic thing and being friendly and shaking hands and at the same time saying, here's the economic consequences that are going to happen, unless you step forward,' Pence said of President Trump during his appearance on NewsNation's show 'The Hill.' 'If we pass those secondary sanctions, Vladimir Putin will understand that we could literally break their economy and by providing continued military support for Ukraine, that combination of efforts, I think, is the best pathway to peace,' the former vice president told host Blake Burman. The sanctions bill, which has been pushed by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), would impose 500 percent tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil and gas. The measure has over 85 co-sponsors in the upper chamber, but the Senate left for recess before advancing the bill, deferring to Trump to give the green light. 'We propose in our bill 500 percent. If it's 250 percent, I could live with it. Even if it's 100 percent, possibly. But you ought to impose bone-crushing sanctions that will stop them from fueling Russia's war machine,' Blumenthal said earlier this month. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said on Monday that Trump should be 'commended' for his efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and signaled the Senate is 'ready' to provide the president 'any economic leverage needed to keep Russia at the table to negotiate a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.' Trump has pushed to end the three-and-a-half-year war, meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, along with seven European leaders, on Monday at the White House. Since then, Russian officials have expressed doubt about the possibilities of a speedy peace deal with Ukraine, including agreeing on security guarantees for Kyiv and scheduling a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky, for which the president has advocated for some time. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov questioned Zelensky's legitimacy on Thursday and stated the security guarantees under ongoing talks are 'hopeless.' Lavrov claimed that Putin is ready to meet with the Ukrainian president with the 'understanding that all issues that require consideration at the highest level will be well worked out.' Trump said Thursday that 'interesting times [are] ahead' and slammed his predecessor, former President Biden, over his administration's policy of barring Ukraine from using U.S. long-range weapons to strike deep inside Russia. 'It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invaders country. It's like a great team in sports that has a fantastic defense, but is not allowed to play offense. There is no chance of winning! It is like that with Ukraine and Russia,' the president said on Truth Social. Pence, in the interview with NewsNation, argued that one of the reasons why Putin did not invade Ukraine during Trump's first White House term is that the Trump-Pence administration 'had the credible threat of the use of force.' 'He saw us take action, unleashing our military to take down the ISIS caliphate,' Pence said on Thursday. 'Send cruise missiles into Syria to take down Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard leader.'
San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump administration is reviewing all 55 million foreigners with US visas for any violations
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration said Thursday it is reviewing more than 55 million people who have valid U.S. visas for any violations that could lead to deportation, part of a growing crackdown on foreigners who are permitted to be in the United States. In a written answer to a question from The Associated Press, the State Department said all U.S. visa holders, which can include tourists from many countries, are subject to 'continuous vetting,' with an eye toward any indication they could be ineligible for permission to enter or stay in the United States. Should such information be found, the visa will be revoked, and if the visa holder is in the United States, he or she would be subject to deportation. Since President Donald Trump took office, his administration has focused on deporting migrants illegally in the United States as well as holders of student and visitor exchange visas. The State Department's new language suggests that the continual vetting process, which officials acknowledge is time-consuming, is far more widespread and could mean even those approved to be in the U.S. could abruptly see those permissions revoked. There were 12.8 million green-card holders and 3.6 million people in the U.S. on temporary visas last year, according to the Department of Homeland Security. The 55 million figure suggests that some people subject to review would currently be outside the United States with multiple-entry tourist visas, said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. immigration policy program at the Migration Policy Institute. She questioned the value of spending resources on people who may never return to the United States. The State Department said it was looking for indicators of ineligibility, including people staying past the authorized timeframe outlined in a visa, criminal activity, threats to public safety, engaging in any form of terrorist activity or providing support to a terrorist organization. 'We review all available information as part of our vetting, including law enforcement or immigration records or any other information that comes to light after visa issuance indicating a potential ineligibility,' the department said. No more worker visas for commercial truck drivers The U.S. also will stop issuing worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday on X. He said the change was effective immediately. 'The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers,' Rubio posted. The Trump administration in the past months has taken steps to enforce the requirement that truckers speak and read English proficiently. The Transportation Department said the aim is to improve road safety following incidents in which drivers' ability to read signs or speak English may have contributed to traffic deaths. The State Department said later Thursday it was pausing the processing of these work visas to review its 'screening and vetting protocols.' 'Ensuring that every driver on our roads meets the highest standards is important to protecting the livelihoods of American truckers and maintaining a secure, resilient supply chain,' the department said. Edward Alden, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said foreign workers have helped address a labor shortage of commercial truck drivers. 