
Department goes digital: NPOs urged to use new online system
The Gauteng Department of Social Development is ditching paperwork and going digital in a bid to streamline the management of non-profit organisation (NPO) funding.
From this week, the department will begin rolling out a new electronic NPO funding management system, known as Grantor, which will handle all future applications, payments and service level agreements (SLAs) electronically.
'This is your chance to level up your funding application game and embrace a smarter, smoother way of working,' said Social Development MEC Faith Mazibuko.
Digital transformation to fix delays
According to Mazibuko, the department's move to the Grantor system is meant to address long-standing administrative bottlenecks that have often delayed the processing of NPO claims and payments.
'We are investing in technology to improve the processing of applications and payments, something which has been a challenge for the department,' she said.
The Grantor system will enable NPOs to submit business plans, apply for funding, and receive SLAs all online. This will cut down on red tape and speed up turnaround times.
ALSO READ: Is Joburg ready to host G20? Gauteng on frenzy to repair potholes and streetlights [VIDEO]
Week-long training workshops begin Monday
Furthermore, to ensure a smooth transition, the department is hosting mandatory workshops and awareness sessions across all five Gauteng corridors. These sessions will run from Monday, 4 August to Friday, 8 August.
The first workshop takes place in Sebokeng on Monday at 12pm. The rest of the week's schedule is:
Tuesday, 5 August – Johannesburg
Wednesday, 6 August – Ekurhuleni
Thursday, 7 August – West Rand
Friday, 8 August – Tshwane
NPOs are required to bring their own laptops to the sessions to engage directly with the system.
Mazibuko urged organisations to attend, emphasising the system's long-term benefits for improved funding processes.
'With this new online system, we will be able to work faster and more efficiently, and we encourage NPOs to attend our mandatory workshops so that they can learn more about the Grantor system,' she said.
The department said this digital shift marks a 'game-changing' moment in public service delivery.
NOW READ: Lesufi reshuffles several heads of Gauteng departments after reports reveal misconduct

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Herald
3 hours ago
- The Herald
Soweto Marathon shifts to late November under new organisation
The 30th edition of the Soweto Marathon is shifting to late November, a spokesperson for the event said on Thursday, contradicting claims by Soweto Marathon Trust (SMT) representatives that the country's biggest one-day road race had been cancelled. Jabu Mbuli said nine of 11 Soweto running clubs had agreed to administer the race through an NPO. This came after allegations against the previous two bodies that staged the race — the SMT and then a private company that stepped in to organise the past two races in 2023 and 2024. 'We believe this [NPO] option will assist in ensuring good and proper governance and sound financial accountability,' Mbuli said. 'The appointed non-executive board of directors will comprise largely of qualified professionals and will include chartered accountants and attorneys. The athletics clubs of Soweto own this race and they will focus on the race organising committee to run this race by the people, for the people.' SMT representatives recently claimed there would be no race this year, but Mbuli said the 2025 race would be launched this month and would take place at the end of November.

TimesLIVE
9 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Brazil's Lula says he will discuss Trump tariffs with Brics group
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva presented himself as a torchbearer for multilateralism in a fractured world in an interview with Reuters on Wednesday, revealing plans to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint Brics response to tariffs on US imports imposed by President Donald Trump. 'What President Trump is doing is tacit — he wants to dismantle multilateralism where agreements are made collectively within institutions and replace it with unilateralism where he negotiates one-on-one with other countries,' Lula said. 'What bargaining power does a small Latin American country have against the US? None.' Lula said he will initiate a conversation at the Brics group of developing nations about how to tackle Trump's tariffs. He said he planned to call Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday and China's Xi Jinping and other leaders after. The group also has Russia and other emerging economies among its members. 'I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation, what the implications are for each country, so we can make a decision,' he said. 'It's important to remember that the Brics have ten countries at the G20,' he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. Lula stressed that Brazil now holds the presidency of the Brics and said that he wants to discuss with allies why Trump is attacking multilateralism and what his goals may be. Trump called the Brics 'anti-American' and threatened to slap an additional 10% tariff on goods imported from those countries last month, while the group gathered in a summit in Rio de Janeiro. Some of the highest tariffs imposed by Trump have been on imports from those countries. Brazil climbed to the top of the list last month, when Trump tied 50% tariffs on most of the country's exports to what he called a 'witch hunt' against former president Jair Bolsonaro. On Wednesday, Trump threatened to impose another 25% tariff on Indian imports because of the country's reliance on Russian oil, which would add to the 25% levies that are already in place. The 30% tariffs on goods from China and South Africa are also among the highest imposed by Trump, though some Chinese products face additional levies.


Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
African media must follow the money and treat AI as a story about power, not tech
Scott Timcke is a senior research associate with Research ICT Africa. He is affiliated with the University of Johannesburg's Centre for Social Change and the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. A gap has emerged in global discussions about AI governance during South Africa's G20 presidency. This is the role of independent media as democracy's watchdog in an age of concentrated digital power. The Media20 (M20) initiative – an independent civil society initiative that mirrors official G20 engagement groups for business, think tanks and civil society, among others – has identified this gap through a recent set of policy briefs, in particular, one on AI, Africa and the G20. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The findings point to a conundrum. Just as AI systems increasingly shape economic, social and political outcomes across Africa, the media's capacity to scrutinise these developments is being undermined by the very forces they should be monitoring. The triple challenge facing African media Three interconnected challenges demand urgent G20 attention. First, AI development remains concentrated among a handful of global technology companies, creating concentrations of transnational power that national regulatory mechanisms struggle to govern effectively. When decisions made in Silicon Valley boardrooms can determine whether African farmers receive crop recommendations or students access educational content, the stakes for democratic oversight come into relief. Second, Africa occupies a structurally disadvantaged position in the global AI economy. While African workers earn just $1-$3 per hour, labelling images that enable billion-dollar AI applications like autonomous vehicles, they remain locked out of the more profitable layers of the AI technology stack. This digital extraction mirrors historical patterns of resource exploitation where raw materials flow outward while value-added benefits remain elsewhere. Third, and perhaps most critically, journalism covering AI governance suffers from significant knowledge gaps. Too many reporters treat AI developments as 'technology stories', focusing on capabilities and breakthrough narratives, rather than examining the deeper 'power and policy stories' that reveal governance implications and labour impacts. This framing obscures the real questions: Who controls these systems? How are decisions made? What is the impact on ordinary Africans? Democracy under pressure This oversight becomes particularly concerning given Africa's deteriorating information ecosystem. Since 2022, foreign-sponsored disinformation campaigns have targeted at least 39 African countries, exploiting structural vulnerabilities including limited media literacy and declining press freedom. Meanwhile, governments increasingly distort 'fake news' or 'misinformation' laws to suppress dissent, while internet shutdowns undermine freedom of expression and access to information. The surge in information manipulation coincides with AI systems increasingly shaping critical sectors such as agriculture, health, education and governance itself. When algorithmic decision-making affects everything from loan approvals to university admissions, independent oversight becomes more crucial than ever. Yet the technical complexity of AI systems often shields corporate practices from public scrutiny, while the global nature of AI companies complicates jurisdictional oversight. The M20's democratic vision The M20 initiative seeks to interact with official G20 engagement groups and advocate for media recognition as a core pillar of sustainable financial development, human rights and global cooperation. This approach recognises that effective AI governance cannot emerge from purely technocratic solutions; it requires robust democratic accountability mechanisms. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The initiative's recommendations for G20 consideration include establishing AI governance transparency standards that mandate algorithmic impact assessments for government AI deployments, supporting independent AI oversight mechanisms through funding streams for media organisations to develop AI governance expertise, and promoting African AI tools that serve local languages and contexts rather than marginalising them. Most importantly, the M20 calls for strengthening media freedom through concrete benchmarks for press freedom and information integrity, including sanctions for governments that weaponise disinformation legislation against journalists. Reframing the story For African media organisations, the challenge lies in developing the technical literacy needed to cover AI governance effectively, while maintaining editorial independence from potentially unsustainable and biased AI services. If done correctly, they can reframe AI coverage to focus on power dynamics rather than 'technological wizardry'. This means following the money and data in AI systems, particularly examining how African data contributes to AI development and whether economic benefits flow back to African communities. It means developing systematic approaches to covering government use of AI in service delivery and security agencies, with attention to transparency and citizen impact. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Most crucially, it means challenging corporate narratives about AI benefits with independent verification, particularly examining outsized claims about the ability of AI solutions to achieve development goals. A continental imperative The stakes extend beyond journalism itself. AI systems are reshaping Africa's relationship with the global economy, determining whether the continent remains locked into extractive relationships or develops genuine technological sovereignty. The African Union's Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy, endorsed last year, recognises this imperative. But implementation requires the kind of sustained, critical oversight that only independent media can provide. As recent reports indicate a decline in press freedom across major democracies, with significant economic pressures on news organisations, the M20's mission becomes even more acute. Effective AI governance requires collaborative networks that share resources and expertise across borders, recognising that the forces shaping Africa's digital future operate on a global scale. For African media, this means that embracing their role as democracy's watchdog becomes more vital in an era of concentrated digital power. The question is whether Africa's journalists are ready to tell the real story of AI; not as a tale of technological progress, but as a fundamental question of power, democracy and self-determination. DM