
Chechnya's Kadyrov wanted to resign. Or did he?
The health of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, who earlier this month sought to resign, is deteriorating rapidly, sources and observers have told Al Jazeera.
But Russian President Vladimir Putin does not want Kadyrov to be succeeded by his third son, they say.
Earlier this month, 48-year-old Kadyrov, who has long dubbed himself Putin's 'foot soldier', said he wanted to quit.
'Another [Chechen leader] will have his own initiative, his own vision. I hope my request will be supported,' Kadyrov told a pro-Kremlin publication, Chechnya Today, before his May 7 meeting with Putin.
During the meeting in Putin's office, Kadyrov boasted of 55,000 Chechen servicemen fighting in Ukraine and read a laundry list of economic achievements under his rule in Chechnya, a region home to 1.5 million people.
Kadyrov, known as a boxing and weightlifting aficionado, read his words aloud from cards with extra-large print.
Neither mentioned the resignation. Kadyrov clarified the issue a day later and habitually glorified Putin.
'Whatever I say, no matter how hard I ask, the decision is only made by one person – our Supreme Commander,' Kadyrov, who had streets and districts in Chechnya named after Putin, wrote on Telegram. 'I'm a foot soldier. If there's an order – I follow it.'
Two Chechen insiders familiar with the inner workings of Kadyrov's government told Al Jazeera that, despite the deferential tones, Kadyrov has had a falling-out with Putin over his preferred successor – his third son, Adam Kadyrov, who turned 17 last November.
The sources requested anonymity, as rights groups have previously documented a harsh crackdown on dissent in Chechnya, including the persecution of Kadyrov critics and their loved ones.
'Putin refused to have Adam as a successor,' one of the sources said.
Kadyrov presents Adam as his son with his wife, Medni.
In 2023, Ramzan posted a video purporting to show his son in a pretrial detention centre assaulting a Russian man who had burned a copy of the Quran.
Ramzan said he was 'proud' of Adam, who federal investigators said cannot face assault charges because of his age.
The younger Kadyrov has been appointed to several official positions, including head of Chechnya's security council.
But according to one of the sources, he has been 'raised as a prince' and has limited experience of the 'real world'.
According to Chechnya's constitution, no one below 30 can head it.
At the time of the 2004 assassination of his father, Akhmat, Ramzan was 28.
Akhmat was a mufti and separatist strongman who switched sides after conflicts with puritan separatists who rejected Chechnya's Sufi traditions.
Akhmat was killed in a bomb blast, and Ramzan at the time relied on figureheads before officially becoming Chechnya's leader in 2007.
Adam will turn 30 in 2037.
Kadyrov senior reportedly has necrotising pancreatitis, a health condition with a low survival rate, and kidney problems that require frequent dialysis.
The sources Al Jazeera interviewed claimed he was hospitalised several times in critical condition, and spends hours in the AiMed Family Clinic in Chechnya's administrative capital, Grozny, every day and often stays overnight.
Kadyrov also resorts to prerecorded videos that are broadcast for several consecutive days to create the illusion of his busy, uninterrupted work schedule, they said.
Al Jazeera was unable to independently verify their claims, which are consistent with other media reports about Kadyrov's reported ailing health.
The illness has reportedly forced Kadyrov to break unwritten rules.
For the first time in two decades, he did not record a television address to congratulate Chechens when the holy month of Ramadan ended in late March.
He also did not take part in this year's February 24 commemorations of the Stalinist 1944 deportation of the entire Chechen community to Central Asia.
Kadyrov is 'very worried' about his family's destiny after his death, according to Ansar Dishni of Nyiso, a Telegram channel that publishes insider news from Chechnya.
'Of course, the Kremlin has given his family security guarantees, but everything can change because Putin is also not forever,' Dishni told Al Jazeera.
So far, Apti Alaudinov, a 51-year-old top security official in Chechnya, is the Kremlin's preferred successor, the sources said.