'This action should be seen as part of a concerted effort by the administration to discourage American companies and other institutions like universities and hospitals from hiring and retaining foreign workers,' Alden wrote in an email. "The goal here is not to target specific classes of workers, but to send the message to American employers that they are at risk if they are employing foreign workers. The economic consequences will be far larger than just visas being stripped from foreign workers in a few job categories.' New review of all visa holders is a major expansion The administration has steadily imposed more restrictions and requirements on visa applicants, including requiring them to submit to in-person interviews. The review of all visa holders appears to be a significant expansion of what had initially been a process focused mainly on students who have been involved in what the government perceives as pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel activity. Officials say the reviews will include all visa holders' social media accounts, law enforcement and immigration records in their home countries, along with any actionable violations of U.S. law committed while they were in the United States. The reviews will include new tools for data collection on past, present and future visa applicants, including a complete scouring of social media sites made possible by new requirements introduced earlier this year. Those make it mandatory for privacy switches on cellphones and other electronic devices or apps to be turned off when an applicant appears for a visa interview. 'As part of the Trump Administration's commitment to protect U.S. national security and public safety, since Inauguration Day the State Department has revoked more than twice as many visas, including nearly four times as many student visas, as during the same time period last year,' the State Department said. The vast majority of foreigners seeking to come to the U.S. require visas, especially those who want to study or work for extended periods. Among the exceptions for short-term tourist or business visits are citizens of the 40 mainly European and Asian countries belonging to the Visa Waiver Program, which grants those nationals a stay of up to three months without having to apply for a visa. But large swaths of the world — including highly populated countries like China, India, Indonesia, Russia and most of Africa — are not part of the program, meaning their citizens must apply for and receive visas to travel to the United States. Earlier this week, the department said that since Trump returned to the White House, it has revoked more than 6,000 student visas for overstays and violations of local, state and federal law, the vast majority of which were assault, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and support for terrorism. It said about 4,000 of those 6,000 were due to actual infractions of laws and that approximately 200 to 300 visas were revoked for terrorism-related issues, including providing support for designated terrorist organizations or state sponsors of terrorism. ___ Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed. ___
Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
Californians' love-hate relationship with high-speed rail
Presented by With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL: California voters aren't confident the state's high-speed rail project will ever be finished, but they're not ready to give up on it either. Nearly two-thirds — 62 percent — of voters say that California should continue bankrolling the planned rail line from the Bay Area to Los Angeles after the Trump administration clawed back $4 billion in federal grants last month, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. The poll revealed a clear partisan divide among the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed, as just 21 percent of Democrats said it's time to pull the plug, compared to 45 percent of independents and 62 percent of Republicans. But that doesn't mean liberal Californians believe it's any more likely that they'll be able to ride from Southern California to San Francisco in their lifetime. Just 27 percent of Democrats said there's a high likelihood the project will be completed, roughly matching the 23 percent of their conservative counterparts who believe California officials can finish the first high-speed rail line in North America. That seemingly counterintuitive outcome offers a lesson for Gov. Gavin Newsom and the candidates vying to replace him who've doubled down on their support: It's time to put up or shut up. 'There definitely is this sense that the state can't do big things,' said Andrew Acosta, a veteran California Democratic campaign consultant. 'Californians would like to see it happen, but show me the last project that came in on time or under budget.' That sentiment is reflected in the poll, as 38 percent of Democrats said their support is contingent on the project keeping to its current budget. But, in the short term, President Donald Trump's incessant hammering of a project beset with construction delays and cost overruns could be doing California officials a favor. His Federal Railroad Administration yanked $4 billion in Obama- and Biden-era grants last month, following a barrage of attacks from Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, congressional and state Republicans. 'This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED,' Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social, the day the federal funding was revoked. 'Not a SINGLE penny in Federal Dollars will go towards this Newscum SCAM ever again.' Jack Citrin, a political science professor at University of California, Berkeley, and partner on the poll, said the partisan divide over whether California should continue the project reflects a broader trend on issues that have federal connections, like electric vehicle policies. 'Any of these questions that smell of Trump, the Democrats are going to be pushed in the opposite direction,' Citrin said. Newsom and high-speed rail backers, including powerful labor unions, have countered the Republican crackdown with a proposal to guarantee $1 billion in funding annually through the state's cap-and-trade program. Democratic voters' continued support for state funding could bolster their argument as negotiations over how to divvy up revenue generated by cap-and-trade auctions heat up with less than a month before the end of the legislative session. Those are signs that even without federal help, high-speed rail isn't going anywhere in the short term. Democratic lawmakers will likely face another reckoning sooner rather than later over a project that was originally slated for completion by 2020 and is now expected to open its initial line connecting Bakersfield to Merced in 2033, with no projected date for final completion. The rail line's price tag is now estimated to cost up to $128 billion, nearly four times its original $33 billion projection. But Citrin said the results show that Democrats remain hopeful about high-speed rail, even if they have doubts. 