State Supreme Court rules in latest abortion ban lawsuit
The supreme court upheld a previous decision which said fetal heartbeat activity can be detected at six weeks of pregnancy. State law says after a heartbeat is detectable, abortion is no longer an option.
South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster, who signed the six week abortion ban in 2023, applauded the supreme court's decision.
'Time and time again, we have defended the right to life in South Carolina, and time and time again, we have prevailed.'
'Today's ruling is another clear and decisive victory that will ensure the lives of countless unborn children remain protected and that South Carolina continues to lead the charge in defending the sanctity of life.'
Gov. Henry McMaster
Jace Woodrum, executive director of the ACLU of South Carolina also commented on the decision.
'The extreme ban on most abortions is endangering the lives of pregnant South Carolinians and driving medical care providers away from our state. Many people do not find out they are pregnant until after the six-week cutoff that is now being imposed under South Carolina law, and the list of exceptions is so narrow that doctors are struggling to provide life-saving reproductive care for fear of criminal prosecution.'
'Until South Carolina ends its pattern of blatant gerrymandering, a loud and regressive minority will continue to steer our politics via primary elections, resulting in continued erosion of our reproductive freedom.'
Jace Woodrum, executive director of the ACLU of South Carolina
Wednesday's decision is the latest in a long string of lawsuits by Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers to combat abortion bans enacted by the state legislature.
In 2021, the South Carolina General Assembly passed the Fetal Heartbeat Protection from Abortion Act, which would ban abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. At the time it was passed the law was considered unconstitutional due to the longstanding precedent established in Roe v Wade.
When the Supreme Court issued a decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned Roe v Wade, the 2021 act became state law, and Planned Parenthood sued the state, arguing the law violated patients' constitutional right to privacy.
The state supreme court ultimately ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood, prompting state lawmakers to revise the 2021 law, but using the same definition of 'fetal heartbeat' they used in the original law.
Planned Parenthood sued again and a circuit court ruled the law was still unconstitutional, but in a 2023 decision the state supreme court reversed that decision. At the time of that decision the court did not choose to address the meaning of what fetal heartbeat activity means.
Wednesday's decision ends another suit which aimed to clarify when fetal heartbeat activity can be detected in a pregnancy. Planned Parenthood argued heartbeat activity is not detectable until nine weeks of pregnancy, the state maintains it is detectable after six weeks.
A circuit court and the supreme court both sided with the state in the case.
This is a developing story, we will update it as more information becomes available.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
12 hours ago
- Politico
Your first look inside Newsom's campaign-in-waiting
Presented by WHO'S ON THE YES SIDE — Gov. Gavin Newsom still has to get the Legislature's stamp of approval on his plan for a mid-decade gerrymander of the state's U.S. House map, but the campaign to sell it to voters is already taking shape. Newsom has begun to telegraph the messaging, informed by research from his longtime pollster and focus-group conductor David Binder, at the heart of the pitch for what they're hoping to nationalize as Proposition 50. A vote for the measure is a vote against President Donald Trump, argues a digital video released this weekend, and the California electorate will have a say via the ballot how the state (and the country) runs its democracy. 'On November 4, you have the power to stand up to Trump,' Newsom says in a clip from a speech at a launch event in Los Angeles last week. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district.' The strategy to amplify that message is being developed by operatives whose experience stretches from across Newsom's past statewide campaigns. Gubernatorial chief-of-staff Jim DeBoo and his one-time deputy Lindsey Cobia, both now consultants specializing in ballot-measure work, will help corral a coalition that includes top progressive interest groups, including Planned Parenthood, SEIU, the California Teachers Association and the California Federation of Labor. Juan Rodriguez and his San Francisco-based firm Bearstar Strategies, whose Ace Smith and Sean Clegg have guided strategy for Newsom's statewide campaigns, will likely produce the campaign's advertising. Strategists Courtni Pugh and Addisu Demissie bring expertise from Newsom's success fending off a 2021 recall — a race where he also faced tough polling at the outset but upended it by villainizing the opposition and nationalizing the stakes. The campaign's online fundraising operation will be directed by Aisle 518 Strategies' Tim Tagaris, who played a central role on Bernie Sanders' digital team and has helped build out Newsom's small-dollar donor network. Newsom fundraiser Kristin Bertolina Faust will focus on high-dollar donors, running paperwork through campaign-finance specialists Judy Zamore and Josh Myles of the firm Capitol Compliance. Newsom has taken the legal vehicle behind his past efforts to codify abortion rights and overhaul the state's mental-health system and renamed it The Election Rigging Response Act, Governor Newsom's Ballot Measure Committee. Its accounts have already processed deposits from House Majority PAC, which works to elect Democrats to Congress and is likely to be a major source of out-of-state funds for the campaign. Already the campaign has demonstrated its ability to pull in money from both inside and outside California. Hours after Newsom's launch event, the Democratic super PAC 314 Action Fund pledged $1 million toward the effort, the first of what's expected to be a significant flow of national cash into the race. Los Angeles-based Democratic donor Bill Bloomfield told Playbook he has already given his own 'seven-figure' sum to the effort and is prepared to come up with more if needed. 