logo
Multiomics Platform May Guide Melanoma Treatment

Multiomics Platform May Guide Melanoma Treatment

Medscapea day ago
TOPLINE:
The novel Tumor Profiler (TuPro) project, which analyzed melanoma samples using nine independent technologies, demonstrated feasibility in guiding treatment decisions. Molecular tumor board recommendations on the basis of TuPro were deemed useful in 75% of cases.
METHODOLOGY:
Despite advances in melanoma therapy, many patients experience relapse and lack effective treatment options. Multiomics and single-cell profiling promise comprehensive tumor insights but require evaluation for feasibility and clinical utility in guiding treatment decisions.
Researchers conducted a prospective, multicentric observational project (TuPro) enrolling 116 patients with any subtype of melanoma, from whom 126 biopsy samples were collected at three Swiss hospitals from January 2019 to November 2020. The TuPro application cohort included 93 patients (103 biopsy samples).
The biopsies were analyzed using nine independent technologies, including single-cell genomics, transcriptomics (single-cell RNA sequencing [scRNA-seq]), targeted proteomics (imaging mass cytometry [IMC]), drug phenotyping (Pharmacoscopy), and digital pathology, which generated up to 500 Gb of data per sample within a 4-week turnaround time.
The molecular tumor board evaluated data from all technologies to inform treatment recommendations across three patient groups: adjuvant setting (n = 13), palliative standard of care (n = 45), and palliative beyond standard of care (n = 37). The median follow-up duration was 20.5 months.
TAKEAWAY:
Patients in the palliative standard-of-care group achieved an objective response rate of 60% and a disease control rate of 62%, whereas those in the palliative beyond standard-of-care group achieved an objective response rate of 38% and a disease control rate of 54%.
In a matched analysis of patients who received at least three treatment lines, the median progression-free survival reached 8.34 months in the TuPro cohort vs 2.0 months in the non-TuPro cohort (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.79; adjusted P = .0201), suggesting benefit in heavily pretreated patients.
Molecular data from TuPro were considered useful by the multidisciplinary molecular tumor board in 75% of evaluated cases, representing a 39% and 33% increase in concordance vs standard clinical workup alone (diagnostic levels 1 and 2, respectively). The TuPro workflow led to actual therapies in 87% of cases.
A minimal set of four technologies (next-generation DNA sequencing [NGS], IMC, Pharmacoscopy, and scRNA-seq) could cover all 54 markers used for treatment decision-making at 1.15-fold higher costs than those for the standard NGS for adjuvant or palliative standard-of-care settings and 1.8-fold higher costs than those for the palliative beyond standard-of-care setting.
IN PRACTICE:
'This study demonstrates the feasibility of using advanced multiomics approaches, including spatial proteomics, to guide therapy decisions in late-stage melanoma — one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant cancers — with a reproducible patient benefit,' said Stéphane Chevrier, PhD, CSO, and cofounder of Navignostics and contributor to the TuPro study, in a press release. 'This is a major step toward pan-cancer diagnostics. By providing a comprehensive view of the tumor biology, the approach could eventually identify features that are predictive for treatments across cancer indications.'
SOURCE:
The study, led by Nicola Miglino, the University of Zurich and University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, was published online in Nature Medicine.
LIMITATIONS:
The current approach of selecting markers for treatment decisions by human experts did not capture all potentially relevant information. The retrospective comparison between TuPro and non-TuPro cohorts limited extrapolation and generalizability of the results. Additionally, definitive conclusions about the clinical value of serial sampling cannot be drawn owing to heterogeneous results and a small sample size.
DISCLOSURES:
The study received an open-access funding from the University of Zurich. Several authors reported having advisory roles or receiving research funding and having other ties with various pharmaceutical companies. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perfuze Presents Preliminary Results from MARRS Pivotal Trial at SNIS, Highlighting Millipede88 Performance in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Perfuze Presents Preliminary Results from MARRS Pivotal Trial at SNIS, Highlighting Millipede88 Performance in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Perfuze Presents Preliminary Results from MARRS Pivotal Trial at SNIS, Highlighting Millipede88 Performance in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Millipede88 Demonstrates High Revascularization and First Pass Effect Rates in 180 patient multicenter study GALWAY, Ireland, July 16, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Perfuze, a medical device company developing catheter technology for interventional stroke care, today announced positive preliminary results from its pivotal IDE clinical trial, MARRS (Millipede Aspiration for Revascularization in Stroke Study). These preliminary results were presented at the Society for NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) Annual Meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, USA. The trial is evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Millipede System for revascularization in acute ischemic stroke. Conducted across a network of leading stroke centers in the U.S. and Europe, the study included patients with occlusions in the ICA, M1, M2 and basilar, or vertebral arteries. The Millipede System includes the Millipede88 aspiration catheter, Perfuze's flagship Superbore aspiration catheter. The MARRS trial enrolled 180 evaluable subjects, with first pass direct aspiration being performed with the Millipede88 in 101 of these patients. The preliminary analysis shows a high rate of First Pass Effect (FPE), defined as complete or near-complete revascularization (mTICI 2c) following a single device pass. For patients treated with Millipede88, an FPE rate of 61% was observed across all target vessels in the Per Protocol (PP) population. Specifically, for M1 artery occlusions treated with Millipede88 in the PP population, an FPE rate of 77% was achieved. "The MARRS data are truly exceptional. Achieving 77% First Pass Effect for M1 occlusions in a pivotal study is a major advance for stroke care. The ability to reliably achieve rapid, complete reperfusion with a single aspiration pass is exactly what we need to improve efficacy. This technology is a powerful tool that simplifies thrombectomy and delivers outstanding performance," said Dr. Raul G. Nogueira, Principal Investigator of the MARRS Study and Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Across the 180 patients enrolled, delivery success of the Millipede System was 99%, and the median number of passes was 1. Preliminary safety analysis showed a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rate of 1.7%. Perforation was reported at 0% and the rate of intracranial dissection was 1.1%, indicating a promising safety profile. "The MARRS study represents several years of work by the Perfuze team and our clinical partners," said Wayne Allen, CEO and Co-Founder of Perfuze. "We designed the Millipede88 to navigate seamlessly to the clot face, enabling a superbore catheter that improves the likelihood of achieving First Pass Effect. This early data reflects that intent, and we're encouraged by the physician feedback we've received to date." The MARRS trial completed enrollment earlier this year, executed ahead of schedule, reflecting strong engagement from stroke centers and interest in next-generation aspiration technology. These clinical results follow several successful milestones for Perfuze, including FDA 510(k) clearance for its Zipline™ Access Catheters and a €22 million funding round to support commercial expansion and operational scale-up. With these preliminary MARRS data, Perfuze is preparing for FDA submission. "This is a significant inflection point for the company," said Perfuze Chairperson, Hooman Hakami. "Preliminary MARRS results support the Millipede88 catheter's safety and effectiveness and underpin our vision to advance stroke intervention." About the Millipede System and MARRS Trial Millipede88 is a superbore aspiration catheter developed to support effective clot retrieval while maintaining navigability through challenging cerebrovascular anatomy. The MARRS trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm pivotal IDE study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Millipede System in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. Revascularization outcomes were adjudicated by an independent core laboratory. About Perfuze Perfuze is a privately held medical device company based in Galway, Ireland. The company is dedicated to developing advanced catheter technologies that simplify stroke procedures and aim to improve outcomes for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke. For more information, visit Follow us on LinkedIn and X (formerly Twitter). Disclaimer: United States: CAUTION – Investigational device. Limited by Federal law to investigational use. Europe: Exclusively for use in a clinical investigation. These are preliminary results from an ongoing clinical investigation. The Clinical Study Report has not yet been approved or reviewed by regulatory authorities. Data may be subject to change and may not fully reflect the contents of the Clinical Study Report. View source version on Contacts Media Contact: Dr. Freskida GoniCommunications Consultant, Perfuzecomms@ +44 7473678178 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

