SpecFive Launches Trace: Subscription-Free GPS Tracker for Response Teams and K9 Operators
'With Trace, we offer affordable, reliable GPS tracking for professionals, outdoor adventurers, ranchers and dog owners who need to operate beyond the reach of traditional networks' — Amir Husain, Chairman of SpecFive.
AUSTIN, TX, UNITED STATES, March 3, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- SpecFive today announced the launch of Trace, a rugged, GPS tracking device designed for both team coordination and dog tracking. Leveraging LoRa mesh radio technology, Trace delivers reliable tracking without relying on cellular networks—ensuring seamless connectivity over miles, in even the most remote environments.
Key Features of the S5 Trace
Real-Time GPS Tracking: Updates location every 30 seconds with an accuracy of 20–40 feet depending on GPS lock.
LoRa Mesh Network Advantage: Operates independently of cellular service, ensuring coverage even in remote locations.
No dead zones: Can functions in mountainous terrain, dense forests, and off-grid areas.
Scalable coverage: Each device in the network acts as a relay, extending range and reliability. Optional SpecFive Relays can be added to your environment to extend tracking range significantly.
-No monthly fees: A one-time purchase with no hidden costs.
-Enhanced privacy: No reliance on third-party networks, no 'middle man,' and no Big Tech eavesdropping.
-Durable & Weatherproof: Built to withstand rain, mud, and rugged outdoor conditions.
-Long-Lasting Battery Life: 8–10 hours of operation on a single charge.
Multiple Mounting Options:
-Dog Collar Mount: Designed for canine tracking, supporting up to 30mm-wide collars.
-MOLLE Mount: Ideal for tactical and field applications.
Designed for Critical Applications
The S5 Trace is built to support professionals and outdoor enthusiasts who require dependable tracking solutions. Its advanced mesh networking capabilities make it the ideal choice for:
-Search and rescue teams
-Outdoor adventurers
-Hunting and field trials
-Ranchers
-Canine training and tracking
-Coordinating and tracking assets in remote locations
Availability
The S5 Trace is available for purchase immediately in several bundles:
-A single Trace device for dog collar
-A single Trace device for MOLLE mount
-SpecFive Trace + Trekker Bravo Companion Device to act as a receiver
-Accessories: 18-inch tactical green or red dog collar, MOLLE attachment strap
Niesha Waggonner
SpecFive
+1 512-663-0688
X
LinkedIn
Instagram
YouTube
Legal Disclaimer:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
24 minutes ago
Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump's trade war
After stumbling out of the starting gate in Big Tech's pivotal race to capitalize on artificial intelligence, Apple will try to regain its footing Monday at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference. The presummer rite, which attracts thousands of developers to Apple's Silicon Valley headquarters, is expected to be more subdued than the feverish anticipation that surrounded the event during the previous two years. In 2023, Apple unveiled a mixed-reality headset that has been little more than a niche product, and last year WWDC trumpeted its first major foray into the AI craze with an array of new features highlighted by the promise of a smarter and more versatile version of its virtual assistant, Siri. But heading into this year's showcase, Apple faces nagging questions about whether the nearly 50-year-old company has lost some of the mystique and innovative drive that turned it into a tech trendsetter. Instead of making a big splash as it did with the Vision Pro headset, Apple this year is expected to focus on an overhaul of its software that may include a new, more tactile look for the iPhone's native apps and a new nomenclature for identifying its operating system updates. Even though it might look like Apple is becoming a technological laggard, Forrester Research analyst Thomas Husson contends the company still has ample time to catch up in an AI race that's 'more of a marathon, than a sprint. It will force Apple to evolve its operating systems.' If reports about its iOS naming scheme pan out, Apple will switch to a method that automakers have used to telegraph their latest car models by linking them to the year after they first arrive at dealerships. That would mean the next version of the iPhone operating system due out this autumn will be known as iOS 26 instead of iOS 19 — as it would be under the current sequential naming approach. Whatever it's named, the next iOS will likely be released as a free update in September, around the same time as the next iPhone models if Apple follows its usual road map. Meanwhile, Apple's references to AI may be less frequent than last year when the technology was the main attraction. While some of the new AI tricks compatible with the latest iPhones began rolling out late last year as part of free software updates, Apple still hasn't been able to soup up Siri in the ways that it touted at last year's conference. The delays became so glaring that a chastened Apple retreated from promoting Siri in its AI marketing campaigns earlier this year. 'It's just taking a bit longer than we thought,' Apple CEO Tim Cook told analysts last month when asked about the company's headaches with Siri. 'But we are making progress, and we're extremely excited to get the more personal Siri features out there.' While Apple has been struggling to make AI that meets its standards, the gap separating it from other tech powerhouses is widening. Google keeps packing more AI into its Pixel smartphone lineup while introducing more of the technology into its search engine to dramatically change the way it works. Samsung, Apple's biggest smartphone rival, is also leaning heavily into AI. Meanwhile, ChatGPT recently struck a deal that will bring former Apple design guru Jony Ive into the fold to work on a new device expected to compete against the iPhone. 