State Supreme Court rules in latest abortion ban lawsuit
(WSPA) – The South Carolina Supreme Court upheld on Wednesday a lower courts ruling clarifying when a fetal heartbeat can be detected and how it applies to the state's ban on abortions after six weeks.
The supreme court upheld a previous decision which said fetal heartbeat activity can be detected at six weeks of pregnancy. State law says after a heartbeat is detectable, abortion is no longer an option.
South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster, who signed the six week abortion ban in 2023, applauded the supreme court's decision.
'Time and time again, we have defended the right to life in South Carolina, and time and time again, we have prevailed.'
'Today's ruling is another clear and decisive victory that will ensure the lives of countless unborn children remain protected and that South Carolina continues to lead the charge in defending the sanctity of life.'
Gov. Henry McMaster
Jace Woodrum, executive director of the ACLU of South Carolina also commented on the decision.
'The extreme ban on most abortions is endangering the lives of pregnant South Carolinians and driving medical care providers away from our state. Many people do not find out they are pregnant until after the six-week cutoff that is now being imposed under South Carolina law, and the list of exceptions is so narrow that doctors are struggling to provide life-saving reproductive care for fear of criminal prosecution.'
'Until South Carolina ends its pattern of blatant gerrymandering, a loud and regressive minority will continue to steer our politics via primary elections, resulting in continued erosion of our reproductive freedom.'
Jace Woodrum, executive director of the ACLU of South Carolina
Wednesday's decision is the latest in a long string of lawsuits by Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers to combat abortion bans enacted by the state legislature.
In 2021, the South Carolina General Assembly passed the Fetal Heartbeat Protection from Abortion Act, which would ban abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. At the time it was passed the law was considered unconstitutional due to the longstanding precedent established in Roe v Wade.
When the Supreme Court issued a decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned Roe v Wade, the 2021 act became state law, and Planned Parenthood sued the state, arguing the law violated patients' constitutional right to privacy.
The state supreme court ultimately ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood, prompting state lawmakers to revise the 2021 law, but using the same definition of 'fetal heartbeat' they used in the original law.
Planned Parenthood sued again and a circuit court ruled the law was still unconstitutional, but in a 2023 decision the state supreme court reversed that decision. At the time of that decision the court did not choose to address the meaning of what fetal heartbeat activity means.
Wednesday's decision ends another suit which aimed to clarify when fetal heartbeat activity can be detected in a pregnancy. Planned Parenthood argued heartbeat activity is not detectable until nine weeks of pregnancy, the state maintains it is detectable after six weeks.
A circuit court and the supreme court both sided with the state in the case.
This is a developing story, we will update it as more information becomes available.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's who has filed to run for Spartanburg County Sheriff: List
SPARTANBURG COUNTY, S.C. (WSPA) — The filing period for the special election to fill the seat of Spartanburg County Sheriff opened Friday. Five candidates have filed paperwork with South Carolina Election Commission, all of whom have filed as Republicans in the August 5 primary. Sheriff salaries in the Upstate: Where does your county rank? Candidates running in the special election had to pay a filing fee of about $3,000, which is prorated because of the partial term. Candidates are listed below in alphabetical order. In his letter announcing his bid for the seat of sheriff, Clark said he wants to help citizens, residents and visitors throughout Spartanburg County. Clark started his career with the Spartanburg Police Department in March 2002, serving as a senior patrol officer and a field patrol officer. In October 2005, Clark began working with the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office, working as a property crimes investigator, a software systems administrator and records supervisor. 'I have the experience and knowledge to lead the sheriff's office and continue its mission to provide services to citizens that meet or exceed professional law enforcement standards, ensuring equal enforcement, and protection of the law without prejudice,' Clark said. Clevenger, who has served as coroner since 2009, announced his candidacy for Spartanburg County Sheriff on Monday. 'I have dedicated my adult life to serving the people of Spartanburg County with transparency, compassion, and professionalism.' said Clevenger in a news release. 'The brave men and women of the Spartanburg Sheriff's Office deserve a leader who protects their integrity and shields them from politics so they can focus on protecting our community.' Clevenger said his campaign for sheriff will focus on restoring trust in law enforcement, increasing transparency, supporting deputies and ensuring public safety is 'free from political agendas.' Nick Duncan, a Laurens County native, worked as a paramedic with Spartanburg County EMS before he joined the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office in 2014. He announced a run for sheriff in March 2024, but lost the primary election in June. Duncan previously said that, if elected, he would focus on drug issues impacting the county as well as working on community relations and transparency in the office. Duncan encouraged voters to decide what they want from their elected leaders. 'Just look at everybody, figure out what you want from your elected officials, and what beliefs most align with yours and make a good, educated decision.' Duncan said. Bill Rhyne announced his bid for the seat of sheriff on June 3. A northern Spartanburg County native, Rhyne joined the U.S. Marine Corps after graduating from Chapman High School. He worked for the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office as a resident deputy and then for the South Carolina Highway Patrol in the Upstate as a public information officer and community relations officer. Rhyne retired as lieutenant and executive commander. After retirement, he became the director of training for American Services. He also was able to return to SCHP as a community outreach coordinator. 