Airbus bags $3.5 billion Saudi order as Franco-Israeli dispute rocks Paris air show
Airbus bagged a $3.5 billion plane order from Saudi Arabia's AviLease on the opening day of the Paris Airshow on Monday, as a diplomatic dispute erupted over France's decision to shut down four Israeli stands for displaying deadly weapons.
Delegates expect this year's iteration of the world's biggest aviation trade show to see less business than usual, partly due to last week's deadly crash of an Air India Boeing 787 and also because Boeing racked up huge deals during U.S. President Donald Trump's recent tour of the Middle East.
But Airbus looks set to close a series of sales on its home turf, and interest in the defence side of the show is high as Europe ramps up military spending and conflict between Israel and Iran escalates.
Tensions between long-standing allies France and Israel flared up as the show was getting underway, when Paris ordered the main four Israeli company stands to be closed down when they refused to remove offensive weapons from display.
Israel's ministry of defence condemned the move as "outrageous and unprecedented" and accused France of trying to shield its companies from Israeli competition.
The show organisers said they were holding talks to try to "find a favourable outcome to the situation".
Boeing's CEO Kelly Ortberg and Commercial Airplanes boss Stephanie Pope have cancelled their trip to Paris and the U.S. company is scaling back its schedule at the event as it focuses on supporting the probe into last week's Air India crash that killed more than 240 people and was the first for its 787 model.
Another Air India Boeing 787 bound for New Delhi returned to its origin of Hong Kong as a precautionary measure on Monday after a technical issue was suspected mid-air.
But Airbus was busy at the show working on deals.
Saudi leasing company AviLease said on Monday it had ordered 30 Airbus A320neo single-aisle jets and 10 A350 freighters in its first direct deal with the European planemaker.
That would be worth around $3.5 billion, according to estimated prices from analysts Cirium Ascend. The two companies did not give a value for the deal, which could increase to 77 jets if AviLease exercises options to buy more of both models.
Two people familiar with the matter also told Reuters that Polish airline LOT was poised to announce an order for 40 Airbus A220 plus options for a further 44 aircraft.
Brazil's Embraer had pushed hard for that deal, sources said. None of the parties agreed to comment.
Airbus is also the front-runner against the same planemaker for a potential order for dozens of A220 jets from AirAsia, sources said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
How VCs are navigating Europe's defence spending push
As venture capital investors look to profit from Europe's defence spending boom, speculators hunting for the next unicorn need to navigate hurdles such as EU sustainability guidelines and difficulties for start-ups in a market dominated by large prime contractors. The European Union has earmarked up to 800 billion euros ($920 billion) for defence through 2030 with a bulk of that amount expected to go to prime contractors such as France's Airbus or Germany's Rheinmetall. But with large defence contractors focused on meeting record demand due to the war in Ukraine, investors and start-up founders are betting that defence technology startups can fill an innovation gap in Europe, developing technology and driving growth and possibly attracting the attention of those big players later on. "We think it's an important trend and we're investing behind it," said Sequoia investor Julien Bek. His firm invested $15.5 million in German autonomous drone company STARK in October 2024, according to PitchBook. Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump's prodding of NATO countries to raise defence spending to 5% of gross domestic product from a current 2% have spurred the EU to ramp up its military spending plans. It has also drawn venture capital funding into European defence tech, which hit $1 billion in 2024, up from a modest $373 million in 2022. That is up fivefold since 2020, yet Europe's defence tech sector has produced just three unicorns — startups with a valuation of $1 billion — and last year attracted just 1.7% of the venture capital money in Europe, according to startup data provider Dealroom. Among the biggest barriers to entry for venture capital targeting defence tech in Europe are strict EU ESG rules, which forbid investment in lethal, single-use technology, according to more than a dozen investors, companies and government officials interviewed by Reuters. Many funds receive individual state government or EU backing, which in most cases precludes them from investing in defence. Despite the EU's support for Ukraine, only Estonia and Finland have established government-backed funds allowing for investments into lethal, single-use technology. Borys Musielak, managing