Aussie pet food company agrees to pay $1.3 million after 'serious' environmental incident
The acid is a common ingredient in pet food, and often used in very small quantities to improve flavour or prolong shelf-life. But the scope of the incident was so serious, emergency HAZMAT crews were called in to respond, and they discovered the liquid had spread across multiple floors.
Jason Gordon, the EPA executive director of regulatory operations, described the 2023 event as a 'serious chemical spill', which therefore 'demanded' a response from emergency services.
'Fortunately, no environmental harm occurred, but the potential risk was significant,' he added.
Pictures supplied to Yahoo News show the plastic tank that overflowed was severely discoloured by the spill. It occurred due to a faulty valve inside the factory's production tower.
What changes will the pet food factory make?
Under the agreement, Australian Pet Brands, will spend over $1 million relocating its acid dosing system from the top to the ground floor. It will also automate manual systems and improve training to reduce the likelihood of similar incidents.
'These changes will not only make the site safer for workers, but they'll also provide stronger protection for the environment by improving how chemicals are stored, handled and monitored,' Gordon said.
🥊 Aussie publican receives death threats after filming controversial act with kangaroo
🔎 Rare species with less than a thousand in the wild tracked down
☠️ Warning signs placed around Australian shopping centre after mass poisoning
The company will also pay $75,000 to a local environmental charity. The EPA said the outcome holds the company to account while also helping to improve safety at the site.
Australian Pet Brands has been contacted for comment.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
How Trump's war on clean energy is making AI a bigger polluter
At an AI and fossil fuel lovefest in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania last week, President Donald Trump — flanked by cabinet members and executives from major tech and energy giants like Google and ExxonMobil — said that 'the most important man of the day' was Environmental Protection Agency head Lee Zeldin. 'He's gonna get you a permit for the largest electric producing plant in the world in about a week, would you say?' Trump said to chuckles in the audience. Later that week, the Trump administration exempted coal-fired power plants, facilities that make chemicals for semiconductor manufacturing, and certain other industrial sites from Biden-era air pollution regulations. If Trump has his way, the next generation of data centers will run dirtier than the last. It isn't enough to kill renewables and pave the way for more coal and gas plants to power energy-hungry AI data centers. Trump is also obsessed with tossing out environmental protections. 'It costs much more to do things environmentally clean,' Trump claimed in an interview with Joe Rogan in October 2024. Upon his appointment to head the EPA (or, rather, run it into the ground), Zeldin said that he would be focused on 'unleash[ing] US energy dominance' and 'mak[ing] America the AI capital of the world.' The EPA announced thousands of layoffs on on July 18th, gutting its research and development arm. 'It costs much more to do things environmentally clean.' At the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit, Trump attempted to take credit for private investments totaling around $36 billion for data center projects and $56 million for new energy infrastructure. The ceremony itself was mostly pomp and circumstance, but it's telling that the Trump administration says it wants to make Pennsylvania a new hub for AI data centers. It's a swing state that Republicans are eager to move into their column, but it's also a major coal and gas producer. Sitting atop a major gas reserve, fracking in Pennsylvania (as well as Texas) helped usher in the 'shale revolution' in the 2000s that made the US the world's leading gas producer. That was supposed to start changing under former President Joe Biden's direction. He set a goal for the US to get all its electricity from carbon pollution-free sources by 2035. And in 2022, he signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which was full of tax incentives to make it cheaper to build out new solar and wind farms, as well as other carbon-free energy sources. If it had stayed intact, the law was expected to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions by around 40 percent this decade. The law came at a crucial time for tech companies, which were expanding data centers as the AI arms race picked up steam. Electricity demand in the US is rising for the first time in more than a decade, thanks in large part to energy-hungry data centers. Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and other tech giants all have their own climate goals, pledging to shrink their carbon footprints by supporting renewable energy projects. But Trump is making it harder to build those projects in the US. Republicans voted to wind down Biden-era tax incentives for solar and wind energy in the big spending bill they passed this month. The bill will likely decrease electricity generation capacity in 2035 by 340 GW, according to one analysis, with the vast majority of losses coming from solar and wind farms that will no longer get built. All these new data centers still need to get their electricity from somewhere. 