FBI Says Americans Lost $9.3B to Crypto Scams in 2024
The annual IC3 report says nearly 150,000 complaints linked to crypto, with investment fraud leading the way. In these schemes, scammers often pretend to offer high returns on fake cryptocurrency platforms, coaxing victims to transfer funds that are then siphoned away.
The FBI also spotlighted 'pig butchering' scams, where fraudsters build online relationships before pushing fake crypto investments. Crypto investment schemes led to $5.8 billion in losses, while the second-largest category by losses at $1.1 billion were data breaches.
Elderly Americans bore the brunt of the damage. Individuals over 60 reported $2.8 billion in losses through crypto-related crimes—more than any other age group— up from $1.65 billion in 2023 and $1.08 billion in 2022.
The second-most affected age group, those aged 40-49, suffered $1.4 billion in losses, while those under the age of 40 suffered combined losses of around $1.37 billion.
Over 8,000 of the complaints stemmed from people over 60 and related to fake investment opportunities, while others fell victim to tech support fraud and impersonation schemes, often involving cryptocurrency ATMs.
Operation Level Up, a government initiative launched in January 2024, identified thousands of victims of crypto investment fraud and prevented an estimated $285 million in further losses, per the report. It referred 42 victims for suicide intervention.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
41 minutes ago
- CNBC
FBI Director Patel and foundation win defamation lawsuit against blogger, awarded $250,000
FBI Director Kash Patel and his foundation won a default judgment in their defamation lawsuit against a blogger who publicly accused Patel of being a "Kremlin asset," of trying to overthrow the U.S. government, and of planning the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump. Patel and the Kash Foundation were awarded a total of $250,000 in compensatory and punitive damages against the Substack blogger and podcaster Jim Stewartson in an order on Aug. 5 by Judge Andrew Gordon in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas. The order was first reported by the online news site Court Watch. Gordon issued the default judgment favor of the longtime Trump loyalist Patel after Stewartson did not respond in court filings to the lawsuit, which cited a series of social media posts and other comments by Stewartson. Patel had sought $10 million in damages on claims of defamation, injurious falsehood and business disparagement. The judge said punitive damages were warranted in the case "in part to deter Stewartson and others from engaging in defamation." "Factual criticism of, and opinions about, public figures are protected speech and must be tolerated," Gordon wrote. "But defamatory falsehoods made with actual malice are not protected, even if directed at public officials. "The complaint and the motion adequately demonstrate Stewartson acted with malice." Stewartson told CNBC in a text message on Friday, "I was never served with this lawsuit. I just found out about the judgement from trolls on Twitter last week." He said that Patel's lawsuit, and another pending defamation complaint against him by former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn in Florida state court, are "intended to intimidate me because I have been accurately and diligently reporting on Patel and Flynn's involvement in the QAnon movement and their participation on January 6th for five years." "It is a preposterous, frivolous lawsuit and neither of them will receive a dime," Stewartson said. "In fact, I intend to pursue my own case against them for their years-long campaign of abuse of me and the legal system." The FBI said that Patel would have no comment on the decision. CNBC has requested comment from his lawyers. Patel's attorneys said in a court filing in March that after filing the suit in June 2023, Stewartson for months "dodged" accepting service of the complaint, which, as a rule, is required for a civil case to proceed. The attorneys said they finally completed service of the lawsuit in late October 2023, when a person at Stewartson's home in California accepted a copy of the complaint. Gordon wrote in his order that he "found good cause to grant" a request for the default from Patel's lawyers. But Gordon also said that the motion by Patel's lawyers "offers scant evidence of harm or damages to either plaintiff." He noted that an expert's report "states that Mr. Patel's 'image has been deeply hurt by the defamation accusing him of working against the government, corruption, and crime. Apart from the business already lost, this impacts future opportunities and relationships.'" "But the report offers no examples of 'business already lost' and how Mr. Patel's image was hurt by the defamatory statements themselves, as opposed to the myriad non-defamatory attacks Mr. Patel has suffered as a result of being a public figure," Gordon wrote. "To the contrary, after the defamatory statements, Mr. Patel was confirmed by the United States Senate as Director of the F.B.I." the judge wrote. "Clearly his reputation was not significantly sullied by the defamatory statements." Gordon said there was "almost no concrete evidence of harm or damages suffered by" Patel's foundation. "All of the defamatory