logo
Dublin St overbridge confirmed in post-iReX Picton plans

Dublin St overbridge confirmed in post-iReX Picton plans

1News02-07-2025
A port infrastructure upgrade in Picton to accommodate new ferries will include building a Dublin St overbridge, Rail Minister Winston Peters confirmed on Tuesday.
He was in the port town to announce that Ferry Holdings has reached an agreement with CentrePort, Port Marlborough and KiwiRail on the core infrastructure scope for the new Interislander ferries, covering the physical work and equipment to be delivered by 2029.
The Dublin St overbridge was a feature of the previous ferry project iReX, and work had already started on the site when the project was scrapped at the end of 2023. The intersection had to be put back to normal in 2024 to restore the road connection to central Picton.
On Tuesday, Peters said the overbridge was necessary to rid the town of the blocked streets it would experience when freight-laden trains arrived at the port.
'This road takes 33% of the passengers from both ferry operators, but it's blocked when long trains arrive in Picton or shunting movements take place in the in the rail yard,' he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
'This impacts tourists visiting New Zealand and locals alike.
'Trains will get longer and busier in the future, so we must address this problem.'
Rail Minister Winston Peters announces new infrastructure for Port Marlborough in Picton on Tuesday. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
Peters said the overbridge, which would be funded by KiwiRail, would be ready by 2029, and would be built with minimal disruption to the community.
'The teams at Ferry Holdings, CentrePort, Port Marlborough and KiwiRail are doing an outstanding job in the service of the taxpayer, and we thank them for it.'
Mayor Nadine Taylor welcomed the announcement as the overbridge had been requested by the community since the scrapped iReX project.
'I'm feeling really pleased and really relieved. It's great to have it confirmed, both for Picton and for the community,' Taylor said.
ADVERTISEMENT
'We always knew it was needed with the new ferries ... and it's wonderful to have the minister come down here on site to Picton and confirm to the council and to the community that it is going to happen.'
Mayor Nadine Taylor says she is pleased by the announcement of an overbridge for Picton's Dublin St. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
Congestion was a critical issue, both for the general public but also emergency services, she said.
'You cannot have a town where you can't have emergency services easily access both sides of the town.
'The overbridge will take away all of that risk.
'It really is a fantastic future-proofing piece of infrastructure for the town of Picton.'
Taylor was at Peters' announcement at the Marlborough Port offices on Tuesday, along with Port Marlborough chairperson Warren McNabb, and Ferry Holdings chairperson Chris Mackenzie.
ADVERTISEMENT
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Australia's weather bomb, the surprising costs of getting one more dog, and BTS are back. (Source: 1News)
Peters said port and KiwiRail agreements would be entered later this year to confirm the investment splits between Ferry Holdings and each other company and other commercial terms.
'This is not our first regatta, as this no-nonsense infrastructure focus is what was supposed to happen in 2020, until poor management and a lack of oversight allowed iReX to blow out,' he said.
'We will save the taxpayer billions through our disciplined approach.
'The agreements entered into effectively mean the ports and KiwiRail are in, boots and all, with Cabinet's preferred low-cost option.'
The current Interislander terminal, built as a temporary option, will become the permanent terminal. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
Another major component of the Picton infrastructure included the reuse of passenger and commercial vehicle facilities, as well as the terminal building.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Interislander's current terminal building, built as a temporary option after the old terminal building was demolished in 2024, would become the permanent terminal.
'iReX was going to build a Taj Mahal terminal building here in Picton, and a Sydney Opera House in Wellington,' Peters said.
'We are keeping [the] existing buildings in contrast, as all passengers need is a warm, dry spot to wait with their luggage, especially when the vast majority wait in their own vehicle, not the building.'
Peters said the pre-fab structure would serve as the terminal building for the next 60 years.
'A whole lot of people, more practical, more clever, more smart, who took this country to be number one in the world ... decided it was the best option, and I agree with them.'
Peters said there could need to be additional works performed on the terminal building to make it permanent.
By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter
ADVERTISEMENT
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NZ First Bill Legislates 'New Zealand' As Official Name Of Country In Law
NZ First Bill Legislates 'New Zealand' As Official Name Of Country In Law

