Formula E rookie test pits women alongside the men in Berlin
Formula E would love to have a female driver back on the starting grid but, on times alone, the all-electric series' rookie test in Berlin on Monday suggested that it remained some way off.
Four women took part in the test after weekend races at Tempelhof but the highest in the overall classification was Abbi Pulling, last year's F1 Academy champion and current GB3 competitor, in 17th with the Nissan team.
Fellow-Briton Ella Lloyd, who competes in British F4 and F1 Academy, was 18th for McLaren and Jamie Chadwick, three-times winner of the now-defunct W Series and a Williams F1 development driver now racing in European Le Mans, was 19th for Jaguar.
Bianca Bustamante of the Philippines, a GB3 racer with 1.7 million followers on Instagram, was 22nd and last for the Cupra Kiro team although the entire grid was separated by just 1.550 seconds.
Italian Gabriele Mini was overall fastest for Nissan in a field that included former F1 racer Daniil Kvyat, Charles Leclerc's younger brother Arthur and leading Formula Two drivers.
Formula E chief executive Jeff Dodds told Reuters ahead of the test that he was optimistic a woman would make it back onto the grid before too long.
"We went from no women testing really, to 20 women in the official women's test last year and off the back of that we've actually got four women testing in the actual rookie test now in Berlin," he said.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun
Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3
Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA
Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder
Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean
Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges
Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack
Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat
"So that's a big jump, we've made progress.
"In the end the teams will make a choice based on what their objectives are in terms of building a fan base, promoting themselves as a team, bringing on sponsors and partners and being as successful as they can be.
"It may not be next year but I would love over the next couple of years to see women back racing on that grid."
Three women have raced in the series, which is now in its 11th season -- Britain's Katherine Legge twice in 2014, Switzerland's Simona de Silvestro started 12 times in 2015-16 and Michela Cerruti four times in 2014-15.
De Silvestro is the only one to have scored points.
Unlike Formula E, Formula One has not had a woman start a race since Lella Lombardi in 1976.
Pulling, who was top in last year's all-female test, told Reuters recently she saw Formula E as "a really viable career path in the future".
"For now I'm going to keep going up the ladder as far as possible and see where things take me," she said. "I don't have the finances to plan massively in advance so it all depends on how I perform this year." REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Boxing-'Unstoppable' Dubois says he's ready to cause chaos and beat Usyk
LONDON - Daniel Dubois said he felt unstoppable and ready to cause chaos when he fights unbeaten Ukrainian Oleksandr Usyk for the undisputed heavyweight world title at Wembley Stadium on Saturday. Dubois, 27, is the IBF champion while Usyk, 38, holds the WBA, WBC and WBO belts. The unification fight is a rematch of one that the Londoner lost by a controversial ninth-round knockout in Wroclaw, Poland, in 2023 after Usyk was given time to recover from what the referee ruled was a low blow. Dubois can become Britain's first undisputed champion since Lennox Lewis in 1999 while Usyk is bidding to be a four-belt undisputed heavyweight champion for the second time after relinquishing the IBF title last year. "I've resurrected myself, resurrected my career and now we're on a roll," Dubois told the BBC. "Unstoppable, I feel like I can't be beat right now. I'm in the prime of my life and I'm going to go through whatever I have to do. We're here now, no more excuses. "I've got to beat him this time and I am going to win. I am going to cause chaos, knockouts, by any means necessary... I am ready. Man, I'm 100% ready. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA Singapore 2 weeks' jail for man caught smuggling over 1,800 vapes and pods into Singapore Singapore Jail for man who fatally hit his daughter, 2, while driving van without licence Singapore Primary 1 registration: 38 primary schools to conduct ballot in Phase 2A Singapore ComfortDelGro to introduce new taxi cancellation, waiting fee policy Singapore Here comes the sun: Less rain, more warm days in second half of July Singapore Instead of overcomplicating COE system, Govt has ensured affordable transport for all: SM Lee to Jamus Lim Singapore Baby died after mum took abortion pills and gave birth in toilet; coroner records an open verdict "As soon as the bell rings my whole approach is just to seek and destroy, bring chaos and get the victory, seize the moment," he added. The two fighters were due to hold open workouts at a venue near the stadium on Wednesday before the final face-to-face press conference on Thursday. Promoter Frank Warren, who represents Dubois, has said Usyk would find the Briton a very different opponent to the one he beat before. "Last time they fought Daniel the boy. This time they're fighting Daniel the man and that's the difference and he'll find that out on Saturday," he told reporters on Tuesday. "He (Usyk) is the best heavyweight of his generation, but everybody's the best until they get beaten and I think it's his time now." REUTERS
