Authorities prevent $149,000 loss in impersonation scam targeting 55-year-old woman
The ruse began with a phone call in May 2025 claiming that her credit card had been misused.
The caller, who identified himself as a bank officer, alleged that the woman's credit card had been used for unauthorised purchases in China, the police said in a news release on Tuesday (10 June).
When she denied making any such transactions, the call was transferred to another scammer pretending to be a police officer.
The fake officer told her she was under investigation for money laundering and threatened her with 60 days' detention if she did not cooperate.
Fearing arrest, she followed their instructions and, on 24 May 2025, transferred more than $49,000 to a MariBank account.
The scammers falsely assured her that the transfer would not affect her account balance.
MariBank, a digital bank owned by Sea Limited, flagged the transaction as suspicious through its monitoring system and immediately alerted the Anti-Scam Centre (ASC).
ASC officers quickly intervened, engaged with the victim, and successfully convinced her that she had been targeted by scammers.
Swift action by ASC and MariBank led to the recovery of $49,000 and prevented further potential losses of about $100,000.
The police urged the public to stay vigilant and adopt precautionary measures, such as enabling international call blocking on mobile devices, activating two-factor or multifactor authentication for online accounts, and using the 'Money Lock' feature on bank accounts to safeguard savings.
Members of the public are also encouraged to verify suspicious claims with official sources, such as the ScamShield Helpline at 1799 or the website www.scamshield.gov.sg.
Personal details—including SingPass credentials, CPF information, internet banking details, and One-Time Passwords (OTPs)—should never be disclosed to unknown parties.
Individuals should also closely monitor transaction alerts sent by their banks.
Anyone who suspects they have fallen victim to a scam should contact their bank immediately to block unauthorised transactions and make a police report.
Suspicious accounts or chat groups should also be reported to the authorities.
According to the Singapore Police Force's Annual Scams and Cybercrime Brief 2024, there were 1,504 reported cases of government official impersonation scams last year, resulting in at least S$151.3 million in losses.
Victims aged between 50 and 64 formed the largest group, accounting for 28.6 per cent of cases. Scammers primarily contacted victims via phone calls and WhatsApp messages.
For more information or assistance, members of the public can visit www.scamshield.gov.sg or call the ScamShield Helpline at 1799.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 days ago
- Straits Times
With just 1 tap, this doctor lost his Telegram account to cyber criminals
In a poll by the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore, only 13 per cent of respondents were able to distinguish between all phishing and legitimate content In 2024, there were 8,552 cases of phishing scams in Singapore in 2024, placing it among the top five scam types. Minutes after Dr Chai Chwan tapped on a link within a Telegram message from an acquaintance, his phone buzzed non-stop. A flood of Telegram messages poured in from 10 friends, asking the 60-year-old general practitioner the same urgent question: 'Is your Telegram account hacked?' They had all received an identical Telegram message sent from Dr Chai's phone number. It contained a link inviting recipients to apply for We Care @ North East Fund, a genuine scheme by the North East CDC that provides financial support to needy families. The text claimed there was a 'limited time' offer for Singaporeans to receive up to $1,000 in cash assistance and urged recipients not to 'miss out'. That was when Dr Chai realised he had fallen prey to a phishing scam. His Telegram account was compromised. In phishing scams, victims are tricked into clicking malicious links or into revealing personal