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

NZ First Bill Legislates 'New Zealand' As Official Name Of Country In Law

Rt Hon Winston Peters Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First has today introduced a Member's Bill that seeks to state in law that 'New Zealand' is the official geographic name of our country. 'Over the past few years, we have had a bunch of unelected bureaucrats, officials, government departments, and politicians trying to change our country's name by stealth - with no permission or consent from the people' says Rt Hon Winston Peters Leader of New Zealand First. The 'New Zealand (Name of State) Bill' confirms that 'New Zealand' is our country's official name, and it is only parliament and the people, not bureaucrats, government departments, or officials, that have the authority to make decisions about the name of the country. 'The vast majority of New Zealanders are shocked at this insidious creep of misguided and misinformed cultural history of the name 'Aotearoa'.' 'Any true historian or cultural expert would know that it was never the original Māori name for New Zealand – and we should not allow it to be misused for cultural virtue signalling.' 'Colonialist William Pember Reeves incorrectly used 'Aotearoa' in the late nineteenth century, now the cultural hand-wringers have embraced his mindset.' 'Don't force the South Island's iwi Ngāi Tahu to use 'Aotearoa'. In 2021, Ngāi Tahu said the history of the name 'Aotearoa' originally referred solely to the North Island.' Putting the name 'New Zealand' in law will also provide constitutional clarity and legal certainty. 'The name 'New Zealand' is recognised around the world as the name of our country, and any uncertainty about that risks our global economic markets and political identity that we have built, and spent billions of dollars promoting, over many decades' says Mr Peters. 'Our country's name is New Zealand and should not change unless the people of our country decide to change it.'

Calls grow for NZ to take a stand on Palestinian statehood
Calls grow for NZ to take a stand on Palestinian statehood

The Spinoff

timea day ago

  • The Spinoff

Calls grow for NZ to take a stand on Palestinian statehood

Canada, the UK and France are on the brink of recognising Palestine – so why is New Zealand still holding back, asks Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Pressure mounts as allies take a stand New Zealand is coming under increasing pressure to recognise Palestine as a state, as key allies signal they're preparing to do just that. On Wednesday, foreign minister Winston Peters joined 14 other counterparts in signing a statement declaring their 'willingness or positive consideration' of Palestinian recognition. But Peters, backed by prime minister Christopher Luxon, made clear that formal recognition won't happen any time soon, reports RNZ's Craig McCulloch. In parliament this week, Peters argued that 'if we are to recognise the state of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable political entity'. His caution hasn't stemmed the growing chorus of criticism. Former prime minister Helen Clark said that on the statehood issue, New Zealand has been hamstrung by its desire not to upset the US. 'That is no longer tenable,' she told Morning Report. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson was more blunt: 'History will judge Aotearoa if we fail to do what is right at this pivotal moment. It's time for the government to make a clear stand for human rights and for justice, and recognise Palestine as a state.' A shifting international tide New Zealand's hesitation comes as other liberal democracies move towards recognition. Canada on Thursday became the third country in a week to announce it will recognise Palestine, following similar pledges from France and the UK. Britain's promise is conditional on Israel allowing more aid into Gaza, ending its annexation plans and committing to a two-state peace process. As the UK foreign secretary David Lammy pointed out in a speech to the UN this week, Britain carries a particular responsibility to Palestine due to its colonial-era role in shaping the modern Middle East, beginning with the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Support for a two-state solution, he said, should be viewed as part of that legacy. Currently, 147 of the UN's 193 member states recognise Palestine; that number is poised to grow in the coming months. In Australia, prime minister Anthony Albanese is 'preparing the ground' for recognition, reported the ABC, but has indicated he wants to choose a moment that will have the most impact on peace prospects. The case for economic pressure In a powerful article for The Spinoff this week, New Zealand journalist Cole Martin – currently based in a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank – accused the government of offering only 'empty rhetoric' in the face of Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza. While New Zealand has signed joint statements and imposed targeted travel bans on a handful of Israeli officials, Martin says it has taken no significant action in 21 months to deter what he describes as 'genocidal' violence and apartheid policies. Martin argues that 'meaningful disruption is essential', and that economic pressure – including divestment, sanctions and boycotts – is among the most effective non-violent tools available. 'Global economic sanctions played a pivotal role in ending apartheid in South Africa,' he wrote. 'The same tools must now be applied to Israel.' What else can New Zealand do? While sanctions and trade restrictions are the most obvious tools available, they're not the only ones. Auckland University law professor Treasa Dunworth, writing for The Conversation, outlines several other ways New Zealand could demonstrate its opposition to Israel's conduct and support for Palestinian rights. These include creating a special visa pathway for Palestinians seeking family reunification, launching an inquiry into New Zealand's intelligence-sharing with Israel via the Five Eyes network, and withdrawing from Operation Prosperity Guardian, the US-led naval coalition in the Red Sea. Dunworth also points out that New Zealand could act unilaterally to refer Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court for the use of starvation as a weapon of war. Each of these steps, she argues, is legally and diplomatically feasible – but all require political will. The question now, as more peer nations act, is whether New Zealand's government is willing to move beyond words.

