logo
Killing entire troops of Cape baboons is once again a very real threat despite 25 years of hard effort

Killing entire troops of Cape baboons is once again a very real threat despite 25 years of hard effort

Daily Maverick2 days ago

If we are to sum up more than 25 years of active work, research and effort, we can say that there are no baboon-proof bins, none of the suggested strategic baboon-proof fences, no fines or prosecutions, very little education or signage, but now a huge threat of loss of life for 120 baboons.
3 June 3 2025: 120 baboons to be 'removed'
In my book Beast or Blessing I examined the history of baboons and established that baboons have been around for many thousands of years, and certainly living on the Cape Peninsula before the arrival of the first settlers.
But it is neither here nor there who got here first – the priority must be to manage the situation so that we co-exist; wildlife neighbours alongside urban dwellers.
In my mind, I see baboons living their best lives in natural spaces and in the event that they opportunistically forage in human occupied spaces, I would hope we have efficient steps in place to minimise conflict and to keep our different spaces respectfully separate.
Given their respective mandates, roles and responsibilities, the authorities should make our ideals a reality. However, the nub of the problem is that although the City of Cape Town, CapeNature, SANParks and Table Mountain National Park (the Joint Task Team, JTT) have known about baboons on the Cape Peninsula all this long time they have failed to manage either baboons or their human neighbours appropriately.
Looking back over the peninsula's history, apart from sound aversion trials at Cape Point in the 1950s, there was no management other than if the baboons 'stepped out of line' whole troops were executed.
Baboons were disposable and our conservation bodies acquiesced as scientists and doctors used baboons to experiment upon (who can forget Dr Chris Barnard's experimental heart surgery for which countless baboons gave their lives).
It was only in the 1990s, when Wally Petersen and I started KEAG, that the lack of management really came under scrutiny and efforts were made to educate residents and find mitigation solutions. The Kansky Gaynor WWF Management Plan of 2002 laid out and prioritised solutions and Dr Kansky's educational booklet, 'Baboons on the Cape Peninsula', provided education and understanding to residents of affected areas. (Both of these documents are still valued today).
But despite the focused management plan and education drive, the roles of the authorities continued to be problematic and their lack of cooperation held the project back from achieving all it could. For example, they all agreed on mitigation – in fact their own protocols insist on mitigation as the first step in management – yet there are still no baboon-proof bins and no fines for noncompliance of existing regulations and by-laws.
The JTT state that they manage a 'healthy, sustainable population' of baboons within this urban context and they do so by relying heavily on the monitor project – ironically referred to as the Urban Baboon Programme. The URBAN Baboon programme, not baboons of the wild programme.
And the irony continues as the baboons are blamed for being overly habituated due to being 'fed by residents', when in fact the baboons are being 'fed' daily from unsecure waste and from bins, from poorly managed business sites and at the SA Navy. Could CapeNature fine the City of Cape Town for feeding baboons, I wonder?
Although I am quite sure a few people may actively feed baboons, the main cause of 'time in town' is the high food attractants found in waste and these rich rewards will continue to lure baboons into town no matter how often baboons are hurt, paintballed or shot. We know this, yet after 26 years there are still no baboon-proof bins and in the latest bin procurement failure we are told that they 'underestimated how strong baboons are' and that the new lock won't work.
Flags of concern were raised as early as 2004 when Dr Kansky noted how little of the management plan had been implemented and called for an audit. The authorities dived for cover and instead of the objective review requested, they became progressively less inclined to implement any of the mitigation solutions.
We could talk about the court cases, the workshops, the endless meetings, but at the end of all of that hard effort and time, killing entire troops of baboons is once again a very real and imminent threat because, really, the JTT are simply too disinterested to do anything else.
More than 80 baboons were killed in terms of the JTT's BBTG3 protocol – despite the fact that their own protocol calls for mitigation strategies as the first step. Now 120 baboons must be removed – removed to either a newly created sanctuary or they will be killed – or there may be a combination of some baboons being killed and some removed if a sanctuary can be found.
If we are to sum up more than 25 years of active work, research and effort, we can say that there are no baboon-proof bins, none of the suggested strategic baboon-proof fences, no fines or prosecutions, very little education or signage, but now a huge threat of loss of life for 120 baboons.
What is so very sad in this whole shambolic mess is the fact that the JTT have trialled aversion techniques, but never given any consideration for attracting the baboons back up the mountains. We have suggested enriching areas, provision of water points, planting food forests and even short-term food provisioning to break the cycle of baboons coming into urban areas and rather keeping them on the mountain – all to no avail.
The new service provider is hoping to reach a consensus on the way forward – but to get to that point we are expected to accept that there will be no negotiation on the one area that the general public probably would get behind and support: provisioning as a trial rather than killing as an end result.
As we wade through the current murky mess one thing is clear: we will not stop fighting!
To quote the Green Group of Simon's Town (in relation to the new JTT plan): 'Talk of euthanasia isn't humane – it's calculated killing to conceal failure. This is not the baboons' failure. It's the failure of management, of policy and of ethics.' DM
Jenni Trethowan is the founder member of the Baboon Matters Trust and has been advocating for better management of the baboon-human interface for the past 25 years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SANParks highlights the fight against plastic pollution this World Environment Day
SANParks highlights the fight against plastic pollution this World Environment Day

