Rebel Wilson: ‘I always wanted to be like Judi Dench. But people like laughing at me'
You've worked with Sir Derek Jacobi twice – in Juliet & Romeo, and the upcoming Tinsel Town. How was he? Derekj2210It was pretty cool to be in scenes with him. Even though we weren't doing the iambic pentameter, it was interesting to watch how the language fell off his tongue. We were filming in this medieval Italian church. It was zero degrees, but he was so easygoing: always telling stories, with this fun grandpa vibe. He's one of the most amazing Shakespearean actors ever: in his 80s, still crushing every line. I kept wanting to get selfies with him, because he really is one of the greats.
I felt the same when I worked with Dame Judi Dench on Cats. When I started acting, I always wanted to be like Dame Judi, because I thought I was going to be a serious actor. It just turned out that people like laughing at me. She's like your grandma, in that you just want to hold her hand, and help her. She's also got a wicked sense of humour: she'd be throwing out jokes and cursing, which I thought was hilarious. There have been a few times I've had to pinch myself. I had to do a boot camp with Sir Ian McKellen for Cats; at one point we were crawling around on the floor, pretending to lick each other. It was so funny.
What is it like being a guest on the Graham Norton Show? I enjoyed your rap and the way you took your heels off. VegansRuleThePlanetGraham Norton is such a master of the talkshow. Other talkshows can be a bit of a struggle, but with him, it really is just like having a chat. I did the rap because I was telling the story of when I was 11, I had a rap group with my sister, which was probably the most uncool thing ever, seeing as we were two white girls from Sydney. I took my shoes off because I'm terrible at doing anything in high heels. I do try to wear them to be classy on the night-time talkshows, but I'm terrible at moving in heels: I move like a shuffling wombat.
You won $250,000 for charity on the US version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Does this mean you're not such a Rebel Without a Cause? vammypWe had a great cause: the money sponsored a school in Tanzania, and helped put 40 kids through college. Some have already graduated. The medical students still send me video updates every six months. It's surreal that going on a gameshow for half an hour resulted in putting 40 kids through college in Africa.
My heart rate was pumping because I wanted to win as much money for charity as I could. You think: oh my God, please don't be an idiot. I play a lot of dumb, stupid characters, but in real life, I do have two degrees – in theatre and performance studies, and law.
I have a charitable connection to Africa because when I was 18, I did a gap year, and travelled from South Africa to Malawi, Mozambique and Zimbabwe. When I got to Mozambique, I got malaria really badly. We didn't have time to put up the mosquito nets and I woke up with my face covered in mosquito bites. Two weeks later, I was in hospital because it was a really bad strain. I don't know whether it was the disease or the drugs, but I was hallucinating really badly, and I hallucinated that I won an Academy Award. It was so visceral and real that I came out of hospital and said: 'Hey everyone, I think I'm going to become an actor now.' The South Africans were like: 'Ah, no, Rebel. The malaria has demented your brain.' My parents were pushing me into law school, so I did law by day and acting by night.
Has your positive body transformation led to different scripts coming your way? BradLopez22In the movie I just shot in the UK, Tinsel Town, I play the love interest to Kiefer Sutherland, which is probably not at all the kind of role you'd think I'd get cast as. There was a tendency to think: she's no longer Fat Amy [from Pitch Perfect], so she can't play those characters any more. There was a little bit of: also, is she still funny? I've just been offered the lead in a horror movie. So it's not just comedies, musicals and romcoms. It's good to surprise people.
Did I have a Greggs? [Sutherland is an outspoken fan, so Greggs sent a van to the set]. Yes. I enjoyed a sausage roll. Greggs gifted Kiefer and I a £50 VIP voucher, which I still have. You get four sausage rolls for the price of three as well. That's a lot of sausage rolls.
Pitch Perfect: The Reunion ...? Any plans for a fourth instalment? writeronthestormOh God, I hope so. We hear rumours all the time. I know Universal is developing some scripts. The fanbase for Pitch Perfect is so awesome and keeps growing as younger people are introduced to it. So, hopefully – there's a huge desire for another movie.
Marmite or Vegemite? TopTrampI'm actually a weird Australian: I don't eat Vegemite or Marmite. I don't know why. I just don't like the look of it. If I was putting something on toast, I'd put Nutella.
What role challenged you most? HamesJoyceI did a very small movie called The Almond and the Seahorse, which we filmed up in Liverpool and north Wales, about traumatic brain injury. Because it was such an intense subject, you had to go from zero to 100 emotionally within the same scene. I was like: how am I gonna do this? But it turned out really well, and challenged me a lot more than roles like Fat Amy where I get to sing, dance and be goofy.