'It's a terrible path for the country to go down,' Bloomfield said. 'But if in fact it happens in Texas, I don't think California should ... sit back and let President Trump and MAGA try to steal the House of Representatives.' — With help from Melanie Mason and Jeremy B. White NEWS BREAK: LA can't back out of 2028 Olympics … Heat wave heads for California … San Jose to clear largest homeless camp. Welcome to Ballot Measure Weekly, a special edition of Playbook PM focused on California's lively realm of ballot measure campaigns. Drop us a line at eschultheis@ and wmccarthy@ or find us on X — @emilyrs and @wrmccart. TOP OF THE TICKET A highly subjective ranking of the ballot measures — past and future, certain and possible — getting our attention this week. 1. Redistricting (2025): Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has emerged to rally Republican forces against Newsom's gerrymander, as our colleague Blake Jones scooped last week, while a No committee is counting on upwards of $30 million from Charles Munger Jr. and the active involvement of former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. 2. Minimum wage referendum (Los Angeles, 2026): A coalition of LA-area unions and community organizations are threatening protests and strikes if its demands for a 'New Deal' ahead of the 2028 Olympics isn't met. At the heart of the campaign Unite Here Local 11 will launch on Thursday with United Farm Workers, United Teachers Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy is a $30 minimum wage whose future at the ballot is now being determined by the city clerk's office. 3. Judicial elections (2026): Assemblymember Gail Pellerin's effort to allow California Supreme Court judges to extend their terms without an election will have to wait at least another year after being gutted and amended to serve as a vehicle for Newsom's redistricting scheme. 4. Insurance reform (2026): Elizabeth Hammack, the proponent of an initiative to reimagine California's insurance regime, is offering more context for her out-of-nowhere attempt to repeal and replace Prop 103, explaining that she filed the initiative after growing frustrated listening to an educational seminar about California's insurance 'death spiral.' A public LinkedIn post late last week offered no details about how she would fund or run a campaign (and she hasn't yet spoken to us). 5. Israel boycotts (2026): Pro-Palestinian activists Hatem al-Bazian and Malak Afaneh have filed an initiative to protect Californians' right to boycott or divest from Israel. They will set out to collect signatures just as the Trump administration seeks a $1 billion settlement from UCLA for what it claims were antisemitic practices related in part to the university's handling of anti-Israel protests. 6. Proposition K (San Francisco, 2024): Ballots have gone out in the September 16 recall of Supervisor Joel Engardio, currently facing a voter revolt inspired by his support for an initiative to close the Great Highway for a new coastal park in his district. 7. Home-buyer loans (2026): Former Assembly speaker Bob Hertzberg filed an initiative on Friday to establish a loan fund up to $25 billion to finance mortgage-secured 'homeownership loans' for middle-class families as part of a broader effort to 'expedite and encourage' single-family home construction. IN MEMORIAM CALEXIT: Backers of a California secession have given up on making the 2026 ballot after failing to meet a signature-gathering deadline late last month. This is the third time the group has failed to reach the ballot. Since filing the measure in January, Calexit's boosters have been plagued by a series of scandals. Longtime independence advocate Marcus Evans, the initiative's official proponent, claimed to have gathered 200,000 signatures before being forced to admit the actual haul was just one-tenth of that. Xavier Mitchell, a campaign CEO whose financial contacts and expertise were pitched by Evans as a key to the initiative's future success, was revealed this month by POLITICO Magazine to have a criminal history of fraud and deceit. Although the measure is dead for 2026, Evans has already filed another secession measure with the secretary of state listing the 2028 general election as its target date. I'M JUST A BILL HOUSING BOND (AB 736 and SB 417): Environmentalists are intensifying their lobbying efforts behind an affordable-housing bond in an effort to budge a bill lingering unloved in the Senate. The proposed $10 billion borrowing package passed the Assembly this spring but has yet to be heard by a Senate committee. Any potential movement for the bill sponsored by Sen. Christopher Cabaldon appears now stalled behind other priorities, including the redistricting package legislators are working to push through this week. In a letter to the two chambers' appropriations chairs, a coalition including Audubon California, the Environmental Action Committee of West Marin, the California Coastal Protection Network and the Endangered Habitats League argue the state's housing crisis amounts to a climate problem, too. 'California's severe lack of affordable housing represents both social and environmental crises,' representatives from 17 different environmental groups write in the letter dated Friday and shared first with Playbook. 