IOL News

time5 hours ago

  • IOL News

SANParks highlights the fight against plastic pollution this World Environment Day

Greenpeace Africa activists staged a demonstration outside Coca-Cola's corporate offices in Rosebank, Johannesburg, with a striking 3-metre by 3-metre glass bottle cap installation. The South African National Parks marked World Environment Day on Thursday by focusing on plastic pollution. The global theme this year for World Environment Day (WED) 25 is 'Beat Plastic Pollution'. Globally, over 400 million tons of plastic waste enter ecosystems each year, harming rivers, soils, and biodiversity. A large number of national parks under SANParks' management are mainly located in rural areas. In keeping with this year's WED, SANParks highlighted the link between plastic pollution, negative impact of climate change and communities adjacent to its national a statement SANParks said they were working to ensure that communities are not only included in WED events but positioned as leaders in environmental stewardship. "This includes co-management models, youth-led clean-up initiatives, education in traditional zero-waste practices, and access to ancestral lands for ceremonial and ecological restoration activities. "The communities will become leading figures in the fight against environmental nuisances like plastic pollution and its related consequences," read the statement. SANParks also adopted a plan to incrementally phase out problematic waste streams (like plastic) in all its national parks' operations.

Killing entire troops of Cape baboons is once again a very real threat despite 25 years of hard effort
Killing entire troops of Cape baboons is once again a very real threat despite 25 years of hard effort

Daily Maverick

time2 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

Killing entire troops of Cape baboons is once again a very real threat despite 25 years of hard effort

If we are to sum up more than 25 years of active work, research and effort, we can say that there are no baboon-proof bins, none of the suggested strategic baboon-proof fences, no fines or prosecutions, very little education or signage, but now a huge threat of loss of life for 120 baboons. 3 June 3 2025: 120 baboons to be 'removed' In my book Beast or Blessing I examined the history of baboons and established that baboons have been around for many thousands of years, and certainly living on the Cape Peninsula before the arrival of the first settlers. But it is neither here nor there who got here first – the priority must be to manage the situation so that we co-exist; wildlife neighbours alongside urban dwellers. In my mind, I see baboons living their best lives in natural spaces and in the event that they opportunistically forage in human occupied spaces, I would hope we have efficient steps in place to minimise conflict and to keep our different spaces respectfully separate. Given their respective mandates, roles and responsibilities, the authorities should make our ideals a reality. However, the nub of the problem is that although the City of Cape Town, CapeNature, SANParks and Table Mountain National Park (the Joint Task Team, JTT) have known about baboons on the Cape Peninsula all this long time they have failed to manage either baboons or their human neighbours appropriately. Looking back over the peninsula's history, apart from sound aversion trials at Cape Point in the 1950s, there was no management other than if the baboons 'stepped out of line' whole troops were executed. Baboons were disposable and our conservation bodies acquiesced as scientists and doctors used baboons to experiment upon (who can forget Dr Chris Barnard's experimental heart surgery for which countless baboons gave their lives). It was only in the 1990s, when Wally Petersen and I started KEAG, that the lack of management really came under scrutiny and efforts were made to educate residents and find mitigation solutions. The Kansky Gaynor WWF Management Plan of 2002 laid out and prioritised solutions and Dr Kansky's educational booklet, 'Baboons on the Cape Peninsula', provided education and understanding to residents of affected areas. (Both of these documents are still valued today). But despite the focused management plan and education drive, the roles of the authorities continued to be problematic and their lack of cooperation held the project back from achieving all it could. For example, they all agreed on mitigation – in fact their own protocols insist on mitigation as the first step in management – yet there are still no baboon-proof bins and no fines for noncompliance of existing regulations and by-laws. The JTT state that they manage a 'healthy, sustainable population' of baboons within this urban context and they do so by relying heavily on the monitor project – ironically referred to as the Urban Baboon Programme. The URBAN Baboon programme, not baboons of the wild programme. And the irony continues as the baboons are blamed for being overly habituated due to being 'fed by residents', when in fact the baboons are being 'fed' daily from unsecure waste and from bins, from poorly managed business sites and at the SA Navy. Could CapeNature fine the City of Cape Town for feeding baboons, I wonder? Although I am quite sure a few people may actively feed baboons, the main cause of 'time in town' is the high food attractants found in waste and these rich rewards will continue to lure baboons into town no matter how often baboons are hurt, paintballed or shot. We know this, yet after 26 years there are still no baboon-proof bins and in the latest bin procurement failure we are told that they 'underestimated how strong baboons are' and that the new lock won't work. Flags of concern were raised as early as 2004 when Dr Kansky noted how little of the management plan had been implemented and called for an audit. The authorities dived for cover and instead of the objective review requested, they became progressively less inclined to implement any of the mitigation solutions. We could talk about the court cases, the workshops, the endless meetings, but at the end of all of that hard effort and time, killing entire troops of baboons is once again a very real and imminent threat because, really, the JTT are simply too disinterested to do anything else. More than 80 baboons were killed in terms of the JTT's BBTG3 protocol – despite the fact that their own protocol calls for mitigation strategies as the first step. Now 120 baboons must be removed – removed to either a newly created sanctuary or they will be killed – or there may be a combination of some baboons being killed and some removed if a sanctuary can be found. If we are to sum up more than 25 years of active work, research and effort, we can say that there are no baboon-proof bins, none of the suggested strategic baboon-proof fences, no fines or prosecutions, very little education or signage, but now a huge threat of loss of life for 120 baboons. What is so very sad in this whole shambolic mess is the fact that the JTT have trialled aversion techniques, but never given any consideration for attracting the baboons back up the mountains. We have suggested enriching areas, provision of water points, planting food forests and even short-term food provisioning to break the cycle of baboons coming into urban areas and rather keeping them on the mountain – all to no avail. The new service provider is hoping to reach a consensus on the way forward – but to get to that point we are expected to accept that there will be no negotiation on the one area that the general public probably would get behind and support: provisioning as a trial rather than killing as an end result. As we wade through the current murky mess one thing is clear: we will not stop fighting! To quote the Green Group of Simon's Town (in relation to the new JTT plan): 'Talk of euthanasia isn't humane – it's calculated killing to conceal failure. This is not the baboons' failure. It's the failure of management, of policy and of ethics.' DM Jenni Trethowan is the founder member of the Baboon Matters Trust and has been advocating for better management of the baboon-human interface for the past 25 years.