'This campaign isn't about politics. It's about people,' Rhyne said. 'It's about making sure our communities are safe, heard, and respected. It's about being present, well-reasoned in our actions, and building a sheriff's office that truly serves every corner of Spartanburg County.' Richard 'Ric' Stephens served in the Army National Guard from 1982-1992, according to his website. Later, Stephens worked for the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office from 1996-2002 in various positions. He retired from work in law enforcement in 2015. 'In doing this, I learned the complexity of the sheriff's office and how extremely important it is for you as an employee to understand and use all the county resources allocated,' Stephens said. In an interview with 7NEWS, Stephens explained that his bid for sheriff is personal, after losing a family member was killed by a drug dealer in Spartanburg County. 'The sheriff's office has a dedicated professional workforce, with my leadership we will focus on issues that affect the taxpayers the most (traffic, drugs, and crime) I will give immediate results,' he added. The primary will be held on August 5 while the special election is set to be held on November 4, which is the date of the 2025 general election. Early voting for the primary will be held from July 21 through August 1 while early voting for the special election will run from October 20 through October 31. A primary runoff would be held on August 19, if necessary, with early voting from August 13 to August 15. Full schedule for special election: June 13 – Candidate filing opens June 21 – Candidate filing closes July 21 – Early primary voting begins August 1 – Early primary voting ends August 5 – Primary election August 13 – Primary runoff early voting begins (if necessary) August 15 – Primary runoff early voting ends (if necessary) August 19 – Primary runoff election October 20 – Special election early voting begins October 31 – Special election early voting ends November 4 – Special Election Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
With ‘No Kings' protests upcoming, has SC's approval of Trump shifted at all?
Large numbers of protesters are expected to descend on the South Carolina State House this Saturday for a planned protest against President Donald Trump. And who shows up may tell us something about where the administration is headed. Saturday's planned demonstration at the State House is one of several 'No Kings' protests being organized across the country to coincide with a planned military parade in Washington, D.C., to mark the Army's 250th birthday — and which also falls on the president's 79th. The protests are also taking place with the backdrop of Trump's deployment of thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration raids in the city, a move that was resisted by local officials who fear it could increase tensions and the potential for violence. Other demonstrations held at the State House so far this year have drawn hundreds upset by the Trump administration's actions on immigration and other issues. Which raises the question of whether those numbers represent any waning enthusiasm for the president in a state that voted for Trump by 18 percentage points seven months ago. Winthrop University has conducted three statewide polls of South Carolina voters since Trump assumed office on Jan. 20. In February, April and May, Trump's approval among all voters has been consistently around 45%. The disapproval rate was at 40% and rose to 45% and 43% in the next two months, respectively. But that's largely because the percentage answering 'don't know' fell from 16% to 11% to 9%. 'That may not be the same after the protests' in California, said Scott Huffmon, director of the Winthrop Poll. 'There's a clear difference over [Kilmar Abrego] Garcia being brought back, but that's really the only strong immigration story that's bubbled up to public attention.' Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who previously lived in Maryland after entering the country without documentation. He and several other immigrants the Trump administration accused of gang ties were deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador under an emergency war powers act that courts later blocked. A judge ordered that the U.S. 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. because his deportation violated a previous court order that found Abrego Garcia was likely to face persecution if he was returned to El Salvador, and the Supreme Court later upheld the decision. Trump initially insisted he was unable to remove Abrego Garcia from Salvadoran custody, but earlier this month he was brought back to the U.S. to face charges of human smuggling. The May Winthrop poll showed that 44% of South Carolinians said Trump should comply with court orders to return Abrego Garcia to the United States. 33% said he should not, and 23% were unsure. 'We shouldn't assume that all of the respondents knew the particulars of the Abrego Garcia case,' Huffmon noted when releasing the poll results. 'If they didn't, this becomes more of a referendum on whether the Trump administration should be bound by court orders when it comes to immigration.' The same poll shows that 45% of South Carolinians disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, while 43% approve. But Trump is much stronger on immigration, with 50% approving of his handling of the issue and 40% disapproving. 'The people who constantly follow the news forget that the average person doesn't pay attention closely until something like the protests erupt, and then they see it as coming out of nowhere,' Huffmon said. 'It's possible that people who like the idea of Trump deporting folks have a problem with using the National Guard and military against U.S. citizens. That could produce a shift among those moderately supporting Trump.' But the Winthrop University pollster was unsure how representative that subset of the population will be of the people at Saturday's protests. 'People at protests are going to be of two flavors,' he said. 'The largest number are the most liberal and active, but among them are people who normally wouldn't attend a rally for the Democratic Party, but became concerned because of this. They will be the minority among the protesters, but there will be some people who wouldn't have shown up except for the extreme nature of what was happening.' But Greg Brewer, an engineer and self-described 'limited government fiscal conservative' living in Lexington, was weary of what a mass protest in the state's capital might mean. He remembers the last large protest in the Midlands, when a march against the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd in 2020 ended with vandalism and a police car set on fire. 