logo
Israel used 230 kg bomb in Gaza café strike killing 24; experts say may constitute war crime

Israel used 230 kg bomb in Gaza café strike killing 24; experts say may constitute war crime

First Post10 hours ago
The use of heavy munition in an area known to be filled with unprotected civilians, including children, women, and the elderly, was likely unlawful and could amount to a war crime, according to report, citing experts read more
Palestinians check an area of a cafe that was damaged in an Israeli strike in Gaza City on Monday. AP
The Israeli military used a 500lb (230kg) bomb, a powerful and wide-impact weapon, in a strike on a crowded beachfront café in Gaza on Monday, according to The Guardian report, citing evidence reviewed by news outlet.
The use of such munition in an area known to be filled with unprotected civilians, including children, women, and the elderly, was likely unlawful and could amount to a war crime, added the report, citing international law experts.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to the report, ordnance experts have identified weapon fragments found in the ruins of al-Baqa café as parts of a US-made MK-82 general-purpose 230kg bomb, commonly used in airstrikes over recent decades.
The large crater at the scene further supports the use of a powerful bomb like the MK-82, added the report, citing two ordnance specialists.
An Israel Defence Forces (IDF) spokesperson said the strike is under review, adding that 'steps were taken to mitigate the risk of harming civilians using aerial surveillance' prior to the attack.
The cafe strike killed 24 to 36 Palestinians, with dozens injured, according to medical and other officials.
The dead included a prominent filmmaker, an artist, a 35-year-old housewife, and a four-year-old child. Among the wounded were a 14-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl.
Under international law, attacks causing civilian deaths must not be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage. While interpretation varies, experts say only a target of major strategic value could justify such high civilian casualties, reported The Guardian.
The café had two levels — an open upper deck and a lower floor with large beach-facing windows — and was in a location clearly visible from the air.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The Israeli military hasn't said exactly whom it was targeting but it said it used aerial surveillance to minimise civilian casualties, which means it knew the cafe was teeming with customers at the time," The Guardian quoted Gerry Simpson, of Human Rights Watch, as saying.
'The military would also have known that using a large guided air-dropped bomb would kill and maim many of the civilians there. The use of such a large weapon in an obviously crowded cafe risks that this was an unlawful disproportionate or indiscriminate attack and should be investigated as a war crime,' Simpson added.
Dr Andrew Forde, an assistant professor of human rights law at Dublin City University, said the strike was shocking.
'When you see a situation where there are heavy munitions being used, particularly [in a] crowded civilian space, even with the best targeting in the world … that will necessarily create an indiscriminate outcome that is not in compliance with … the Geneva conventions,' he told The Guardian.
Founded nearly 40 years ago, the family-run al-Baqa café was a popular spot for young people and families in Gaza City.
Despite widespread malnutrition and looming famine in Gaza, some residents with savings or salaries still frequent the few cafés that remain open.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Al-Baqa was located in Gaza's port area, which was not covered by any Israeli evacuation orders ahead of the strike.
Israel has access to a wide range of munitions and has often used smaller, precision-guided weapons in targeted strikes across Gaza, Lebanon, and more recently Iran.
In a prior statement, the IDF said that even the most sophisticated measures employed to assess civilian harm were hardly ever perfect and that its choice of munitions was 'a professional matter contingent on the nature of the strike's objective'.
'While some targets are suitable for smaller payloads, others may require heavier munitions to achieve mission success – for example, when intending to destroy structures that are built with certain hard materials, large structures, or underground tunnel,' the statement read.
On Tuesday, an Israeli government spokesperson said the IDF 'never, ever targets civilians.'
Israel has repeatedly accused Hamas of using civilians as human shields — a claim Hamas denies.
With inputs from agencies
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

Economic Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

AP Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal is back in news. Mount Rushmore with the four presidents' faces is the center of new political debate over potential expansion. Then-President Donald Trump stands at Mount Rushmore National Memorial on July 3, 2020, near Keystone, S.D. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts. Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history. Also Read: Big Beautiful Bill Passed: What's in Trump's megabill and when will it go into effect? These Republicans voted against it The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response. In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage. Also Read: Michael Madsen Net Worth: Actor's cause of death, financial success, movies list, iconic roles and career Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on. What are the main reasons experts oppose adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe. Has anyone else supported adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.

