City of Aiken Community Development Block Grant Meeting allows citizens to voice needs
AIKEN, S.C. – The Neighborhood Services Department of the City of Aiken hosted a public meeting regarding the allocation of funds from the Community Development Block Grant. Residents of the City of Aiken came to voice their concerns and ideas on how the funds should be spent by the Neighborhood Services Department.
Last year Aiken received $182,000 through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which is dispersed to assist low and moderate income housing areas throughout the city. Sabina Craig, Neighborhood Services Director for the City of Aiken, spoke to WJBF about the specifics of the CDBG, 'We are an entitlement, which means that we do a continuation of an application. We don't have to apply for the funds each year.'
Residents from neighborhoods that receive CDBG Funds gathered at the Smith-Hazel Recreation Center to voice their opinions and concerns on how the funds should be spent. Different areas of concern for residents included pot holes, lack of street lights, and long waits at traffic lights to name a few.
'Some neighborhoods may need sidewalks, so may need streetlights, others may need activities for the youth in that area. So, what's more important to them is what I need to hear, So I know how to divvy up the funds and allocate them.' said Sabina Craig.
According to the 2024 Annual Action Plan, the CDBG helped fund the Lot Clean Up Program which assisted 40 households; the Demolition Program, and Land Acquisition among other projects.
Comments and concerns from Thursday's meeting will be presented to the Aiken City Council in the 2025 Annual Action Plan by the Neighborhood Services Department. For more information on the Aiken CDBG visit https://www.cityofaikensc.gov/government/community-development-block-grant-cdbg/
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
9 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump wants to cut federal housing funds in half, and even Republicans are questioning it
"It's time for a paradigm shift." "We have to refocus." "We want to be efficient and effective, not bloated and bureaucratic." Democrats on House and Senate appropriations subcommittees were outraged — and even some Republicans were skeptical. Turner was tasked with explaining what Trump's proposed $45 billion cut to HUD's funding would look like in practice. The agency would be among the hardest hit parts of the federal government under Trump's plan to eliminate $163 billion in federal spending. But the secretary offered little detail on plans for how his agency would continue serving millions of older, disabled, and low-income Americans, people struggling to recover from disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and those experiencing homelessness. "The goal here is not to serve less Americans. The goal here is to serve Americans better," Turner said during his testimony before the House subcommittee on Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development on June 10. While Democratic lawmakers were particularly critical of Turner's approach and Trump's massive budget cut request, some Republicans also probed Turner for more detailed explanations he didn't provide. The hearings highlighted how the nation's major housing affordability challenges have become a bipartisan concern. "The federal government doesn't have all the answers, and the budget empowers collaboration with states and localities," HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett told Business Insider. During the House hearing, Republican Rep. David Joyce asked Turner how HUD plans to continue helping victims of disasters, like flooding and fires, if the agency slashes funding for the Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery program, as the budget proposes. The agency has long helped FEMA rebuild homes destroyed in natural disasters that lack sufficient insurance, as well as repair roads and bridges. In response, Turner insisted that HUD "will not allow disaster recovery and those that need assistance in disaster recovery to be lost on us" and that HUD is simply pursuing a "different way of distributing these funds." Joyce, who represents Northeast Ohio, wasn't satisfied. "Thank you, sir, that was a great answer, but it didn't demonstrate a plan. Do you have a plan?" the congressman responded. Turner ultimately conceded that the plan for supporting disaster victims "is forthcoming." Joyce ended the exchange by warning that the agency has a role to play. "The one thing I know is, you're right. Disasters come. All over the country, disasters come. And you need to be ready for them." Rep. Rutherford, a Florida Republican, pressed Turner on how states will help support homeownership in low-income communities when the president's budget proposes eliminating HUD's Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), a competitive grant program that Rutherford said has been successful in his district. "Everywhere that homeownership went up, violent crime went down," said Rutherford, a former sheriff. "How are we going to address this issue if we're doing away with SHOP?" Turner replied by saying that states can support homeownership programs if they see fit going forward, but didn't clarify where that funding would come from. Spokespeople for Rutherford and Joyce didn't immediately return BI's requests for comment. 'People will die' Democratic lawmakers expressed more direct frustration about the program cuts and lack of detail the secretary presented. "People will die," Rep. Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat, told Turner of HUD's proposed cuts to homelessness services, including the elimination of the Housing for Persons with AIDS program. "If you just want to say we've got to cut these things because that's our plan, I'd respect you a lot more than telling us that you care about people as you put them on the street." Turner replied that the agency isn't just cutting funding but is "going to be more effective and more efficient." "How?" Quigley asked. "It's a new paradigm. It's a new way to do things," Turner replied. During Turner's testimony before the Senate on June 11, Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz, who's made housing a key priority, urged Turner to reinstate a bipartisan program Schatz championed that incentivizes states and localities to cut red tape that hampers housing construction. "It's the most significant pro-housing deregulatory mechanism that we've passed," Schatz said. Turner didn't answer Schatz's question on the eliminated program, and simply said he's encouraging local leaders to find ways to cut regulations. But the president's budget isn't law. Government funding is set to run out in September, and Congress has the final say on what the federal budget looks like. The House hearing concluded with the chairwoman, Republican Rep. Stephanie Bice, suggesting that Turner hasn't had enough time in the few months he's been in office to nail down more specifics about where HUD funding will go and how programs will be reformed. "Is it safe to say that you have a framework for a plan that you want to move forward, but maybe not all of the nuts and bolts that you need to be able to present those details?" Bice asked Turner.
Business Insider
9 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump wants to cut federal housing funds in half, and even Republicans are questioning it
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner kept repeating the same phrases to Congress in defense of President Donald Trump's proposal to cut the agency's budget by 51%. "It's time for a paradigm shift." "We have to refocus." "We want to be efficient and effective, not bloated and bureaucratic." Democrats on House and Senate appropriations subcommittees were outraged — and even some Republicans were skeptical. Turner was tasked with explaining what Trump's proposed $45 billion cut to HUD's funding would look like in practice. The agency would be among the hardest hit parts of the federal government under Trump's plan to eliminate $163 billion in federal spending. But the secretary offered little detail on plans for how his agency would continue serving millions of older, disabled, and low-income Americans, people struggling to recover from disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and those experiencing homelessness. "The goal here is not to serve less Americans. The goal here is to serve Americans better," Turner said during his testimony before the House subcommittee on Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development on June 10. While Democratic lawmakers were particularly critical of Turner's approach and Trump's massive budget cut request, some Republicans also probed Turner for more detailed explanations he didn't provide. The hearings highlighted how the nation's major housing affordability challenges have become a bipartisan concern. "The federal government doesn't have all the answers, and the budget empowers collaboration with states and localities," HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett told Business Insider. Few details, lots of frustration During the House hearing, Republican Rep. David Joyce asked Turner how HUD plans to continue helping victims of disasters, like flooding and fires, if the agency slashes funding for the Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery program, as the budget proposes. The agency has long helped FEMA rebuild homes destroyed in natural disasters that lack sufficient insurance, as well as repair roads and bridges. In response, Turner insisted that HUD "will not allow disaster recovery and those that need assistance in disaster recovery to be lost on us" and that HUD is simply pursuing a "different way of distributing these funds." Joyce, who represents Northeast Ohio, wasn't satisfied. "Thank you, sir, that was a great answer, but it didn't demonstrate a plan. Do you have a plan?" the congressman responded. Turner ultimately conceded that the plan for supporting disaster victims "is forthcoming." Joyce ended the exchange by warning that the agency has a role to play. "The one thing I know is, you're right. Disasters come. All over the country, disasters come. And you need to be ready for them." Rep. Rutherford, a Florida Republican, pressed Turner on how states will help support homeownership in low-income communities when the president's budget proposes eliminating HUD's Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), a competitive grant program that Rutherford said has been successful in his district. "Everywhere that homeownership went up, violent crime went down," said Rutherford, a former sheriff. "How are we going to address this issue if we're doing away with SHOP?" Turner replied by saying that states can support homeownership programs if they see fit going forward, but didn't clarify where that funding would come from. Spokespeople for Rutherford and Joyce didn't immediately return BI's requests for comment. 'People will die' Democratic lawmakers expressed more direct frustration about the program cuts and lack of detail the secretary presented. "People will die," Rep. Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat, told Turner of HUD's proposed cuts to homelessness services, including the elimination of the Housing for Persons with AIDS program. "If you just want to say we've got to cut these things because that's our plan, I'd respect you a lot more than telling us that you care about people as you put them on the street." Turner replied that the agency isn't just cutting funding but is "going to be more effective and more efficient." "How?" Quigley asked. "It's a new paradigm. It's a new way to do things," Turner replied. During Turner's testimony before the Senate on June 11, Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz, who's made housing a key priority, urged Turner to reinstate a bipartisan program Schatz championed that incentivizes states and localities to cut red tape that hampers housing construction. "It's the most significant pro-housing deregulatory mechanism that we've passed," Schatz said. Turner didn't answer Schatz's question on the eliminated program, and simply said he's encouraging local leaders to find ways to cut regulations. But the president's budget isn't law. Government funding is set to run out in September, and Congress has the final say on what the federal budget looks like. The House hearing concluded with the chairwoman, Republican Rep. Stephanie Bice, suggesting that Turner hasn't had enough time in the few months he's been in office to nail down more specifics about where HUD funding will go and how programs will be reformed. "Is it safe to say that you have a framework for a plan that you want to move forward, but maybe not all of the nuts and bolts that you need to be able to present those details?" Bice asked Turner. "Yes, ma'am," Turner replied.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Could a new tax incentive get the Village at Harbor Hill across the finish line?
Could an affordable housing initiative help get the Village at Harbor Hill across the finish line? The city of Gig Harbor is considering a potential tax exemption program aimed at encouraging rent-restricted housing. The Village at Harbor Hill, a proposed retail site in the Gig Harbor North area that has been stalled for years, could be its first test case. Talks to develop the 18.5-acre property go back at least a decade, according to The News Tribune's reporting. Last year, the property owner began considering adding multifamily housing to make the development more feasible financially. The development has struggled to land a grocer to anchor the project. A multifamily property tax exemption program, or MFTE, could make developing those housing units — and the project as a whole —more attractive, though representatives for the city and the property owner haven't shared any concrete timelines for moving forward. MFTE programs have been popular among developers in other area cities and are a tool for cities and counties to encourage housing development, including more affordable units. Tacoma, for example, offers three options. Those include an 8-year all-market rate version and 12- and 20-year versions, which require a percentage of units to be rent-restricted, or what the programs call 'affordable.' As defined by the state and as part of its Growth Management Act (GMA), the MFTE program offers a property tax exemption in exchange for the development of market-rate multifamily units or multifamily affordable housing of at least four units in designated 'residential targeted areas,' via the 8, 12- and 20-year versions. The property owner does not pay property taxes on the residential improvements for the designated number of years, but still pays tax on the land and any nonresidential improvements, such as a commercial portion of a mixed-use building. Cities and counties can tailor programs to meet policies, such as what percentage of area median income the 'affordable' units are based on, generally tied to figures from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). All cities, many towns, and Clark, King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties are eligible to offer an MFTE program, according to the state Department of Commerce. The city of Gig Harbor hasn't been shy about mentioning the potential benefits of an MFTE program for the long-anticipated retail site. At one time, Village at Harbor Hill was planned as a business park at Borgen Boulevard and Harbor Hill Drive, anchored by a Town & Country Market grocery store and surrounded by banking, restaurants, shops and medical services. Plans for the site stalled as a legal battle over transportation impact fees and eventual settlement between the developer and the city took time to reach. Town & Country was out of the project by the summer of 2020 and two years later also abandoned plans to set up shop at the Peninsula Shopping Center on Judson Street. After a community meeting about the project last summer, property owner representative Jon Rose confirmed to The News Tribune in December that residential was now in the mix, along with the audience's receptivity to a discount grocer. Rose is vice president of real estate with Florida-based Raydient/Rayonier, which owns the Village at Harbor Hill property. In a city newsletter March 19, the city announced that 'Discussion of (an MFTE) mechanism, beginning with the Village at Harbor Hill, will focus on the opportunity to promote multi-family workforce/affordable housing in the community near transit and other key services.' The city council heard an overview of the program at its study session on March 13 and a