Ontario elementary teachers' union to make smaller class sizes its top issue when bargaining talks begin
The union representing Ontario's English elementary teachers is vowing to make class sizes its top issue during collective bargaining talks.
The Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario (ETFO) said the issue emerged as the top priority following a survey of its 84,000 members.
Speaking to CTV News Toronto on Tuesday morning, ETFO President Karen Brown said while the issue of class sizes has been ongoing for years, it's reached a 'critical mass.'
'We're saying that the government needs to invest in public education, and they need to look at reducing class size. Reduction in class size is one way to address some of the violence that we're seeing in schools. Reduction in class size means more one-to-one attention for our students,' she said.
'And we also know with the reduction in class size, it means an opportunity for the educators to focus on our most vulnerable students.'
The current collective bargaining agreement is set to expire on Aug. 31, 2026.
According to ETFO, there are no caps on class size for Grades 4 to 8, which are funded to support 24 students.
The union said it has resulted in large class sizes, often with 30+ students of varying needs, prompting them to call on the Ministry of Education to impose a cap of 24 for those grades and 26 in kindergarten.
Brown does not expect that the issue will be resolved in one round of bargaining but hopes that it'll prompt the government to begin forming a long-term strategy to address it.
'We know that, as I said before, more one-to-one attention with the students provides better outcomes,' she said. 'I think we're all in agreement. We want to see students succeed, and this is one thing that we can do. It's not going to solve all the issues, but it's a start.'
ETFO announced it launched a public bargaining campaign—'smaller classes, BIG DIFFERENCE'—to bring awareness to the issue.
'We've been pushing this, and our members are saying it's time. It's time that smaller class sizes make a real difference,' Brown said.
'We know that when students are able to focus and have that additional adult to secure, to support and guide their learning, we see those outcomes. When students don't have that attention, they're struggling on their own to meet those needs.'
During her opening remarks at the union's annual meeting at the Sheraton Centre Hotel in downtown Toronto on Monday, Brown informed members that the campaign will be on billboards, in movie theatres and social media.
Brown shared that she has spoken with Education Minister Paul Calandra twice in July and that he committed to going on school visits with her in the fall.
'I think we can hopefully try to build ongoing communications with this minister. And I'm hoping it's not just talk, that he really wants to be a partner, working together with ETFO as a stakeholder in public education to make a difference for our educators and the students in this province,' she said.
ETFO represents 80,000 teachers and occasional teachers as well as 3,500 early childhood educators, education support personnel and professional support personnel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
a few seconds ago
- CTV News
‘This is really a lifeline': Metro Vancouver charity rallies for renewed provincial funding
The Gaia Community Care and Wellness Society is a Metro Vancouver charity that supports vulnerable Chinese seniors living independently. A Metro Vancouver charity that supports vulnerable Chinese seniors living independently held a rally Tuesday outside the provincial cabinet offices in Vancouver, urging the government to restore funding critical to its operations. 'We are not asking for charity, we are asking for respect for the senior,' said Percy Wong, executive director of the Gaia Community Care and Wellness Society. Gaia received $350,000 in provincial funding across 2023 and 2024, which Wong says accounted for about 40 per cent of its budget. That funding ended in March. Wong was joined by B.C. Conservative MLAs advocating for renewed support. 'The message is really simple. All they ask is for the NDP government to restore the funding,' said Teresa Wat, B.C. Conservative MLA for Richmond-North. 'It's absolutely critically important that this program is restored back to the funding and expanded as we go into the future,' added Brennan Day, B.C. Conservative MLA for Courtenay-Comox. 'We're going to be seeing far more seniors age into care over the next decade, and the province is woefully behind in this area.' A recent report estimates B.C. will need nearly 16,000 new long-term care beds by 2036. Wong argues Gaia helps reduce that burden by enabling seniors to remain at home. 'There's a shortage, a huge shortage, of long-term care homes,' he said. 'We're trying to help the government to save the seniors and save the money of the government.' Gaia's services include housekeeping, counselling, and group classes—such as teaching seniors how to fall safely. Representatives say the charity is largely volunteer-driven, with costs covering staffing and room rentals. The province says the funding was part of a one-time pilot project in 2023 and 2024. 'The aging in place services for low-income Chinese seniors, that are culturally and linguistically appropriate, have been an important service to the community,' said Housing Minister Christine Boyle in a written statement. 'B.C., like many jurisdictions, is working to address significant fiscal pressures. In the face of that we're committed to making sure every dollar we spend has the greatest impact on the lives of British Columbians.' Boyle added that future support for Gaia hasn't been ruled out, but no timeline or commitment was provided.
