logo
Jacinda Ardern's unexamined life

Jacinda Ardern's unexamined life

New Statesman​5 hours ago

For 24 days in February 2022 protesters occupied the grounds of New Zealand's parliament. They were mimicking the trucker 'Freedom Convoy' that had ground Canada's capital city to a standstill earlier that year in defiance over Covid-19 vaccine mandates. In Wellington, protesters were outraged about New Zealand's own vaccine mandate, but there was also palpable rage over 'masks, the media, the UN, communism and the government', recalls Jacinda Ardern, who was prime minister at the time. 'They blocked off streets and erected makeshift toilets. A few ripped masks off the faces of commuters.'
The protesters also had signs. 'I saw the American flags, the Trump flags, the swastikas,' writes Ardern, in her new memoir A Different Kind of Power. 'I saw my own image, with a Hitler moustache, a monocle and 'Dictator of the Year' emblazoned above my face. I saw the gallows, complete with a noose, which people said had been erected for me.' Such a scene would have been unimaginable five years earlier, when Ardern, as a newly installed leader of her Labour Party, rode a wave of 'Jacindamania' to become, at 37, the youngest female head of government in the world. She then bested her previous electoral performance in October 2020, months into the pandemic, by securing New Zealand's first majority government in 24 years. Yet the adulation and support that had once buoyed her premiership eventually curdled, so much so that by the time she resigned as prime minister, in January 2023, her net approval rating in the country had plummeted to just 15.
As Ardern presents it, she was always a reluctant politician. Growing up in small towns on New Zealand's North Island, she was often surrounded by grinding poverty, particularly in Murupara, a small, remote forestry town the family moved to when Ardern's father, a police officer, was offered a job there. In an interview as a new MP, a reporter asked her when she first became political and, thinking of the town's economic struggles, Ardern responded, 'I became political because I lived in Murupara.'
Despite this, Ardern describes her own childhood as happy. The Arderns were Mormons and, growing up, Jacinda was devoted to the religion. Going door-knocking for the church in her youth laid the foundation for political canvassing: 'I was already starting to prepare for a role I could never imagine holding.' It wasn't until she was in her twenties and had already started working as an adviser in the Labour Party that she began to interrogate her faith. She believed politics was the surest way to bring about positive change to people's lives, but she was increasingly confronted with tenets of her faith that ran counter to her liberal progressive 'values' – particularly regarding same-sex unions. At first, she would simply 'compartmentalise', mentally separating the clashing realities of her religion and her political beliefs, but as she got older and her career in politics progressed, she found that often difficult to do. She eventually left the church, a decision her family accepted gracefully.
Ardern's rise in front-line politics might have been embarked upon reluctantly, but it was rapid. She had moved to London and was working as an adviser in Tony Blair's Cabinet Office when a former colleague called to convince her to return to New Zealand to run as an MP herself. She entered parliament the following year, but she was doubtful about her abilities. 'If there was any place that being a sensitive overthinker was going to trouble me, it would be here,' she thought at the time. Yet Ardern became determined to turn her weakness into a political strength – to make her lack of cynicism and her empathy the defining features of her politics.
Her uncertainty over becoming prime minister in 2017 – after a surprise surge in support allowed her Labour Party to form a coalition government with the populist New Zealand First party and the Greens – had less to do with any nagging feelings of imposter syndrome and more to do with the fact that she was a few weeks pregnant. She was nervous about how the public would respond to a prime minister taking maternity leave, and her initial scans were clandestine affairs, carefully orchestrated and kept secret from even her security detail. A physician friend of a friend, who would meet with her in his clinic after hours, used the code name Kilgore Trout, a character from Kurt Vonnegut's novels, on all of her medical paperwork. When she finally did announce her pregnancy to the public, she was overwhelmed by support from New Zealanders and the world. While Ardern writes movingly about the private struggles of becoming a mother for the first time while also leading a government, publicly the perception was again one of strength: when Ardern brought three-month-old Neve to a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, she was celebrated as a trailblazer.
