Aussie blasts Uber Eats driver for extremely dodgy act that is happening around the country: 'This is not fair'
John Jenkins, who runs Gold Coast Kebabs, said a recent experience with a delivery driver left him outraged.
Mr Jenkins described how a driver accepted an Uber Eats order but did not arrive at the store for more than 13 minutes.
'He claims he's been waiting for 13 minutes, but there's no driver here,' Mr Jenkins said in a TikTok video, showing the front of his shop.
'So what's gonna happen now?'
Mr Jenkins claimed he contacted the driver, who told him he was 'coming', but still took more time to arrive.
'Mate, you don't like it? Cancel the job. Give it to someone who's close by,' Mr Jenkins said.
'You cannot. This is not fair.'
He said the situation put him in a difficult position: if he gave the driver a thumbs down for the delay, the driver would know it came from him, and could retaliate.
'All of a sudden you want to give them a thumbs down, what do they do? They go on your Google review and they give you thumbs down,' Mr Jenkins said.
'Is this fair? Is this justice?'
The kebab shop owner warned the system creates a risk for business owners, who may avoid giving negative feedback to poor-performing drivers out of fear of bad reviews.
'Uber, you've got to fix this problem,' Mr Jenkins said.
'This is causing businesses big problems. If you don't fix it, you will lose a lot of customers.'
Social media users were left disgusted by the dodgy tactics used by some drivers.
'I had one say they had picked it up, but the store rang me to say they hadn't,' one wrote.
'I told them I'd pick it up, and in the meantime, the driver cancelled the order. I got a refund and the food. Some drivers are very dodgy.'
Another added: 'Lately my Uber orders are cold. The problem is they are multi-lapping and have three or four orders at the same time.'
Uber Eats' rating system allows both customers and delivery partners to leave feedback on each other after a trip.
However, small businesses have long raised concerns about the potential for 'revenge' reviews that can impact a store's public reputation and revenue.
In February, a retail worker claimed his lunch was stolen by a food delivery driver who pretended to leave the order at his address.
Corey Davis, an employee of Billy Hyde Music in Marleston, Adelaide, had ordered the expensive feast from Betty's Burgers for himself and his colleagues.
CCTV footage from outside the shop appears to show the Uber Eats driver attempted to cover his tracks by taking photos of the delivery on the kerb, before he immediately picked it up again and drove off.
After submitting a complaint, the delivery service offered him a flat $25 refund.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The ultra-wealthy have exploited Australia's tax system for too long. It's time to ensure everyone pays their fair share
Unions want to tackle intergenerational inequality by reforming Australia's tax system. For the first time in living memory, younger Australians risk facing lower living standards than those before them. This is not acceptable to the union movement, so our one big idea is to rebalance the tax system so that productivity gains are fairly shared, housing becomes more affordable, and essential services are properly funded. Australia's current tax system is exploited by big business and the ultra-wealthy, entrenching intergenerational inequality and placing affordable housing out of young workers' reach, which threatens the services and infrastructure we all rely on. We need a minimum 25% tax on gas export revenues, a minimum 25% tax for trust funds and individuals earning more than $1m, and a one investment property limit for negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount benefits, with the grandfathering of current arrangements for five years. These changes have a simple intention: to make sure everyone pays their fair share, so productivity gains flow across society fairly. These proposed reforms would help restore fairness and opportunity for young Australians to get ahead in their lives. For the past 25 years, productivity increases have gone back into company profits, shareholder dividends, share buybacks and executive bonuses. Working people know that every time they check their bank accounts, there is no 'direct debit system' where the extra profits generated by increased productivity are automatically shared with them. Australia is a rich country but, for decades, as the 'economic pie' has got bigger, corporations have not just taken their own bigger slice, they have been eating into ours. The way to stop this is to make sure workers have strong rights at work to get the pay rises they deserve and to make sure our tax system ensures everyone – not just the ordinary worker – pays their fair share of taxes. There are flaws in our tax system that disadvantage younger Australians and reinforce inter-generational inequity. Just 1% of taxpayers own 25% of investment properties, fuelling house prices, skyrocketing rents and putting home ownership out of reach. House prices have gone up at twice the rate of wages in the last 25 years. The result? Workers can no longer afford to live near their jobs, while young people face high rents and are priced out of buying homes. It is true that housing supply needs to increase, but the tax system is adding to the affordability problem and that needs to change. The loudest complaints will come from those who have gamed the system to accumulate enormous economic and political power. Australia's economy is dominated by an artificially inflated property market, in addition a small number of large companies in a small number of industries. Claims that working people will automatically be better off if productivity increases are wrong. Dr Jim Stanford's recent paper on productivity shows that if real wages had grown at the same rate of productivity since 2000, average wages would be 18% – or $350 per week – higher than they are now. What you won't hear from big business is the real reason productivity growth in Australia has been slow: they have prioritised distributing profits rather than investing in capital, research and people. Workers' rights are not 'red tape', they are the way we get pay rises and limits on working hours. They are essential to workers benefiting from the productivity gains our hard work creates. If we take them away, workers will get even