formal proposal introducing a 12-year MFTE version with at least 20 percent of units designated as rent-restricted housing for low- and moderate-income households at the council meeting on April 28. Households are considered low-income if they earn 80% or less of the area median income, and moderate-income if they earn between 80 to 100%, as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, per the city's draft ordinance presented April 28. As of April 1, the median family income in Pierce County is $120,800. A household of five is considered low-income if they make $104,400 or less in a year, according to the Tacoma Housing Authority. A one-person household qualifies as low income if they make $67,700 or less. The Gig Harbor City Council heard a first reading on April 28 but did not vote on an ordinance that would establish an MFTE program in the city. A second reading of the ordinance, scheduled for May, was removed from the agenda. Instead, city staff are planning a town hall to discuss the program with the community, according to City Clerk Josh Stecker. The council may consider the program again afterward under a new ordinance, he wrote in an email. That town hall is still being scheduled, but city staff are looking at the first three weeks of July, City Administrator Katrina Knutson said. Attendees will be able to learn more about a potential MFTE program as well as the spate of state housing bills passed in recent years that affect the city. Speaking about the Village at Harbor Hill project, Jon Rose, the property owner representative, told the city council at the April 28 meeting that 'multifamily developers that we have talked to are supportive of this version of the MFTE.' Gig Harbor Community Development Director Eric Baker explained to The News Tribune that an MFTE program could make a mixed-use project with housing more feasible because it could help the developer save on the housing portion. The property tax exemption wouldn't apply to the land and any commercial components of the project. He added that he doesn't have insight into the Village at Harbor Hill project specifically but understands how multi-use projects tend to proceed. Baker also explained that the tax exemption would result in a 'tax shift' onto the rest of the city's property owners. To make up for the lost revenue, residents and businesses would be subject to a slight levy rate increase, which he said city staff expects to be 'a relatively small number' but haven't quantified yet. City Administrator Knutson said that she has directed city staff to do a full comprehensive look at the proposed MFTE program and 'what the property tax offset would be' if used at the Village at Harbor Hill site, so that they can present that to the public and the city council for informational purposes. Knutson said Wednesday that the city is aware of at least two grocers 'in regular contact' with the Village at Harbor Hill property owner. She declined to comment on whether a budget grocer like Winco or a Trader Joe's is still a possibility for the site, but said 'that's a great question.' Since the Village at Harbor Hill is a private development project, the city's role is primarily regulatory, Knutson said. But the city is also aware that the project is of strong interest to many residents in the Gig Harbor North area, and has been in 'proactive and regular communication with the property owner and their agents in order to be responsive to what they may need to accomplish the project,' she said. In an interview on May 29, Rose noted that without a residential component or viable grocer as a possibility, the Village at Harbor Hill site likely would go back on the market. Since the community meeting with Gig Harbor residents in 2024, he said, 'probably six or seven grocers have brought their boats into the dock for a look, and most of them have taken a look and moved on.' As Rose explained, 'It's one thing to take over a space, like if the QFC emptied, you're buying a used space where it was built with dollars and expenses that were from 30 years ago. It's like buying a used car, you don't pay the same as new for a used car.' 'And some of the grocers, some of them that are particularly well liked and desired, have never done a ground-up retail,' he added. 'They don't have to. There's some in particular that just go to 15,000-square-foot spaces that are already there.' But he also noted there is some good news about the site, with several grocery entities that 'have stuck around.' 'And with the apartment idea, we have checked it with other apartment developers, just to make sure we're not chasing a dream. And there's interest from both sides.' While Baker, the Gig Harbor community development director, said the site has been rezoned to allow for multifamily development, Rose remained neutral on any MFTE benefits to the project. 'We'd love if our project was helpful, but the city needs to meet certain growth targets ... mandated by the GMA, and the affordable housing is also mandated,' he said. 'So it's up to the city. If it's offered as a program, people who develop multifamily and our project will consider using it.' 'If they don't offer it, there will still be apartments, and they just won't meet any affordable housing criteria,' he added. 'So we're not going to weigh in and start lobbying people. This is an internal issue for the city more than it's an issue for us.' 'But I can tell you, there's legitimate and strong interest from grocers — more than one. And same with the multifamily.' Previous reporting from The News Tribune contributed to this report.