Hamas seeks war-end promise as US-led Gaza ceasefire talks advance
Hamas seeks war-end promise as US-led Gaza ceasefire talks advance

India Today

time41 minutes ago

  • India Today

Hamas seeks war-end promise as US-led Gaza ceasefire talks advance

As ceasefire negotiations intensify, Hamas is demanding clear guarantees that any new US-backed truce proposal for Gaza will not just pause the fighting, but lead to a permanent end to the war, a source close to the militant group insistence comes as Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed at least 59 people across Gaza on the same day, underscoring the high human cost of delays in diplomatic progress. Nearly 21 months into the war between Israel and Hamas, momentum appears to be building for a breakthrough — if both sides can agree on the is seeking clear guarantees that the ceasefire will eventually lead to the war's end,' the source told reporters, highlighting a major sticking point in talks mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and the United States. On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump announced that Israel had accepted the terms of a 60-day ceasefire, designed to allow space for negotiations toward a final resolution of the Hamas has not yet officially accepted the plan, the group said it was in consultation with other Palestinian factions and would issue a formal response to mediators OFFICIALS ARE CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC'If the Hamas response is positive, an Israeli delegation is ready to participate in indirect talks to finalise the deal,' said a senior official close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. A second source familiar with the talks said Israel expected a reply from Hamas by proposal includes the staggered release of 10 living Israeli hostages and the return of the bodies of 18 more in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, an official familiar with the negotiations said on Thursday. Of the 50 remaining hostages in Gaza, 20 are believed to still be and Qatari negotiators have reportedly sought international assurances that the two-month ceasefire would serve as a stepping stone toward a broader end to hostilities — an element that Hamas views as non-negotiable.'Efforts for a Gaza truce gathered steam after the US secured a ceasefire to end the 12-day aerial conflict between Israel and Iran,' noted one Egyptian security source. 'Now the priority is getting both sides to commit to deeper talks.'But on the ground, Gaza continues to endure heavy bombardment. Medical officials reported dozens of civilian casualties from Israeli strikes on Thursday alone, as expectations mount for a breakthrough, but without guarantees, Hamas remains hesitant.- Ends(With inputs from Reuters)Tune InMust Watch

Iran resumes most flights, reopens airspace after Israel conflict: State media
Iran resumes most flights, reopens airspace after Israel conflict: State media

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Iran resumes most flights, reopens airspace after Israel conflict: State media

Iran has reopened its airspace for both domestic and international flights after a temporary closure due to the conflict with Israel, according to Iran's state media. The closure was imposed on June 13 after Israel launched a wave of to the semi-official Tasnim news agency, Iran's airspace is now open to international transit flights between 5:00 am and 6:00 pm local time. This includes major airports in the capital Tehran and in other parts of the Mehrabad and Imam Khomeini international airports, as well as those in the north, east, west and south of the country, have been reopened and are ready to operate flights," Iran's official IRNA news agency also confirmed. Flights from most airports across the country have resumed, except from the cities of Isfahan and Tabriz. Authorities said that flights from those two cities will restart once the needed safety infrastructure is in place.A day earlier, Iran had closed its central and western airspace to international transit flights. Domestic, international, and transit flights, the rest of the country's skies were CLOSURE WAS RESPONSE TO ISRAEL TENSIONSThe decision to close Iranian airspace came after Israel launched airstrikes in mid-June, which forced Iranians to retaliate. In response, Iran shut down all its airports and blocked airspace for domestic and international flights. A spokesperson for Iran's Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, Majid Akhavan, explained that the closure was made by a civil aviation coordination committee for safety reasons."The country's central and western airspace was closed again to international overflights, but the eastern half remains open," Akhavan reopening of airspace began shortly after a US-brokered ceasefire came into effect on June 24. Iran had first allowed flights over its eastern region before expanding access to more parts of the country. However, as tensions kept boiling, Iran once again limited access over some areas last week.- EndsWith inputs from Agencies Must Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store