DOE redirects $365 million from Puerto Rico's solar projects to oil-dependent power grid
The U.S. Department of Energy announced Wednesday that $365 million originally slated for solar projects in Puerto Rico will be diverted to improve the island's crumbling power grid, sparking an outcry just days before the Atlantic hurricane season starts.
The funds had been in limbo in recent weeks, with the Department of Energy missing a recent deadline to finalize contracts worth $365 million that would see battery-operated solar systems installed at health clinics and public housing units in Puerto Rico.
The money had been set aside for that purpose under the administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden.
'That money was spring loaded to flow now,' said Javier Rúa Jovet, public policy director for Puerto Rico's Solar and Energy Storage Association.
He and others criticized the move.
'This is shameful,' Democratic New York Rep. Nydia Velázquez wrote on X, noting that the funds were meant to serve the most vulnerable.
'Republicans have turned their backs on those who need it most, just 1 week before the start of hurricane season,' she wrote.
Grantees that include the nonprofit Hispanic Federation had said the funds were urgently needed to provide stable power to people including those on dialysis as major outages continue to hit Puerto Rico.
'Pretending that reallocating these funds will make any immediate difference on the stability of the electric grid, when the grid already has an $18 billion allocation, is just a way to distract from the real consequences of their decision. Puerto Rico deserves better,' said Frankie Miranda, the federation's CEO and president.
The Department of Energy said in a statement that the money would now be used 'to support technologies that improve system flexibility and response, power flow and control, component strength, supply security, and safety.'
A spokesperson for the Department of Energy told The Associated Press that the money would used for things including upgrading aging infrastructure, clearing vegetation from transmission lines and dispatching baseload generation units. The department said it has final authority over how the funds will be used, adding that the solar projects were not scheduled to be constructed until 2026.
U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a statement that redirecting the funds would ensure that 'taxpayer dollars are used to strengthen access to affordable, reliable and secure power, benefiting more citizens as quickly as possible.'
Meanwhile, Puerto Rico Gov. Jenniffer González praised the move in a statement, saying it would help all 3.2 million residents on the island instead of 'a few customers.'
'Puerto Rico is facing an energy emergency that requires we act now and deliver immediate solutions. Our communities, businesses, and healthcare facilities cannot afford to wait years, nor can we rely on piecemeal approaches with limited results,' she said.
González previously came under fire as her support for investing $1 billion of federal funds in solar projects across Puerto Rico appeared to fade.
A spokeswoman for the governor did not immediately respond to a request for additional comment and details.
A spokeswoman for Josué Colón, the island's so-called energy czar, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Dwindling power generation
Rúa Jovet noted that there are currently at least $16 billion in unspent funds from the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency meant to improve Puerto Rico's electric grid, adding that the $365 million should be used for its original purpose.
'There is nothing faster and better than solar batteries,' he said. 'We should all be moving as fast as we can on generation.'
Officials in Puerto Rico already have warned that there will be a shortage of generation this summer. In addition, the Atlantic hurricane season starts June 1, and it is predicted to be above average, with nine anticipated hurricanes, four of them major.
Many in Puerto Rico worry that any storm, regardless of how small, could knock out the grid given its fragile state.
Puerto Rico already was hit with island-wide blackouts on Dec. 31 and April 16.
The diversion of funds come as González criticizes the work of Luma Energy, which oversees transmission and distribution of power on the island, and Genera PR, which oversees generation.
The two private companies were contracted by the previous administration as Puerto Rico's Electric Power Authority struggled to restructure more than $9 billion in public debt, with mediation still stalled.
'Elections have consequences'
Under Biden, there was a push for more renewable energy projects in Puerto Rico, where crews are still rebuild the power grid after Hurricane Maria hit in September 2017 as a powerful Category 4 storm. But the grid was already weak before the storm hit given a lack of maintenance and investment for decades.
Rúa Jovet said the Department of Energy's decision is an ideological one supported by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.
Of the $1 billion allocated for solar projects in Puerto Rico under Biden, $450 million already has been granted to install solar rooftop and batteries in thousands of homes located in rural areas or whose occupants have medical needs.