'While much of WWDC will be about what the next great thing is for the iPhone, the unspoken question is: What's the next great thing after the iPhone?' said Dipanjan Chatterjee, another analyst for Forrester Research. Besides facing innovation challenges, Apple also faces regulatory threats that could siphon away billions of dollars in revenue that help finance its research and development. A federal judge is currently weighing whether proposed countermeasures to Google's illegal monopoly in search should include a ban on long-running deals worth $20 billion annually to Apple while another federal judge recently banned the company from collecting commission on in-app transactions processed outside its once-exclusive payment system. On top of all that, Apple has been caught in the cross-hairs of President Donald Trump's trade war with China, a key manufacturing hub for the Cupertino, California, company. Cook successfully persuaded Trump to exempt the iPhone from tariffs during the president's first administration, but he has had less success during Trump's second term, which seems more determined to prod Apple to make its products in the U.S.. 'The trade war and uncertainty linked to the tariff policy is of much more concern today for Apple's business than the perception that Apple is lagging behind on AI innovation,' Husson said. The multi-dimensional gauntlet facing Apple is spooking investors, causing the company's stock price to plunge by nearly 20% so far this year — a decline that has erased $750 billion in shareholder wealth. After beginning the year as the most valuable company in the world, Apple now ranks third behind longtime rival Microsoft, another AI leader, and AI chipmaker Nvidia.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump's trade war
CUP — After stumbling out of the starting gate in Big Tech's pivotal race to capitalize on artificial intelligence, Apple will try to regain its footing Monday at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference. The pre-summer rite, which attracts thousands of developers to Apple's Silicon Valley headquarters, is expected to be more subdued than the feverish anticipation that surrounded the event during the previous two years.
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
Why We Need Global Prosocial AI Governance — Now
Abstract image of a person's profile symbolically composed of dials of different sizes. Concept man, ... More time, space The artificial intelligence revolution isn't coming — it's here. But unlike previous technological waves, AI's transformative power is being concentrated in the hands of remarkably few players, creating global imbalances that threaten to entrench existing inequalities for generations. As AI systems increasingly shape our economies, societies, and daily lives, we face a critical choice: Will we allow narrow market forces and geopolitical power dynamics to dictate AI's development, or will we proactively steer this technology toward benefiting humanity as a whole? It is late to set the stage for global prosocial AI governance, but it is not too late – yet. Before examining governance frameworks, we must confront an uncomfortable truth: the AI revolution is built on a foundation of extreme market concentration that makes Big Tech's dominance look almost quaint by comparison. Nvidia controls approximately 80 percent of revenues and shipments for datacenter GPU computing, the essential infrastructure powering modern AI systems. This isn't just market leadership — it's approaching technological hegemony. The implications extend far beyond corporate balance sheets. Collectively, the global south is home to just over 1 percent of the world's top computers, and Africa just 0.04 percent. Meanwhile, the U.S. government further restricts AI chip and technology exports, dividing up the world to keep advanced computing power in the United States and among its allies. This creates what development economists call a digital colonialism scenario — entire regions become structurally dependent on technology controlled by a handful of corporations and governments. The concentration isn't limited to hardware. Three cloud providers — Amazon, Microsoft, and Google — control over 65% of global cloud infrastructure, creating additional bottlenecks for AI access. When you need specialized chips from one company, hosted on infrastructure controlled by three others, and governed by regulations written primarily in wealthy nations, the barriers to entry become virtually insurmountable for most of the world's population. This hardware concentration translates into stark global inequalities that dwarf previous technological divides. The economic and social benefits of AI remain geographically concentrated, primarily in the Global North. But unlike the gradual rollout of previous technologies like the internet or mobile phones, AI's infrastructure requirements create immediate exclusion rather than delayed adoption. Consider the practical reality: training a state-of-the-art AI model requires computational resources that cost millions of dollars and consume as much electricity as entire cities. The rise of AI could exacerbate both within-country and between-country inequality, placing upward pressure on global inequality as high-income individuals and regions benefit disproportionately while resource-poor regions risk being left behind. This creates a vicious cycle. Countries and regions without access to AI infrastructure become less competitive economically, reducing their ability to invest in the very infrastructure they need to participate in the AI economy. Meanwhile, AI-enabled automation threatens to disrupt traditional export industries that many developing economies rely on, from manufacturing to service outsourcing. The result is what economists call premature deindustrialization — developing countries losing industrial competitiveness before achieving full industrialization. But now it's happening at digital speed, compressed from decades into years. Yet maybe the fundamental challenge with AI isn't the technology itself — it's the intention behind its development and deployment, now amplified by a sharpened concentration of control. Today's AI systems are predominantly designed to maximize engagement, extract value, or optimize narrow business metrics determined by a small number of actors. Social media algorithms amplify divisive content because controversy drives clicks. Hiring algorithms perpetuate bias because they're trained on historical