Conservation world mourns loss of visionary leader Sharon Haussmann
Conservation world mourns loss of visionary leader Sharon Haussmann

Daily Maverick

time4 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

Conservation world mourns loss of visionary leader Sharon Haussmann

Sharon Haussmann, a trailblazer in the field of conservation and the CEO of the Greater Kruger Environmental Protection Foundation, has died. Her death last weekend has sent ripples of grief across the conservation community, where she was widely admired for her relentless drive, strategic brilliance and deep love of wildlife. Haussmann was more than a CEO – she was a connector, mentor and fierce protector of South Africa's natural heritage. Known for her wicked humour and capacity to inspire those around her, she led the Greater Kruger Environmental Protection Foundation (GKEPF) through a pivotal period of transformation. With great skill, she united fragmented stakeholders, from private landowners to public institutions, forging partnerships in one of the country's most contested conservation landscapes. 'Sharon's leadership acumen was evident in every engagement,' said SANParks Board Chairperson Pam Yako in a statement on Monday, 2 June 2025. 'Her clarity of thought, strategic foresight and deep understanding of the complexities of conservation partnerships consistently elevated the quality of dialogue and decision-making.' Under Haussmann's leadership, GKEPF became a key strategic partner of the Kruger National Park and SANParks. Her work helped build the foundation for Vision 2040, SANParks' new agenda for inclusive, sustainable conservation. Yet her passion was always grounded in action. Whether darting rhinos, coordinating anti-poaching units or organising youth soccer tournaments in remote communities, Haussmann was hands-on. Her presence in Balule, where she lived, exemplified her commitment to living and working at the frontline of conservation challenges. 'She influenced, connected, persuaded and inspired,' said the GKEPF in a heartfelt Facebook tribute. 'From relocating rhinos to mentoring young rangers, Sharon approached every task with courage and enthusiasm.' She was especially devoted to rhinos and spotted hyenas – animals she defended with fervent conviction. But it was her people skills that made her irreplaceable. She had a rare ability to make others feel valued and empowered, never standing on ceremony, always leading from the front. Sharon Haussmann is survived by her husband, Robin Haussmann and their son, Aden. The GKEPF family expressed its heartbreak in a public statement, noting that 'her presence, strength, and leadership will be sorely missed'. SANParks said in a media statement that it would 'honour her memory by recommitting ourselves to the path she eloquently helped to forge – one of unity, innovation and unwavering dedication to the protection of our natural heritage'. Her legacy, etched into the landscapes she fought to protect, will live on in every rhino rescued, every fence line patrolled and every young conservationist she inspired. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store