Overall, roughly 117,000 homes and businesses on the island currently have solar rooftops.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Dem Golden Boy Abrego Garcia Returns
Well the Democrats got their wish, their martyr Kilmar Abrego Garcia returned to the US to face charges. I'm Tomi Lahren, more next. The Democrats' golden boy Kilmar Abrego Garcia was brought back to the US from his home country of El Salvador to face charges including human trafficking here in Tennessee. In an interview with NBC News, President Trump said it wasn't his decision to bring Abrego Garcia back to the US but that the DOJ decided to do it that way and that's fine. I can't help but think what a giant waste of US taxpayers dollars it was to fly him all the way back here, go through the rigamarole of criminal charges, pay for his room and board, all to send him right back to his home country of El Salvador. But THIS is what the Democrats want. They'll do anything to keep their illegal aliens in your community and they'll waste your hard earned money to do it and stretch out the process as long as possible. This is the hill they're willing to die on and this is the man they're willing to defend till the end. A man who was here illegally for years, has credible allegations of gang affiliation, protective orders from his wife, and actual footage of his alleged human trafficking. Ladies and gentlemen, the Democrat Party is for they/them and Abrego Garcia, not for you! I'm Tomi Lahren and you watch my show 'Tomi Lahren is Fearless' at Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stock Movers: Paramount Global, Apple, Meta
On this episode of Stock Movers: - Paramount (PARA) shares are up after the company said it plans to cut several hundred employees on Tuesday due to a continuing decline in the cable-TV industry and the broader economic landscape. The move will affect about 3.5% of the media company's US workforce, according to an internal memo sent to staff reviewed by Bloomberg. - Apple (AAPL) shares rise after the company unveiled a new software redesign called Liquid Glass, which aims to make its device lineup more cohesive and useful, with a transparent menu and glassy look. The company also announced updates to its operating systems, including iOS 26, watchOS 26, and visionOS 26, which will provide a more uniform experience across devices. - Meta (META) shares gain after news that Mark Zuckerberg is assembling a team of experts to achieve artificial general intelligence, recruiting from a brain trust of AI researchers and engineers who've met with him at his homes in Lake Tahoe and Palo Alto.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Benchmark diesel price turns higher as futures price rises
On the back of an increase in diesel futures prices that has risen more than 13 cents/gallon in less than two weeks, the benchmark price used to set most fuel surcharges rose Monday for just the second time in nine weeks. The Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration average retail price increased by 2 cts/g Monday to $3.471/g. It brings the price up from its prior week which had been a milestone: the June 2 price was the lowest since September 2021. The increase Monday, announced Tuesday morning by the DOE/EIA, was just the second increase in the last nine weeks. That run of falling prices began with the benchmark at $3.639/g on April 7, so that the latest price is still down 16.8 cts/g during that stretch. Oil prices in general have been moving higher in recent trading. Brent crude, the global crude benchmark, settled at $60.94/barrel on May 29. It rose five out of the next seven days to settle Monday at $65.29. The increases were continuing Tuesday. At approximately 10 a.m. Eastern, Brent had risen another 2% to $66.65/b. Ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) futures prices, which had been trailing crude in recent weeks, strengthened slightly more than Brent during that time, tacking on another roughly 2 cts/g in the spread between the price of ULSD and Brent. Market analysts are citing the undercurrent of trade talks between the U.S. and China, and the prospect of avoiding an even-wider trade war, as reasons for bullishness. The bear case for prices is based on the forecasts by agencies such as the International Energy Agency that global oil demand may struggle to add even 1 million b/d this year, a historically low number. Paired with that is the OPEC+ determination to continue unwinding output cuts that have been in effect since spring of last year, despite the supply/demand models that would seem to suggest such supply would swamp a market with such weak forecasts of demand increases this year. The other side points to the structure of the market and its unrelenting backwardation. In a perfectly balanced market, the price of oil going forward–or any commodity–increases with the calendar. The July market for ULSD, which is the first month currently being traded, would have a lower price than August, August would be lower than September, and so on. The structure is called contango and the rising price reflects the cost of storage and the time value of money. The opposite is backwardation, where the nearest month price is the highest price. The next month is less than that, and the next month is lower still. That structure reflects the fact that the most nearby barrel is the most valuable because of tight inventories. The backwardation in the ULSD market actually has headed the other way, with the backwardation narrowing, suggesting an easing of tight inventories. On May 15, the spread between the first month and second month ULSD was about 5.5 cts/g. On Monday, the spread settled at 1.75 cents, with the July contract worth that much more than August. Diesel futures prices, which had been trailing crude in recent weeks, strengthened slightly more than Brent during that time, tacking on another roughly 2 cts/g in the spread between the price of ULSD and Brent. The ULSD market actually has headed the other way. On May 15, the spread between the first month and second month ULSD was about 5.5 cts/g. On Monday, the spread settled at 1.75 cents, with the July contract worth that much more than August. But in the Brent market, the spread between first month Brent and six months out widened Monday to more than $2/b. It is a spread that has been all over the map, from $2.85/b on April 17, down to 22 cts/b on May 5 and then back out to more than $2/b Monday, only the fifth time since the start of May that it has exceeded that level. The backwardation is being cited by bulls as the basis for their view that the 'swamping' of oil markets by the increase in OPEC+ oil is not going to result in a sharp decline in price. Part of that view is that there are increasing signs of at least a temporary plateau in oil output in various parts of the world beyond OPEC+. An article in the Financial Times summed up that view. 'Big companies from non-cartel countries such as ExxonMobil, Shell and BP have of late found relatively few new oilfields,' the article said. 'Over the past five years, new non-shale discoveries have averaged at 2.5bn barrels a year — less than a quarter of the level of the previous three years, according to a Goldman Sachs analysis of the top projects in the sector. Given the long lead times between drill bit success and production, oil majors are still growing output from earlier discoveries. But, after 2027, pumping from conventional projects will start to fall. Similarly, US shale oil, which has been a huge driver of supply growth, is expected to peak in 2027, according to the US Energy Information Administration, and then start to decline.' More articles by John Kingston One-day stock slide at Proficient may be tied to somewhat bearish investor presentation Parts supplier FleetPride's debt rating cut by Moody's, outlook still negative Truck transportation jobs up year over year for first time since 2023: BLS The post Benchmark diesel price turns higher as futures price rises appeared first on FreightWaves.