partner at Smok Ventures, a U.S. VC firm based in Warsaw, said rules there had prompted funds like his to invest in cybersecurity. "In Poland nearly every fund has some part of it government or European funding, which makes it difficult to invest in defence," he said. Jan-Hendrik Boelens, CEO of Munich-based Alpine Eagle, which develops counter-drone systems, the topic of ESG represents a hurdle that remains for investors and startups. "There are changes on the way, but I can't say that they've happened yet, at least not to the extent that they should," he said, referring to governments or investors changing policies to facilitate more defence investment. "If you are not a pure weapon of war, as it is called, then I think that is very fundable. If you cross this line into actually becoming a lethal weapon, that might still be very difficult to fund." Some VCs seek to avoid ESG restrictions by targeting so-called "dual-use" technologies that have civilian as well as military applications. Such technologies include computer vision where AI mimics human vision to interpret visual information, robots, cybersecurity software and autonomous drones. All three of Europe's defence tech unicorns — German battlefield software firm Helsing, German drone maker Quantum Systems and Portuguese drone company Tekever — market themselves as dual-use. Sten Tamkivi is a partner in Tallinn- and London-based investment platform Plural, which has invested in Helsing. "We and our limited partner base are aligned with the idea that defending the future of our democracies is a moral good, but some investor bases at other firms say lethal is not okay," Tamkivi told Reuters. London-based VC firm Balderton in 2025 led a 160 million euro funding round by Munich-based Quantum Systems. "Why this one? I think it's serendipity, right team, right company, right timing," said Rana Yared, a general partner at Balderton. "We passed on almost everything that we had looked at up until that point," she said. Founded in 2015, Quantum Systems' AI-operated reconnaissance drones provide real-time battlefield intelligence and are being used in Ukraine. "We have shown we can deliver due to three years at the battlefront, with more than 800 systems in Ukraine," Quantum Systems co-CEO Sven Kruck told Reuters. "The defence market is getting hotter," he said. "Every investor is now creating a defence fund." Last month the company raised 160 million euros to take its total funding to 310 million euros. It also reached unicorn status, as did Tekever. With its increased defence spending plans, the European Commission is also looking to rewrite the rules to allow more investors to participate and individual governments are doing the same. The Commission has said next week it will propose giving governments more flexibility on defence procurement, which is another challenge startups face. They also need to contend with figuring out how to connect to and sell to the big players and governments who represent the majority of the customer base, investors say. In Finland, the country's pension agency, the Finnish Industry Investment Ltd, has removed a clause that had prevented it from investing in defence. Reuters
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Netanyahu suggests killing Iran's supreme leader Khamenei would end conflict
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggested on Monday that assassinating Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would "end the conflict" between the two arch-foes. "It's not going to escalate the conflict, it's going to end the conflict," Netanyahu told ABC News in an interview when asked about reports that US President Donald Trump vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the supreme leader out of concern it would intensify the Iran-Israel showdown. "The 'forever war' is what Iran wants, and they're bringing us to the brink of nuclear war," Netanyahu said. "In fact, what Israel is doing is preventing this, bringing an end to this aggression, and we can only do so by standing up to the forces of evil." Agence France-Presse
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran would have to risk it all to count on an oil price shock ending the war
