British citizens among 9,000 immigrants to be sent to Guantanamo
At least 9,000 undocumented immigrants, including British citizens, are to be sent to Guantanamo Bay detention camp, according to reports in the US.
The first transfers are due to start within days, as the Trump administration ramps up its campaign to deport illegal immigrants.
In January, Donald Trump announced plans to house 30,000 migrants in the notorious camp on Cuba, which was previously used as a military prison to house combatants captured during George W Bush's 'war on terror' following the September 11 attacks on the US.
According to documents seen by Politico, the plan is to hold the migrants at the camp for a short period before deporting them back to their home country.
Guantanamo currently holds roughly 500 people.
This move represents a further toughening of the administration's immigration policy, which has seen masked snatch squads lifting suspected illegal immigrants off the streets.
The official reason for detaining migrants at Guantanamo is to free up space in migrant detention centres in the US itself, especially with the White House setting a target of 3,000 arrests a day.
However, critics say the administration believes using Guantanamo will serve as a deterrent for new illegal immigrants and encourage those already in the country to self-deport.
An estimated 800 Europeans are on the list of potential Guantanamo detainees, with the Washington Post saying they include British and French citizens.
It is a move which has reportedly alarmed European diplomats, given that they have previously co-operated in the repatriation of their own citizens.
'The message is to shock and horrify people, to upset people,' one State Department official told Politico.
In Washington, a court is considering a plea to outlaw the use of Guantanamo to house migrants, with the American Civil Liberties Union claiming they are being held in dire conditions in a rodent-infested camp, where detainees are denied a weekly change of clothing and adequate food.
In its writ, the ACLU accused the administration of using Guantanamo 'to frighten immigrants, deter future migration, induce self-deportation, and coerce people in detention to give up claims against removal and accept deportation elsewhere'.
This was denied by the US Justice Department, which told the court that Guantanamo is being used as a temporary staging post.
Previously, nine British citizens were held at Guantanamo, of which five were repatriated in March 2004. A further nine who had residency status in the UK, but not citizenship, were also held at the camp.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term
BEIJING, June 12 (Reuters) - Billions of dollars of Chinese goods have been impacted by additional U.S. tariffs since 2018, initially under the first Donald Trump presidency and later under the Biden administration. Returning to the White House this year, Trump has imposed even more duties on China. The U.S. tariffs range from those imposed under Section 301 of its trade act due to what Washington claims are unfair Chinese trade practices, to duties under Section 232 levied for national security reasons. This year, Trump has imposed another 20% levies on all Chinese goods, saying Beijing has not done enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. So-called reciprocal tariffs, under which the U.S. will match duties imposed by other countries, have also been levied in a bid to rebalance trade flows. Below are the U.S. tariffs on China effective as of June 12, 2025: In September 2019, the U.S. imposed 15% tariffs on more than $120 billion of Chinese goods under Section 301, which it then halved to 7.5% less than six months later. The 25% U.S. tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods under the earlier List 1-3 remain unchanged. In September 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative under the Biden administration announced additional tariffs of 25-100% on 14 product groups following a four-year review of the Section 301 tariff actions. The levies were imposed on strategic Chinese sectors or sectors where the United States has made significant domestic investments. In addition to the above duties, the first Trump administration in 2018 imposed a range of tariffs under Section 232 aimed at restricting goods deemed a threat to national security, including all aluminium and steel imports, shutting most Chinese suppliers out of the U.S. market.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reeves pours cold water on Nato demands for more defence spending making clear it WON'T go over 2.5% of GDP before 2029 and hinting 3% will be the limit in the next Parliament
played down the prospects of ramping up defence spending today despite mounting pressure from Donald Trump. The Chancellor stressed that Labour had only committed to hitting 2.5 per cent of GDP in the current Parliament. And she suggested the 'ambition' after 2029 remains to reach a level of 3 per cent - even though Nato states are being asked to agree a target of 3.5 per cent at a summit later this month. The blueprint being pushed by Mr Trump and the military alliance's secretary general Mark Rutte would see countries pledge to hit the higher spending by the early 2030s. A further 1.5 per cent of GDP would be required for 'defence-related expenditure'. A timetable could be set for gradually increasing their allocations. However, there are questions about how the UK would fund such an huge increase - roughly equivalent to an extra £30billion annually. Britain allocated 2.33 per cent of GDP to defence last year, and is set to reach 2.5 per cent by April 2027. The Labour Government has an 'ambition' of increasing that to 3 per cent in the next parliament - likely to run to 2034. In a round of broadcast interviews this morning, Ms Reeves said the Spending Review she laid out yesterday included the 'biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War'. 'The commitment on defence in our manifesto was 2.5 per cent… we've said 3 per cent in the next Parliament,' she told Sky News. The Chancellor said the spending plans only covered this 'this Parliament'. She said: 'We will set out costed and funded plans in due course, but in this Parliament the commitment was to get to 2.5 per cent.. ' The generous fiscal envelope set by the Chancellor last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economy slowing down and Mr Trump 's trade war. That has led analysts and political rivals to argue that more tax increases are 'inevitable' - although the funding gap will not crystalise until the next fiscal package. The US itself missed the proposed Nato target by spending 3.38 per cent of GDP on defence last year - although the sheer size of its economy meant that dwarfed contributions from the rest of the alliance. Countries such as Germany face finding upwards of $60billion a year more for the military. The increase in Italy would be equivalent to around $46billion, Canada $45billion, France £44billion and the UK roughly $40billion. Spain - which has not invested heavily in defence up to now - could need to allocate an additional $36billion despite its economy being much smaller. The UK's Strategic Defence Review, published last week, recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump wants to sell America to China – but will they buy?