'We are eager to support responsible solutions to California's housing crisis, such as SB 417 and AB 736, and we respectfully urge you and your committees to advance this legislation as written.' Affordable-housing advocates, too, are pressing senators to take action before the session ends in mid-September. Representatives from Housing California and the California Housing Consortium last week asked supporters to call legislators with a message 'that the state is prepared to do what's needed to take on the housing crisis.' ON OTHER BALLOTS Lawyers for Medicaid- and marijuana-related measures on the 2026 ballot in Florida are urging a federal judge to halt enforcement of the state's new law restricting the citizens' initiative process, after the same judge issued a mixed ruling on the law earlier this year ... A coalition of Montana unions and progressive groups launched a committee and two versions of ballot language for an amendment that would enshrine nonpartisan judicial elections in the state constitution, following a separate group that launched a similar effort in June ... Alaska natural-medicine activists seeking to decriminalize psychedelics have been cleared to begin gathering signatures for an initiative that would appear on the 2026 ballot ... And in Colorado, two high school seniors have filed a proposed initiative to automatically admit the top 10 percent of graduates from every Colorado high school to state colleges and universities based on their grade point averages. POSTCARD FROM ... ORANGE: Swim classes are cancelled, summer day camp has disappeared, and the upcoming Halloween fair is now entirely volunteer-run — all the result of a budget crunch that could lead this Southern California city to declare bankruptcy. To claw its way out, Orange's leadership is thinking about putting a sales-tax increase of at least half a percent on the 2026 ballot. The only problem? Orange voters just rejected one less than a year ago. 'If we go back and ask, given the current environment in this country, people are going to be very wary of saying yes,' said Councilmember Arianna Barrios. 'No matter how much its needed, or how many cuts there are at the local level.' According to Barrios, who joined the council in 2020, the city ran into its budget nightmare in large part because of a Covid-era decision to fund 15 permanent police officer positions using one-time relief money. She said in an interview that the council was not fully aware of the decision's downstream fiscal impacts. 'That was the bomb that basically blew our budgets out of the water,' Barrios said. The first effort to permanently fund police positions, along with emergency and fire services, reached the November 2024 ballot as Measure Z. But the proposal to raise the sales tax by 0.5 percent for 10 years fell short by about 400 votes after an opposition campaign led by the Orange County Republican Party. Many of those police officer positions remain unfilled, but because the budget operates on the assumption that they will be soon, the city has had to cut essentially all its events. (Volunteers and local organizations have stepped in to keep some of them going.) There are also currently 80 staff vacancies going unfilled. City leadership is also looking to more aggressive code enforcement to raise funds. But financial consultants are recommending another ballot measure as the best permanent solution. The political class will have to sell a new sales-tax increase to a tightwad electorate, while also convincing them the same leaders that got Orange into hot water can bail it out. 'Going back out to the voters means asking one more time who are we as a city, who do we want to be, and do you trust us to get you there,' Barrios said. 'I hope they do.' RETIRE THIS NUMBER Democratic efforts to pull off a mid-decade gerrymander will require gutting California's Proposition 11, a 2008 constitutional amendment referred to the ballot by lawmakers to establish an independent redistricting process. In other years, the same digit has been used for statewide measures that would: Remove the four-year term limit for civil-service positions created under a local charter (1911, passed) ... Allow the University of California to take out up to $1.8 million in bonds to fund construction of its Berkeley campus (1914, passed) ... Exempt cemetery property and income from taxation (1918, failed) ... Impose an annual tax of at least $4 on every non-citizen man between the ages of 21 and 60 residing in California, except those the state classifies as 'paupers, idiots and insane persons' (1920, passed) ... Create the Fish and Game Commission (1930, failed) ... Empower lawmakers to regulate wrestling and boxing matches, with all money generated by license fees to fund homes for war veterans (1942, passed) ... Prohibit hiring discrimination based on race, religion, color, national origin or ancestry and create a commission to handle enforcement (1946, failed) ... Allow city charters and amendments to be voted on at a special election or as part of the next general or municipal election, and allow charter amendments to be filed at any time (1948, failed) ... Amend the state constitution to guarantee a right to privacy (1972, passed) ... Replace masculine words with gender-neutral words (like 'person') throughout the state constitution (1974, passed) ... Reassign excess land originally purchased with state gas-tax revenue for road construction to be used instead as public parks (1976, passed) ... Impose a 10 percent surtax on energy-related businesses operating in California, along with a tax credit for those which reduce fossil-fuel use (1980, failed) ... Uphold the state Senate district map drawn by the state Legislature in 1981 and keep it in place until 1991 (1982, failed) ... Authorize local governments to enter into sales tax revenue-sharing agreements with one another (1998, passed) ... And allow ambulance providers to require workers to remain on-call during their meal and rest breaks (2018, passed).