'They won't be powered by wind,' Trump said during the summit, repeating misleading talking points about renewable energy that have become a cornerstone of new climate denial. He signed an executive order in April, directing the Commerce, Energy, and Interior Departments to study 'where coal-powered infrastructure is available and suitable for supporting AI data centers.' Trump, backed by fossil fuel donors, campaigned on a promise to 'drill, baby, drill' — a slogan that he doubled down on again at the event. He also referenced the Homer City Generating Station, an old coal plant that's reopening as a gas plant that will power a new data center. The deals announced at the summit include Enbridge investing $1 billion to expand its gas pipelines into Pennsylvania and Equinor spending $1.6 billion to 'boost natural gas production at Equinor's Pennsylvania facilities and explore opportunities to link gas to flexible power generation for data centers.' 'They won't be powered by wind.' Data centers are a 'main driver' for a boom in new gas pipelines and power plants in the Southeast, according to a January report from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). The Southeast is home to 'data center alley,' a hub in Virginia through which around 70 percent of the world's internet traffic flows through. Even if AI models become more efficient over time, the amount of electricity they're currently projected to demand could lock communities across the US into prolonged reliance on fossil fuels as utilities build out new gas infrastructure. Zeldin's job now is essentially to remove any regulatory hurdles that might slow down that growth. From his first day in office, 'it was clear that EPA would have a major hand in permitting reform to cut down barriers that have acted as a roadblock so we can bolster the growth of AI,' as Zeldin wrote in a Fox News op-ed last week. 'A company looking to build an industrial facility or a power plant should be able to build what it can before obtaining an emissions permit,' he added. And after moving to roll back pollution regulations for power plants, the Trump administration is now reportedly working on a rule that would undo the 2009 'endangerment finding' that allows the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. Zeldin also writes that when it comes to Clean Air Act permits for polluters it considers 'minor emitters,' the EPA will only meet 'minimum requirements for public participation.' An AI Action Plan that the White House dropped on July 23rd proposes creating new categorical exclusions for data center-related projects from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a sunshine law that mandates input from local communities on major federal projects. The plan directs agencies to identify federal lands for the 'large-scale development' of data centers and power generation. There are other factors at play that could derail Trump's fossil-fueled agenda, including a backlog for gas turbines in high demand. Solar and wind farms are still generally faster to build and a more affordable source of new electricity than coal or gas, and we could see some developers rush to complete projects before Biden-era tax credits fully disappear. One early bright spot for renewables was the fact that data centers used to train AI are theoretically easier to build close to far-flung wind and solar projects. Unlike other data centers, they don't need to be built near population centers to reduce latency. They could also theoretically time their operations to match the ebb and flow of electricity generation when the sun shines and winds blow. But so far, things are shaping up differently in the real world. 'It's just a race to get connected as quickly as possible,' says Nathalie Limandibhratha, senior associate US power at BloombergNEF. Data center developers are also concerned that if they build facilities specifically to train AI closer to renewable energy, they could be left with stranded assets down the road. They'd rather keep building data centers close to population centers where they can repurpose the facility for other uses if needed. They also get more bang for their buck running 24/7, so data centers are leaning toward around-the-clock electricity generation from gas and nuclear energy (and nuclear energy has more bipartisan support than other sources of carbon-free energy). 'There's no question right now that AI is driving greater fossil fuel use in the United States and really setting us back in terms of climate change,' says Cathy Kunkel, an energy consultant at IEEFA. Tech giants Google and Amazon made announcements coinciding with the Pennsylvania summit committing to purchasing hydropower and nuclear energy, respectively. But their most recent sustainability reports show that their greenhouse gas pollution is still growing, taking them further away from their climate goals of reaching net zero emissions. 'If [tech companies] wanted to meet their sustainability goals, they could do so,' Kunkel says. 'They're getting a free pass, obviously, from the Trump administration.'Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Justine Calma Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Climate Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Energy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Environment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Regulation Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Peabody Energy (BTU) Jumps 9% on Coal Overmining Crackdown