Alaudinov is a poster boy of Chechens fighting on Russia's side in Ukraine, even though the forces he commands have been ridiculed for staging videos of 'participating' in the hostilities.
Al Jazeera reported that these forces barely distinguished themselves in combat and mostly have to police Russia-occupied areas in Ukraine.
For years, Kadyrov has been reportedly investing in real estate and businesses in the United Arab Emirates and other Middle Eastern nations, creating a financial haven for his family.
Others have followed suit.
'Chechens are among our best buyers,' a Russian-speaking real estate agent in Dubai told Al Jazeera. 'They show up with bags of cash.'
Three decades ago, Chechnya was a hotbed of separatism beset by kidnappings, assassinations and abject poverty.
'At one point, some believed that Chechnya's status as part of the Russian Federation could serve as a guarantee against further degradation of the human rights situation,' Ivar Dale, a senior policy adviser with the Norwegian Helsinki Committee, a rights watchdog, told Al Jazeera.
But after two devastating wars and a decades-long, violent crackdown on 'extremism' in the wider North Caucasus region, Chechnya has by far become Russia's most privileged province.
Moscow floods it with federal funds that are reportedly misappropriated by Kadyrov, who has built palatial, heavily fortified residences, boasted a collection of luxurious sports cars and invited champion boxer Mike Tyson, as well as Western celebrities to perform at public concerts on his birthday.
Human rights groups accuse him and his personal guards of extrajudicial killings, torture, abduction and the destruction of properties that belong to alleged 'extremists'.
Dale said Chechnya's human rights abuses are being replicated in other Russian regions and Russia-occupied parts of Ukraine.
'The most horrific abuses in Chechnya have become the standard for Russia in general,' Dale said.
Observers believe little will change after Kadyrov's death and the appointment of his successor.
But whoever rules Chechnya next 'may try to use Kadyrov's image in a negative key as a figure the people allegedly got rid of to present himself as a good-willed reformer', Dishni of the Nyiso Telegram channel concluded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
25 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
At least three killed in Russia's ‘most powerful' attack on Kharkiv
At least five people have been killed and more than 20 wounded as Russia launched a barrage of missiles, drones and bombs across Ukraine, officials said. The Ukrainian air force said on Saturday that Russia struck with 215 missiles and drones overnight, and Ukrainian air defences shot down and neutralised 87 drones and seven missiles. At least three people were killed and 17 others, including two children, were wounded in the northeastern city of Kharkiv, Mayor Ihor Terekhov said, describing the assault as 'the most powerful' on the city since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. He reported 48 Iranian-made drones, two missiles and four guided bombs were fired before dawn at the city of 1.4 million people, located just 50km (30 miles) from the Russian border. 'Drones are still circling above,' Terekhov wrote on Telegram at 4:40am (01:40 GMT), as air raid sirens wailed across the city. Residential buildings and civilian infrastructure were heavily damaged. The northeastern city was also hit by a missile strike on Thursday that left 18 people injured, including four children. Elsewhere in the south, Russian shelling hit the city of Kherson, killing a couple and damaging residential buildings, regional Governor Oleksandr Prokudin confirmed. In Dnipro, two women, aged 45 and 88, were injured in separate attacks. Officials said on Friday that at least six people were killed and dozens were wounded on Friday when Russia launched an aerial bombardment across Ukraine. Rescue workers in the city of Lutsk on Saturday recovered another body, raising the toll from Friday's attacks to seven. Moscow said Friday's assault was carried out in response to Ukrainian 'terrorist acts' against Russia, saying military sites were targeted. The surge in Russian attacks follows a Ukrainian drone operation last weekend that damaged nuclear-capable military aircraft at Russian airbases deep behind the front lines, including in Siberia. Russian President Vladimir Putin has pledged to retaliate for the attack, which Kyiv reportedly planned for 18 months using smuggled drones. Ukraine, meanwhile, continues to push for a 30-day ceasefire and presented its latest proposal during talks in Istanbul on Monday. But Moscow has rejected calls for a truce, insisting the war is a matter of national survival. 'For us, it is an existential issue,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Friday. 'It concerns our national interest, our safety, and the future of our country.' Putin has demanded Ukraine withdraw from four partially occupied regions, abandon its NATO ambitions and halt all Western military cooperation – terms Kyiv has dismissed as unacceptable. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has instead called for a three-way summit involving himself, Putin and United States President Donald Trump.


Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
North Korea's internet hit by a major outage, says analyst
Internet access in North Korea has experienced a major outage, according to a United Kingdom-based monitor, but the exact cause may be internal rather than the result of a cyberattack. Junade Ali, a researcher who monitors the North Korean internet, said on Saturday that the secretive country's entire internet infrastructure is not registering on systems that monitor global internet activity. 'A major outage is currently occurring on North Korea's internet – affecting all routes whether they come in via China or Russia,' Ali said. 'Hard to say if this is intentional or accidental – but seems like this is internal rather than an attack,' he said. Pyongyang maintains several externally accessible government websites, including those for its Foreign Ministry and official news sources such as the Korea Central News Agency (KCNA). Both of these sites were down when Al Jazeera attempted to access them on Saturday morning. Almost all of the country's internet links and traffic are believed to pass through Chinese servers. It is not known how many people have direct access to the global internet in North Korea, but estimates place the figure at a small fraction of 1 percent of the country's population of some 25 million. A highly-monitored and curated intranet is offered to North Korean citizens – known as Kwangmyong – while global internet access is strictly limited in the authoritarian country. The country has been the target of cyberattacks in the past, including in January 2022, when United States-based hacker Alejandro Caceres removed every publicly visible North Korean website and kept them down for more than a week using distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. North Korea, ruled by third-generation dictator Kim Jong Un, has been accused by US and United Nations officials of operating armies of hackers from within the country as part of an escalating campaign of global cyber theft. In a report published in December, US blockchain analysis firm, Chainalysis, said North Korean hackers set a new record for cyber theft in 2024, stealing more than $1.34bn worth of cryptocurrency through 47 cyberattacks.


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
The US has checked out. Can Europe stop Putin alone?
The United States was once Ukraine's most important ally – supplying arms, funding and political cover as Kyiv fought for its sovereignty. But today, Washington is losing interest. President Donald Trump, more at home on the golf course than in a war room, is pulling away from a conflict he no longer seems to care to understand. Trump has not hidden his disdain. He has echoed Kremlin narratives, questioned NATO's relevance and reduced Ukraine's defence to a punchline. Even his recent comment that Russian President Vladimir Putin has 'gone absolutely crazy' does little to undo years of indulgence and indifference. He has not become a credible peace broker or a consistent supporter of Ukraine. His words now carry little weight – and Kyiv is paying the price. Just last week, Ukraine launched what it called Operation Spiderweb, a coordinated series of drone strikes deep inside Russian territory. Dozens of aircraft were destroyed at airfields, and key military infrastructure was disrupted. The White House swiftly denied any US involvement. Trump responded by again threatening to 'walk away' from the war. Shortly afterwards, a second round of peace talks in Istanbul collapsed. The only agreement reached was a sombre one: the exchange of the remains of 6,000 fallen soldiers. That may help bring closure to grieving families – but it has done nothing to alter the course of the war. Trump's belated proposal – relayed by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt – that he supports direct talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Putin sounded more like political theatre than diplomacy. The moment had already passed. It is Trump – not Zelenskyy – who now lacks leverage. And with the US pulling back from its traditional security leadership, the burden is shifting decisively to Europe. Despite the brutality of Russia's invasion in 2022, American officials have frequently treated Kyiv as the side to pressure and Moscow as the side to appease. European leaders pushed back – but mostly with words. They posted pledges of 'unwavering support' yet hesitated to take full ownership of Europe's defence. Now, as US military aid slows and Trump continues to distance himself from the war, Europe faces a historic reckoning. For the first time in nearly 80 