Resurfaced video shows Zohran Mamdani saying domestic violence wouldn't be a priority for the NYPD
Mamdani, the democratic socialist candidate who last month shocked the political world from coast to coast with his stunning victory in the New York City Democratic Party primary for mayor, made the comments in a 2020 podcast.
"If somebody is jaywalking, if somebody is surviving, going through domestic violence—there are so many different, different situations that would be far better handled by people trained to deal with those specific situations, as opposed to an individual with a gun," Mamdani said.
The comments, which came five years ago in the 'Immigrantly' podcast as he denounced New York City's police department, were first reported by the conservative-leaning Washington Free Beacon.
Since his victory over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and nine other candidates to secure the Democratic mayoral nomination, 33-year-old Ugandan-born assemblyman from Queens has faced intense scrutiny over his past comments on policing.
Mamdani, who took a big step toward becoming the first Muslim mayor of the nation's most populous city, ran in the Democratic primary on a platform that called for replacing police with "crisis responders" in "mental health" cases.
But Mamdani campaign policy memos don't define such cases, and it's unclear if he would push, if elected, to prevent police from responding to reports of domestic violence. The New York Police Department (NYPD) responded to more than 100,000 domestic violence incidents in 2024.
Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York has congratulated Mamdani on his primary victory and praised his laser focus on affordability on the campaign trail, but she has refrained, as of now, from endorsing him in November's general election.
The governor, at a news conference on Friday, highlighted that the business community "is concerned about what will happen with the police department" if Mamdani becomes New York City's next mayor.
"Everybody's concerned what will happen to the policing of the city," Hochul said.
In 2020, amid nationwide Black Lives Matter protests following the death of George Floyd, Mamdani publicly referred to the NYPD as "wicked and corrupt," calling for its defunding and dismantlement.
In one Dec. 2020 viral tweet, he declared, "There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt. Defund it. Dismantle it. End the cycle of violence."
He also linked LGBTQ+ liberation to police abolition, asserting in a November 2020 tweet, that "queer liberation means defund the police."
Fraternal Order of Police National Vice President Joe Gamaldi told Fox News Digital this week that Mamdani's past rhetoric is emblematic of a dangerously radical ideology.
"Anyone who still supports defunding the police is completely insane," Gamaldi argued. "Especially after seeing the horrific consequences on our urban communities. It brought on rampant crime and disorder, historic murder rates in over a dozen cities and destroyed the quality of life for millions."
Now, as Mamdani eyes the mayoralty, his public safety message appears to be shifting. He has backed away from some of his earlier rhetoric, acknowledging the importance of police in addressing violent crime.
"I will not defund the police. I will work with the police because I believe the police have a critical role to play in creating public safety," he said in the second New York City Democratic mayoral debate on June 13. "Sixty-five percent of crimes from the first quarter of this year are still not solved. We need to ensure that police can focus on those crimes, and [that] we have mental health professionals and social workers to address and tackle and resolve the mental health crisis and homelessness."
His current platform includes the creation of a Department of Community Safety to handle non-violent incidents that he believes would get to the root cause of crime. Mamdani's public safety plan includes reallocating $600 million from existing programs and raising taxes on wealthy New Yorkers to fund the new department.