less. Our proposed reforms are targeted and achievable. These are simple changes that close loopholes and restore balance, because we recognise that the problem isn't everyday investors who are looking to build a nest egg with a housing investment, the problem is that the current tax system rewards investing in housing as an asset class so the richest mega-investors are accumulating a large number of properties, tying up capital that could be invested in things that contribute to productivity growth and forcing property prices up beyond what any ordinary working person can afford. Working people pay their fair share of tax, we just want everyone else to as well. Ninety-one people with an income over $1m paid no income tax in 2022-23. Not one cent! When the very wealthy pay less tax than a bus driver or an aged care worker, something is very wrong. Trust funds have also become tax minimisation schemes for rich people, and mega-profitable resource companies are also getting away with paying little or no corporate tax. Our proposals are about ensuring the economy works for those who actually keep it running: working people. Sally McManus is a trade unionist and political activist who has served as the secretary of the Australia Council of Trade Unions since 2017
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Maker or faker? Australia's handicraft markets face rise in mass-produced goods
Peggy Byrne was strolling through market stalls held by artisans and makers in Adelaide. A selection of crocheted flowers and animals caught her eye. Byrne, the owner of Bowerbird, a design market in the city, asked the stallholder which pattern was his favourite. 'He looked at me like I was an alien,' she says. 'There is no way this guy is the maker of these things.' Tiziana Ferrero-Regis, an associate professor of fashion at Queensland University of Technologysays markets are the 'number one place' people go to find that 'special thing'. But over the past 18 months market organisers and vendors have noticed a rise in mass-produced goods being bought online then resold in ways that imply they are locally handmade. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning Georgia Richards, who used to sell handmade ceramics at several markets across Brisbane, says many have been 'overrun with resellers'. She has also noticed resellers who claim their goods are handmade, and has seen them at markets that specifically promise local and artisanal wares. Jo Harvey, who manages the Kirribilli markets in Sydney, says she has seen resellers 'slapping … little 'handmade' signs on everything'. She believes this practice is wrong: 'It's not fair on those people that put a lot of time, money and effort into it. Their products are beautiful and it means something because they are handmade.' Harvey has strengthened Kirribilli's stallholder application process to combat this practice. She now asks would-be vendors to include videos or pictures of themselves making the product to prove it is handmade. Kirribilli also uses Google Lens when looking over applications, to cross-reference images against websites including Temu, Alibaba or Aliexpress, where resellers may have purchased their goods. 'We get the same person applying 20 or 30 times, under different names, under different emails,' Harvey says. Emma Morris, a founder of the design market Makers and Shakers, has also experienced an increase in applications from resellers and says she is surprised at how pervasive the model has become. 'That's the business,' she says. 'It's 'what can I import and sell?'.' Resale vendors usually sell their goods at low prices, which has left small designers and creatives struggling to compete. Richards believes that their presence comes at the expense of local artisans. 'I would have times where I would be placed next to a reseller who was selling items at a fifth of the price I was selling my items for. Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion 'Between vendors it creates … an impossible price comparison. Artists price their work based on their skill, time, materials and much more to create something unique.' This cannot be compared to the cost of mass produced items, she says. Kai Salvador spends nearly every weekend shopping at markets around Sydney. She agrees with Richards, saying she has noticed a change in the quality of wares being sold at markets. It 'ruins the culture', she says, and to see fewer local, small-scale vendors is 'just a bit … saddening'. She says people go to markets is to support local brands and to find quality items that people pour their time into. On a wet Sunday, the Kirribilli markets are still busy. People take their time picking up, touching and feeling the items on display. Two shoppers, Alyssa Ellwood and Annalese Vochteloo, say that they have both noticed more mass-produced items coming into markets, rather than 'little homemade things'. At Kirribilli markets, artisans and general stallholders are kept separate, in different sections, and most people Guardian Australia spoke to there had not noticed any vendors misrepresenting the origin of their goods. Maddie Boyd, another shopper, says she has noticed a rise in mass-produced crochet but believes the differences between a handmade item and something that has been bought online are obvious. 'I think you can easily tell … but they're often mixed in with pieces that are genuinely handmade, or made by local artists.' It's something you have to look out for, she says. Boyd has mixed feelings about whether mass-produced items have a place at markets. 'It also does sometimes provide a cheaper alternative for people to engage in a market,' she says. Clearly distinguishing artisanal goods from mass-made is something Richards advocates for. She says resellers do have a place. 'They're essentially doing what retail stores do,' she says. 'But 'handmade markets' should be for handmade artists. 'There's nothing worse than going to an artisan market and seeing a table full of Temu wares.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The economic roundtable is Jim Chalmers' chance for bold reform. Australians can't afford anything less