Apart from the Covid pandemic, the defining event of Ardern's premiership was the Christchurch mosque shooting. On a Friday afternoon in March 2019, a 28-year-old man, recently arrived from Australia, walked into the Al Noor Mosque armed with several semi-automatic weapons and opened fire, livestreaming the attack on Facebook. He then made his way to Linwood Islamic Centre and once again started shooting. He was stopped by police while on his way to a third mosque. In total, 51 were killed, dozens more were injured. Ardern's response to the attack – which included swiftly banning semi-automatic guns and a public address in which she said of the victims: 'They are us. The person who has perpetuated this violence against us is not' – burnished her reputation at home and abroad as a compassionate leader.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
By the time the pandemic arrived on New Zealand's shores, the country still trusted Ardern. Her coalition government embraced a zero-Covid strategy, attempting to eradicate the virus completely – this meant an initial strict lockdown and the complete closure of the borders. That strategy worked at first: New Zealand had the lowest death toll out of all OECD countries, while schools remained largely open and hospitals weren't overwhelmed. Public support for Ardern was so strong that Labour won a landslide election in October 2020, allowing her to form a majority government. Yet by the time Covid's more slippery variants appeared, the strategy's effectiveness started to falter – longer and longer lockdowns were required, including one in Auckland that lasted 107 days. By the time the vaccine was rolled out in New Zealand, much of the solidarity in the country had evaporated. Hostility – toward restrictions, toward vaccines, and most of all, toward Ardern herself – took hold. Threats of violence and death against the prime minister and her family surged each year as the pandemic dragged on.
Yet few of these details make it into Ardern's account, who writes vaguely about unspecified regrets. 'I still think about this time so often,' she writes of the protest outside parliament, 'not just the occupation, but the two years that preceded it, those long days and impossible choices.' While it's certainly likely that she has spent a long time dwelling on those regrets and impossible choices – overthinker that she is – she doesn't detail what mistakes she thinks she made or share what lessons she took away from this period. Bafflingly, Ardern devotes more pages to her relationship with Prince William over the years than she gives to an entire year of her premiership during the pandemic; 2021, with its variants and lockdowns and increasing radicalisation, is covered in just a page and a half. Why? Is she once again compartmentalising? This was clearly a monumental time for her; she resigned as prime minister in January 2023, before the end of her term.
It's clear that Ardern is intent on forging on with her brand of compassionate leadership – it's the throughline of her book, the subject of a documentary about her time in office, Prime Minister, that was also released this year, as well as the focus of her fellowship at Harvard (she and her family have lived in Boston since mid 2023). But she doesn't reckon with the fact that, while more empathetic leadership is a worthy goal, far more people would prefer effective leadership. Ardern made a global name for herself by embodying the former and there's clearly potential for her to capitalise on that momentum outside New Zealand. When it comes to the latter, however, it's hard to argue that Ardern had much lasting success. Her government failed to make a dent in child poverty, despite it being an animating issue of her politics; many of the reforms she implemented while in office to tackle New Zealand's housing crisis were reversed by the next government. This also goes unmentioned in A Different Kind of Power.
The most generous interpretation is that she – like many incumbents around the world who were punished at the ballot box once the pandemic waned – is still reckoning with the many 'hard, imperfect' decisions that may have triggered the backlash against her. A much less generous interpretation is that she simply doesn't see the value in publicly grappling with failure. Perhaps she is now satisfied with being a symbol of a type of politics, rather than continuing on with the hard graft of actual politics.
A Different Kind of Power
Jacinda Ardern
Macmillan, 352pp, £25
Purchasing a book may earn the NS a commission from Bookshop.org, who support independent bookshops
Related
[See also:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unscripted Angela Rayner takes benefits swipes in her Stride
Unscripted Angela Rayner takes benefits swipes in her Stride

Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Times

Unscripted Angela Rayner takes benefits swipes in her Stride

As the House of Commons clock made its slow rotation toward noon, Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, could be seen hanging around behind the Speaker's chair for several minutes. The prime minister was absent for a second week running, this time at what has been billed as the most important Nato summit since the end of the Cold War, but at which his own very important role has been mainly to answer questions about his own collapsing welfare bill. Stride's hyper-extended loitering was the first official indication of who would be standing in for Kemi Badenoch this week. But why was he doing it? This isn't how things normally work. Was he waiting to be passed the microphone so he could announce himself over the PA from backstage like a touring standup? Did he perhaps think he couldn't walk in until his entrance music started playing, as is customary in World Wrestling Entertainment? If the shadow chancellor is in need of some entrance music, it has been observed before that TikTok cult classic Break My Stride by the 1980s one-hit wonder Matthew Wilder fits perfectly to the words: 'Ain't nobody gonna back Mel Stride.' Although sadly in the recent leadership election it was also true. Eventually Stride gave up the wait and strode in, finding his interlocutor Angela Rayner already in place. Awaiting the shadow chancellor was what should have been the very widest of open goals. There's only one subject around in Westminster at the moment, which is, at time of typing, 122 Labour MPs signalling their intent to either amend away or vote down the government's welfare bill next week, principally its £5 billion cuts to disability benefit payments. That is easily enough MPs to destroy or fatally weaken the bill, which would be easily enough to destroy or fatally weaken the government. 'Can she explain,' Stride began, 'why she thinks 122 of her colleagues are wrong and she is right?' Ah, politics. May it never change. Stride knows what she knows, that actually, she thinks 122 of her MPs are right and that she is wrong, that she's just doing what she's told, but that she can't admit it. It was a clever point at which to make the first incision with the paring knife. The kebabing had begun. But sadly it wasn't that easy, because the Conservatives support the cuts. If it destroys the government, it will have to do so almost without their assistance. She didn't know why she was right and they were wrong. Who would, in the circumstances, when politics has compelled you to disagree with yourself? But Stride did extract from Rayner a clear promise. There had been rumours, impeccably sourced, that the vote on the bill next Tuesday could be scrapped altogether, but not any more. They'd never get away with it. Rayner leant across the dispatch box as she did it, in the style of Prince Naseem Hamed presenting his chin to an inferior opponent, daring them to take a swing. 'I don't know if he sort of listened to the previous answer, or if he was just reading his script,' she said. 'I don't need a script. We will go ahead on Tuesday.' So that's that then. It will have to go ahead now. What happens when it does is anyone's guess. The rebels won't be bought off, and there are enough of them to defeat the bill with dozens to spare. Starmer and Reeves's tediously repeated mantra about taking ' tough decisions ' will be all but destroyed. You can't take tough decisions if your party won't let you. Rayner was right when she said she doesn't need a script. The script is her enemy. She is a natural freewheeler. One Labour MP was told he spoke 'with great authenticity' on some subject or other, while she struggled to look both at him, and her notes at the same time. Toward the end, one of the Tory newbies, a youngish purple-ish sort called Andrew Snowden, asked a question that had the air of a solid week's practice in front of the bathroom mirror. Who would she most like to sack from the cabinet? The chancellor for this? The foreign secretary for that? The home secretary for the other? He sat down thrilled with himself. 'Maybe he'd like to have a go next week?' he was told. It was as deliciously patronising as it gets. Sadly for Snowden, he knew it had worked. Still, we shall have to hope that some of it was scripted, specifically the bit she said hadn't been. Her adamant insistence that next week's vote is going ahead has not quietened all of the noise that says it won't. She must, she hopes, have known what she was doing. One makes political predictions at one's peril, but I suspect that that look of unshakeable certainty may not prove to be quite all it seemed.

Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart by-election candidates hit out at potholes
Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart by-election candidates hit out at potholes

Edinburgh Reporter

time43 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart by-election candidates hit out at potholes

Voters in Fountainbridge and Craiglockhart will go to the polls tomorrow to elect a new councillor – with candidates concerned about the state of the roads and pavements they will use to get there. The by-election for the ward was called after Labour councillor Val Walker passed away suddenly in April. Polls will open at 7am across the ward, and close at 10pm, and ahead of the vote we contacted the candidates to ask what issues local people were concerned about and how they would tackle them if elected. And almost all raised the issue of potholes and poorly maintained pavements as being on the minds of residents. The council was criticised over 'quick fix' solutions, while one candidate said the state of local pavements was ' a disgrace'. Murray Visentin, the SNP candidate for the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election Gary Neill, the Reform UK candidate for the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election Catriona Munro, the Scottish Labour candidate for the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election Manivannan, the Scottish Greens candidate for the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election Mark Hooley, the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party candidate for Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart Anti-social behaviour was also a topic that kept coming up, with concerns over. youth violence rising in the wake of the Covid lockdowns. Here are what some of the candidates had to say. Mark Hooley, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party – 'Get the basics right' Scottish Conservative and Unionist party candidate Mark Hooley, who has lived in the ward for five years, said that potholes, roads and anti-social behaviour were big issues. He said: 'In terms of areas [of concern], it would definitely be the roads. I think that's an issue. In general, the state of the roads, sometimes the council just does a quick-fix job, and then it's not done properly. 'Also, I would want to focus on anti-social behaviour. We've had some issues down by the canal, so I would definitely want to focus on rectifying that.' Mr Hooley, who has lived in the city for nine, says his campaign is all about getting the basics of government right. He said: 'My basic philosophy is that government should do less, but do it better. It's not doing the basics as well as it should. 'I don't think it's surprising that when people get disillusioned from government, and then some more extreme options become more attractive to people because they say, 'oh, regular politicians aren't doing what they should do''. Mr Hooley, who works in senior management at a betting firm and is studying an MSc in journalism at Napier, says he cares deeply about where he lives, and wants to help improve the ward by representing it at the council. He also said that he wanted to be a visible presence in the community if elected, and further that he would want to encourage more civic participation in government. Q Manivannan, Scottish Green Party – A more caring, considerate politics Q Manivannan, a PhD student from India who moved to Scotland four years ago, is representing the Scottish Greens at the by-election. They said that housing and traffic, as well as environmental issues, would be big priorities if they were elected. They continued: 'Let's start with housing. Lots of people in the area, especially in Fountainbridge and Tollcross, are paying sky high rents. 'And in Hutchison and Chesser, lots of what used to be council housing is now let out privately. 'Besides that, residents have talked to me constantly about the road safety aspect of it all. I think traffic calming measures are long overdue. 'But way too many councillors are far too timid about reducing traffic and offering positive alternatives like walking, cycling and public transport.' They said that their experience as a queer member of the Tamil community would help them relate deeply to constituents in the ward if they were elected. They continued: 'This election is not just a chance to elect one of the 63 councillors, but it's also a chance for the people in Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart to say they don't want the same as usual. 'I think people are yearning for a more caring, considerate politics – one that isn't just driven by remediating the worst things happening in society, but rather looking for new ideas and new kinds of people.' In their life before entering politics, they have spent time working for the UCU trade union, as well as working at the United Nations on disability-inclusive responses to Covid-19. They also convene the Green Party's Palestine solidarity group, and said the party's collective nature drew them towards it. Catriona Munro, Scottish Labour – Continuing a legacy For Labour candidate Catriona Munro, the biggest issues she sees in the ward are the state of the roads and the pavements, as well as road safety and the provision of public services. She said: 'The concerns that people have voiced are a lot of issues around the roads, the state of the roads and the state of the pavements. 