statements were directed at Mr. Patel individually," the judge noted. But Gordon said that both compensatory and punitive damages were warranted in the case. "Stewartson's statements were defamatory and caused presumed damages," the judge wrote. "Falsely stating as fact that a public figure 'attempted to overthrow the government,' planned the January 6 insurrection, was a 'Kremlin asset,' and paid people to 'lie to [C]ongress' ... inflicts real injuries, personally and professionally," the judge wrote. The judge awarded Patel $100,000 in compensatory damages and the same amount in punitive damages. He awarded the foundation $25,000 in compensatory damages, and the same amount in punitive damages after accepting as a reasonable estimate a claim that at least seven donors had stopped giving to the group.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Noem temporarily relocated to military housing after ‘vicious doxxing' and death threats, DHS says
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem temporarily relocated her personal residence as she's facing an increase in threats against her and 'vicious doxxing,' a department spokesperson told Fox News Digital on Friday. 'Following the media's publishing of the location of Secretary Noem's Washington D.C. apartment, she has faced vicious doxxing on the dark web and a surge in death threats, including from the terrorist organizations, cartels, and criminal gangs that DHS targets. Advertisement Due to threats and security concerns, she has been forced to temporarily stay in secure military housing,' Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. 'Secretary Noem continues to pay rent for her Navy Yard residence. 'It's a shame that the media chooses sensationalism over the safety of people enforcing America's laws to keep Americans safe,' McLaughlin added. Noem said last week that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents 'are now facing a 1000% increase in assaults against them as they risk their lives to arrest the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.' 3 Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has temporarily left her personal residence after 'vicious doxxing.' U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem speaks during a tour of the Terrorist Confinement Center (CECOT) on March 26 in Tecoluca, El Salvador. Getty Images 3 'Due to threats and security concerns, she has been forced to temporarily stay in secure military housing,' Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. AP 'We will not and have not let this violence stop us or slow us down. Everyday our law enforcement continues to enforce the law and arrest the most depraved criminals including pedophiles, terrorists, murderers, gang members, and sexual predators,' she added in a post on X. Advertisement In July, Fox News Digital reported that ICE officials faced an 830% increase in assaults between Jan. 21, 2025 and July 14, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. That timeframe began the day after President Donald Trump returned to the Oval Office.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal grand jury indicts New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell after long corruption probe
New Orleans Mayor Federal Charges NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal grand jury indicted New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell on Friday after a long corruption investigation. Cantrell's lawyer, Eddie Castaing, confirmed to The Associated Press that an indictment was returned, and her name was read aloud by a federal magistrate judge as a defendant. The charges weren't immediately known, though the FBI and U.S. attorney scheduled an afternoon news conference. The mayor's office didn't immediately respond to a phone message or email from The Associated Press seeking comment. The indictment is the culmination of a long-running federal investigation into the first female mayor in the city's 300-year history. Cantrell, who is term-limited, will leave office in January. The Democrat has clashed with City Council members during a turbulent second term and survived a recall effort in 2022. 'This is a sad day for the people of New Orleans,' said Monet Brignac, a spokesperson for City Council President JP Morrell. 'Our thoughts and prayers are with the Cantrell family as they navigate through this difficult time.' Cantrell hasn't sent out a message on her official feed on X, formerly known as Twitter, since July 15, when she said the city was experiencing historic declines in crime. As she heads into her final months in office, Cantrell has alienated former confidants and supporters, and her civic profile has receded. Her early achievements were eclipsed by self-inflicted wounds and bitter feuds with a hostile city council, political observers say. The mayor's role has weakened following voter-approved changes to the city's charter meant to curb her authority. Cantrell and her remaining allies allege that she's been unfairly targeted as Black woman and held to a different standard than male officials, her executive powers sabotaged. Earlier this year, Cantrell said she's faced 'very disrespectful, insulting, in some cases kind of unimaginable' treatment. —- Hollingsworth reported from Mission, Kansas. Solve the daily Crossword