China hits back at FBI director's 'groundless assertions' in Wellington
China hits back at FBI director's 'groundless assertions' in Wellington

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

China hits back at FBI director's 'groundless assertions' in Wellington

The Chinese Embassy building in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER China says it strongly opposes any "groundless assertions" after comments made by the head of the FBI at its new office in Wellington. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation is opening a dedicated attaché office in the capital to investigate threats, including terrorism, cyber crime, money laundering and child exploitation. Director Kash Patel also said it would counter China's influence in the Pacific. Kash Patel during his visit to Parliament. Photo: Supplied/OLA THORSEN The Chinese Embassy hit back, saying it took note of the comments and described them as part of a "Cold War mentality". "Transnational crime is a common challenge encountered by all countries requiring cooperation to tackle," a spokesperson said. "On the opening of a new FBI office in Wellington with a permanent Legat (legal attaché) position, we have taken note of the assertions by the American side, as well as the remarks by relevant New Zealand ministers in response to the media. "We believe that relevant cooperation should not target any third party. And we strongly oppose any attempt to make groundless assertions or vilification against China out of the Cold War mentality. Such acts are against people's will and are doomed to fail." The government has pushed back on suggestions that the FBI's new office in Wellington aimed to counter China. Foreign Minister Winston Peters said China was not raised in his meeting with Patel, and the minister responsible for the spy agencies GCSB and NZSIS, Judith Collins, said it was up to Patel what he wanted to say. "When we were talking, we never had raised that issue," Peters said. "We talked about the Pacific, what we could do to improve the law and order situation and the great concern that Pacific countries had and that they needed help, and that we need to be part of the solution." Collins said the US was "very focused on fentanyl" and knew New Zealand was focused on disrupting the methamphetamine trade . "We know that we do have international criminals ... let's just understand that our security agency is also involved in this. We're not going to single out any particular country." University of Otago lecturer Dr Peter Grace said drug and human trafficking was "spiralling out of control" in the region, and New Zealand had limited resources to fight it. "New Zealand is a small state, and we just don't have the kind of resources that are going to help solve these problems… So the fact that you've got somebody with much deeper pockets coming down and cooperating can be a particularly good thing." Opposition parties expressed surprise at the announcement, Labour saying it had come without explanation and Greens saying the office should not exist and New Zealand should exit the Five Eyes arrangement altogether. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store