information. The scam happened on a Saturday afternoon in July this year. Just 10 minutes earlier, Dr Chai had received the same link from an acquaintance. Without thinking, he tapped on it. The page that opened mimicked a Singpass login. Dr Chai tapped the QR code, but an error message appeared. This glitch saved him from handing over his personal data, but it didn't stop scammers from hijacking his Telegram account. Within minutes, the same scam message was sent to Dr Chai's Telegram contacts, this time under his name. What followed was a scramble to report the incident to both the police and Telegram. Dr Chai also spent the next few hours sending warning messages in batches to all 7,000 of his phone contacts, hoping to contain the damage. He's unsure how many of his friends received the phishing text on Telegram. 'I feel quite embarrassed,' Dr Chai admits. 'It should have been common sense (not to click on the link).' With scams becoming more sophisticated, it can be hard to spot phishing attempts, says Mr Luke Ho, deputy director of National Cyber Threat Analysis Centre of the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA). In the CSA's Cybersecurity Awareness Survey 2024, only 13 per cent of respondents were able to distinguish between all phishing and legitimate content. The survey polled 1,050 respondents aged 15 years and above on their attitudes towards cyber incidents and their awareness and adoption of good cyber hygiene practices. Phishing scams 101 There were 8,552 cases of phishing scams in Singapore in 2024, placing it among the top five scam types, say the police. Victims lost at least $59.4 million. How it works: Scammers impersonate legitimate individuals or organisations on social media and messaging platforms. Upon clicking on links embedded within messages on these platforms, victims are directed to a fraudulent site. They will be asked to key in their personal, bank login or credit card details. Scammers then gain access to their messaging or bank accounts. They may even impersonate the victims to scam their circle of acquaintances, family members and friends. Evolving tactics Why is it becoming harder to spot phishing scams? One reason is the use of generative artificial intelligence by scammers, says Mr Ho. 'Scammers (can) now create content that is increasingly indistinguishable from legitimate ones.' Gone are the days when poor grammar or awkward phrasing gave phishing messages away, he adds. Cyber criminals also increasingly use security certificates – depicted as 'https' in the URL – in their fake websites. Mr Ho adds that scammers often exploit emotions, such as the fear of missing out, or the false sense of urgency in Dr Chai's situation. Such tactics pressure victims to respond quickly without checking the legitimacy of the messages. Taking action Staying safe from scams requires more than just awareness, says Mr Ho. It requires a change in how we behave online. He shares some actions that one can take to protect against scams: Set strong passwords and enable two-factor authentication – such as using biometric features, like fingerprint or facial recognition, for your online accounts Ensure that your devices are running the latest version of its software by enabling automatic updates Install the ScamShield app to filter out scam messages and block scam calls Install anti-virus apps to detect and remove malware, and malicious phishing links If you're unsure whether something is a scam, 'always check with official sources by calling the 24/7 ScamShield helpline at 1799,' Mr Ho says, 'or with family members and friends before proceeding.' For Dr Chai, the anxiety from the phishing scam has not fully gone away. 'There's always this discomfort,' he shares, from the fear that scammers still have personal information of his that they haven't used. And though his bank accounts remain secure, Dr Chai has since taken extra steps to protect himself. He downloaded the ScamShield app that helps to block out reported scam numbers and messages, giving him some peace of mind.