A war between Israel and the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been the big black swan event for oil markets that energy-rich Gulf states and opportunistic western traders were on the lookout for. So far, it has been a disappointment. Although oil prices shot up around 10 percent after Israel's attack on Iran on Friday, they have cooled substantially despite the images of burning oil facilities in Iran and Israel. The international benchmark Brent was trading at 3.38 percent on Monday, at $71.84 per barrel. Before Israel's Friday morning attack on Iran, Brent was trading at roughly $69 per barrel. The main factor keeping prices subdued is that Iran has not bombed oil-rich countries in the Arabian Gulf or followed through on its threat to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway separating Iran from the Gulf states through which a third of the world's seaborne oil passes. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters To be sure, Israel and Iran have pounded each other's energy infrastructure. Israel attacked two gas processing facilities on Iran's south coast over the weekend. The facilities process gas from South Pars, the world's largest natural gas field, which Iran shares with Qatar. But the facilities are mainly for domestic use. Israel also bombed Iranian oil depots in Tehran. Iran has responded by attacking the Bazan oil refinery complex in Haifa, Israel, sparking large blazes. But experts say the attacks have been carefully calibrated on both sides to avoid big supply disruptions. 'At this stage, there is very limited to no impact on oil outputs and exports, so the rally largely reflects a rising risk premium to account for…potential disruptions,' Citibank analysts wrote on Monday. 'Iran prefers not to hit Arab Gulf' Despite the blazes in Israel and Iran, Citibank has maintained its long-term forecast for oil to be at $60-65 per barrel. Iran faces a strategic dilemma, Greg Priddy, an energy expert at the Center for the National Interest, told Middle East Eye. 'Iran seems to be trying to find a way back to the negotiating table with Trump,' Priddy said. 'They would also prefer not to have to hit Arab countries,' he added. Israel and US modified F-35s to enable Iran attack without refuelling, sources say Read More » On the one hand, bombing the Gulf or closing the Strait of Hormuz may be the type of event that inflicts serious pain on American and European consumers because of higher energy prices. That could make Israel's attacks more unpopular. But that could also antagonise the very Gulf states that Iran hopes will lobby the US to rein in Israel. Iran is less isolated amid Israel's attacks today than it was in 2018, when US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal. This is because Tehran and Gulf monarchies like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates painstakingly worked on a delicate rapprochement after fighting proxy wars for years in Yemen and Syria. The Gulf states have condemned Israel's attacks on Iran and have attempted to distance themselves from any military intervention. Reuters reported on Monday that Iran had asked Saudi Arabia, Oman and Qatar to press the Trump administration for a ceasefire with the Israelis. If Iran attacks Saudi oil facilities or closes the Strait of Hormuz with mines, it could invite a direct US military attack with the Gulf's tacit support. Arab officials are already concerned that the likelihood of the US bombing Tehran is increasing, MEE reported on Monday. Iran knows from history that weaponising the Strait of Hormuz would invite a US response. During the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, the US Navy intervened to protect Kuwaiti oil tankers and engaged in direct conflict with Iran after it mined the area. Iran also relies on the strait to send its oil to China, its top customer. Even Israel has refrained from attacking Iranian tankers. How Saudi Arabia and Opec hurt Iran's energy leverage But the big problem for Iran, if it is counting on an energy shock, is that there is just too much oil on the market. Any action that it does take would have to be very large, experts say. The energy alliance Opec+, which is led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, opened the taps in the lead-up to Israel's attack on Iran. US notified Turkey before Israel began attacking Iran, sources say Read More » The decision to increase production surprised many because it represented a break for Saudi Arabia, which for three years lobbied Opec+ to keep production tight, in a bid to boost prices. Experts at the time said that Saudi Arabia pivoted to supporting big production increases to punish countries like Kazakhstan and Iraq, which were "cheating" on their Opec+ quotas, in addition to pleasing US President Donald Trump as he tried to tame inflation. The decision has been incredibly convenient for the Trump administration, as Israel and Iran trade blows. For example, in the US, a gallon of regular gasoline costs $3.14 on average, down from $3.45 at the same time last year, according to the AAA motor club. The worst-case scenario that Priddy described to MEE would be an attack on the massive Abqaiq refinery in eastern Saudi Arabia, combined with 'chaos in the Strait [of Hormuz]'. 'That could end up with crude in the upper $100's per barrel and cause a recession,' he said. But even then, such war shocks often prove to be short-lived. After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, crude shot up by 30 percent above $120 per barrel, only to drop down to pre-invasion levels two months later. Unless it's willing to risk it all, Iran may not be able to count on an oil price shock.