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Why Trump is attacking Biden over autopen signatures
Autopens have been use in the White House for decades, opening up the possibility that anyone with access to the device could exercise presidential power. For decades, presidents have used autopens to keep up with the relentless stream of paperwork that crosses their desk. But it's not just a matter of saving them from hand cramps. When the president is travelling, time-sensitive documents – such as bills to keep the government open – may need a signature right away, and it's not always feasible to fly the original documents to wherever the president is. Still, the use of the autopen has long raised questions, because it opens up the possibility that anyone with access to the device could exercise presidential power, without a clear written record that the president himself approved it. The latest round of controversy concerns US President Donald Trump's claim that certain orders issued by his predecessor, Mr Joe Biden, are invalid because they were signed using an autopen . Among the contested actions are a series of preemptive pardons for high-profile adversaries of Mr Trump. Mr Trump has also suggested that aides to Biden may have affixed Mr Biden's signature to official documents without the president's authorisation. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore $3b money laundering case: MinLaw acts against 4 law firms, 1 lawyer over seized properties Business 'Some cannot source outside China': S'pore firms' challenges and support needed amid US tariffs Multimedia From local to global: What made top news in Singapore over the last 180 years? World Trump arms Ukraine and threatens sanctions on countries that buy Russian oil Singapore Turning tragedy into advocacy: Woman finds new purpose after paralysis Opinion Sumiko at 61: Everything goes south when you age, changing your face from a triangle to a rectangle Sport World Aquatics C'ship women's 10km open water swimming event delayed by a day due to water quality Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun In an interview with the New York Times on July 10, Mr Biden denied the charge . 'I made every decision,' he said. He added his use of the signing device for clemency actions was a practical decision because 'we're talking about a whole lot of people.' The Trump White House, the Justice Department and Congress have all launched investigations into Mr Biden's use of the autopen. Here's what to know about the device that has repeatedly been implicated in presidential controversies. What is an autopen? An autopen is a device that replicates a signature using a mechanical stylus, making the signature appear to be handwritten. The earliest mechanical writing device, patented in 1803, allowed users to create a duplicate of the letter they were writing by connecting two pens through a system of levers. The user would write with the first pen, and the second would move across a second piece of paper in synchrony. President Thomas Jefferson used it extensively, calling it 'the finest invention of the present age.' The technology eventually evolved to the point where a robot arm could duplicate a signature without the user's involvement. Those robotic autopens became popular across the federal government in the 1940s, when Mr Harry Truman became the first president to use one. How have presidents used autopens? At first, presidents used autopens to sign ceremonial mass mailings like holiday cards and letters of condolences. To maintain the illusion that correspondents were getting a genuine presidential autograph, the White House was typically circumspect about its use of the device. Then, in 1968, Mr Lyndon B. Johnson allowed his to be photographed for a National Enquirer article under the headline, 'The Robot That Sits in for the President.' In 2005, White House lawyers asked the Justice Department for an opinion on whether the president may sign a bill by autopen, which no president had done. The DOJ concluded that under the historical and legal meaning of the word 'sign' in the early republic, 'a person may sign a document by directing that his signature be affixed to it by another,' and that 'the President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill to sign it.' What the president cannot do, the Justice Department said, is delegate the decision about whether to sign a bill. Mr Barack Obama became the first president to sign a bill with an autopen when, in 2011, he remotely