'It's a problem for all road users, all sorts – pedestrians, cyclists and cars. We need to get better at making sure that these are dealt with.' She also said that she had gotten to know late councillor Walker 'so well' through their shared engagement in arts in the ward. Their connection started over Ms Munro's efforts to save a dance space she used from closure, which Cllr Walker had taken an interest in. Ms Munro, a solicitor, has lived in Edinburgh for almost 30 years, and recently retired from full-time practice. She said: 'I've always wanted to engage in public service of some sort, and I have stood for election before, but I feel that the time has come for me to give something back to my community. 'I would be honoured to be given the opportunity to do so.' Gary Neill, Reform UK – Action on potholes and social housing Gary Neill, originally from Belfast, is the Reform UK candidate for the by-election. He said that potholes would be a focus of his if he became the ward's councillor, continuing: 'Some of the pavements are a disgrace. The roads are absolutely terrible. 'What are [visitors] thinking of a city like Edinburgh, when the council can't even present decent walkways, decent roads for people to drive on.' He also says that he has heard many complaints about crime and housing. On social housing and homelessness, Mr Neill wants to see stronger action from the council, saying: 'It takes anything between two and four years, if you're lucky, to get social housing. 'And the problem is, one, there's not enough. Two, the normal approach is, block book a hotel, block book a bunch of properties from private landlords, block book Airbnbs. 'What's a permanent solution [to homelessness]? Why not use some of the council land and build a prefab village, or a portacabin village? 'One might think, well, that doesn't sound great. But at least if you are allocated a unit, it's yours – you're not moved every six months because the hotel has run out of contract, you're not moved from A to B because of anti-social behaviour.' He's had a wide-ranging background, spending time in the British Army and as a part-time police officer in his younger years before leaving Northern Ireland in 1984 to continue a career in sales, management and project management. Mr Neill, who moved to Edinburgh in 2023, says that his work experience gives him a 'good background' for becoming a councillor. Murray Visentin, SNP – A well-established local face SNP candidate Murray Visentin says that one of the biggest concerns he's heard of in the ward is issues around the Caledonian Brewery redevelopment, in Shandon. While it's not in the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart ward, he says many local residents are concerned about the parking impact the development – which has two parking spaces for almost 170 units – will have. He also says he's heard that potholes are an issue, as well as anti-social behaviour. He said: 'One thing that has been, even in my Asda, is anti-social behaviour from youths not long after Covid. 'People were stuck in the house for a long time, and the kids felt like they could run amok like they could run amok in their houses. 'And then you've got what people always talk about, which is potholes.' Having spent most of his life in the ward, Murray Visentin says he has a strong tie to the community he's looking to represent. He believes he can serve his local community best by running for council, saying: 'My belief is that local politics can make a difference with people more than national politics. 'It can come across as a negative thing sometimes, but local politics, regardless of party, becomes, 'what can your councillor do for you?' 'And because I know an awful lot of people in the ward, they'll have this local personal contact, and I thought that's probably the best thing I could possibly do for my local community.' Mr Visentin works as a manager at Chesser Asda, and says this brings him people and management skills that would make him well-suited for the job. He presently works as a manager in the warehouse, where he's ended up due to his possessing a forklift license, but has worked as a manager in every part of the store. All candidates A full list of candidates is as follows: Bonnie Prince Bob, Independent Derrick Emms, Independent Lukasz Furmaniak, Scottish Libertarian Party Mark Hooley, Scottish COnservative and Unionist Party Richard Crewe Lucas, Scottish Family Party Q Manivannan, Scottish Green Party Kevin Joseph McKay, Scottish Liberal Democrats Catriona Munro, Scottish Labour Party Gary Neill, Reform UK Mark Rowbotham, Independent Murray Visentin, Scottish National Party Steve Cristopher West, Independent Marc Wilkinson, Independent By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds
Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

