Google is fighting a new DOJ bid to break up another part of its empire
The US government got a second chance to try to dismantle Google's (GOOG, GOOGL) stronghold over the internet in a hearing on Friday meant to sort out how best to restore competition in two online advertising markets.
Judge Leonie Brinkema, a US federal district judge in Alexandria, Va., set a "remedies" trial date of Sept. 22 for the tech giant to face off against the Justice Department's effort to break up Google's ad tech monopoly.
Google now has to defend that part of its empire against a breakup while also doing the same in a separate antitrust trial where the DOJ is seeking the divestment of the tech giant's Chrome search browser.
Last August, in that case, US District Judge Amit Mehta found Google liable for illegally monopolizing the general search engine market and the market for general search engine text.
He is now considering divestments of Google's highly valuable Chrome browser and its Android operating system, along with limitations on its implementation of artificial intelligence tools.
In the ad tech monopoly case, Judge Brinkema in April sided with the DOJ and 17 state attorneys general by ruling that the tech giant used illegal tactics to block competition in markets where online advertisements are bought and sold.
That ruling gave the judge discretion to permit or deny the government's request to consider divestments known as 'structural remedies.'
Specifically, the DOJ has argued that Google's Ad Manager suite, which includes DoubleClick for Publishers, a publisher-side ad server, and Google Ad Exchange, its exchange platform where buyers and sellers broker deals for online ads, should be spun off.
Google tried to get the judge to eliminate the option of divestitures. It was "going for a kill shot,' said Daniel McCuaig, a former trial attorney with the Justice Department's antitrust division, who is now a partner with Cohen Milstein.
But Google didn't get its way, which heightens its business risks as it fights to hold on to multiple subsidiaries in two major antitrust defeats suffered over the past year. However, Judge Brinkema did express concern about overreaching remedies during the hearing, noting that the wrong remedies can cause additional harm. Publishers, for example, may see no benefit if Google's ad server were demolished.
Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google's vice president for regulatory affairs, said, "The DOJ's additional proposals to force a divestiture of our ad tech tools go well beyond the Court's findings, have no basis in law, and would harm publishers and advertisers."
Google's lawyers told the judge that divestiture should be excluded as a possible remedy and that the court should instead focus only on changing how the company operates its businesses. A company spokesperson added that divestitures would be an unprecedented remedy in the case, given that the court found the acquisitions did not harm competition.
McCuaig said that at the heart of the ad tech decision, Judge Brinkema found that Google enshrined its illegal monopoly by tying together its advertising technologies, which reinforced each other and allowed it to charge supracompetitive prices.
Ideally, he said, the government would likely want the two businesses sold off to different buyers.
Google's acquisition of DoubleClick was reviewed and cleared by the US Federal Trade Commission by a four-to-one vote in 2007, based on its finding that the deal was unlikely to substantially lessen competition.
Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Has Long Been Itching To Use The Military On American Streets
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM's Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version. We come into the new week with more weekend news to process than we've had since February or March, so I'm going to jump right into it. I tried to condense it as much as possible, grouping like things together, in roughly descending order of importance. One note: I wrote extensively about the return of Abrego Garcia on Friday so I didn't include it here given the volume of other news, but we'll come back to this, especially the news that the criminal division chief in Nashville resigned over the Abrego Garcia indictment. In the meantime, Abrego Garcia's lawyers filed a flaming retort last night to the Trump DOJ's attempt to end the original case and sidestep the contempt of court proceeding entirely. We can't talk about the protests in Los Angeles against mass deportation and President Trump itching to send in the military without a quick reminder that we all knew there was an extremely high risk that if Trump were re-elected he would provoke civil unrest in order to use it as a pretext for lawless actions he was already determined to take. It's too early to say whether this particular incident ends up being the defining episode of the erosion of the line between the military and domestic law enforcement. But it's understandable why everyone has a hair trigger about Trump sending in the National Guard over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Two things in particular: The President's memo was concerningly open-ended. It didn't specify Los Angeles or California; it applies anywhere. It empowered the defense secretary 'to employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary.' It broadly defined protests as rebellion: 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made a big deal over the weekend about a detachment of 500 Marines at Twentynine Palms being ready to provide backup to the National Guard. A former acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau told Fox News: 'This is an inappropriate use of the National Guard and is not warranted.' The most astute analysis: Law professor Chris Mirasola, who used to work in the DoD Office of General Counsel, unpacks the presidential memo. The NYT's Charlie Savage on the various legal issues implicated. Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck on what the presidential proclamation did and did not do and why it remains alarming. A helpful thread from Carrie A. Lee, a former associate professor at the US Army War College: 'I'll say it over and over again; you can't build the mass deportation machine without first building the police state machine.'–Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council ABC News suspended veteran newsman Terry Moran for a blistering tweet about White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. Here's the tweet: A great visualization from Amanda Shendruk and Catherine Rampell on the people Trump doesn't want to exist: This is part of a broader campaign to delete the statistical and visual evidence of undesirables, or at least those who may not fit into President Donald Trump's conception of the new American 'golden age.' Entire demographics are being scrubbed from records of both America's past and present — including people of color, transgender people, women, immigrants and people with disabilities. They are now among America's 'missing persons.' The Trump administration has forced out two senior FBI officials and punished a third for his friendship with former FBI agent Peter Strzok, the longtime Trump target. Damian Williams, the former U.S. attorney in Manhattan, is leaving Paul Weiss, which cut a deal with President Trump, and joining Jenner & Block, which in contrast sued over Trump's executive order against it and won. Proud Boys Enrique Tarrio, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs and Dominic Pezzola – all convicted in the Jan. 6 attack then given clemency by President Trump – have sued prosecutors and FBI agents in federal court in Florida over their prosecutions, demanding $100 million in punitive damages. An alleged series of thefts of combat equipment from an Army Ranger regiment in Washington state led to the arrest earlier this month of two veterans at a home full of Nazi and white supremacy paraphernalia and a stockpile of stolen weapons, the NYT reports. The Forward: ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt compared pro-Palestinian student protesters to ISIS and al-Qaeda in an address to Republican attorneys general. A 6-3 Supreme Court granted DOGE access to confidential Social Security records, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson blasting the decision in a written dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor Jackson. Over the objections of the three liberal justices, the Supreme Court cut back the scope of discovery the watchdog group CREW can seek from DOGE. Frank Bisignano, the new head of the Social Security Administration, declared himself to be 'fundamentally a DOGE person.' In a widely panned decision, two Trump appointees on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals largely reinstated the Trump White House's ban on the Associated Press in retaliation for not using 'Gulf of America' in its stories. Adam Bonica used computational text analysis to examine judicial decisions in nearly 300 cases involving the Trump administration and found what he called an 'institutional chorus of constitutional alarm': The sharp language from the bench isn't judicial activism; it's the sound of democracy's defense mechanisms under unprecedented stress. These interventions span the political spectrum. Judges were responding not to partisan disagreement but to actions that crossed fundamental legal and constitutional lines. The alarm is being sounded by conservative and liberal judges in a range of cases, many of which you'll be familiar with from Morning Memo.
Android Authority
28 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Gemini could soon rival ChatGPT with its new privacy feature (APK teardown)
Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR Google is working on a temporary chat feature for Gemini. This feature could be similar to ChatGPT's Temporary Chats, which give users a blank slate for conversation and doesn't save any memory. Users will be able to access Gemini's temporary chat feature by clicking on a new disappearing clock icon. OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini have emerged as popular AI assistants. Both are usually neck-and-neck when it comes to features, but given the pace of innovation, a few things are missing here and there. It seems Google wants to close the gap on its end, as it could bring a ChatGPT-like temporary chat feature to Gemini in the future. Authority Insights story on Android Authority. Discover You're reading anstory on Android Authority. Discover Authority Insights for more exclusive reports, app teardowns, leaks, and in-depth tech coverage you won't find anywhere else. An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. We've spotted code within Google app v16.22.44 beta that indicates that Google is working on a temporary chat feature. We managed to activate the feature to give you an early look at it: AssembleDebug / Android Authority In the screenshot above, you can see a new disappearing clock icon right next to the New Chat button in the sidebar (which is an upcoming tablet-friendly feature that hasn't rolled out yet). You can tap on the icon to presumably start a temporary chat. We couldn't get the feature to work, but we presume it will work similarly to ChatGPT's Temporary Chat feature. When you start a Temporary Chat in ChatGPT, the AI assistant doesn't display the chat in your chat history, saving you from the trouble of deleting queries from your history. Further, the conversation begins as a blank slate, as ChatGPT won't be aware of your previous conversations, nor have any past or future memory. However, it will still follow custom instructions if they are enabled. OpenAI may keep a copy of your conversation for up to 30 days for 'safety purposes,' but they won't be used to improve their models. The feature is very similar to what most users recognize as 'incognito mode' in their browsers. Google has yet to share details about the temporary chats feature in Gemini. We'll keep you updated when we learn more. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Live updates: Apple WWDC event to kick off with keynote, iPhone and iOS announcements