'I think a lot of this support shows that hope springs eternal,' he said. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! PASS 'EM IF YOU'VE GOT 'EM: Kids are back in school, Labor Day plans are locked in, and it's hot enough to cook an egg on the sidewalk in Sacramento. All signs of one undeniable fact: It's almost the end of the session. Since recess ended, redistricting and a slew of major energy packages have dominated the conversation. But there's still some perfectly good legislation to pass outside the center of those dueling storms. At least so says a coalition of renewable energy business groups and advocates. The group — including former state Sen. Fran Pavley, Advanced Energy United and The Climate Center — sent a letter Thursday to Newsom and the leadership of both legislative houses and their appropriations committee making the case for giving some lower-profile energy bills some love. 'These common-sense bills will have a big impact on lowering energy costs, expanding access to clean energy, and strengthening grid reliability,' said Edson Perez, California lead with Advanced Energy United. 'But because they've faced no big controversy and advanced quietly, they risk slipping under the radar in this crowded legislative session.' So what's on the list? THE CLIMATE MONEY: Remember Proposition 4, the $10 billion climate bond voters approved last November as one of the year's big climate wins? The groups that championed it sure do — and now they're angling for their payday. Water, wildfire, conservation and renewable energy groups urged budget leaders in a Thursday letter to detail and pass a spending plan for at least $2.7 billion of the money this year. 'Given the cuts to and uncertainty around federal funding for natural resources, state investments are more important than ever,' wrote the groups, including The Nature Conservancy, American Clean Power-California and the Association of California Water Agencies. In its own letter, ACWA detailed 'shovel-ready' dam safety and recycled water projects that were originally slated to get money from the general fund but were cut in an agreement between Newsom and lawmakers to instead fund them with the bond money. Sen. Ben Allen and Assemblymember Steve Bennett, who chair the budget subcommittees overseeing environmental spending, have said in interviews they're interested in passing a spending plan for the bond money. But negotiations around the pot of money are tangled with negotiations over how to distribute cap-and-trade revenues as part of the program's reauthorization. — CvK SOAK IT UP: One reservoir's loss is another's gain. The California Water Commission voted unanimously this week to redirect $218.9 million in Prop 1 bond money it had allocated to the Los Vaqueros Reservoir expansion, which stalled last year over disagreement over who should pay for what, to the Sites Reservoir project, bringing the total state contribution to $1 billion for the proposal to store enough American River water to supply 3 million households per year. The money comes at a good time for Sites, the state's biggest new reservoir in decades, because a brand new cost estimate hiked its ten-year-old price tag of $4.5 billion up to $6.8 billion — but it's not enough. Filling in the gap will be the water agencies who've signed up to get some of the water but have yet to finalize their contribution — most notably the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which has preliminarily signed up for a 22 percent share. The federal government, coming in at 9 percent right now, has also expressed interest in getting more of the water. If the State Water Resources Control Board signs off on its water permit as expected this year and, crucially, the cost-share is figured out, construction could start as soon as next year — making Sites a major test of California's ability to build large-scale water infrastructure in a changing climate. — CvK NUCLEAR BY THE BAY: Bay Area startups and tech veterans appear to be the earliest winners in the Trump administration's push to loosen nuclear regulations and speed up the development of small reactors. Eight of 10 companies chosen by the Department of Energy last week to compete for safety design approvals were founded in the San Francisco Bay Area or have former tech industry leaders in executive positions, as Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho reports for POLITICO's E&E News. That program aims to quickly advance nuclear technology and have at least three new pilot plants operating by July 4, 2026. The development comes after Trump signed a May executive order that allows safety designs for new reactors already tested and certified either by DOE or the Defense Department to avoid scrutiny from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Industry watchers say that change benefits startups, which are less eager to work with the NRC than are established nuclear developers like Westinghouse Nuclear and GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy. — AN RAISE A GLASS: How do you wrap up a day of lobbying legislators, many of whom are on the brink of rolling back major environmental regulations? You drink on it. The EnviroVoters Ed Fund (the group's 501(c)3 arm) hosted the Green CA Reception on Wednesday evening at Cafeteria 15L. POLITICO spotted Assemblymember Alex Lee in the crowd, plus a slew of environmental advocates including: Resource Renewal Institute Director of Advocacy and Engagement Scott Webb, Environmental Defense Center Chief Counsel Linda Krop, BlueGreen Alliance Senior California Policy Organizer Franki Gracey, Fearless Advocacy Inc. President Jennifer Fearing and, of course, California Environmental Voters Executive Director Mike Young. — NB SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. We're thrilled to announce our panel: 'California's Energy Policy at a Crossroads,' featuring state Senate energy and environment policy adviser Kip Lipper, Western States Petroleum Association CEO Catherine Reheis-Boyd, Newsom senior climate adviser Lauren Sanchez and environmental justice consultant Katie Valenzuela — and moderated by our editor Debra Kahn. The live event is currently at capacity, but will be streamed. Advance registration is required — request an online invite here. — Sammy Roth at the Los Angeles Times pins California's climate backsliding on Newsom. — Southern California is facing a triple threat of extreme heat, wildfire risk and thunderstorms. — A leading expert on energy affordability has a new book on the implications of solar getting cheaper.
