
Israel Preparing Strike on Iran's Nuclear Facilities According to Report
Oil jumped following a CNN report that new US intelligence suggests Israel is preparing for a potential strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Brent crude rose above $66 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate surged as much as 3.5% before paring gains. It wasn't clear that Israeli leaders have made a final decision on whether to carry out the strikes, CNN said, citing unidentified officials. Oil has been volatile since last week on mixed headlines about the fate of Iran-US nuclear talks, which could pave the way for more barrels to return to a market that's expected to be oversupplied later in the year. An attack by Israel would hinder any progress in those negotiations and add to unrest in the Middle East, which supplies about a third of the world's crude. Golnar Motevalli, who leads our coverage of Iran joined Stephen Carroll and Valerie Tytel on Bloomberg Radio to discuss. (Source: Bloomberg)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analyst says Circle's ‘risk-free' stock is better than MicroStrategy
Analyst says Circle's 'risk-free' stock is better than MicroStrategy originally appeared on TheStreet. Circle's stock (CRCL) made its public debut on June 5 and instantly became one of the most-watched listings in crypto and finance. After opening at $69, the USD Coin (USDC) issuer surged as high as $120 within four days, triggering chatter that Circle could surpass even Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy (MSTR) in long-term profitability. In a widely shared post on X, BitMEX Research wrote, 'The Circle [$CRCL] market cap has now reached 50% of the USDC in circulation. This would give Circle an 'infinite money glitch', which unlike $MSTR, would also be risk free.' They later added, 'If $CRCL goes up another 100%, it can start to become a US$ 'treasury company'. Selling its own shares, to buy more US$...'X. Since IPO, CRCL has gained nearly 70%, while MicroStrategy has climbed a more measured 5.7% in the same period. But with rapid growth comes heightened volatility. On June 10 alone, CRCL dropped more than 8%, signaling that the honeymoon may be over, at least for now. Technically, Circle looks overheated. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for CRCL sits at approximately 74, indicating overbought conditions and a likely cooldown ahead. Its MACD line, which surged in the days after the IPO, is now flattening, and the histogram has begun to decline, potential early signs of weakening bullish momentum. MicroStrategy's RSI, by contrast, is a healthier 62, suggesting it's still in a bullish range but not yet overbought. Its MACD shows a solid upward trend, indicating growing strength without the kind of parabolic action that often precedes a reversal. MSTR continues its slow, steady climb, bolstered by Bitcoin exposure and a seasoned investor base that's weathered several crypto cycles. Its price floor around $370 appears strong, offering a safer long-term bet, especially for those wary of post-IPO euphoria. Even so, industry analysts agree. Circle's path is unique. The company holds over $24 billion in U.S. Treasuries, operates the second-largest stablecoin in the world, and now trades publicly with a valuation nearing $24 billion. Its listing also comes at a time when institutional demand for stablecoin rails and tokenized financial infrastructure is heating up. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing in cryptocurrencies and stocks carries risk; always do your own research before making financial decisions. Analyst says Circle's 'risk-free' stock is better than MicroStrategy first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.


Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S., China reach "framework" to activate Geneva trade deal
The U.S. and China have agreed on a "framework" to implement a trade deal struck last month, pending approval from both countries' leaders, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday. Why it matters: Progress on trade peace with China, particularly if it resolves the issue of crucial Chinese rare earth minerals exports, would be a boon to an economy and markets that have struggled for months with the impact of President Trump's tariff program. Catch up quick: After a series of tit-for-tat retaliations in April, the world's two largest economies effectively had a trade embargo in place, with 145% U.S. tariffs crushing imports from China. The sides announced a trade deal that included a 90-day pause on most of those tariffs on May 12 after a weekend of high-level talks in Geneva. Only days later, the U.S. issued global restrictions on the use of certain Chinese chips from Huawei Ascend, saying they were developed in violation of U.S. export controls. The Chinese reacted furiously, and soon there were reports the government was restricting exports of the rare earth materials needed for hundreds of the world's most important high-tech products. The U.S. subsequently retaliated with a move to restrict and withdraw visas for Chinese students. Where it stands: Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke for 90 minutes last Thursday about trade issues, and agreed to high-level talks immediately. That led to this week's meeting in London. "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus," Lutnick told reporters in London Tuesday night after marathon trade talks, Bloomberg reported. The Wall Street Journal reported that Tuesday's deal would essentially get the May 12 deal back on track, including the lowered tariffs and the loosened Chinese restrictions on rare earths. Between the lines: The trade war is squeezing both economies.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social media algorithms boost L.A. protest misinformation in ‘combustible' environment
Offline, in real-world Los Angeles, most Angelenos are having a perfectly normal day. But online, the fires and riots are still raging. The powerful algorithms that fuel social media platforms are feeding users days-old and sometimes completely fake content about the recent unrest in L.A., contributing to a sense of nonstop crisis that doesn't exist beyond a small part of the sprawling city. Unvetted accounts on platforms like X and TikTok, in an apparent bid for clicks, clout and chaos, have preyed on the fears of liberals and conservatives about where last weekend's clashes will lead. An AI-generated fake video on TikTok purported to show a National Guardsman going by the name Bob livestreaming his preparation for 'today's gassing' of protesters. The video has been viewed more than 960,000 times as of Tuesday afternoon. Many in the comments section called the video a fake, but others appeared to believe it was real. (The video, which was debunked by BBC News, appears to have since been taken down.) 'What's happening on social media is similar to the chaos of the information environment around the 2020 George Floyd protests,' said Renée DiResta, an associate research professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy and an expert on how conspiracy theories spread online. 'People are trying to discern between real current footage and recycled sensational old footage repurposed for political or financial ends.' In 2025, though, AI-generated images are more abundant, and users have splintered onto different online platforms 'where different stories are being told,' DiResta told CNN. On X, where right-wing views tend to flourish, influencers are denouncing the anti-ICE protesters as agitators and terrorists, while on the more left-wing Bluesky, prominent users are condemning President Trump's deployment of the National Guard. Hyperpartisan and hyperactive accounts on X have been wildly overstating the actual volume of unrest in Southern California, furthering the online confusion about the offline situation. One viral post on X falsely claimed on Sunday that there were 'breaking' news reports that Mexico was considering 'military intervention' in Los Angeles. More than 2 million people have viewed the post as of Tuesday afternoon. Dozens of posts on X have spread conspiracy theories claiming the protesters were government-backed or funded by various sources, according to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a think tank. Many of those posts have over a million views, and only a handful of them have been fact-checked with X's community notes features. CNN has requested comment from X and TikTok. Recognizing how viral posts can distort public opinion and potentially exacerbate violence, California Governor Gavin Newsom's office on Sunday night pleaded with the public to 'check your sources before sharing info!' in a post on X. The governor's office also directly debunked some of the info. As some protests in L.A. turned ugly on Sunday evening, Senator Ted Cruz shared a shocking video clip of L.A. Police Department cars on fire and wrote, 'this… is… not… peaceful.' The Texas senator's X post implied the video clip was brand-new, but it was actually from 2020, when the racial justice protests tipped into civil unrest. Cruz was reacting to actor James Woods, one of the prominent conservative X users who promoted the five-year-old fire video. Newsom responded to Woods: 'This video is from 2020.' Adding to the confusion, vandals did damage several police cars and set several self-driving cars on fire Sunday evening. But the viral clip reposted by Woods was old. Federal government accounts have been among the misleading sources on social media. A Defense Department 'rapid response' account on X claimed Monday morning that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' But there were no reports of fires burning in L.A. at the time of the Defense Department's claim. Russian and Chinese state media have also amplified images of the unrest, whether real or fake. Chinese state media outlets have 'rapidly seized on the deployment of Marines in the streets of Los Angeles,' the German Marshall Fund's Alliance for Securing Democracy, a think tank, said in an analysis shared with CNN. 'In keeping with their coverage of 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, PRC (People's Republic of China) propaganda outlets have used protests in the United States to dent America's image abroad and to suggest that the US government's response to protests at home bears little resemblance to their support for protests overseas,' Bret Schafer, a senior fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy, told CNN. Russian state-controlled outlet Sputnik, meanwhile, circulated a photo, also shared by the actor Woods, purporting to show 'pallets of bricks' at a protest site. But that photo is actually from a construction site in New Jersey, according to X's 'community notes' feature. Russian state media outlets have also echoed false or misleading claims from pro-Trump influencers about left-wing groups and figures funding the protests, according to Schafer. Moscow 'seems less interested in scoring propaganda points and more interested in throwing fuel into a combustible domestic information environment,' he said.