He has also spoken about reducing police overtime and cutting the NYPD's $80 million communications budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
By bringing back Brock Lesnar amid federal suit, WWE exhumes the ghosts of Vince McMahon's ugly departure
You have to hand it to WWE: It takes one hell of a twist to blow both of your main event competitors out of the water — at least in terms of the conversation online — within minutes of said massive main event finishing. It isn't like we didn't have enough to talk about. We'd already had the confirmation that the John Cena heel turn is done, as the now-former champ brought back his full-color entrance this past Sunday, prompting elation from the live crowd at WWE SummerSlam Night 2. We'd already had Cody Rhodes reclaiming the Universal Championship in a sensational match, turning a page on the events of WrestleMania 41 and giving Cena a chance to show that he can still summon a vintage night at age 48. Then, just as the broadcast appeared to be wrapping up, it happened. That shriek-like guitar lick which can only mean one thing: The return of one of WWE's most dominant — and controversial — talents, 'The Beast Incarnate.' Leaving aside the potential storyline implications for now, it's worth saying that the choice to bring back Brock Lesnar is a bold call by WWE given the former champion's involvement in one of the company's bigger controversies of the 21st century, the Vince McMahon sex trafficking scandal. We should be clear from the off: Lesnar himself is not being sued or investigated for anything. But he is named in an ongoing federal lawsuit against McMahon and WWE, which very much has yet to be resolved. Given that, it's worth a recap of the pertinent facts and how they relate (or not) to Lesnar. In January 2024 — four months after helping to oversee the TKO merger — McMahon resigned from WWE's parent company, following a bombshell report in the Wall Street Journal that a former WWE employee, Janel Grant, filed a lawsuit against the company (as well as McMahon and former WWE executive John Laurinaitis) alleging that McMahon had sexually assaulted and trafficked her. How does that affect Brock Lesnar? As part of its claims against McMahon, the lawsuit alleges that WWE's founder had shared sexually explicit images of Grant with what it called a 'world-famous athlete' and 'former UFC fighter," in order to entice the performer to sign a new WWE contract. While the lawsuit didn't name Lesnar, the Journal was able to look at the specific details and come to the conclusion that it couldn't possibly be anyone else. Grant's legal team have since amended their complaint to explicitly name Brock Lesnar. After the story broke, WWE reportedly shelved a plan to bring back Lesnar for the 2024 Royal Rumble. Since then, he's been gone from WWE programming, though not entirely persona non grata — Lesnar's old matches have recently been posted to the company's YouTube channel, for example, and he still gets mentioned from time to time on commentary. But he hasn't appeared in-person. At 9.45 p.m. local time Sunday in New Jersey, that all changed when Lesnar made his unannounced return to attack Cena, presumably setting up a match for Aug. 31's Clash in Paris event or Crown Jewel: Perth later this year in October. It was an explosive end to what was already a massive weekend in the pro-wrestling calendar. But what will it mean for WWE and Lesnar? Again, Lesnar himself isn't in any legal jeopardy, and we can probably assume from his return that the WWE doesn't see any risk of that situation changing soon. (Indeed the Wrestling Observer Newsletter has reported that WWE's legal team came to that conclusion four weeks ago.) Of course, that doesn't mean they're not risking any reputation fallout by working with Lesnar. We can see from Grant's lawsuit (which has been the subject of some stellar reporting from Brandon Thurston) that the descriptions of Lesnar's alleged actions are fairly vulgar, to say the least. It isn't implausible that brand sponsors carry out their own risk assessment. There will inevitably be awkward questions to come at press availabilities and the danger that conversations get out of hand on social media. What we can safely say from Sunday night is that WWE has decided that working with Lesnar — a massive draw, in anyone's estimations — is worth risking that kind of backlash. In fairness, it isn't like WWE CCO Paul Levesque hasn't been asked about Lesnar in the recent past. Last year, he told the Daily Mail that WWE would be 'open' to a return provided that Lesnar was interested. At last night's post-show, he suggested that it was Cena's desire to work with Lesnar once more that tipped the balance. As for the lawsuit itself, there's no confirmation (yet) that it will go to trial. TKO continues to say they treat any allegations seriously, while McMahon has claimed that the case is a 'smear campaign.' Laurinaitis has since settled with Grant out of court. Lesnar has never made a public comment. No doubt some will link Lesnar's return to WWE's increasing willingness to alienate some parts of his fan base (for example, by promoting Levesque's appearance at the White House last week). But, in truth, the sheer star power of the man probably meant that a return was more likely than not in the long run. 'It's about John being able to go out the way he wants to go out,' said Levesque on WWE's Sunday night post-show, suggesting that the bigger story is what will happen in the ring with Cena and Lesnar. He's certainly right that it will be a massive event — but he's kidding himself if he thinks it will be the only story.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene's Surprising Quote About The Republican Party Is Going Viral