data that reflects past discrimination. Financial AI systems may optimize for short-term profits while creating systemic risks. This is where prosocial AI governance becomes essential. Unlike traditional regulatory approaches that focus on constraining harmful outcomes, prosocial AI governance aims to actively incentivize beneficial behaviors from the outset. ProSocial AI can enhance access to essential services, improve efficiency in resource use, and promote sustainable practices across all levels of society — but only if we design governance systems that prioritize broad-based benefits over narrow optimization. The global AI regulation landscape is fragmented and rapidly evolving. Earlier optimism that global policymakers would enhance cooperation and interoperability within the regulatory landscape now seems distant. The European Union has pioneered comprehensive AI regulation through its AI Act, while other jurisdictions take vastly different approaches — from the United States' innovation-first philosophy to China's state-directed development model. This fragmentation creates several problems. First, it allows AI developers to engage in regulatory arbitrage, developing systems in jurisdictions with the most permissive rules. Second, it prevents the emergence of global standards that could ensure AI systems operate prosocially across borders. Third, it creates competitive disadvantages for companies that voluntarily adopt higher ethical standards. Given the borderless nature of this issue, an internationally coordinated response is necessary. AI systems don't respect national boundaries — a biased hiring algorithm developed in one country can perpetuate discrimination globally, while misinformation generated by AI can destabilize societies worldwide. Traditional regulatory approaches tend to prove inadequate for rapidly evolving technologies. By the time regulators identify and respond to harms, the damage has already been done. Prosocial AI governance offers a different approach: building beneficial outcomes into the DNA of AI systems from the beginning. This means designing AI systems that actively promote human flourishing rather than merely avoiding harm. Instead of social media algorithms that maximize engagement at all costs, we need systems that promote constructive dialogue and community building. Rather than AI systems that automate away human jobs without consideration for displaced workers, we need technologies that augment human capabilities and create new opportunities for meaningful work. Companies with strong environmental, social, and governance frameworks, enhanced by AI, outperform competitors financially and foster greater brand loyalty. This suggests that prosocial AI isn't just morally imperative — it's also economically advantageous for businesses that adopt it early. Forward-thinking business leaders are beginning to recognize that prosocial AI governance isn't a constraint on innovation—it's a competitive advantage. Organizations that proactively embed prosocial values into their AI systems build stronger relationships with customers, employees, and communities. They reduce regulatory risk, attract top talent who want to work on meaningful problems, and position themselves as leaders in an increasingly values-driven marketplace. Moreover, prosocial AI often leads to better technical outcomes. Systems designed with diverse stakeholders in mind tend to be more robust, adaptable, and effective across different contexts. AI systems built with fairness and transparency as core requirements often discover innovative solutions that benefit everyone. The economic argument becomes even stronger when considering systemic risks. AI systems that prioritize narrow optimization over broader social welfare can create negative externalities that ultimately harm the very markets they operate in. Financial AI that ignores systemic risk can contribute to market crashes. Recommendation systems that polarize societies can undermine the social cohesion that stable markets depend on. Establishing global prosocial AI governance requires coordinated action across multiple levels. International bodies need to develop frameworks that incentivize prosocial AI development while allowing for innovation and adaptation to local contexts. These frameworks should focus on outcomes rather than specific technologies, creating space for diverse approaches while ensuring consistent prosocial objectives. At the organizational level, companies need to move beyond compliance-based approaches to AI ethics. This means embedding prosocial considerations into product development processes, establishing clear accountability mechanisms, and investing in the technical infrastructure needed to build genuinely beneficial AI systems. Technical standards organizations should develop metrics and evaluation frameworks that measure prosocial outcomes, not just traditional performance metrics. We need ways to assess whether AI systems actually promote human flourishing, environmental sustainability, and social cohesion. The urgency cannot be overstated. As AI systems become more powerful and pervasive, the window for establishing prosocial governance frameworks is rapidly closing. Once entrenched systems and business models become established, changing them becomes exponentially more difficult and expensive. We're at a pivotal moment where the next generation of AI systems will be designed and deployed. The decisions we make now about how to govern these systems will shape society for decades to come. We can either allow narrow economic interests to drive AI development, or we can proactively steer this technology toward broadly beneficial outcomes. The challenge of prosocial AI governance isn't someone else's problem — it's a defining challenge of our time that requires leadership from every sector of society. Business leaders, policymakers, technologists, civil society organizations and ultimately each of us have roles in the AI-infused play that society has become. Prosocial AI governance isn't a constraint on innovation — it's the foundation for sustainable technological progress that benefits everyone. The time to act is now, before today's AI solutions become tomorrow's entrenched problems.