Mr Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire that took hold on Tuesday on the 12th day of the war, told reporters at a Nato summit that he was not particularly interested in restarting negotiations with Iran, insisting that US strikes had destroyed its nuclear programme. Earlier in the day, an Iranian official questioned whether the United States could be trusted after its weekend attack. President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP) 'We may sign an agreement, I don't know,' Mr Trump said. 'The way I look at it, they fought, the war is done.' Iran has not acknowledged any talks taking place next week, though US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries. A sixth round of negotiations between the US and Iran had been scheduled for earlier this month in Oman but was cancelled when Israel attacked Iran. Earlier, Mr Trump said the ceasefire was going 'very well', and added that Iran was 'not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich'. Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear programme. In a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, its parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog that has monitored the programme for years. Ahead of the vote, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticised the IAEA for having 'refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities' that the United States carried out on Sunday. 'For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend co-operation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear programme will move forward at a faster pace,' Mr Qalibaf told legislators. Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP) IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities. Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the US strikes, and Mr Grossi said his inspectors need to reassess the country's stockpiles. 'We need to return,' he said. 'We need to engage.' French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country was part of the 2015 deal with Iran that restricted its nuclear programme but began unravelling after Mr Trump pulled the US out in his first term, said he hoped Tehran would come back to the table. UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres 'very much hopes' the promised talks will lead to an end to the Israel-Iran conflict, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said. Mr Guterres also hopes the momentum from the Israel-Iran ceasefire will also lead to negotiations to end the conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, Mr Dujarric said. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme was peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged. Workers clear rubble of a damaged building in Tehran, Iran (Vahid Salemi/AP) The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said its assessment was that the US and Israeli strikes have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years'. It did not give evidence to back up its claim. The US strikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, which Mr Trump said 'completely and fully obliterated' the country's nuclear programme. At the Nato summit, when asked about a US intelligence report that found Iran's nuclear programme has been set back only a few months, Mr Trump scoffed and said it would at least take 'years' to rebuild. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei confirmed that the strikes by US B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had caused significant damage. 'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, while refusing to go into detail. Mr Baghaei seemed to suggest Iran might not shut out IAEA inspectors for good, noting that the bill before parliament only talks of suspending work with the agency, not ending it. He also insisted Iran has the right to pursue a nuclear energy programme. A heavily damaged building in a residential area in Beersheba, Israel (Ariel Schalit/AP) 'Iran is determined to preserve that right under any circumstances,' he said. Mr Witkoff said on Fox News late on Tuesday that Israel and the US had achieved their objective of 'the total destruction of the enrichment capacity' in Iran, and Iran's prerequisite for talks – that Israel end its campaign – had been fulfilled. 'The proof is in the pudding,' he said. 'No-one's shooting at each other. It's over.' Mr Grossi said he could not speculate on how bad the damage was but that Iran's nuclear capabilities were well known. 'The technical knowledge is there, and the industrial capacity is there,' he said. 'That no-one can deny, so we need to work together with them.' An Israeli official said the ceasefire agreement with Iran amounted to 'quiet for quiet', with no further understandings about Iran's nuclear programme going ahead. In the Fox News interview, Mr Witkoff said Mr Trump is now looking to land 'a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire'. 'We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors,' Mr Witkoff said, adding that the conversations were promising and 'we're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement'. However, Mr Baghaei said Washington had 'torpedoed diplomacy' with its attacks on nuclear sites, and that while Iran in principle was always open to talks, national security was the priority. 'We have to make sure whether the other parties are really serious when they're talking about diplomacy, or is it again part of their tactics to make more problems for the region and for my country,' he said. China, a close Iranian partner and major buyer of Iranian oil, said it hoped a 'lasting and effective ceasefire can be achieved so as to promote' peace and stability in the region. China has blamed Israel for starting the war and destabilising the region. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters that China is willing to 'inject positive factors to safeguard peace and stability in the Middle East'. Mr Grossi said Iran and the international community should seize the opportunity of the ceasefire for a long-term diplomatic solution. 'Out of the … bad things that military conflict brings, there's also now a possibility, an opening,' he said. 'We shouldn't miss that opportunity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store