Marjorie Taylor Greene is NOT happy with the Republican Party. She was pissed about the attack on Iran. Related: She broke ranks with Republicans and called the crisis in Gaza a "genocide." And she won't stop talking about how Republicans won't deal with the national debt. Now, she's talking about breaking up with the Republican Party. Related: In an interview with the Daily Mail, the Congress member said: "I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore. I don't know which one it is." She also said: "I think the Republican Party has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans." And finally, she criticized the way Republicans treat women: "I think there's other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women." Related: Those anti-GOP quotes are going viral in a tweet by Brian Tyler Cohen: People in the replies are, like, duh: "What if she switches parties and becomes a normie dem," one person asked. Related: "I really never thought i'd see that day she was saying shit like this and uttering the word 'genocide'…" another person said in disbelief. And then the Lincoln Project invited her to the party: "Welcome to the resistance, Marge." As this person said, "Trumps presidency is so goddamn bad that it wokeified marjorie taylor green." Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be ‘Unthinkable a Decade Ago'
The MSNBC anchors and commentators warn Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics data chief will lead to further distrust of U.S. job reports The 'Morning Joe' crew on Monday warned that Donald Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer will raise further scrutiny into the employment numbers released under the new leadership. The president fired McEntarfer on Friday after suggesting that weaker-than-expected jobs report was 'rigged.' More from TheWrap 'Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be 'Unthinkable a Decade Ago' | Video Wondery CEO Jen Sargent to Exit as Amazon Restructures Podcasting Studio Jacob Soboroff to Join MSNBC as Senior Political Correspondent Ahead of Comcast Spinoff 'Scamanda' Creator Charlie Webster Returns With New Scammer Podcast, 'Unicorn Girl' | Exclusive 'When the numbers are good, he praises them,' Jonathan Lemire said on 'Morning Joe' Monday. 'When the numbers are bad, he gets angry, and he fires the person in charge.' Earlier this year, Trump praised the bureau's job reports – but after Friday's numbers were released he said they were rigged in favor of Democrats, noting that he is looking for 'an exceptional replacement' after he deemed the numbers subpar. 'This would have been unthinkable a decade ago before Trump came on the scene,' NYT Opinion writer Mara Gay told Lemire.'This is another example of American exceptionalism out the window.' She said that the implications of this decision will affect the credibility of the United States as a democracy. She pointed to other examples in modern history of Greece, Argentina and China, stating that their leaders fudged the numbers to appease their world leaders. Gay added that inflating publicly reported numbers will not affect the American economy – it will only cause more unrest internally. 'What Americans can expect is to see the United States lose its sense of confidence in facts and also just excellence … the political reality will catch up with him,' Gay said of Trump's refusal to accept that the economy is weakening because of his tariffs. Andrew Ross Sorkin warned that Trump's decision will stir greater distrust of facts amongst world leaders. 'Invariably when those numbers [reported by the Chinese government] come out, there are conversations about what are the real numbers,' Sorkin said. 'Nobody believes the numbers that the Chinese government provides. That is the fear about what's about to happen here in the United States.' Senior writer at 'The Dispatch' David Drucker rebutted Trump's claim that the numbers are in favor of Democrats, pointing specifically to what he called a 'horrendous' job report from President Joe Biden's administration ahead of the 2024 election. 'When the president talks about rigged numbers and that it was rigged in favor of the Democrats right before the last election, it's just flatly untrue,' David Drucker said. He said the September report ahead of the election reported worse employment numbers than Friday's report that caused Trump to fire the data chief. 'Morning Joe' anchor Joe Scarborough added that there are several examples in modern history of the practical impacts of misconstruing numbers in favor of the individual in power. 'You don't have to go to the Soviet Union to just look at the practical impacts of when leaders start to fudge the numbers,' Scarborough said. The post 'Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be 'Unthinkable a Decade Ago' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