We recently published . Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) is one of Tuesday's top performers. Peabody Energy grew its share prices for a second day on Tuesday, adding 8.99 percent to close at $17.34 apiece, as investors cheered the Chinese government's move to crack down on coal companies producing coal above permitted levels as part of its move to regulate the market. The effort forms part of a broader initiative to stabilize the coal market and reduce oversupply—a move that could unlock higher global coal prices. While Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) does not have direct mining operations in China, the supply tightening would help support in boosting demand for seaborne coal globally. A coal miner in a thick protective suit and helmet drilling for coal under bright lights. Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) is a US-based company that operates an extensive number of mining sites in Australia and the United States. In a note on its website, Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) said it is scheduled to announce the results of its earnings performance for the second quarter of the year next week, July 31. While we acknowledge the potential of BTU as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
EPA poised to scrap landmark finding that will limit its battle against climate change
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has taken another step toward ending its own ability to fight the climate crisis. The agency is considering scrapping a 2009 scientific 'endangerment finding' that confirmed greenhouse gases from the oil and gas industry, and other sources, endangered people's health, so there was reason to regulate them under the 1970 Clean Air Act. 'On Monday, June 30, 2025, EPA sent over its 'Reconsideration of 2009 Endangerment Finding and Greenhouse Gas Vehicle Standards' proposal to the Office of Management and Budget, which was originally announced on March 12, 2025,' an EPA spokesperson told The Independent, in an email Wednesday. 'The proposal will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the Administrator.' EPA did not respond to The Independent's questions regarding the potential impacts of a rollback. But if the 2009 finding is rescinded, it would erase EPA limits on greenhouse gas pollution across industries, adding to dozens of rollbacks in federal climate and environmental policy by the Trump administration. Over the past 15 years, the endangerment finding has helped to reduce climate pollution and protect Americans' health, bolstering limits on power plants and emissions standards for trucks and other vehicles. If rolled back, limits on tailpipe emissions would be overturned and automakers could make cars that guzzle more gas. Climate scientists and activists said tossing the 2009 ruling would throttle the U.S.'s ability to prevent the worst outcomes of climate change, and would endanger people around the world in the name of the Trump administration's push for energy dominance. "If you're busily committing a crime, it's smart to try and change the law so that it's not technically a crime any more,' author and Third Act founder Bill McKibben said, on the proposal. 'Big Oil is not content to merely wreck the future, they'd like to alter the past as well." The EPA proposal is still in draft form, sources told The New York Times , so could be changed. But if it is finalized, legal challenges would almost certainly follow although those could take a year, said Dr. Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the California Institute for Water Resources. 'But, if this ultimately comes to pass, the consequences will be stark: it essentially would halt all federal actions to regulate heat-trapping and climate change-causing greenhouse gases as a pollutant. That would mark a grim milestone, indeed,' Swain told The Independent. Dr. Michael E. Mann, the director of the Center for Science, Sustainability, & the Media at the University of Pennsylvania, had warned of an attack on the 'endangerment finding' a year ago. 'The United States, and a small number of petrostates including Russia and Saudi Arabia, now pose a major threat to the planet. The rest of the world will need to decide what to do about that,' he told The Independent, in an email Wednesday. Earlier this year, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said that the agency would reconsider the 2009 finding in what he deemed the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' 'The Trump Administration will not sacrifice national prosperity, energy security, and the freedom of our people for an agenda that throttles our industries, our mobility, and our consumer choice while benefiting adversaries overseas,' he said. 'We will follow the science, the law, and common sense wherever it leads, and we will do so while advancing our commitment towards helping to deliver cleaner, healthier, and safer air, land, and water.' Under Zeldin, the EPA announced it would shutter its Office of Research and Development, which provides expertise for environmental policy and regulation, and analyzes the dangers of climate change and pollution. The agency is also expected to shed thousands of employees, including chemists, biologists, and toxicologists. The U.S. has produced more greenhouse gas emissions than any country in human history. Countries are failing to cut their greenhouse gas emissions at a fast enough rate, and temperatures around the world are hitting unprecedented highs. As the planet continues to heat up, extreme weather events will become more severe, the threat of famine and plague rockets, and more species face extinction.