Globe and Mail
30 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Quebec says Bill 21 opponents are trying to overturn established law
The Quebec government says legal opponents challenging its secularism law at the Supreme Court of Canada are merely rehashing old, failed arguments in an effort to overturn established legal precedent. On Tuesday, Quebec filed 100 pages of legal arguments to the Supreme Court ahead of a hearing in which it will defend Bill 21 in court for a third time. The province won two previous decisions in the lower courts in Quebec, which led to the current appeal at the Supreme Court. Quebec's Bill 21, enacted in 2019, bans public sector workers, including teachers, from wearing religious symbols such as hijabs on the job. The province's goal is to promote secularism in Quebec, but critics argue it is an attack on minority rights. Record number of groups to speak at Supreme Court case against Quebec secularism law Quebec has won two court battles for overriding Charter rights to implement its secularism law. Now the fight hits the Supreme Court The Bill 21 case represents a landmark hearing at the Supreme Court, where the country's top court will consider governments' ability to override the rights and freedoms of Canadians in detail for the first time in almost four decades. The provincial government used Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the notwithstanding clause, to shield the secularism law from constitutional challenges on the basis of freedom of religion and other rights. The province's Tuesday filing says opponents are trying to circumvent its proper use of Section 33. In French, the filing says such arguments are asking the Supreme Court 'to amend established law.' Quebec further said its opponents are using legal arguments that have previously failed and that the challengers have not exposed errors in last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision on Bill 21, which broadly upheld the provincial government's actions. The appeal court, Quebec said in its filing, 'conducted a detailed and meticulous analysis of all the arguments raised by the appellants and rightly dismissed them.' The key precedent is a 1988 case called Ford, where the Supreme Court considered Section 33 on a narrow legal basis but didn't delve in deeper questions about the notwithstanding clause. The Supreme Court at the time said the 'essential requirement' is for a government that uses Section 33 to name the Charter sections it aims to override. The basis of Quebec's Bill 21 argument is that the Ford decision is a precedent that should not be reconsidered. In Bill 21, Quebec stated it was using Section 33 to override the 10 sections of the Charter to which the notwithstanding clause can apply. But in the decades since Ford, and especially in recent years as more provincial governments have used Section 33 to shield laws, legal academics and others have argued there may be more for the top court to say about the notwithstanding clause. That includes whether it can be invoked pre-emptively, as Quebec did with Bill 21, or whether a court can declare rights have been violated even if a law is allowed to continue to operate because of Section 33. This week, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal said there is room for such judicial declarations. Last year, the Quebec appeal court came to the opposite conclusion. Six groups are appealing last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision. They filed their legal arguments in mid-April. The appellants want the Supreme Court to overturn Bill 21. Among the arguments is a call to reconsider the 1988 Ford precedent. Further arguments include looking at other parts of the Charter, the Constitution, Canada's history and the limits of provincial powers to question the validity of Quebec's use of Section 33 in Bill 21. In Quebec's arguments filed Tuesday, the province said the Bill 21 case 'does not raise any new issues distinct from those considered in Ford.' Quebec then suggested that two of the appellants are effectively trying to rewrite Section 33 of the Charter 'to add conditions that are not found there.' A Bill 21 hearing has not been scheduled, but it could happen this winter. Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner has said it could be heard over three days. Most Supreme Court hearings take one day; rare cases occupy two days. The landmark Bill 21 case has attracted a record number of intervenors, as 38 outside groups will present written legal arguments to the court by mid-September. The federal government is also set to file its legal arguments at the same time, alongside six provincial attorneys-general, including Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Ottawa has previously expressed concern about provincial governments pre-emptively invoking Section 33.
CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
B.C. government staff spent more than $220K on pricey Helijet flights in 2024, says watchdog
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is questioning the travel habits of B.C. government staff after finding they spent more than $220,000 on costly Helijet flights last year, instead of using the much more affordable BC Ferries. It argued the trips, which included $93,000 from the Ministry of Tourism, Arts, Culture and Sport alone, amounted to wasteful spending at a time when the province is urging ministries to tighten their belts. 'There's a lot of ways to get between the capital and the Lower Mainland, but taking a luxury helicopter service is literally the most expensive way to do it,' said Carson Binda, with the federation. 'There is no realistic reason why a senior executive at the tourism ministry, for example, should be expensing taxpayers for 27 separate luxury helicopter trips,' he argued. The CTF found the Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs billed over $40,000 for Helijet travel, while the Ministry of Jobs, Economic Development and Innovation expensed more than $90,000. In a statement to CTV News, the Ministry of Finance said cost-saving measures are already underway. 'The province is committed to making sure every dollar we spend has the greatest impact on the lives of British Columbians,' it read. 'As directed by the minister of finance earlier this year, all government ministries are cutting back on travel. We're finding savings on contracting, hiring and travel – to safeguard key services like health care and education while investing in jobs and the economy.' The ministry said travel decisions are evaluated based on need, urgency, and available options, and that staff are expected to find the most cost-efficient method given their circumstances.