years, the continent stands alone. The future of NATO – the alliance created after World War II to ensure collective defence – is in question. Ukraine's ability to resist Russian aggression increasingly depends on European guarantees. Can Europe meet the moment? Can a loose coalition of willing nations evolve into a durable security bloc? And can it do so without the US? As of early 2025, Ukraine was meeting roughly 40 percent of its own military needs, according to the Centre for Security and Cooperation in Kyiv. Europe provided 30 percent and the US the remaining 30 percent. To sustain the fight, Europe must now do more – quickly. The alternative would be disastrous. The Kiel Institute for the World Economy has estimated that if Russia were to occupy Ukraine, it could cost Germany alone 10 to 20 times more than maintaining current levels of support – due to refugee flows, energy instability, economic disruptions and defence risks. One of Ukraine's most urgent needs is ammunition – particularly artillery shells. Until recently, the US was the main supplier. As American deliveries decline, Ukraine is burning through its reserves. Europe is now scrambling to fill the gap. The problem is scale. Europe's arms industry has long been underdeveloped. It is only now beginning to respond. According to European Union Commissioner for Defence and Space Andrius Kubilius, the bloc aims to produce 2 million artillery shells annually by the end of 2025. This would just meet Ukraine's minimum battlefield requirements. A particularly ambitious initiative is a Czech-led plan to procure and deliver up to 1.8 million shells to Ukraine by the end of next year. Confirmed by Czech President Petr Pavel in May and backed by Canada, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark and other countries, the effort is one of the few on track to make a meaningful impact – if it arrives on time. Germany has also moved beyond donations. In late May, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius signed an agreement with his Ukrainian counterpart, Rustem Umerov, to cofinance the production of long-range weapons inside Ukraine, tapping into local industrial and engineering capacity. The United Kingdom remains one of Kyiv's most dependable allies. On Wednesday, London announced a new 350-million-pound ($476m) drone package – part of a broader 4.5-billion-pound ($6.1bn) support pledge. It includes 100,000 drones by 2026, a substantial increase on previous commitments. But war is not waged with weapons alone. Financial and economic power matter too. Trump recently told Fox News that US taxpayer money was being 'pissed away' in Ukraine. The remark was not only crude – it was also misleading. Since 2022, the US has provided about $128bn in aid to Ukraine, including $66.5bn in military assistance. Meanwhile, the EU and its member states have contributed about 135 billion euros ($155bn), including 50 billion euros ($57bn) in military support, 67 billion euros ($77bn) in financial and humanitarian aid, and 17 billion euros ($19.5bn) for refugee programmes. The UK has added another 12.8 billion pounds ($17.4 billion). These are not gifts. They are strategic investments – meant to prevent far higher costs if Russia succeeds in its imperial project. Europe has also led on sanctions. Since 2014 – and with renewed urgency since 2022 – it has imposed 17 successive rounds of measures targeting Russia's economy. None has ended the war, but each has taken a toll. On May 20, one day after a reportedly warm call between Trump and Putin, the EU and UK unveiled their most sweeping sanctions package yet. It included nearly 200 vessels from Russia's so-called shadow fleet, used to smuggle oil and circumvent global price caps. Some estimates, including AI-assisted modelling, suggest the sanctions could cost Russia $10bn to $20bn per year if loopholes are closed and enforcement holds. Even partial implementation would disrupt Moscow's wartime revenue. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas was clear: 'The longer Russia wages war, the tougher our response.' Europe is beginning to back that promise with action. From drones to shells, sanctions to weapons production, the continent is finally moving from statements to strategy – slowly but steadily building the foundations of Ukrainian resilience and Russian defeat. But this momentum cannot stall. This is no longer just Ukraine's war. The US has stepped aside. Europe is no longer the backup plan. It is the last line of defence. If it fails, so does Ukraine – and with it, the idea of a secure, sovereign Europe. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.