'I think if you haven't learned from the past, you're doomed to repeat it, and the last time a protest came through the Vista, it ripped things apart,' he said. 'So if that's what's indicated, we need to learn from the past and make sure the resources are deployed to make sure that doesn't happen.' Brewer used to live in California, and moved back to South Carolina amid the strict lockdown requirements imposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. 'California in general is completely mismanaged, with its debt, its catastrophes,' Brewer said. 'The vegetation isn't managed, which is why they have these wildfires. I think there's nothing impressive about Gavin Newsom, he's a disaster.' 'Trump got elected because of concerns about sovereignty and border protection,' he said. 'That's what he campaigned on, and he's delivering on it.' He encourages any protesters to find peaceful ways to channel their concerns into constructive action. 'Regular people can engage each other in civil and respectful ways,' Brewer said. 'You can speak to your representative at the State House or find a way to handle it locally.' But another Lexington conservative had a different reaction to the week's news. Anne Marie Green, the former chair of the Lexington 1 school board, posted on Facebook that she was surprised to be heading to the protest herself. 'As a Christian, a lifelong Republican, and someone who grew up on the principled, conservative leadership of Ronald Reagan and Governor Carroll Campbell, I never imagined I would attend a protest,' Green wrote. 'I'll be standing with others at the No Kings protest to affirm something simple but vital: In America, we don't worship politicians. We hold them accountable. Our leaders are servants, not kings.' 'If you believe that our nation's strength lies in humility, not showmanship, and that faith and patriotism should never be used as tools for personal power or glory, join me tomorrow as we peacefully and prayerfully protest,' she said. State Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Richland, minority leader in the state House of Representatives, said he was unsure who would be involved in Saturday's protest. 'I've been involved with protests since college, and I can never tell,' Rutherford said. 'I remember at every single George Floyd protest, I was shocked at how many people showed up. It really depends on what's on people's social media feeds.' Rutherford believes that at least some people who voted for Trump are reconsidering, citing Arab American voters in Michigan who abandoned the Democrats over the Biden administration's approach to the war in Gaza, or Cuban Americans who have seen the revocation of immigrants' protected status under Trump. 'Republican businessmen see their 401(k)s plummet, and then when a court rules he did something illegal, the stock market goes up,' he said. 'Even the business community feels like they did not get what they pay for.'
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene launches probe into Planned Parenthood's use of taxpayer funds
FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and her DOGE subcommittee are launching an investigation into Planned Parenthood on Friday. Greene is sending a letter to Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson, questioning whether the nonprofit is commingling "federal funds and using them for unpermitted purposes." Federal funds are barred from being used for abortions under a measure called the Hyde Amendment. President Donald Trump has also taken executive action toward affirming the Hyde Amendment and blocking federal dollars from organizations that provide transgender healthcare to youth. However, Greene's letter suggested she is accusing Planned Parenthood of doing both. 148 Democrats Back Noncitizen Voting In Dc As Gop Raises Alarm About Foreign Agents "Despite receiving 39 percent of its annual revenue from federal funds intended for essential health services, such as cancer screenings and wellness exams, Planned Parenthood is increasingly using its resources to offer abortions to its patients," Greene wrote. Read On The Fox News App Greene said the data show that the "latest Planned Parenthood annual report shows that it performed more than 400,000 abortions, an increase of 23 percent over the last 10 years." The letter also accused Planned Parenthood of providing "gender-affirming care" with "allegedly little to no medical or psychological evaluation." An annual report by Planned Parenthood, cited by Greene, showed 45 "affiliate health centers" providing hormone therapy for so-called "gender-affirming care." However, Greene said other gender transition services were reported as "other procedures," including pediatric care and infertility services as well, which she said obscured the "true number of transgender services provided." "Planned Parenthood's official policy varies by state, but some Planned Parenthood health centers will provide cross-sex hormones to minors as young as 16 years old with parental consent," Greene wrote, while also accusing the group of "not consistently adhering to its own parental consent policies." To assist her probe, Greene is seeking Planned Parenthood's non-public financial statements from between January 2020 through June 2025, as well as a list of its independent affiliate health centers, informed consent documents, and other documentation. Notably, that period includes when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and sent the issue of abortion back to the states in June 2022. Republicans have long targeted Planned Parenthood, accusing the nonprofit of misusing federal dollars despite the longstanding anti-abortion funding measure. Republicans Challenge 'Irrelevant' Budget Office As It Critiques Trump's 'Beautiful Bill' The group's supporters, meanwhile, have held it up as a key nationwide provider of women's healthcare – which they believe has only gotten more critical after the high court's June 2022 decision. Greene's panel, which is under the House Oversight Committee, is opening the probe weeks after House Republicans passed their version of Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which includes a provision to block federal funds from organizations that provide abortions. Fox News Digital reached out to Planned Parenthood for comment but did not immediately hear article source: Marjorie Taylor Greene launches probe into Planned Parenthood's use of taxpayer funds