KKR Mulls Acquisition of Health-Care Technology Firm GPI
KKR Mulls Acquisition of Health-Care Technology Firm GPI

Bloomberg

time18 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

KKR Mulls Acquisition of Health-Care Technology Firm GPI

KKR & Co., the buyout firm that's been scouting for takeover targets amid the recent market volatility, is considering a potential acquisition of Italian health-care technology firm GPI SpA, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The US private equity firm has been speaking with advisers in recent weeks as it considers a potential deal to take Trent-based GPI private, the people said, asking not to be identified as the matter is private. Shares of GPI have risen 24% in Milan trading this year, giving the company a market value of about €377 million ($438 million).

Fact or Fiction: Endometrial Cancer
Fact or Fiction: Endometrial Cancer

Medscape

time18 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Fact or Fiction: Endometrial Cancer

Recent research emphasizes the importance of recognizing subclinical and early-stage endometrial cancer and the risks associated with delayed diagnosis, particularly among patients with metabolic syndrome, obesity, or other chronic health conditions. Improvements in diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities allow for a patient-centered, personalized approach, focusing not only on tumor eradication but also on overall health, quality of life, and long-term well-being. Although hormonal imbalance, particularly excess estrogen without sufficient progesterone, contributes significantly to the development of endometrial cancer, numerous other factors play critical roles. Specifically, women with Lynch syndrome have the highest risk for endometrial cancer (40%-60% lifetime risk), and research has shown that obesity and insulin resistance also drive its pathogenesis. Lifestyle factors, such as alcohol consumption and tobacco use, and psychological factors can further influence pathogenesis and prognosis. Learn more about the etiology of endometrial cancer. Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the standard surgery for endometrial cancer, except in candidates for fertility-sparing options. Decisions regarding the addition of chemotherapy, radiation, or both depend on factors such as tumor stage, histologic subtype, grade, lymphovascular invasion, and molecular classification (eg, POLE mutations, p53 status, or mismatch repair deficiency). This individualized approach ensures that patients with low-risk disease are not overtreated while those with high-risk or advanced disease receive more aggressive and effective multimodal therapy. Learn more about treatment of endometrial cancer. Although hysterectomy is a key component of treatment, especially when performed with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, endometrial cancer can still recur. Up to 20% of patients will experience recurrence after hysterectomy, with most cases occurring within 2-3 years. Further, relapses can be local or include distant extrauterine manifestations. Therefore, ongoing surveillance through regular follow-up appointments, and imaging when necessary, is part of comprehensive care in both American and European recommendations. Learn more about the workup for endometrial cancer. Approximately 90% of patients with endometrial cancer will present with abnormal vaginal bleeding, with most cases occurring post-menopause. This has led to a belief that endometrial cancer is highly treatable because most patients with abnormal bleeding causes seek care when the cancer is still in early stages. However, mortality due to uterine cancer, of which endometrial cancer is the largest subgroup, has increased 1.25 times in all age groups throughout the 2000s. After presentation, an endometrial sample, which is easily obtained through office endometrial biopsy, can confirm the diagnosis, and further testing is then done to guide the course of treatment. Learn more about management guidelines for endometrial cancer. When fertility-sparing therapies are used in correctly selected patients, there is no significant adverse impact on survival. Specifically, patients with stage 1 endometrial cancer treated with fertility-sparing progestin therapy had comparable 5-year survival rates to those treated with hysterectomy, but comparable survival outcomes were not seen in those with higher-stage disease. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, patients must meet all of these criteria to be candidates for fertility-sparing treatment: grade 1 histology, disease limited to endometrium, absence of suspicious metastases, no contraindications to therapy or pregnancy, and counseling that this is not the standard of care. Learn more about management approaches to endometrial cancer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store