
Some Eastern Baltimore County residents divided over councilmanic redistricting maps
Some Eastern Baltimore County residents are divided over multiple proposals for the county's councilmanic redistricting plan, with concerns about fair representation and splitting existing communities dominating a somewhat tense hearing Monday evening.
Baltimore County's 2025 Councilmanic Redistricting Commission, a seven-member group tasked with drawing boundaries of nine new councilmanic districts, is considering two main maps ahead of the 2026 election.
The first draft map, published by the commission in April, includes two majority Black districts and one majority-minority district made up of racial and ethnic minorities.
Maryland state Del. Kathy Szeliga and Del. Ryan Nawrocki, both Republicans who represent portions of eastern Baltimore County, said they supported the first draft because it unified Middle River and Essex.
Gustavus McLeod, executive director of the Glenn L. Martin Maryland Aviation Museum, agreed.
'People who have things in common should have a common voice,' he said. 'Number 1 plan does that.'
But to Shafiyq Hinton, who ran for council in 2022, the first map is a 'clear effort to crack, dilute and silence diverse voices on the east side,' he said.
However, a second draft map proposed by Lisa Belcastro, a Pikesville resident who represents the existing councilmanic District 2 on the commission, would create two majority Black districts centered on Randallstown and Owings Mills, and two districts made up of people from various racial and ethnic backgrounds.
Support for the second iteration of the map was limited. Some said it looked closer to a final product, while others alleged it was backed by developers.
A third map was proposed by Keith Dorsey, Baltimore County's former budget chief. Known as the Woodlawn Approach C, his map would create two greater-majority Black districts around Woodlawn and Randallstown, as well as a simple majority-minority district on the eastern side of the county.
'It is the only plan that truly begins and ends with trying to recognize those historic communities,' he said.
Still, others argued that an entirely different map would best represent the county demographics.
A map that creates three majority Black districts on the west side, a majority BIPOC district on the east side and five majority white districts would most accurately represent Baltimore County's population, said Dana Vickers Shelley, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland.
The county's population is nearly 50% people of color.
'Packing Black voters into two districts on the west side dilutes the power of Black voters by overconcentrating them in fewer districts,' she said. 'The Voting Rights Act requires that districts be drawn in a way that provides Black and BIPOC residents an equal opportunity — and I say residents, not voters, because this is what it is about: being represented.'
Tension and controversy have marked discussions about the expanding council even before county voters approved the charter amendment in November to create a nine-member council. The council currently has seven districts. Some had argued that the redrawn council boundaries could violate federal civil rights law and others threw accusations about backroom deals.
'I see so much divide amongst my Black people in this room and my Democrats, and it's a problem because we should all be standing together, Democrats, Republicans, white or Black,' said county resident Tamara Gunter.
The commission will hold its final public hearing at 6 p.m. May 19 at the Randallstown Community Center.
Have a news tip? Contact Natalie Jones at najones@baltsun.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
L.A. protests lead to new bill in Congress
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep Brandon Gill (R-TX) co-introduced the 'Lawless Cities Accountability Act' in Congress. The bill would withdraw federal funds from cities that don't stop violent unrest or don't accept help from federal law enforcement. 'We have to use the tools in our toolbox to ensure that our mayors and our governors like Gavin Newsom are following the law in this country, because if we don't have laws, we're not a country at all,' Rep. Mace told me. But will Republicans back measures like this? Of the more than 9.7 million people who live in Los Angeles County, more than 1.1 million people voted for President Trump in 2024. When I brought up the potential threat of funding to Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) earlier this week warned not to 'lump everyone in California in with the actions of a few leaders.'


CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.