Juliet & Romeo will screen in selected UK cinemas for one night only on 11 June
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dakota Johnson's new movie takes on the ruthless world of New York Dating - but it's not your average rom-com?
Materialists Cert: 15, 1hr 56mins Matthew Bond review - Mail On Sunday Rating: The first film that screenwriter Celine Song directed as well as wrote was the delightful Past Lives (2023), which explored the choices we make in life, particularly when it comes to relationships. It earned her an Oscar nomination, critical acclaim and, for an arthouse film, commercial success. Her follow-up, Materialists, is an altogether bigger affair with a cast led by Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans and explores similar territory only without the magic and gentle spirituality of its predecessor. That's because it's set in the ruthless world of New York dating. Johnson plays Lucy, a successful senior executive at an agency that looks down its nose at apps and still believes in the old-fashioned art of match-making, at least for those who can afford it. Its demanding clients are not so much looking for love as wealth, good looks and compatible levels of education. For women, the height of a prospective husband is everything while, for men I'm afraid it's still youth. But Lucy knows it's more complicated than that, which is why she's already on her ninth successfully arranged wedding. So why is she herself still single, despite being magnificently courted by the absurdly eligible Harry (Pascal) while being shambolically pursued by her handsome but impoverished actor ex-boyfriend, John (Evans)? Song's screenplay is smart, insightful and funny, albeit in a familiar Sex And The City kind of way. So it's probably a good thing it's also bleak, cynical and occasionally depressing, at least for balance. Johnson is excellent, the ubiquitous Pascal as charming as ever and Evans just a little bit too good to be true. Materialists lacks the emotional depth of Past Lives but it's well-made, watchable and will make you think. And possibly hope, too. Laruskha Ivan-Zadeh - Daily Mail review Rating: Do soul mates exist? That question unites the week's two biggest releases, which answer it in two, very different ways. Materialists is a movie about beautiful people chasing the perfect partner. Lucy (Dakota Johnson) reckons she's got it all worked out. She's a professional matchmaker in Manhattan, responsible for nine weddings and counting, who firmly believes that 'Marriage is a business deal, and always has been, since time eternal.' Commitment is not about love, it's about currency, market forces and 'math', with Lucy's personal 'non-negotiable' being that, as well as being tall and handsome with a full head of hair (be warned, this movie is not an ego-boost for shorter, bald men), her future husband will be eye-wateringly rich. Enter hunk-of-the-moment Pedro Pascal, a tall, handsome, hirsute moneybags with a $12million penthouse in Tribeca. However, this being a (sort of) romcom, also re-enter Lucy's ex, John (Chris Evans), a tall, handsome struggling theatre actor, with a head full of hair, but empty coffers, who Lucy broke up with because he was, er, broke. So, who will win her hand? The answer isn't as obvious as might first appear. Because this isn't cheese puff Hollywood escapism of the glossy sort that Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey popped out in the 2000s – it is the 'difficult' second feature from writer /director Celine Song, whose wistful romance Past Lives was arguably the finest film of 2023. Materialists is similarly based on authentic lived experience. Song worked as a matchmaker when she first came to New York, and her script here poses interesting questions most of us can relate to about the balance sheet between romance and rationalism. Bottom line: are you really going to make it long term with someone of different background and values, particularly if you always end up squabbling about money? Unfortunately, the Materialists' parts are better than its whole. Excellent and effortless as the three leads are, their dialogue can feel forced. Sometimes it's deliberate, like when Pascal's smoothy-chops woos Lucy with the line: 'I want to be with you for your immaterial assets.' But other times not. It is occasionally very witty and well-observed. Song has set out to deconstruct the romcom, but the way she reconstructs it proves kind of disappointing. As we wait to find out if love conquers all, you will likely feel unconvinced by where the happy ending lies.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Mars confirms M&M's, Skittles and others will have no synthetic dyes in 2026
M&M's, Skittles, and some of the world's most popular colorful candies will be made without artificial colors in the United States next year. Candy manufacturer Mars Wrigley North America quietly announced the move last month, saying the products would be made available online across the country. 'Brands that will soon have options made without FD&C colors: M&M's Chocolate, Skittles Original, Extra Gum Spearmint and Starburst Original fruit chews,' the company said. Mars Wrigley is slated to announce further commitments to complying with the Trump administration's push to 'Make America Healthy Again.' 'When we have identified fully effective, scalable solutions across the entire portfolio, we will share additional item commitments and timelines,' it said.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge rules Alex Jones' Infowars to be sold once again, paving way for The Onion to renew its bid