Independent Singapore
5 days ago
- Independent Singapore
5 months, 10 weeks jail for 34 yo woman who faked documents to withdraw from CPF account
SINGAPORE: A woman who handed in documents with a forged doctor's signature as well as other falsehoods in order to withdraw money from her Central Provident Fund (CPF) account received a sentence of five months and 10 weeks of jail time earlier this week. Thirty-four-year-old Nasuha Zakaria, who had previously claimed in the documents she submitted to the authorities that she was suffering from a respiratory illness, pleaded guilty on Tuesday (Aug 12) to one count of forgery and two counts of theft. She faced a total of seven charges in all. The other charges were taken into consideration by the judge for her sentencing. In January 2021, Nasuha submitted two documents to the CPF Board, applying under a scheme that would have allowed her to withdraw $5,000 or even more. The first was supposedly issued by the Singapore General Hospital. It was a memo that said she had a respiratory disease. The second was also a memo that purportedly came from another doctor from the hospital, certifying that she was suffering from the disease. Nasuha had handed in these documents as proof that she needed money for medical reasons, as she hoped to withdraw money from her CPF account, according to a report in Lianhe Zaobao. When her documents were being verified, irregularities were found by the CPF Board, specifically in the part that contained the doctor's signature. When the staff of the CPF Board reached out to Singapore General Hospital to confirm the authenticity of the documents, they were told by the hospital that no doctor had signed them. Upon being questioned, Nasuha admitted to having forged the signatures on the documents, as she wanted to expedite the process to hasten the withdrawal from her CPF account. It was noted by the prosecution that while no money had been stolen from the CPF Board, actions such as those committed by Zakaria threatened its responsibility to safeguard members' long-term financial security, and therefore recommended a strong deterrent. 'CPF is a government body and this is a situation where the public confidence is at stake,' said Deputy Public Prosecutor Nivethaa Ravintharan. Other news reports pointed out that Nasuha committed theft twice in January. In the first incident, she entered an unlocked office and stole an iPad and two laptops, with a total value of S$4,500. One of the stolen items was later found through an iPhone tracking app, which indicated that it could be found at Nasuha's home address. In the second incident, she took advantage of a store in Lorong 11 Geylang, taking $800 cash and a mobile phone from a counter when it was unattended. She was also previously penalised for another theft and abetment of cheating. /TISG Read also: SCAM check: All calls from CPF Board now come from only one number: 6227 1188
AsiaOne
6 days ago
- AsiaOne
Jail for woman who forged medical documents in bid to quickly withdraw her CPF funds, Singapore News
SINGAPORE — In a ploy to withdraw money from her Central Provident Fund (CPF) account before the permitted age of 55, a woman forged two medical documents claiming she had a respiratory illness. Although the CPF Board (CPFB) saw through the ruse and did not disburse any funds to her, the prosecution said Nasuha Zakaria's crime constituted serious mischief. On Aug 12, the 34-year-old was sentenced to five months and 10 weeks' jail after she pleaded guilty to one forgery charge and two unrelated charges of theft. Four other charges of theft, forgery and fraudulently possessing property were taken into consideration during sentencing. Deputy Public Prosecutor Nivethaa Ravintharan said the scheme Nasuha tried to exploit was intended for individuals with a reduced life expectancy, those who are permanently unfit for work or those lacking mental capacity. The prosecutor added: "CPF is a government body and this is a situation where the public confidence is at stake." The court heard that in 2021, the CPFB received two medical certification forms from Nasuha. The forms were purportedly issued by doctors from the Singapore General Hospital and certified that Nasuha suffered from a respiratory illness. When verifying the authenticity of these documents, CPFB discovered the signatures on the doctor's columns did not seem legitimate. CPFB wrote to SGH, which replied that none of their doctors had signed on the two documents. It was then that Nasuha admitted she had signed the documents herself as she wanted to quickly withdraw funds from her CPF account. According to CPF's website, successful applicants under the scheme may withdraw $5,000 or more. DPP Nivethaa said: "While there was no monetary loss on the part of CPF, such attempts should be strongly deterred as it endangers CPF's primary interest in ensuring the long-term financial security of individuals." Separately, Nasuha committed two theft offences in January. On Jan 7, she entered an unlocked office in a commercial building in Changi Road when its staff had left for lunch and stole two laptops and an iPad amounting to about $4,500. Using the "Find my iPhone" app, a staff member found that one of the items was at Nasuha's residential address. She was subsequently arrested. But she struck again on Jan 25, this time stealing a mobile phone and $800 cash from a store in Lorong 11 Geylang when the store owner was not at the counter. The owner saw the taxi she fled in and reported it to the police. She was arrested but the stolen items were not recovered. The court heard that Nasuha was previously fined for theft and jailed for abetment of cheating. Victoria Tay from the Public Defender's Office said her client, who is married with a daughter, has plans to continue her studies and find proper employment moving forward. "This is going to be the end of her criminal behaviour. She is committed to changing her ways," said Tay. [[nid:719899]] This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.