Jim Chalmers had a determined look about him this week, ahead of the government's much-hyped economic reform roundtable in Canberra. The atmosphere in the treasurer's office was reminiscent of the days immediately before a federal budget, with frenetic activity and an air of sleep deprivation among the small army of advisers. Preparations for the three-day event have been exhaustive and Chalmers works at a pace few people in the ministerial wing can sustain. Armed with a small page of handwritten notes, Chalmers told this column that the process of consulting with hundreds of individuals and organisations about how to turn around the country's productivity challenges had been more than worthwhile, as 30-odd attenders prepare to take their seats at the cabinet table on Tuesday morning. There's no doubt new approaches are needed. Productivity has barely grown at all since 2016. The stagnation in the Australian economy poses a threat to living standards, since working smarter is the long-run driver of securing higher incomes for households. Ken Henry, the former Treasury boss and summit invitee, puts the challenge another way. He calculates Australian workers have lost about $500,000 in potential pay rises over the past 25 years because of sclerotic productivity growth. 'I see it as three days to help inform three budgets,' Chalmers said, sitting at a conference table in the office previously occupied by Wayne Swan, his former boss and mentor. Family photos and a curated collection of books about politics and history dominate the space. Conscious of messaging and expectations in Canberra and beyond, Chalmers said outcomes from the roundtable would fuel and inform future decisions of the government, helping set a direction for Labor in this term of parliament an others to come. Solutions to emerging problems such as AI and an ageing population are also badly needed. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The event itself has required more than a little productivity already. Treasury received 900 submissions – twice the number of pitches received before Labor's jobs and skills summit early in the government's first term. Chalmers has held boardroom talks with business leaders and lobby groups, while ministers have convened more than 40 preparatory meetings of their own, attended by about 700 people. The Productivity Commission has released a slew of reports to guide the process. Bureaucrats in Chalmers' department have used AI to organise and structure this massive input of ideas, including the predictable mix of kite flying, influence peddling and ambit claims. On Friday, Chalmers sat down with his state and territory counterparts for the last of these events. Talking up consensus, the group agreed to work towards faster approvals for major infrastructure projects, to cut cumbersome and outdated regulation, to boost competition and build more homes more quickly. Some serious ideas are in the mix, illustrated by an awkwardly timed Treasury leak this week, which showed Labor was preparing to move forward with reforms to clear a backlog of 30,000 housing approvals held up by outdated environmental laws, as well as new rules for AI and a pause on changes to the National Construction Code. 'There's been a heap of effort,' Chalmers said. 'Working around the clock for four weeks to make sure that people's voices are heard and that we can shape up a meaningful and useful roundtable.' The meeting has become an organising tool for Labor's second term, including allowing Chalmers and Albanese to test ideas with voters and the media, and rule some ideas out. The prime minister has also stressed the government won't misjudge its mandate or foist new taxes on the electorate. Overdue ideas already firmly in need of resolution are being attached as well: changes to Howard-era national environmental laws will get a kick along and Anthony Albanese telegraphed this week that road user charging rules for electric vehicles would be thrashed out over the roundtable. Here a phased-in and staged approach is expected, treating heavy vehicles differently to ensure EV take-up continues to grow in line with the renewables transition. Labor might even come away with an idea or two for major reform proposals to take to voters at the next election, putting its thumping victory over Peter Dutton to use. But the lead-up to the summit hasn't all been smooth sailing. It emerged on Wednesday that Chalmers and Albanese had held a face-to-face meeting last week after a reported 'frisson' over expectations for the summit. Albanese appeared frustrated at some mission creep for the talks and the pair discussed the need to 'be on the same page' about major tax reform plans and the scale of Labor's ambition. After the story emerged, both were quick to say they meet all the time, while the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, talked up their cooperation at the heart of the government. Despite not wanting to shut down ideas ahead of the summit, Albanese and Chalmers have rejected calls to change the rate and base of the GST, and ruled out negative gearing and capital gains tax concession rule changes. The Australian Council of Trade Unions called for a four-day week for workers, without any loss of pay, a reform that feels both eminently possible in the future but too ambitious for the present. The Greens want Labor to move faster with expensive plans for universal childcare, an ambition Albanese is laying the groundwork for already, while the Coalition is both taking part in the talks and deriding them as akin to a tour of Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. It is unclear who will play the role of Augustus Gloop in this scenario. Labor can't afford not to be bold. It has identified the productivity problem and told voters it is better placed than the Coalition to manage the economy. Chalmers wants to be remembered as a reforming treasurer, and aspires to higher office, but will need to convince his colleagues – and the sometimes more cautious prime minister – of the case for ambition. Chalmers and Albanese made their own job harder by raising the prospect of sweeping tax reform at the start of the process, only to quickly shut down some of the serious proposals in a bid to manage expectations. The best way to undermine claims that the roundtable is a stage-managed talkfest is to make it a success: to take up real economic reform options that drive growth and boost productivity. Strengthening the budget and lifting living standards is as necessary as it is difficult, but buy-in from roundtable participants will be a crucial start, even if Labor has to spend political capital to get the job done.