Months after conspiracy theorist Alex Jones mocked The Onion after the satirical news outlet's proposed purchase Jones' Infowars was rejected by a federal bankruptcy court, a state judge ruled this week that the far-right platform can once again be sold – clearing the way for The Onion to resurrect its bid. In a Wednesday hearing in Texas district court, Judge Maya Guerra Gamble ordered the assets of Infowars' parent company Free Speech systems to be handed over to a court-appointed receiver, who will then start the process of selling them off in order to pay the roughly $1.3 billion that Jones owes the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims. The families, who have spent nearly three years attempting to collect on the judgment in federal bankruptcy court, were awarded the damages over Jones' repeated false and baseless claims that the Sandy Hook shooting was a 'hoax' and that the children killed were crisis actors. Last year, The Onion – backed by the Sandy Hook families – had won a court-ordered auction to purchase Infowars, with plans to turn the far-right conspiracy outlet into a parody site that would mock the conservative media ecosphere. Additionally, The Onion said that it planned on entering into an advertising agreement with gun-control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety. That sale was blocked in December, however, after a federal bankruptcy judge ruled that the acquisition was flawed and that he would not approve the sale, citing issues regarding the transparency of the process. That allowed Jones to keep Infowars for the time being – and he celebrated on-air by using music from Star Wars to mock The 'We are deeply disappointed in today's decision, but The Onion will continue to seek a resolution that helps the Sandy Hook families receive a positive outcome for the horror they endured,' Ben Collins, CEO of The Onion's parent company Global Tetrahedron, said after the December ruling. A giddy Jones, meanwhile, read Collins' statement on his show at the time alongside the 'Imperial March' from The Empire Strikes Back. 'I told you guys. We weren't going down,' Jones boasted. While halting the sale to The Onion, the federal bankruptcy judge suggested to the Sandy Hook families that they should go take their case to state court to get what they're owed from Jones, of which he has yet to pay a dime. And now, according to Gamble's ruling, it appears that Jones could soon be locked out of the Infowars studios. According to Wednesday's order, the receiver has the power 'to collect all accounts receivable… change the locks to all premises at which any property is situated… access all storage facilities, safe-deposit boxes, [and] real property… and exercise control over any website [of Jones].' Additionally, the receiver can turn to local law enforcement for help 'carrying out his duties and exercising his powers.' Unsurprisingly, Jones was not happy about the ruling. 'I'm pretty p*ssed off and wound up,' he grumbled on Wednesday's broadcast, telling his viewers: 'This fight is your fight.' Attorneys for the families, meanwhile, said that the judge's order was a 'critically important step closer to achieving the goal' of 'holding Alex Jones accountable for years of harm,' specifically noting that it could finally lead to Infowars shuttering for good. 'The receiver is now authorized to liquidate his business assets, and we look forward to the corrupt media empire that Jones built finally being dismantled,' attorney Chris Mattei, who represents the Connecticut-based families, told NPR. 'The families are pleased that the court has placed InfoWars parent company into receivership, which will finally lead to accountability for Alex Jones' monstrously cruel harassment," Mark Bankston, another lawyer for the families, stated. As for the likelihood that The Onion can finally complete its purchase of Infowars now that it's in a receivership, legal experts said that it may not be a 'panacea' but the conditions are now more 'favorable' for a sale. 'From a creditor's point of view, you're most often better off under state law … because the state court may be able to operate with greater speed and flexibility…[and fewer] constraints than the bankruptcy judge has to deal with,' Larry Ponoroff, dean and professor emeritus at Tulane Law School, told NPR. Reached for comment, Collins told The Independent that while he wasn't at liberty to fully discuss the situation right now, he could say that 'we're working on it.' Throughout this entire process, Jones has also insisted that even if the Infowars brand and property are taken from him, he will continue to stay on the air by stating another company. Still, because a bankruptcy judge ruled his behavior 'willful and malicious,' the families could continue to make claims on any money Jones makes in the future through other business ventures. In June, Jones was accused by the trustee overseeing his personal bankruptcy of trying to shield assets of more than $5 million to avoid paying on the Sandy Hook judgment. This included allegations that Jones fraudulently transferred $1.5 million to his wife, $800,000 to his father and attempted to hide his ownership of two condominiums with a combined value of $1.5 million.