Update: Date: Title: Another Apple and Google partnership? Content: Google already partners with Apple to make its search engine the default in its Safari web browser, a deal that's been at the center of the Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit against Google. But Apple has reportedly been in talks with Google to incorporate its Gemini AI model into the iPhone since last year, according to reports from The New York Times and Bloomberg. Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in courtroom testimony in April that the company hopes to reach a deal with Apple this year, according to Reuters. However, Bloomberg reports such an announcement won't come at WWDC this year. Still, Apple has previously announced partnerships like this at WWDC. Last year, for example, it revealed a collaboration with OpenAI that incorporates ChatGPT into Siri. Apple's visual intelligence feature, which uses the iPhone's camera to provide information about a user's surroundings, also uses Google and OpenAI's technologies. Integrating Gemini into the iPhone would likely allow Apple to rely on Google's models to power some of its features, potentially giving users more choice and enabling the iPhone maker to offer new functionality more quickly. Update: Date: Title: Will your iPhone support the new software? Content: Apple's new software updates are usually available for iPhones that are six to seven years old. That's because hardware limitations likely make it challenging for aging devices to run the new software properly. The oldest phones that support iOS 18, the current version of Apple's iPhone software, are the iPhone XS, XS Max and iPhone XR, which launched in 2018. If Apple decides to stop supporting those devices with this year's update, users may need an iPhone 11 or later to upgrade to the latest software. That doesn't mean older iPhones will stop functioning, but users won't be able to install the update. As a result, they'll miss out on new functions and may be vulnerable to security risks. Apple Intelligence requires even newer devices; the technology is only supported on the iPhone 15 Pro and later because those devices have more powerful processors. Wall Street had hoped that Apple Intelligence would serve as a catalyst for driving iPhone upgrades for this reason, although consumers aren't buying new iPhones for AI just yet, said Carolina Milanesi, president and principal analyst at tech analysis firm Creative Strategies. 'I do believe that at the end of the day, AI is going to make it easier for everybody to use their devices,' she said. Update: Date: Title: A new look for the iPhone's software Content: One of the biggest changes, according to Bloomberg, will be a software redesign across all of Apple's products. That means the iPhone's software might look and feel much different in the fall, when Apple typically rolls out the final version of its new operating system. The redesign is inspired by the Vision Pro's software, the report says. That could provoke mixed reactions from iPhone owners, said Carolina Milanesi, president and principal analyst at tech analysis firm Creative Strategies. Some consumers were upset with Apple's decision to reorganize the iPhone's Photos app last year, for example. 'Consumers are creatures of habit,' Milanesi said. 'And change is always resisted before it's embraced.' Changes like these, while not as flashy as a new iPhone, are important because they bring new functionality to the billions of Apple devices in use worldwide without requiring users to buy new hardware. Update: Date: Title: What to expect at WWDC this year Content: The past two WWDC events have been milestones for Apple, marking expansions into new areas like generative artificial intelligence and mixed reality. This year's event, however, is expected to be more muted. Apple typically introduces sweeping new software updates for its major products at WWDC: the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, Apple TV, AirPods and Vision Pro. This year, those updates could include a major software redesign for the iPhone and other products, more translation features, a tool that uses AI to manage the iPhone's battery life and an upgrade to the Messages app that makes it more like WhatsApp, according to Bloomberg. Apple may also rebrand the name of its new software for each product to correspond with the coming year, the report says. For example, instead of going from iOS 18 to iOS 19, the company is expected to call its next iPhone update iOS 26. That could provide more continuity across products, given that software version numbers currently differ across platforms. Update: Date: Title: The big question: What's next for Apple Intelligence? Content: Last year, Apple made its long-awaited push into AI with the introduction of Apple Intelligence. But it's faced hurdles since then; Apple Intelligence wasn't ready in time for the iPhone 16's launch last fall. The company delayed its revamped version of Siri that incorporates data from a person's iPhone to answer questions – a factor that could be key in separating it from rival AI helpers. And it pulled AI-generated summaries of Apple News notifications earlier this year after displaying inaccurate headlines. The bigger issue is that Apple's current AI tools don't offer experiences that are notably different from what you can get elsewhere. Now, at WWDC, Apple will show how its AI efforts have progressed over the past year.