signed an extension of the Patriot Act with the device while in Europe. In all, he used it to sign at least seven time-sensitive bills. He also used it for at least 78 pardons in the last month of his presidency. Mr Trump told reporters he has used an autopen, but only for unimportant papers. Did Biden use autopens? Yes. According to the New York Times, Mr Biden used an autopen on 25 pardon and commutation warrants between December 2024 and the end of his presidency. He is also confirmed to have used an autopen to remotely sign a short funding extension for the Federal Aviation Administration while traveling in San Francisco in May 2024. Whether he used the device in other cases is less clear. On March 6, the Oversight Project, an arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation, sparked Mr Trump's interest in Mr Biden's usage of the autopen by pointing out that digital records of Biden's executive orders published in the Federal Register all appear to have the same signature. However, the Office of the Federal Register said that's true of all presidents: The publication has one graphic image of a president's signature that it uses on all presidential documents, and Mr Trump's executive orders, too, would all look like they had the same signature in the register. The versions archived in the official journal of the executive branch are not images of the actual signed orders. Is a pardon signed by autopen legally sound? During Mr Obama's presidency, Republicans raised objections to his use of the autopen to sign legislation. In 2011, a group of Republican members of Congress signed a letter demanding he re-sign the Patriot Act extension by hand and end the practice of signing bills with an autopen. However, the Obama administration leaned on the 2005 DOJ opinion to justify the use of autopens, and the practice was never challenged in court. Pardons present a separate use case from legislation, and presidents are probably on even firmer legal ground there. A 1929 Justice Department opinion on pardons held that 'neither the Constitution nor statute prescribed the method by which executive clemency shall be exercised or evidenced. It is wholly for the president to decide.' In 2024, a federal appeals court found that a presidential pardon doesn't even have to be in writing. The decision – which was issued in a case brought by an inmate who said Mr Trump had verbally promised to commute his sentence – found that 'nothing in the Constitution restricts the President's exercise of the clemency power to commutations that have been rendered through a documented writing.' A political scientist who assembled a database of clemency warrants issued by presidents since George Washington said it contained a large number of unsigned – but legally unquestioned – warrants. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Starc record as Australia bowl out Windies for 27 to win third test
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Mitchell Starc delivered the fastest five-wicket haul in test history on Monday as Australia crushed the West Indies by 176 runs in the third test in Kingston, Jamaica to complete a 3-0 series sweep. Starc took 15 balls to wreck the West Indies top order in a brilliant display that left the home side's run chase in tatters, before returning to take his sixth wicket after Scott Boland's hat-trick. West Indies were bowled out for 27, the second-lowest total in test history after New Zealand's 26 against England in 1955. Starc shattered the previous record for a five-for by four balls, surpassing Ernie Toshack (1947), Stuart Broad (2015) and Boland (2021), who needed 19 deliveries to achieve the feat. The drama began on the first delivery of West Indies' second innings, when Starc enticed John Campbell to nick an outswinger to wicketkeeper Josh Inglis. Debutant Kevlon Anderson shouldered arms to a ball that jagged back and struck his pad four balls later, before Brandon King edged on to his stumps as the hosts found themselves three wickets down with no runs on the board. Starc then trapped Mikyle Louis lbw to become the fourth Australian to reach 400 test wickets alongside Shane Warne, Glenn McGrath and Nathan Lyon. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3 Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat Two balls later, he trapped Shai Hope lbw and he finished with figures of 6-9. At tea, the West Indies stood at a precarious 22-6, needing 182 runs for victory and staring down the barrel of cricket's ultimate embarrassment, with five runs needed to avoid the lowest-ever total. And the drama was far from over. Boland dismissed Justin Greaves, Shamar Joseph and Jomel Warrican to claim a hat-trick that left West Indies at 26-9, level with New Zealand's record. In the end, it was a narrow escape for the hosts as they added another run before Starc returned to bowl Jayden Seales. Earlier, Australia were dismissed for 121, their lowest score against West Indies in 30 years, with Alzarri Joseph completing career-best figures of 5-27 and Shamar Joseph 4-34. REUTERS