On Wednesday, a jubilant Donald Trump declared that his trade deal with Beijing would 'open up China to American Trade', delivering 'a great WIN for both countries!!!' Yet even as the US president trumpets victory, a chorus of Western companies has been warning that the spoils may be underwhelming. Cosmetics company Estee Lauder is grappling with 'retail softness, reflecting subdued consumer sentiment' in China. Drinks giant Diageo, which makes Guinness and Johnnie Walker, said 'consumers remain cautious and the macroeconomic recovery is taking longer than expected'. Unilever, the consumer goods giant behind Dove soap and Ben & Jerry's ice cream, told its shareholders that 'market growth in China remained subdued'. Burberry reported waning sales there, while KFC and Pizza Hut-owner Yum China said sales in the first quarter were flat. When Starbucks this week slashed the price of its tea lattes and Frappuccinos in China by almost one fifth, it was only the latest sign that trouble was brewing in China for big Western businesses. Trump wants Chinese consumers to buy more American goods, rebalancing what he sees as the lopsided trading relationship between the two countries. But the middle kingdom's economy is in a prolonged funk, reeling from a property crisis and a long hangover from harsh Covid restrictions. With lingering US tariffs of up to 55pc taking a chunk out of China's exports, recovery in the world's second-largest economy depends on the willingness of Chinese consumers to open their wallets and start spending. But unless companies cut prices, or the government steps in to boost demand, cautious Chinese consumers are at best spending selectively. Unlike China's gleaming motorways, the road to an economic rebound looks slow and uncertain – meaning Trump may well be disappointed. Ending the US president's anti-China crusade depends on the Chinese consumer taking out their wallets. It's the 'excess savings' of China's households, coupled with the excess spending of the American government and consumers, that lie at the heart of the pair's unbalanced economic relationship. In layman's terms, Chinese families save, while Americans buy – meaning China exports to the US far more than it imports. 'China has a singular opportunity to stabilise its economy by shifting away from excess production towards greater consumption,' Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, said on Wednesday. So far, there is little sign of the balance shifting. In a recent survey by McKinsey, Chinese households said they were not planning to increase how much they spend as a share of their income. (McKinsey saw this as progress; in the 2024 version of the survey, households had actually been planning to reduce consumption.) The survey found that rural dwellers were slightly more enthusiastic about shopping than their urban counterparts. That's unsurprising: it's in the cities where the scars of the property crisis, which began with the collapse of the developer Evergrande in 2021, are most acute. 'Property prices have fallen by around 20pc since the onset of the property crisis,' says Leah Fahy, a China analyst at Capital Economics. 'That has been a massive hit to household wealth and really dampened propensity to spend, and confidence as well.' 'And then more recently, you add all this tension around the trade war, what's going to happen with US tariffs. Even if the actual hit from that hasn't been massive yet.' Justin Koh, a Shanghai-based director at consultancy AlixPartners, says: 'When I first came to China about 15 years ago, there used to be an idea that everything would only go in one direction – up. People just thought sales would double every year. 'Now, the consumer companies we're working with are more pragmatic about growth. They're also very pragmatic about opening and closing stores, about what works and what doesn't work in the market.' Officially, China's economy is holding up, growing at 5.4pc in the first quarter from a year earlier. But the threat of a trade war looms over a country that still relies heavily on manufacturing. Exports to the US slumped by almost 35pc in April from a year earlier and China is struggling with deflation. Consumer prices dipped 0.1pc, the fourth consecutive month of decline, led by food and fuel. A survey by the EU Chamber of Commerce in China found that 83pc of food and beverage companies felt their business environment in the country was deteriorating. Many consumers seem to be looking for bargains, waiting for price decreases, or keeping their yuan in the bank or under the bed. Beijing has been encouraging people to spend, pushing them to buy more white goods by backing a trade-in scheme. It seems to have worked: according to the Xinhua news agency, it spurred 175bn renminbi (£18bn) of transactions this year, and 39pc year–on-year sales growth in April. But that would only be a drop in the ocean of what is required. It might stack a percentage point or two on to GDP growth, but Capital Economics reckons consumption might need to expand by 4pc to offset the hit from falling exports. Fahy says the government seems reluctant to wheel out the fiscal artillery needed to deliver this. 'You get a lot of lip service to the importance of supporting consumption, supporting demand, but they're really hesitant to expand things like social security measures, pension payments, welfare benefits – the things that are most needed to boost households' willingness to spend really and lower the savings rate,' she says. Worryingly for Trump, even if there is an upturn in consumer spending, Chinese may not choose to buy American products. 'There was probably more bargain hunting back in 2022, 2023 – confidence was lower, there was a very clear dip,' says Koh. 'I think this bargain-hunting helped consumers understand other [non-Western] brands a little bit better – they realised that, 'Hey, there might not be that much of a difference there.'' Chinese business news site Caixin says there has been an increase in promotions for 'repatriated foreign trade products' – items originally made to sell overseas that are now being sold at home. This includes marketing campaigns and exhibitions at supermarkets, department stores and shopping malls. Local brands are also gaining ground. Koh's 10-year-old daughter is wild for the Labubu dolls made by Chinese start-up Pop Mart, for example. 'They're the latest craze. If consumer confidence was at an all-time low, we'd likely be seeing less people buying them – less of that type of consumer behaviour,' he says. 'It's a sign of a more discerning consumer, and a consumer that's expressing his or her consumer confidence in different ways.' The ball is now in Beijing's court: the government needs to do more if it wants a consumer-led kickstart for the economy, and a fix for the US-China trade imbalances. Without action, Trump's 'great WIN' may turn into a disappointing loss.