USA Today
13 hours ago
- USA Today
SC Gov. McMaster deploys National Guard to 'restore law and order' to Washington D.C.
South Carolina's governor has authorized the deployment of 200 South Carolina National Guardsmen to the Capitol in Washington, D.C., amid a federal crackdown on crime. Gov. Henry McMaster announced on August 16 that Palmetto State guardsmen will be deployed to Washington, D.C. to support President Donald Trump. The U.S. Department of Defense stated that Trump called roughly 800 troops from the Army and Air National Guard into the Capitol on August 11 in a crime-fighting effort. This move faced criticism by city leaders, including Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who says crime in the nation's capital is at a 30-year low. South Carolina is one of three states that have chosen to deploy their state National Guard to the Capitol. The other two states are West Virginia and Ohio. The federal government will pay for South Carolina's deployment under Title 32, according to the governor's office. That title enables the Secretary of the Army to offer financial aid to a state that utilizes its National Guard to support specific federal duties. 'South Carolina is proud to stand with President Trump as he works to restore law and order to our nation's capital and ensure safety for all who live, work, and visit there,' McMaster said in a statement. The governor's office said South Carolina National Guardsmen are subject to immediate recall in case of a hurricane or other natural disaster in the state. Crime rates in South Carolina versus Washington, D.C. The White House issued a media release on August 11 saying that crime in Washington, D.C., is "out of control." "While Fake News journalists and politicians go out of their way to claim otherwise, the reality is that our nation's capital is anything but safe," the White House release stated. The U.S. Department of Justice stated on January 3 that crime in the capital is at a 30-year low. Data from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) showed a 35% drop in violent crime between 2023 and 2024. The Rochester Institute of Technology compared 2024 homicide rates across 24 U.S. cities. It put Washington D.C.'s homicide rate at 27.3 per 100,000 people. That ranking put Washington, D.C. as the city with the fourth-highest crime rate of the ranked U.S. cities, in between Atlanta and Detroit. The 2023 homicide rate in Washington, D.C. was 40.4, according to population data from World Population Review and crime statistics from MPD. The capital notably had a significantly higher homicide rate in 2023 than in previous years, with 226 incidents in 2021 and 203 reports in 2022. How does this compare to South Carolina cities? The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) works with Beyond 20/20 to operate an interactive crime statistic database. The most recent data set available is from 2023. More: Panelists address gun policy challenges: 'Thoughts and prayers are not enough anymore' North Charleston had the highest homicide rate of the three most populous cities in South Carolina at 25.5 per 100,000 people. Spartanburg had the highest homicide rate of the three Upstate communities, with a rate of 21.1. Greenville, Spartanburg, and Anderson do not have a population over 100,000. Their homicide rates were calculated with the same formula used for Washington, D.C., and the three most populous South Carolina cities. The data for those three cities indicates an estimate of a homicide rate if each municipality had a population of at least 100,000. Lawmakers applaud, criticise use of National Guard President Trump signed the Presidential Memorandum on August 11 to "restore law and order" in Washington, D.C. The order directs the Secretary of Defense to mobilize the capital's National Guard to fight crime in the city until law and order are restored. The response to McMaster's deployment of the South Carolina National Guard is split along party lines, with Democratic lawmakers criticising the decision as Republicans applaud it. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, and Congressman William Timmons are some Republican politicians who have expressed support for the move on social media. I fully support @henrymcmaster's decision to deploy 200 South Carolina National Guardsmen to assist @realDonaldTrump in restoring law and order in our nation's capital. This mission is federally funded under Title 32, and our Guard remains ready to return home immediately should… State Rep. Wendell Jones (D-Greenville), State Sen. Karl Allen (D-Greenville), and Democratic Party leadership all came out in opposition to the decision over the weekend. "Hurricane season is here. We need our soldiers home, not on call for photo ops," Jones said in a statement posted to the media. Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Henry McMaster authorizes deployment of National Guard to Washington, DC
Gov. Henry McMaster Saturday authorized the deployment of 200 South Carolina National Guardsmen to Washington, D.C.
